Connect with us

Politics

Musk renews harsh rebuke of Dems who rejected deporting sex offenders: Vote out ‘every one’

Published

on

Musk renews harsh rebuke of Dems who rejected deporting sex offenders: Vote out ‘every one’

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Tech billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk renewed criticism of the more than 150 House Democrats who voted against deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex offenses, demanding each of the lawmakers be voted out of office. 

“There is no excuse. Please post the list of people who opposed this law and want to keep illegals who are convicted sex offenders in America,” Musk posted to his X account on Saturday referencing a September House vote. 

Advertisement

“They all need to be voted out of office. Every one of them.”

The Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act passed the House in September, after all 215 present Republicans voted in favor of the bill, and were joined by 51 Democratic colleagues. A total of 158 Democrats, however, voted against the bill. 

158 DEMS VOTE AGAINST BILL TO DEPORT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO COMMIT SEX CRIMES

President-elect Trump and Elon Musk watch the launch of a test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket on Nov. 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

The Democrats who voted against the bill came under scrutiny in September, and are facing renewed criticism on social media this month as commenters resurrect the vote ahead of President-elect Trump taking office this month. 

Advertisement

“The bill targeted rapists, pedophiles, domestic abusers, and stalkers, ensuring they couldn’t stay in the U.S. Opponents claimed it ‘demonized immigrants,’ but how does protecting convicted predators help anyone – especially their victims?” X show host Mario Nawfal posted to his account Saturday, sparking Musk to weigh in. 

“Deporting violent offenders isn’t ‘fearmongering’ – it’s basic public safety. Why would anyone vote to keep criminals who prey on women and children?” Nawfal added.

EX-BORDER CHIEF WARNS OF ‘SIGNIFICANT THREAT’ AS MIGRANT NUMBERS SKYROCKET: ‘ENTIRE SECTORS’ MISSING AGENTS

The legislation would deport illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes, and would ​​also deem illegal immigrants who admit to domestic violence or sex-related charges – or are convicted of them – to be inadmissible in the U.S., Fox Digital previously reported. The legislation is currently with the Senate, and was referred to the Judiciary Committee. 

Representatives of the 119th Congress are sworn in during the first day of session in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 3, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Notable Democrats who voted against the legislation included Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., former California Rep. Adam Schiff, who now serves in the Senate, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Musk’s call for the Democrats to be voted out of Congress over the vote comes after he vowed in December to fund moderate Democratic politicians in deep blue districts, “so that the country can get rid of those who don’t represent them.”

CLYBURN BRUSHES OFF MUSK’S PLAN TO FUND MODERATES IN DEMOCRATIC DISTRICTS

President-elect Trump greets Elon Musk as he arrives to attend a SpaceX Starship launch on Nov. 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Musk is also slated to serve alongside Vivek Ramaswamy to lead an upcoming presidential advisory committee, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which will work to cut excessive government spending and slash the size of the government under Trump’s second administration.

Advertisement

According to the office of the House clerk, the 158 Democrats who voted against the legislation are:

