Connect with us

Connecticut

Opinion: A CT doctor shortage made worse

Published

on

Opinion: A CT doctor shortage made worse


The United States is currently in the grips of a massive physician shortage estimated to be over 60,000. As the workforce ages, the Association of American Medical Colleges estimates the physician shortage will increase to over 86,000 physicians by 2036.

Connecticut is not immune with almost 20% of residents already living in designated Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) with fewer than one primary care physician per 3,500 residents.

This critical shortage has dire consequences for the health of Connecticut residents. Wait times to see primary care physicians already average over 26 days and are projected to get longer. As fewer physicians struggle to manage the health of an ever-growing population, healthcare outcomes suffer. One study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine showed that the average life expectancy of people living in HPSAs was almost a full year shorter than those who do not. In short, physician shortages kill.

Connecticut ranks 46 out of 50 states in physician retention, as only 41.7% of physicians who complete their residency in Connecticut remain here to practice medicine. By contrast, the proportion of physicians who stay in the highest-ranking states, California and Texas, after training are 78% and 66%, respectively. This dire situation demands urgent action to attract physicians to our state rather than push them away, to prevent our physician shortage from getting worse.

Advertisement

An Act Limiting Out-of-Network Costs (H.B. 6871) is being proposed, purportedly to control healthcare costs. However, beyond worsening the physician shortage that is already drowning Connecticut’s healthcare system, we are concerned that this bill would also particularly devastate rural hospitals and small physician-run private practices.

At first glance, the bill’s goals appear innocuous, capping the maximum amount that healthcare providers could charge health insurers for out-of-network care at 240% of the Medicare rate. However, by tilting the balance in negotiations far in favor of insurers over physicians and hospitals, this bill would do serious damage to the ability of healthcare providers to negotiate fair rates with insurers. These adverse consequences have led to a coalition of physicians and hospitals from around the state to warn of dire consequences for access to care in Connecticut should the bill pass.

Medicare reimbursement for hospitals and physicians is 50% and 70% the rate of private insurers, respectively. Even worse, Medicare payments to physicians have fallen 33% in inflation-adjusted terms since 2001. Tying out-of-network reimbursement to Medicare rates would place providers at a significant disadvantage as these rates continue to decline.

Physicians and other clinicians will become scarcer as practicing in Connecticut becomes infeasible. Hospitals will close. Essential physician practices, beloved by the communities they serve, will be forced to shut their doors for good.  As struggling healthcare facilities and practices are forced to close, the health of Connecticut residents will ultimately suffer. Rather than the approach being offered by this bill, which will limit services while not addressing the root causes of cost, we advocate for focus on policies to improve physician retention in and recruitment to Connecticut.

Tax and regulatory incentives can entice physicians to move or keep their practices here. Providing student loan relief to young physicians who are being crushed by sky-high student loan debt in the face of high cost of living can make it practical for them to start their lives and careers here. These reforms can expand the supply of physicians available to Connecticut residents, reducing wait times and meaningfully improving public health.

Advertisement

We urge the General Assembly to reject H.B. 6871 and get to work on practical solutions to heal our ailing healthcare system. The health of Connecticut’s people depends on it.

Ryan Englander is a MD/PhD candidate at the University of Connecticut. Anthony Yoder, DO, is Chair, Health and Public Policy, CT Chapter, American College of Physicians.



Source link

Advertisement

Connecticut

Chilly temperatures continue for Thursday

Published

on

Chilly temperatures continue for Thursday


While today is fair, it will be very cold and breezy.

The highs today are in the lower 20s with winds making it feel like single digits.

NBC Connecticut

NBC Connecticut

By tonight it will be windy and brutally cold.

Wind chill “feels-like” is near negative 15 degrees.

Advertisement

The Sunday storm will give us glancing blow with a chance of some snow in Eastern CT and cold winds statewide.

Chilly temperatures will stick around for next week.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut Democrats to bring back legislation giving parents control over social media 

Published

on

Connecticut Democrats to bring back legislation giving parents control over social media 


Democrats plan to revive a proposal to give parents greater control over how children use social media.  

“If they don’t like what we’re going to protect the kids, what is your plan to protect the kids?” Gov. Ned Lamont (D-Connecticut) said. “Otherwise, we’ll keep going with this.”  

Leaders of the legislature’s General Law Committee joined Lamont for a press conference at the Capitol, saying they’ll introduce the bill once the legislative session starts on Feb. 4.  

The bill would require parental approval before anyone under 18 years old can open a social media account.  

Advertisement

Additionally, parents would need to approve the content children can view, set time limits for usage, and decide whether their accounts are public. 

Attorney General William Tong (D-Connecticut) said the law would require parents to opt in to ensure they give consent.  

That means social media platforms can’t, for example, make a minor’s account public as a default setting.  

Lastly, the bill would prohibit social media companies from sending push notifications to children between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. 

“What this specifically does is highlight a very vulnerable population and says there needs to be protections in place,” Rep. Roland Lemar (D-New Haven) said. “Children need to have these protections. 

Advertisement

Lemar said social media can be a valuable resource, but he wants to safeguard children against potential harm.  

Some experts have been raising concerns that social media platforms can become addictive, especially since they allow users to scroll content endlessly.  

Those experts have also warned about increased risks of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues among children and teenagers.  

“They’re still children, and they’re still vulnerable in how they’re developing those individual identities,” Connecticut Children’s pediatrician Dr. Robert Keder said. “They are subject to things like FOMO, or fear of missing out, or influencing body image.”  

Tech companies pushed back against the bill last year, saying they’re already putting tools in place for parents.  

Advertisement

Instagram, for example, announced a teen-friendly version of its app in October, with more age-appropriate content.  

Christopher Gilrein, executive director with the lobbying firm Technet, said last year that “the industry has a longstanding commitment to provide parents and guardians with resources to help ensure a safe online experience for their children, and the industry has been at the forefront of educating parents and guardians about safety.”  

Last year’s version received a 121-26 vote in the House, but the Senate failed to raise it for debate before the session ended.  

A few Republicans raised concerns about whether the state could enforce the bill.  

One of those Republicans, Rep. Lezlye Zupkus (R-Prostect), said she’ll need to review this year’s bill, but she supports the concept.  

Advertisement

“We need to look at what our kids are looking at and what is age-appropriate for them and what they should be doing,” she said



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

House destroyed after fire in Tolland

Published

on

House destroyed after fire in Tolland


Fire crews were dispatched to Bonair Hill Rd for a structure fire around 11:30 p.m. on Tuesday.

When they arrived, the single-family home was fully involved, according to Town Manager Brian Foley.

Foley said in a post on Facebook that an adult male was outside on the property in serious medical distress and was transported to Rockville hospital. He also mentions that several family members got out safely and were staying at a neighbor’s house.

The home was completely destroyed, and the town staff and Red Cross are working to ensure the displaced family has access to any needed services, Foley said.

Advertisement

Local CT State Fire Marshals are on scene investigating the incident.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending