Connect with us

Michigan

Staff Predictions: Michigan Football vs Alabama Crimson Tide

Published

on

Staff Predictions: Michigan Football vs Alabama Crimson Tide


The final game of the 2024 season is nearly upon us, as the Michigan Wolverines will meet with the Alabama Crimson Tide in the ReliaQuest Bowl on New Year’s Eve. This will be the second meeting in the 2024 calendar year between these two squads, and this one is obviously a lot less meaningful than the first one at the Rose Bowl.

For the final time in 2024, the Maize n Brew staff came together to answer some questions about the upcoming game, as well as taking a quick look back at The Game.

Before we really dive in, we have to discuss Michigan’s fourth straight victory over Ohio State, with this one being the biggest upset of them all. Jot down any thoughts you had/still have from that game.

Von: Man…how awesome was that? Michigan going into Columbus as a three-touchdown underdog, with a former walk-on quarterback that was benched earlier in the season, no Will Johnson, no Colston Loveland, no Donovan Edwards in the second half…no problem for Michigan. It isn’t my favorite win in The Game ever, but it sure was the most funny of them all because A) The huge point spread, B) Michigan prevented OSU from going to the Big Ten Championship, and C) Ryan Day and Chip Kelly were baited into running the ball over and over, only to have their ball-carriers be met by Buckeye slayer and Michigan legend Mason Graham at the line of scrimmage. The team planted the Michigan flag even further down into the minds of every Buckeye on Nov. 30, 2024. Better luck next year!

Advertisement

Kellen: It was nice to see Ohio Rep. Josh Williams get properly roasted online after proposing a bill that would make flag planting a felony at Ohio Stadium. That was one of the dumbest ideas I’ve seen a politician propose on a low-stakes manner in a long time. I was also reading every single article about Ohio State reflecting on the loss and trying to downplay the importance of The Game after losing it four years in a row. At this point, Sherrone Moore has rented a condo inside Ryan Day’s head, and that condo will still be there when Ohio State loses to Oregon in the quarterfinals.

Sam: Harbaugh has inflicted Day with the notion that if you don’t run the ball, you’re not a real Big Ten team. I think that has never been more apparent than this matchup. This one felt like the biggest stamp on the complete turnover the rivalry has seen over the last few years.

Jake: I will never forget when the air was taken out of Ohio Stadium as Michigan led 13-10 late in the fourth quarter. I never expected strong quarterback play, but seeing the defense and the offensive line step up like they did against one of the most dominant teams in 2024 still brings a tear to my eye. After Ohio State’s blowout win over Tennessee, it makes the win even more special. The foundation is there to be good for years to come. P.S. Flag planting is a tradition in college football that should never go away.

Now that that’s out of our system, let’s turn our attention to Michigan’s matchup with Alabama. With guys like Colston Loveland, Mason Graham and Will Johnson, among others, not suiting up in this game, what — or who — are you most looking forward to seeing play in this one?

Von: I am really excited to see Jordan Marshall get some snaps at running back. Since Dono and Kalel Mullings won’t be playing, this will provide him, Ben Hall and Micah Ka’apana some carries against a good team in Alabama. These snaps are incredibly meaningful for guys like them, and hopefully springboard them into a pivotal offseason for their individual developments. I am also looking forward to seeing some more playing time for tight end Hogan Hansen, defensive tackles Trey Pierce and Enow Etta, and perhaps we finally see some legitimate snaps for quarterback Jadyn Davis.

Advertisement

Kellen: Give Andy Bailey’s boy Jordan Marshall some run in this one. He has flashed potential on special teams, and I want to see him get the bulk of the carries in this one. I’d also like to see what Michigan actually has in Jadyn Davis, even though he feels like a likely candidate to eventually transfer with Bryce Underwood coming in next year.

Sam: I’m definitely interested in seeing returning front seven guys get more run. The offensive line is always gonna have depth, so I’m sure there will be guys to watch there as well. I’m really more interested in learning more about the early enrollees (despite them not being able to play in this game).