  1. Alma Adams, North Carolina
  2. Pete Aguilar, California
  3. Gabe Amo, Rhode Island
  4. Jake Auchincloss, Massachusetts
  5. Becca Balint, Vermont
  6. Nanette Barragán, California
  7. Joyce Beatty, Ohio
  8. Ami Bera, California
  9. Donald Beyer, Virginia
  10. Sanford D. Bishop Jr., Georgia
  11. Earl Blumenauer, Oregon
  12. Suzanne Bonamici, Oregon
  13. Lisa Blunt Rochester, Delaware
  14. Jamaal Bowman, New York
  15. Shontel Brown, Ohio
  16. Julia Brownley, California
  17. Cori Bush, Missouri
  18. Salud Carbajal, California
  19. Tony Cárdenas, California
  20. André Carson, Indiana
  21. Troy Carter, Louisiana
  22. Greg Casar, Texas
  23. Ed Case, Hawaii
  24. Sean Casten, Illinois
  25. Kathy Castor, Florida
  26. Joaquin Castro, Texas
  27. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Florida
  28. Judy Chu, California
  29. Katherine Clark, Massachusetts
  30. Yvette Clarke, New York
  31. Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri
  32. James Clyburn, South Carolina
  33. Steve Cohen, Tennessee
  34. Gerald Connolly, Virginia
  35. Luis Correa, California
  36. Jim Costa, California
  37. Jasmine Crockett, Texas
  38. Jason Crow, Colorado
  39. Danny Davis, Illinois
  40. Madeleine Dean, Pennsylvania
  41. Diana DeGette, Colorado
  42. Rosa DeLauro, Connecticut
  43. Suzan DelBene, Washington
  44. Mark DeSaulnier, California
  45. Debbie Dingell, Michigan
  46. Lloyd Doggett, Texas
  47. Veronica Escobar, Texas
  48. Anna Eshoo, California
  49. Adriano Espaillat, New York
  50. Lizzie Fletcher, Texas
  51. Bill Foster, Illinois
  52. Valerie Foushee, North Carolina
  53. Lois Frankel, Florida
  54. Maxwell Frost, Florida
  55. John Garamendi, California
  56. Jesús “Chuy” Garcia, Illinois
  57. Robert Garcia, California
  58. Sylvia Garcia, Texas
  59. Dan Goldman, New York
  60. Jimmy Gomez, California
  61. Al Green, Texas
  62. James Himes, Connecticut
  63. Steny Hoyer, Maryland
  64. Valerie Hoyle, Oregon
  65. Jared Huffman, California
  66. Glenn Ivey, Maryland
  67. Jonathan Jackson, Illinois
  68. Sara Jacobs, California
  69. Pramila Jayapal, Washington
  70. Hakeem Jeffries, New York
  71. Henry “Hank” Johnson, Georgia
  72. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, California
  73. Bill Keating, Massachusetts
  74. Robin Kelly, Illinois
  75. Ro Khanna, California
  76. Dan Kildee, Michigan
  77. Derek Kilmer, Washington
  78. Andy Kim, New Jersey
  79. Raja Krishnamoorthi, Illinois
  80. Ann Kuster, New Hampshire
  81. Greg Landsman, Ohio
  82. Rick Larsen, Washington
  83. John Larson, Connecticut
  84. Barbara Lee, California
  85. Summer Lee, Pennsylvania
  86. Teresa Leger Fernandez, New Mexico
  87. Ted Lieu, California
  88. Zoe Lofgren, California
  89. Doris Matsui, California
  90. Lucy McBath, Georgia
  91. Jennifer McClellan, Virginia
  92. Betty McCollum, Minnesota
  93. Morgan McGarvey, Kentucky
  94. James McGovern, Massachusetts
  95. Gregory Meeks, New York
  96. Rob Menendez, New Jersey
  97. Grace Meng, New York
  98. Kweisi Mfume, Maryland
  99. Gwen Moore, Wisconsin
  100. Joseph Morelle, New York
  101. Seth Moulton, Massachusetts
  102. Kevin Mullin, California
  103. Jerrold Nadler, New York
  104. Grace Napolitano, California
  105. Richard Neal, Massachusetts
  106. Joe Neguse, Colorado
  107. Donald Norcross, New Jersey
  108. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York
  109. Ilhan Omar, Minnesota
  110. Frank Pallone, New Jersey
  111. Nancy Pelosi, California
  112. Scott Peters, California
  113. Brittany Pettersen, Colorado
  114. Dean Phillips, Minnesota
  115. Chellie Pingree, Maine
  116. Mark Pocan, Wisconsin
  117. Katie Porter, California
  118. Ayanna Pressley, Massachusetts
  119. Mike Quigley, Illinois
  120. Delia Ramirez, Illinois
  121. Jamie Raskin, Maryland
  122. Deborah Ross, North Carolina
  123. Raul Ruiz, California
  124. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Maryland
  125. Linda Sánchez, California
  126. John Sarbanes, Maryland
  127. Mary Scanlon, Pennsylvania
  128. Janice Schakowsky, Illinois
  129. Adam Schiff, California
  130. Bradley Schneider, Illinois
  131. Robert “Bobby” Scott, Virginia
  132. David Scott, Georgia
  133. Terri Sewell, Alabama
  134. Brad Sherman, California
  135. Darren Soto, Florida
  136. Melanie Stansbury, New Mexico
  137. Haley Stevens, Michigan
  138. Marilyn Strickland, Washington
  139. Mark Takano, California
  140. Shri Thanedar, Michigan
  141. Mike Thompson, California
  142. Bennie Thompson, Mississippi
  143. Rashida Tlaib, Michigan
  144. Jill Tokuda, Hawaii
  145. Paul Tonko, New York
  146. Norma Torres, California
  147. Ritchie Torres, New York
  148. Lori Trahan, Massachusetts
  149. David Trone, Maryland
  150. Lauren Underwood, Illinois
  151. Juan Vargas, California
  152. Marc Veasey, Texas
  153. Nydia Velázquez, New York
  154. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Florida
  155. Maxine Waters, California
  156. Bonnie Watson Coleman, New Jersey
  157. Nikema Williams, Georgia
  158. Frederica Wilson, Florida

The Democrats who voted against the legislation came under fierce scrutiny in September from conservatives. 

“If you vote against it, you’re sexist against women,” South Carolina Republican Nancy Mace, who introduced the legislation, said in September to Fox Digital. 

Migrants attempt to cross into the U.S. from Mexico at the border Dec. 17, 2023 in Jacumba Hot Springs, California. (Nick Ut/Getty Images)

ELON MUSK AGREES WITH RON PAUL’S CALL TO ‘ELIMINATE FOREIGN AID’

“I mean, truly, because we’re talking about illegals who are here who are committing domestic violence, rape and murder on women and children – they’ve gotta go. They shouldn’t be allowed into our country.”

Advertisement

“158 Democrats just voted AGAINST deporting migrants for s*x offenses. This is a slap in the face to every victim and their family members. Democrats hate you and your children,” popular conservative X account Libs of TikTok posted at the time. 

Democrats who voted against the bill characterized it as xenophobic and an example of “fearmongering” against immigrants. 

“Here we are again, debating another partisan bill that fear mongers about immigrants, instead of working together to fix the immigration system,” Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said during debate on the bill.

“I probably shouldn’t be too surprised. Scapegoating immigrants and attempting to weaponize the crime of domestic violence is appearing to be a time-honored tradition for Republicans.”

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report. 

Politics

Trump signs order to protect Venezuela oil revenue held in US accounts

Published

on

Trump signs order to protect Venezuela oil revenue held in US accounts

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order blocking U.S. courts from seizing Venezuelan oil revenues held in American Treasury accounts.

The order states that court action against the funds would undermine U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

President Donald Trump is pictured signing two executive orders on Sept. 19, 2025, establishing the “Trump Gold Card” and introducing a $100,000 fee for H-1B visas. He signed another executive order recently protecting oil revenue. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Trump signed the order on Friday, the same day that he met with nearly two dozen top oil and gas executives at the White House. 

The president said American energy companies will invest $100 billion to rebuild Venezuela’s “rotting” oil infrastructure and push production to record levels following the capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro.

The U.S. has moved aggressively to take control of Venezuela’s oil future following the collapse of the Maduro regime.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Column: Some leaders will do anything to cling to positions of power

Published

on

Column: Some leaders will do anything to cling to positions of power

One of the most important political stories in American history — one that is particularly germane to our current, tumultuous time — unfolded in Los Angeles some 65 years ago.

Sen. John F. Kennedy, a Catholic, had just received his party’s nomination for president and in turn he shunned the desires of his most liberal supporters by choosing a conservative out of Texas as his running mate. He did so in large part to address concerns that his faith would somehow usurp his oath to uphold the Constitution. The last time the Democrats nominated a Catholic — New York Gov. Al Smith in 1928 — he lost in a landslide, so folks were more than a little jittery about Kennedy’s chances.

