Seattle, WA
Faith-based groups offer aid, recovery paths to homeless
On a cold, cloudy January morning in Seattle, rows of battered recreational vehicles, cars with missing windows and tents lined both sides of 6th Avenue. Volunteers from Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission walked through the homeless encampments, calling out “Union Gospel Mission” and “Love Van” as they stepped across puddles and around discarded belongings.
Slowly, people emerged from makeshift shelters. Some were bundled in layers of old clothing; others draped themselves in worn-out blankets against the damp winter chill. The volunteers offered food, water, coats, blankets and hand warmers. Many of those receiving these items expressed both relief and exhaustion.
Seattle’s homelessness crisis has been well-documented, yet it continues to defy simple solutions. Critics sometimes call the city “Freattle,” contending that Seattle’s services attract more homeless individuals and worsen the problem.
Many organizations aimed at homeless services say they are simply responding to people in need.
Different experiences
Scott Cleveland, vice president of program ministries at Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission, said homelessness spans more circumstances than some realize.
“We could walk down this street and find a hundred different stories,” Cleveland said. “Nobody in third grade said, ‘I want to be homeless when I grow up.’ It’s a moment in time. It doesn’t have to define a person.”
People living on the street have recounted everything from job losses and skyrocketing rents to domestic violence and mental health struggles. Cleveland said his organization tries to work with each person’s unique story, connecting them to relevant services.
Cleveland’s own journey
Cleveland has firsthand experience with hardship. In 1999, he and his brother were both struggling with drug and alcohol addiction.
“We were in a really bad spot,” he said. “We both ended up in the hospital. My brother was in a drug-induced coma, and doctors didn’t know if he would ever come out.”
Family members rushed to the hospital, fearing the worst. But once Cleveland and his brother emerged from that medical crisis, they found their way to Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission.
“The mission opened its doors to us,” Cleveland said. “That was the beginning of our story. It was a healing process that eventually led to long-term recovery.”
His brother recovered, and Cleveland went on to become vice president of program ministries at the same organization that helped save his life.
“Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission really focuses on helping people at their lowest point,” he said. “It can be a place where new stories begin.”
Meeting immediate needs, building trust
Volunteers walked through the encampment in Seattle’s SoDo neighborhood handing out supplies and chatting with people in vehicles so dilapidated they hardly resembled the standard camper or car. Some volunteers offered prayer to those interested. Others simply listened to personal stories. Cleveland described this as a two-pronged approach.
“We might give someone a warm blanket and a cup of cocoa,” he said. “But we’re also inviting them to our shelter and to consider a yearlong recovery program. That’s where deeper change happens.”
Government agencies, including the city of Seattle and King County, have instituted programs ranging from emergency shelters to tiny-house villages. Many living on the streets say they cannot navigate the applications and waitlists or do not qualify for certain services. Cleveland said faith-based organizations have a different kind of flexibility.
“We’ve been around for decades,” he said. “Our volunteers build trust, and that makes it easier for someone to take the step toward a long-term program, rather than just a 30-day detox.”
A portion of a Western Washington map that says “Outreach 2024” at the top is seen inside the “Union Gospel Mission search and rescue center in Seattle. (Photo: Charlie Harger, KIRO Newsradio)
Substance use and stigma
In the Industrial District, I spoke with a woman who asked to be called “Jane.” She said she had relapsed into opioid use after six years of sobriety. She was living in a rundown motorhome alongside her pug-chihuahua mix, named Maci.
“A lot of people think we just like, don’t want help,” Jane said. “But it’s not as easy as just going and getting on the programs. (There are) waitlists, and people who are older or sicker get priority.”
Jane described the stigma of living on the street.
“Nobody wants to talk to us. Everybody wants to turn their nose, like we’re basically scum,” she said. “They’ll honk their horns driving by, just to wake people up and let us know they don’t want us here.”
Up until a few weeks ago, Jane had been living in a tent.
“(It has) been absolutely freezing. But we were lucky enough — we got a good motorhome from somebody who got housing and gave us theirs,” she said. “But it was freezing a couple of weeks ago. We had hand warmers and tried to stay warm at night. That’s about it.”
I asked her if she had any family members she could turn to for help. Jane says she has a supportive, upper-middle-class family, but she withdrew after her relapse.
“I have a very good family, but since I relapsed, I’ve chosen to keep my distance. I don’t want to bring that around them,” Jane said.
She added that she doesn’t want to expose them to the drama of her life as an addict. She hasn’t spoken to them in years.
A connection and a coincidence
As the volunteers wrapped up their visit, they invited anyone interested to join a prayer circle. I stood in a small ring with Union Gospel Mission volunteers, Jane and a few others. The wind whipped along the street, and I held Jane’s hand. While several people prayed for safety and a way forward, I felt compelled to tell Jane she was loved.
“I just want you to know we care about you. I know society can be tough, but you are loved,” I said. “You’re somebody who’s deserving of love, and I hope you know that.”
Jane looked up, tears in her eyes, and quietly thanked me. Then she turned to Scott Cleveland to ask about Union Gospel Mission’s rehab program.
“People say there are bugs there. They’ll steal your stuff,” Jane said.
“Can I paint a different picture for you?” Cleveland asked. “Because I know. I’ve been here for 25 years. But I’ve experienced homelessness. I was a drug addict for years. It’s brand new,” he told her. “It’s super-duper clean. You’ll have your own room, there’s a shower, and the staff are amazing. It’s super nice.”
“Oh really?” Jane asked, her voice revealing a mix of curiosity and excitement.
“If you just wanted to see it, we could show you what it looks like,” Cleveland said. “I think you should do it.”
“That right there is a deciding factor, the fact that you get your own room,” Jane said. “It’s just a lot of change, and that’s scary.”
Cleveland nodded.
“Change is scary as hell.”
Jane admitted she was interested in learning more, but her worry shifted to Maci, her dog and constant companion.
“You can’t take your dog to the shelter,” Cleveland told her, adding that some people foster pets while owners recover.
A look of concern crossed Jane’s face at the idea of leaving Maci behind.
A text to ‘Seattle’s Morning News’
The next morning, I aired a segment on “Seattle’s Morning News,” sharing parts of Jane’s story. Shortly afterward, I received a text from a listener who claimed to be Jane’s mother, the same mother Jane had not communicated with in years.
“The homeless woman on the interview you ran this morning ‘Jane’ is my daughter,” the text read. “I know my daughter’s voice so I know that you definitely interviewed her. She probably had her dog Maci with her. It has been a few years since we’ve had contact, and we desperately need to get in touch with her.”
Then came a simple plea: “Could you please contact me?”
When I called, the woman explained that Jane had once been an athlete in high school before opioids took over her life. She said the family still loves Jane deeply and wants her to seek treatment. Maci the dog, she added, has been the one constant in Jane’s life, her rock.
I mentioned Jane’s concern that no one would be able to care for Maci if she went into rehab.
“We’d gladly take care of Maci while she gets treatment,” Jane’s mom said.
I connected her with a representative from the Union Gospel Mission, hopeful that this message could be shared during the next search and rescue outreach.
It was a remarkable coincidence (or maybe something more) that after years of silence between them, I happened to interview Jane, and when the story aired, her mother tuned in, revealing a possible solution to Jane’s biggest worry.
Homeless in Seattle: Kaya’s story
Another example of Seattle’s diverse homeless population is “Kaya,” who was interviewed while living in a Class B RV van with her husband, her mother and two dogs.
“It’s just me, my husband, my mom and our dogs, which we’re training to be service animals,” Kaya said.
She explained that they came from Arizona and Montana, searching for places with better resources. Kaya acknowledged that Seattle’s more accessible social services attracted them.
Kaya explained that when she and her family first arrived in Arizona, they encountered significant barriers to securing assistance. They ran into issues in Montana as well.
“In Montana, they told us it could take up to 90 days to get food stamps,” she said.
Her experience highlights the frustrations many face when trying to access basic services in certain states, including long wait times and complicated procedures that delay support. By contrast, when they arrived in Seattle, they were quickly able to access food and basic resources, illustrating how uneven resources across states complicate the crisis.
“We came straight here (to Seattle) because (there are) plenty of resources for us,” she said. “This isn’t something we want to do long term. It’s just temporary until we save up enough.”
Critics often cite such stories, asserting that Seattle’s approach inadvertently encourages more people to migrate here. Kaya, however, regarded it as a matter of survival.
“It can happen to anybody, really,” she said. “We just want to get back on our feet.”
Government and faith-based efforts
City and county programs have devoted significant resources to tackling homelessness, but tent encampments and rows of vehicles remain common across Seattle. Critics argue that Seattle’s policies, viewed by some as too lenient, draw people from other states. They say a stronger enforcement stance is necessary.
Organizations such as Union Gospel Mission maintain that help should be available to all who need it, regardless of where they come from. Cleveland said the problem is multifaceted, with no single factor responsible.
“A person living in a van with their family is different from someone who’s using fentanyl,” he said. “They need different solutions, but both need compassion. Our role is to walk with them, understand their story and connect them with resources that can change their lives.”
Union Gospel Mission focuses on long-term recovery, providing a yearlong inpatient program for those ready to break the cycle of addiction. Cleveland said many traditional approaches, such as short-term detox or motel vouchers, do not address the underlying causes of homelessness.
“You don’t get into these situations overnight, and it takes time to get out of them,” he said. “We want to see people reconnect with family, find steady work and have a strong community around them.”
Uncertain futures
For Kaya, the plan is to save enough money for a more permanent place to live. Jane’s future remains unclear. With no phone and an RV that could be towed at any time, she has limited ways to stay connected. Her mother, grateful that Jane is alive, hopes to reunite with her daughter.
Cleveland’s own story, once facing a hospital stay and the loss of his brother, underscores that recovery is possible. For Jane, re-establishing family ties and seeking help through a structured program could be the turning point. Whether that happens remains to be seen.
“It’s complicated,” Cleveland said. “But we’ve seen time and again that a combination of consistent outreach, compassion and long-term options can help people rebuild.”
Seattle’s homelessness crisis is as complex as the personal stories that fuel it. Faith-based organizations like Union Gospel Mission continue their outreach, offering not only blankets and sandwiches, but also a path to comprehensive recovery.
Charlie Harger is the host of “Seattle’s Morning News” on KIRO Newsradio. You can read more of Charlie’s stories and commentaries here. Follow Charlie on X and email him here.
Seattle, WA
New Ben & Jerry’s location opening at Seattle waterfront’s Pier 54
Anyone waiting for the ferry, taking a stroll along the revamped Seattle waterfront or visiting the Seattle Aquarium just got a new option for finding a sweet treat: Ben & Jerry’s is coming to Pier 54.
A lease announcement last week shared that the new shop will be operated by local franchise owners Lance and Moria Blair, owners of the Green Lake and Gig Harbor Ben & Jerry’s locations. They pair is also opening another Seattle location in Northgate soon.
The permanent shop announcement comes after Ben & Jerry’s operated a pop-up at the waterfront location last simmer.
“As a Seattle native, the waterfront holds a special place in my heart,” Lance Blair said in a news release. “I could not be more excited to be a part of bringing Ben & Jerry’s to Pier 54 and continue building connections with the local community while serving visitors from around the world.”
The new location comes as local ice cream chains Molly Moon’s and Salt & Straw have also expanded into the downtown area in the past year.
Where is the new Ben & Jerry’s location?
The new Ben & Jerry’s is located at Pier 54 on the Seattle Waterfront: 1001 Alaskan Way, Seattle, WA 98104.
The shop will be open Monday through Friday from 11:30 a.m. – 8:30 p.m.
Where are the other Ben & Jerry’s locations in Seattle?
The ice cream chain operates four other locations in the Seattle area:
- Alki Beach: 2742 Alki Ave SW, Seattle, WA 98116
- Bellevue: 166 Bellevue Way NE Bellevue, WA 98004
- Green Lake: 7900 E Green Lake Drive N Suite 104, Seattle, WA 98103
- Kirkland: 176 Lake Street South, Kirkland, WA 98033
How many locations does Ben & Jerry’s have in Washington?