Jake: I cannot wait to see the defense against Alabama. While many pieces on the offense are currently in the transfer portal or out of eligibility, Michigan’s second-stringers on defense will get a ton of snaps against a powerhouse SEC program. I wonder if Jaishawn Barham will get snaps along the edge, and I can’t wait to see TJ Guy, Cam Brandt and Derrick Moore get rotational snaps against future NFL picks. I also want to see Jimmy Rolder and Jaydon Hood get more snaps at linebacker, and I am excited to see Zeke Berry play against the Bama receivers, as he will need to step up as one of the only retuning starters in the secondary next season.

Do you truly care if Michigan wins or loses this game? What will be your level of disappointment/anger/any other emotion if Michigan loses?

Von: The season is over whether or not they win this game, so no, I don’t care about the outcome of this game. Of course, it would be nice if they won, but my day won’t be ruined if they lose like it would be if they lost a rivalry game or lost a College Football Playoff game.

Advertisement

Kellen: I only care because it’s Alabama. Alabama’s fans have been the most annoying all season long for constantly playing the hypothetical game and dunking on the Indiana’s and SMU’s of the world with a results-based argument. While I’m on this tangent, Kirk Herbstreit and ESPN deserve to be on the naughty list. Spending a large portion of the pregame show talking about how Bama, Ole Miss and other SEC teams should have gotten a spot because Indiana lost handily to Notre Dame was absurd. That’s a stupid argument that only became more popular online because the opening round of the CFP was relatively boring. It’s the same argument that happens when 11-13 seeds get blown out in March Madness. We can’t change the entire postseason format and qualifications for getting into the dance because the television product was less than ideal. That’s unfair to the little guys of the sport, and basically every non SEC or Big Ten school. Indiana and SMU earned the right to be blown out. Beating Bama with this mediocre team one year after the Rose Bowl will be satisfying for Michigan fans, and will unfortunately force more of the hypothetical arguments that have made college football Twitter a cesspool in recent weeks.

Sam: No. The CFP ruined non-playoff bowl games. That, coupled with the opt-outs and early transfer portal window, have stained bowl season.

Jake: Obviously, I will always want a Michigan win. Nonetheless, the win is meaningless in the grand scheme of things. The goal in these games is to develop young stars further so they are better next season. There will be a lot of hype around the game, given it is a Rose Bowl rematch, but do not give in. Look for certain pieces that can contribute in 2025, and watch how the coaching staff plays out the game. I want to see how this program performs on a big stage in a game that does not impact ranking or seeding.

Give us a bold prediction or two for the game.

Von: Jordan Marshall rips off an explosive 50+ yard run.

Advertisement

Kellen: Kenneth Grant, who I think is playing in this game, gets a scoop and score touchdown off a Jalen Milroe fumble in the second quarter.

NOTE: Grant has now declared for the draft and won’t be playing)

Sam: I think we’re gonna see Milroe more as a passer.

Jake: 1. With Kalel Mullings and Donovan Edwards out, expect Benjamin Hall to receive 15-20 carries. Jordan Marshall will be an instrumental piece in 2025, but he didn’t receive many carries this season, and I do not think that will change in this game. It is Hall’s job to lose, and I think Sherrone Moore wants to see what starting potential he has against a dominant defense.

2. The Michigan defense will hold Alabama to less than 100 rushing yards. The Wolverines have been rotating top talent along the line the last few years, and the next men up have continued to produce in their new roles. Not to mention, the Tide’s most productive back, Justice Haynes, is in the portal.

Advertisement

Prediction time! What is the final score and why?

Von: Alabama 38, Michigan 20. I don’t think Michigan has the horses to keep this one close. Thankfully, the Wolverines will head into the offseason with a blank slate thanks to a new offensive coordinator and new starting quarterback.

Kellen: Bama wins, 27-10, because the Wolverines are missing their best players and already won their Super Bowl against Ohio State last month.

Sam: Bama, 31-14. Too much juice from the Tide offense, Michigan will have some fight but I just don’t see the Wolverines winning.