“I am fully aware of the fact that the Democratic Party, by nominating someone of my faith, has taken on what many regard as a new and hazardous risk,” Kennedy told the crowd at the Memorial Coliseum. “But I look at it this way: The Democratic Party has once again placed its confidence in the American people, and in their ability to render a free, fair judgment.”

The most important part of the story is what happened before Kennedy gave that acceptance speech.

While his faith made party leaders nervous, they were downright afraid of the impact a civil rights protest during the Democratic National Convention could have on November’s election. This was 1960. The year began with Black college students challenging segregation with lunch counter sit-ins across the Deep South, and by spring the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee had formed. The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was not the organizer of the protest at the convention, but he planned to be there, guaranteeing media attention. To try to prevent this whole scene, the most powerful Black man in Congress was sent to stop him.

Advertisement

The Rev. Adam Clayton Powell Jr. was also a warrior for civil rights, but the House representative preferred the legislative approach, where backroom deals were quietly made and his power most concentrated. He and King wanted the same things for Black people. But Powell — who was first elected to Congress in 1944, the same year King enrolled at Morehouse College at the age of 15 — was threatened by the younger man’s growing influence. He was also concerned that his inability to stop the protest at the convention would harm his chance to become chairman of a House committee.

And so Powell — the son of a preacher, and himself a Baptist preacher in Harlem — told King that if he didn’t cancel, Powell would tell journalists a lie that King was having a homosexual affair with his mentor, Bayard Rustin. King stuck to his plan and led a protest — even though such a rumor would not only have harmed King, but also would have undermined the credibility of the entire civil rights movement. Remember, this was 1960. Before the March on Washington, before passage of the Voting Rights Act, before the dismantling of the very Jim Crow laws Powell had vowed to dismantle when first running for office.

That threat, my friends, is the most important part of the story.

It’s not that Powell didn’t want the best for the country. It’s just that he wanted to be seen as the one doing it and was willing to derail the good stemming from the civil rights movement to secure his own place in power. There have always been people willing to make such trade-offs. Sometimes they dress up their intentions with scriptures to make it more palatable; other times they play on our darkest fears. They do not care how many people get hurt in the process, even if it’s the same people they profess to care for.

That was true in Los Angeles in 1960.

Advertisement

That was true in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021.

That is true in the streets of America today.

Whether we are talking about an older pastor who is threatened by the growing influence of a younger voice or a president clinging to office after losing an election: To remain king, some men are willing to burn the entire kingdom down.

YouTube: @LZGrandersonShow

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns

Published

on

Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from stopping subsidies on childcare programs in five states, including Minnesota, amid allegations of fraud.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, a Biden appointee, didn’t rule on the legality of the funding freeze, but said the states had met the legal threshold to maintain the “status quo” on funding for at least two weeks while arguments continue.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns.

The programs include the Child Care and Development Fund, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, and the Social Services Block Grant, all of which help needy families.

Advertisement

USDA IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDS ALL FEDERAL FUNDING TO MINNESOTA AMID FRAUD INVESTIGATION 

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

“Families who rely on childcare and family assistance programs deserve confidence that these resources are used lawfully and for their intended purpose,” HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill said in a statement on Tuesday.

The states, which include California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York, argued in court filings that the federal government didn’t have the legal right to end the funds and that the new policy is creating “operational chaos” in the states.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian at his nomination hearing in 2022.  (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Advertisement

In total, the states said they receive more than $10 billion in federal funding for the programs. 

HHS said it had “reason to believe” that the programs were offering funds to people in the country illegally.

‘TIP OF THE ICEBERG’: SENATE REPUBLICANS PRESS GOV WALZ OVER MINNESOTA FRAUD SCANDAL

The table above shows the five states and their social safety net funding for various programs which are being withheld by the Trump administration over allegations of fraud.  (AP Digital Embed)

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.”

Advertisement

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.” (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox News Digital has reached out to HHS for comment.

Continue Reading

Trending