Ben & Jerry’s has ten locations across Washington, including two in Issaquah and three in the Spokane area. See the full list of locations at benjerry.com/ice-cream-near-me.
Zachary Fletcher is a trending news reporter with USA TODAY Network’s Washington state team. Keep up with him on X (@zdfletch), BlueSky (@zfletcher.bsky.social) or reach him at zfletcher@usatodayco.com.
Seattle, WA
VIDEO: Mayor Wilson proposes renewing, expanding Seattle Transit Measure by doubling the sales-tax percentage that funds it.
Through the end of this year, 0.15% of the sales tax you pay funds the voter-approved Seattle Transit Measure. That would double to 0.30% if the City Council and Seattle voters approve the renewal/expansion that Mayor Katie Wilson officially introduced this afternoon. She said it’ll make living in Seattle more affordable by enabling more people to “live car-free or car-light.” She acknowledged that raising the sales tax isn’t ideal but noted that it’s one of the few revenue-raising tools available under state law. Besides paying for more transit – 280,000 additional Metro bus trips a year, 100,000 more than the current measure funds – it also would pay for 22,000 free ORCA transit passes, more than double what the city provides now, said acting SDOT director Angela Brady during the announcement event at City Hall. The passes are now available to Seattle Promise scholars, low-income Seattle Preschool Program families, and Seattle Housing Authority residents. The measure’s renewal/expansion would also make those passes available to Housing Choice Voucher participants.
The mayor’s announcement says the Transit Measure isn’t just about buses: It also would “support the design and delivery of Sound Transit’s West Seattle Link Extension, Ballard Link Extension, and Graham Street Station.” The 0.30% sales tax would generate an estimated $138 million average per year for the 10 years of this measure, which is proposed to go to voters in November. Council review starts this Thursday and will be led by District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka, who chairs the council committee that oversees transportation. We’ll add the specific text of the proposal when we get it; the slide deck for Thursday’s council meeting is now available, and we’ll add some highlights from that soon.
Seattle, WA
Seattle mayor is violating city law over CCTV cameras ahead of FIFA World Cup, CM says
SEATTLE — With less than two weeks before Seattle hosts matches during the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup, Seattle City Council Public Safety Committee Chair Bob Kettle is escalating his criticism of Mayor Katie Wilson’s decision not to activate newly installed CCTV cameras in the Stadium District and suggesting she is violating established law.
In a sharply worded letter sent Monday, Kettle argues that the mayor’s decision to pause activation of the city’s Technology-Assisted Public Safety Pilot Program is inconsistent with city law and the ordinances approved by the Seattle City Council.
RELATED | Mayor Wilson hosts discussion on surveillance and security, takes questions from public
“I believe that she is not operating according to the ordinances, the law with respect to the stadium ordinances, and her duties under the charter,” Kettle said in an interview on Tuesday.
The dispute centers on 22 CCTV cameras that have already been installed in and around Seattle’s Stadium District but remain inactive as city leaders debate privacy concerns and the circumstances under which the system should be used.
Kettle said the approaching World Cup is what prompted him to send the letter.
“Basically, we’re less than two weeks out from the World Cup, and we’re not ready,” Kettle said. “We have capacity with these stadium cameras, they’re up, they’re installed, but they’re not turned on.”
In his letter, Kettle argues that the council already approved the surveillance technology through council-approved ordinances, specifically outlining the limited circumstances under which the program can be paused.
According to Kettle, those conditions include situations where the city is compelled to release camera data for civil immigration enforcement, gender-affirming care investigations, or reproductive healthcare matters, or when city leaders determine the technology is being used for those purposes.
RELATED | City leaders say Seattle ready for World Cup, despite concerns with surveillance, drones
“Neither condition has occurred that would merit a temporary program pause,” Kettle wrote.
The councilmember contends that the Seattle Municipal Code and the approved surveillance impact report provide no authority for the mayor to indefinitely delay the program’s implementation beyond those specified exceptions.
The mayor’s office has defended its position, saying activation decisions will be guided by public safety experts and intelligence assessments ahead of the World Cup.
“Mayor Wilson continues to consult public safety officials regarding circumstances that might warrant use of the expanded set of cameras during the FIFA World Cup,” the mayor’s office said in a previous statement. “We appreciate councilmembers’ perspectives, and those will be part of ongoing discussions.”
The previous statement continued:
“With regard to credible threats: Identifying a credible threat involves multiple experts from federal, state, and local agencies monitoring and assessing various streams of information. In collaboration with one another, they weigh incoming intelligence and jointly recommend whether to elevate security operations. Mayor Wilson’s decision whether to activate the Stadium District cameras will be informed by this group’s recommendation.”
The mayor’s office has been asked if there is a change in perspective given Kettle’s letter. In a new statement obtained by KOMO News on Tuesday, the mayor’s office said Wilson’s position remains “unchanged.”
“Per our legal review, we believe council has the authority to pause the use of adopted surveillance technology but cannot require its use,” the mayor’s office said in Tuesday’s statement. “The Mayor is ensuring that our use of surveillance technology is protective of civil rights, liberties, and privacy and provides sufficient data privacy safeguards. The Mayor has a duty to make sure our use of these technologies is responsible.”
Kettle argues that waiting for a specific threat before activating the cameras misunderstands modern security planning.
SEE ALSO | Seattle mayor’s verbal missteps prompt national and viral attention, leadership questions
“There are credible concerns,” Kettle said, citing worries about drones and other security issues surrounding a major international event.
He pointed to examples, including the 1996 Atlanta Olympic bombing and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, arguing that public officials often do not receive advance warning before attacks occur.
“This idea that you’re going to get a credible threat warning is not right. It’s not the professional standard,” Kettle said. “The 22 cameras are installed, they’re ready to go, they just need to be turned on.”
Opponents of the camera expansion have raised concerns that footage could potentially be sought by federal immigration authorities or used in ways that conflict with Seattle’s sanctuary city policies.
Kettle dismissed those concerns, arguing that the council built extensive safeguards into the legislation governing the cameras.
“We don’t have facial recognition,” Kettle said, noting the city established restrictions and oversight measures as part of the technology program.
He also argued that federal agencies have their own surveillance capabilities and do not need Seattle’s camera network to conduct enforcement operations.
Kettle said he sought legal guidance before sending the letter and believes the mayor’s decision is inconsistent with the ordinances governing the program.
“I asked the question, if Mayor Harrell had to do all this in terms of ordinances, why is it that Mayor Wilson does not?” Kettle said. He said attorneys reviewing the issue identified concerns centered on the language governing when the program may be “paused.”
While Kettle stopped short of calling for legal action against the mayor, he said he wanted to publicly highlight what he views as a conflict between the administration’s actions and council-approved law.
“Her move related to the pause is not right, and essentially a violation,” Kettle said.
Kettle said Seattle is the only one of the 11 World Cup host cities that does not have its full camera system operational and warned that the city is running out of time.
“We have to take action now to get ourselves ready for the World Cup,” he said. “That is ensuring that we have all the pieces in place, and that we’re using the capacities that we have to their full ability.”
Kettle said he was scheduled to meet with members of the mayor’s team on Tuesday and hopes a resolution can be reached before the first World Cup matches arrive in Seattle.
-
Massachusetts5 minutes agoMass. House votes to set new rules for DiZoglio’s audit
-
Minnesota8 minutes agoMinneapolis considers closing dog park sitting on Indigenous land
-
Mississippi13 minutes agoMississippi Court of Appeals Brings ‘Court on the Road’ Prog…
-
Missouri20 minutes agoTwo airlifted after serious crash in Cole County
-
Montana23 minutes agoClark Fork River remains central to Missoula’s identity, conservation groups say
-
Nebraska28 minutes agoMiss Nebraska festivities kick off with opening ceremonies
-
Nevada35 minutes agoHillel of Northern Nevada Builds Community at the University
-
New Hampshire37 minutes agoNew Hampshire Pummels Altoona with 14 Runs on 18 Hits