Jake: Alabama 38, Michigan 13. The offense will be lackluster if Davis Warren plays most of the snaps, and it will be hard to move the ball without Mullings or Edwards. Ben Hall will get his touches and yards, but I see this being a high-scoring affair that does not play in Michigan’s favor. With a few interceptions, good field position and a strong passing attack, Alabama should win this one easily. That said, if Michigan can impact the Tide’s game plan early on as it did against the Buckeyes, it definitely has the possibility of being close.

Advertisement



Source link

Michigan

Bills to end concealed carry permit requirement introduced in Michigan House

Published

on

Bills to end concealed carry permit requirement introduced in Michigan House


A group of Republicans in the Michigan House say Michiganders’ second amendment rights are being infringed, as they introduce legislation to end requirements for concealed carry permits.

Right now, Michiganders must obtain a permit to carry a concealed gun, with a base fee of $100.

As part of the process, applicants must also receive training.

“The first thing they do is put you in a classroom, make sure you know all proper range and safety procedures, run you over what the law states about when and if you’re allowed to use your firearm,” Jonathan Hold, president of the Michigan chapter of Giffords Gun Owners for Safety and a firearms instructor, said. “It gives a really good grounding.”

Advertisement

Applicants must demonstrate four hours of range time as well.

The group of House Republicans feel this is an undue burden, noting many gun owners are already knowledgeable.

They also believe the current five-year felony for carrying without a permit is too steep.

“For the government of the state of Michigan to tell that that we have to be qualified under the guise of their rules in order to protect ourselves is a far cry from what the constitution provides for us,” Rep. Jay DeBoyer, (R- Clay) said.

The package of bills wouldn’t abolish permits, as they are necessary to take guns outside of the state, but it would institute what’s called “constitutional carry.”

Advertisement

That means Michiganders can carry a gun on them without a permit.

Twenty-nine other states already adopted such policies.

“When we exercise other first amendment rights like our right to speak, we do not have to get a permit or permission from the government to speak,” Rep. Jim DeSana (R- Carleton) said. “When we exercise our right to worship, we do not have to go get a permit or permission to go worship.”

Supporters say concealed guns are important for self-defense, and can also help stop crime.

“It’s going to encourage and increase safety for all,” Rep. Joseph Fox (R- Fremont) said. “It’s about protecting everybody because if there are guns in this situation, and people are worried for their lives, they’re gonna stay back away from evil and making bad choices.”

Advertisement

Gun control advocates like Gold, however, say it’s “ridiculous” not to have guardrails.

“We’re talking about the power of life and death at a distance,” Gold said. “To send an untrained user out into the world with a firearm is a mistake.”

He also takes issue with the constitution argument.

“The constitution says as part of a well regulated militia, if you read the second amendment, and we don’t have well regulated militias in this country,” Gold said. “At the very least, what we should have are trained firearms users.”

A similar effort to end concealed carry permits failed to gain traction last year in the Michigan Senate, and with the landscape unchanged, the bills likely have an uphill battle to become law.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Michigan

Werewolf, trout ruled in ’24. What will be next ‘I voted’ sticker

Published

on

Werewolf, trout ruled in ’24. What will be next ‘I voted’ sticker


play

The rewarding feeling of wearing an “I Voted” sticker after turning in your ballot is something everyone can relate to.

Michigan voters can take it one step farther and vote on the design for the Election Day tradition.

Advertisement

The Michigan Department of State announced on March 3 the return of the highly competitive “I Voted” sticker contest in preparation for the state’s general election on Tuesday, Nov. 3.

“Our first-ever ‘I Voted’ sticker design contest in 2024 was a massive success,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said in a March 3 release. “This year we look forward to seeing the creative ways Michiganders of all ages celebrate democracy. Submit your entry to help us continue the tradition and get voters excited to cast their ballot this fall.”

Designs are being accepted online via the Secretary of State’s “I Voted” webpage: Michigan.gov/IVotedSticker. On the page, participants may print or download the official entry form.

Design and entry rules, the sticker template, and tips and suggestions are included on the official entry form.

Advertisement

There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.

Once submissions are closed, the public may vote for finalists online in June. Winners will be announced and celebrated later in the summer. Winning stickers will be dispersed to local election clerks for the November Election.

In 2024, there were more than 480 submissions, and more than 57,700 voters selected the nine winners, according to the release. Before the contest opened up for a public vote, the Michigan Collegiate Student Advisory Task Force members narrowed the submissions down to 25 semifinalists. 

Advertisement

Here’s the 2024 winners and rules for the 2026 participants:

What did the winning 2024 ‘I Voted’ sticker designs look like?

Want to enter a design? Here are the ‘I Voted’ sticker contest rules

According to the Secretary of State, here’s what to keep in mind for your sticker:

  • Designs must be completed using official entry form.
  • Designs must include the phrase “I voted” AND be nonpartisan in nature.
  • Artwork must be original, non-AI generated, and not contain copyrighted or trademarked designs.
  • Entries can be created using your preferred method (digital, paint, crayon, mixed media, etc.)
  • Provide as high quality of resolution as possible when submitting your design.
  • There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. You may enter one design in one category.
  • Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.

Contact Sarah Moore @ smoore@lsj.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Michigan

2 Smoothie King employees fired for refusing to serve customer in Trump hoodie

Published

on

2 Smoothie King employees fired for refusing to serve customer in Trump hoodie


Two employees who refused to serve a man and his wife because he was wearing a hoodie with President Trump’s name on it were fired after a video of the heated encounter went viral.

Erika Lindemyer and her husband, Jake, were forced out of a Smoothie King franchise location in Ann Arbor, Michigan, following a fiery clash with two young female workers on Sunday.

Jake and Erika Lindemyer were denied service at a Smoothie King location in Michigan on Sunday. Leftism/X

The employees claimed they didn’t “feel comfortable” serving the couple because of Jake’s pro-Trump hoodie, as captured by Erika in a viral video.

Jake and Erika fired back at the pair and insisted that they were being “discriminated” against based on their “political views.”

Advertisement
Both of the employees told them to leave. Leftism/X

“We were just wanting a smoothie and you literally looked at us and I asked you if everything was OK and you said ‘We don’t feel comfortable serving you’ because of my husband’s hoodie. That is discrimination,” Erika spat.

“Okay, well, have a great day,” the first employee said.

“That is illegal,” Erika tried to insist again.

“I said Trump discriminates [against] us,” another employee chimed in.

“Okay, well that has nothing to do with us getting a smoothie!” Erika guffawed.

Advertisement
Erika and Jake claimed they were being discriminated against. Leftism/X

“OK, well that’s who you support though, that’s who you love,” the first employee chided.

“What’s embarrassing is that we’re American citizens and I wanted to get a smoothie,” Erika huffed.

The second employee noted that they “have a right to refuse service” and directed the couple to the exit.

“You asked a question and [the other employee] gave you an answer. Have a great day. Have a great day. The door’s right there,” the second worker said.

The employees said they were “uncomfortable” serving the couple because Jake was wearing a piece of
Trump merchandise. Leftism/X

Erika threatened to call the police while storming out, but it’s unclear if she did.

Advertisement

In a separate video shared Monday, one of the workers joked that she might’ve “accidentally started a race war” and called on the public to help remove Erika’s video.

“I am a minor and she recorded me without my permission. The people in the comments are all white and they’re all being hella racist, guys, please help me get this video taken down,” she implored.

Smoothie King confirmed that the girls involved in the viral confrontation “are no longer with the business” as of Monday.

The girl posted her own video joking she might’ve “accidentally started a race war.” Leftism/X

“As a brand, Smoothie King is committed to ensuring our stores are a place free of discrimination of any kind, where every guest and team member is treated with care and respect,” the company wrote on X.

The owner of the Ann Arbor franchise location will also enforce “mandatory retraining for all employees that outlines our guest experience standards.”

Advertisement

In early December, a woman who worked at a Target in California was berated by a customer for wearing a Charlie Kirk “Freedom” T-shirt.

When the employee insisted she was allowed to wear the red shirt, the irate customer accused her of supporting “a racist.”

The medical center where the agitated customer worked was bombarded with upwards of 6,000 “profanity-laced” phone calls after online sleuths doxxed her personal information.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending