Connect with us

Movie Reviews

MOVIE REVIEW: I cried my eyes out in 'Mufasa: The Lion King' and scared the kids

Published

on

MOVIE REVIEW: I cried my eyes out in 'Mufasa: The Lion King' and scared the kids

The original ‘Lion King’ was the first film I ever saw in cinemas as a teeny child in the 90s, and it had a profound impact on me. 

The concept of the circle of life, the great kings of the past looking down and guiding us, that we all have our place in the world… it’s the closest I’ve ever gotten to having a religion.

It might make Mufasa my Jesus. Or would that be Simba? Either way, no offence intended. 

Mum tells me I used to run around as a four-year-old playing the character ‘Lion King’ – I hadn’t fully grasped the concept – and heartily sang ‘Hakuna Matata’ with the lyrics “it’s our problem-free…alosony…”

So it was a bit special to go and see ‘Mufasa’, the live-action prequel (and sequel?) to the OG ‘Lion King’ with my mum, as well as my nephew Ari and niece Ruby in tow. 

Advertisement

Although, I was apprehensive. I didn’t HATE the 2019 remake of ‘The Lion King’, but like many, I thought it was unnecessary. It was basically a shot-for-shot copy of the original with some new songs and fancy animation.

‘Mufasa’ promised to tell the origin story of the great king I grew up worshipping more than any Disney princess, and despite some serious flaws, I did love being told the tale.

Much like his son Simba, Mufasa’s early life is rocked by tragedy and heartbreak. I shed my first tear approximately 23 minutes in. Everyone’s favourite shaman monkey Rafiki recounts the story of Mufasa to his granddaughter (grandcub?) Kiara, along with Timon and Pumbaa, who occasionally chime in with comedic complaints about their minor roles in this movie. 

We already knew that Mufasa was set to be introduced as an orphaned cub, but watching that play out accompanied by the iconic notes of Hans Zimmer’s original Oscar-winning score sent me right back to my childhood and strapped me firmly back on the emotional rollercoaster of the first movie. 

I replayed Mufasa’s death scene in the 1994 version over and over on video tape, marvelling at the entirely new feelings those swelling orchestral crescendos made me feel as a child, trying to grapple with the idea of death, and worse – losing your parents.

Unfortunately, the rest of the music in ‘Mufasa’ didn’t prompt the same level of emotion. Hans Zimmer dropped out ahead of production, and while ‘Hamilton’ creator and ‘Moana’ songwriter Lin Manuel-Miranda is an exceptional talent, he just couldn’t compete with Elton John and Tim Rice’s epic bangers like ‘Can You Feel The Love Tonight?’ and ‘Circle of Life’. 

Advertisement

Perhaps the biggest let down was the new villain song, sung by an ‘outsider’ giant white lion named Kiros, who despite being genuinely quite scary, was restrained by a jokey, peppy Broadway number called ‘Bye Bye’. It didn’t have a whisker of the operatic, ominous energy of Scar’s ‘Be Prepared’, a battle cry worthy of one of the greatest cartoon bad guys ever. 

Still, the film did a good job of answering questions some 30 years in the making – were Scar and Mufasa enemies from birth? (No) How did Mufasa and Sarabi fall in love? (Cheesily, of course) How did Scar get the injury that gave him his name? (You see it coming, but it’s still satisfying as hell). 

One particularly earth-shaking moment saw me and my 10-year-old nephew turn to each other and simultaneously yell ‘Pride Rock!’ as the familiar scenery of the original story started to come together, and my heart could have burst. 

This film had huge paw prints to fill, and I’m not sure it ever truly could have – especially not for a devotee like me – but it worked its way towards an ending that at least paid spectacular homage to the themes of the original. The last half hour left me an absolute blubbering mess, with my niece and nephew shooting me alarmed looks when they could tear their eyes away from the film’s climax. 

As Rafiki finished up his epic tale, Kiara mourned the grandfather she never knew, saying she “didn’t want him to go” after seeing a vision of him in the clouds so vivid she felt like he was there – just like Simba once did. 

Advertisement

I’ve felt the same hearing stories about my grandfather, who I also never met. Mum still gets visits from her late dad in her dreams, incredibly exhilarating and bittersweet. 

Of course, Rafiki would say none of these heroes of our past ever really leave us – and the magic of these universal, deeply relatable themes from ‘The Lion King’ still shines through by the end of ‘Mufasa’. 

The kids should go for the majestic creatures, close calls, comedic asides and vibrant visuals, but the grown ups should go for the kid they once were.

‘Mufasa: The Lion King’ hits cinemas Thursday 19th December.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA

Published

on

Movie Review – SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA
SHAKA: A STORY OF ALOHA is shared with the audience by investigator Steve Sue in a calm and charming manner, but this documentary tells a powerful, positive and fascinating story. The “hang loose” thumb, pinky sign that originated in Hawaii and carries many meanings is the focus of this film. I just learned this gesture is called a “Shaka” and has a worldwide impact.  And, there are Shaka Contests.  Who knew? And how do you throw a Shaka? For me, […]
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “I Was a Stranger” and You Welcomed Me

Published

on

Movie Review: “I Was a Stranger” and You Welcomed Me

Just when you think that you’ve seen and heard all sides of the human migration debate, and long after you fear that the cruel, the ignorant and the scapegoaters have won that shouting match, a film comes along and defies ignorance and prejudice by both embracing and upending the conventional “immigrant” narrative.

“I Was a Strranger” is the first great film of 2026. It’s cleverly written, carefully crafted and beautifully-acted with characters who humanize many facets of the “migration” and “illegal immigration” debate. The debut feature of writer-director Brandt Andersen, “Stranger” is emotional and logical, blunt and heroic. It challenges viewers to rethink their preconceptions and prejudices and the very definition of “heroic.”

The fact that this film — which takes its title from the Book of Matthew, chapter 25, verse 35 — is from the same faith-based film distributor that made millions by feeding the discredited human trafficking wish fulfillment fantasy “Sound of Freedom” to an eager conservative Christian audience makes this film something of a minor miracle in its own right.

But as Angel Studios has also urged churchgoers not just to animated Nativity stories (“The King of Kings”) and “David” musicals, but Christian resistence to fascism (“Truth & Treason” and “Bonheoffer”) , their atonement is almost complete.

Andersen deftly weaves five compact but saga-sized stories about immigrants escaping from civil-war-torn Syria into a sort of interwoven, overlapping “Babel” or “Crash” about migration.

Advertisement

“The Doctor” is about a Chicago hospital employee (Yasmine Al Massri of “Palestine 36” and TV’s “Quantico”) whose flashback takes us to the hospital in Aleppo, Syria, bombed and terrorized by the Assad regime’s forces, and what she and her tween daughter (Massa Daoud) went through to escape — from literally crawling out of a bombed building to dodging death at the border to the harrowing small boat voyage from Turkey to Greece.

“The Soldier” follows loyal Assad trooper Mustafa (Yahya Mahayni was John the Baptist in Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints”) through his murderous work in Aleppo, and the crisis of conscience that finally hits him as he sees the cruel and repressive regime he works for at its most desperate.

“The Smuggler” is Marwan, a refugee-camp savvy African — played by the terrific French actor Omar Sy of “The Intouchables” and “The Book of Clarence” — who cynically makes his money buying disposable inflatable boats, disposable outboards and not-enough-life-jackets in Turkey to smuggle refugees to Greece.

“The Poet” (Ziad Bakri of “Screwdriver”) just wants to get his Syrian family of five out of Turkey and into Europe on Marwan’s boat.

And “The Captain” (Constantine Markoulakis of “The Telemachy”) commands a Hellenic Coast Guard vessel, a man haunted by the harrowing rescues he must carry out daily and visions of the bodies of those he doesn’t.

Advertisement

Andersen, a Tampa native who made his mark producing Tom Cruise spectacles (“American Made”), Mel Gibson B-movies (“Panama”) and the occasional “Everest” blockbuster, expands his short film “Refugee” to feature length for “I Was a Stranger.” He doesn’t so much alter the formula or reinvent this genre of film as find points of view that we seldom see that force us to reconsider what we believe through their eyes.

Sy’s Smuggler has a sickly little boy that he longs to take to Chicago. He runs his ill-gotten-gains operation, profiting off human misery, to realize that dream. We see glimpses of what might be compassion, but also bullying “customers” and his new North African assistant (Ayman Samman). Keeping up the hard front he shows one and all, we see him callously buy life jackets in the bazaar — never enough for every customer to have one in any given voyage.

The Captain sits for dinner with family and friends and has to listen to Greek prejudices and complaints about this human life and human rights crisis, which is how the worlds sees Greece reacting to this “invasion.” But as he and his first mate recount lives saved and the horrors of lives lost, that quibbling is silenced.

Here and there we see and hear (in Arabic and Greek with subtitles, and English) little moments of “rising above” human pettiness and cruelty and the simple blessings of kindness.

Advertisement

“I Was a Stranger” was finished in 2024 and arrives in cinemas at one of the bleakest moments in recent history. Cruelty is running amok, unchecked and unpunished. Countries are being destabilized, with the fans of alleged “strong man” rule cheering it on.

Andersen carefully avoids politics — Middle Eastern, Israeli, European and American — save for the opening scene’s zoom in on that Chicago hospital, passing a gaudily named “Trump” hotel in the process, and a general condemnation of Syria’s Assad mob family regime.

But Andersen’s bold movie, with its message so against the grain of current events, compromised media coverage and the mostly conservative audience that has become this film distributor’s base, plays like a wet slap back to reality.

And as any revival preacher will tell you, putting a positive message out there in front of millions is the only way to convert hundreds among the millions who have lost their way.

star

Rating: PG-13, violence, smoking, racial slurs

Cast: Yasmine Al Massri, Yahya Mahayni, Ziad Bakri, Omar Sy, Ayman Samman, Massa Daoud, Jason Beghe and Constantine Markoulakis

Advertisement

Credits: Scripted and directed by Brandt Andersen. An Angel Studios release.

Running time: 1:43

Unknown's avatar

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘The Tank’ Review: A War Film More Abstract Than Brutal (Prime Video) – Micropsia

Published

on

‘The Tank’ Review: A War Film More Abstract Than Brutal (Prime Video) – Micropsia

The Tiger Is the Tank. Or rather, the type of German tank that gives the film its international title—just in case anyone might confuse this war story with an adventure movie involving wild animals. The tank itself is the film’s container, much as The Boat was in the legendary 1981 film it openly seeks to emulate in more than one respect, or as the more recent tank was in the Israeli film Lebanon (2009). Yes, much of Dennis Gansel’s movie unfolds inside a tank called Tiger, but what it is ultimately trying to tell goes well beyond its cramped metal walls.

This large-scale Prime Video war production has been described by many as the platform’s answer to Netflix’s success with All Quiet on the Western Front, the highly decorated German film released in 2022. In practice, it is a very different proposition. Despite the fanfare surrounding its release—Amazon even gave it a theatrical run a few months ago, something it rarely does—the film made a far more modest impact. Watching it, the reasons become clear. This is a darker, stranger movie, one that flirts as much with horror as with monotony, and that positions itself less as a traditional war film than as an ethical and philosophical meditation on warfare.

The first section—an intense and technically impressive combat sequence—takes place during what would later be known as the Battle of the Dnieper, which unfolded over several months in 1943 on the Eastern Front, as Soviet forces pushed back the Nazi advance. Der Tiger is the type of tank carrying a compact platoon—played by David Schütter, Laurence Rupp, Leonard Kunz, Sebastian Urzendowsky, and Yoran Leicher—that miraculously survives the aerial destruction of a bridge over the river.

Soon afterward—or so it seems—the group is assigned a mission that, at least in its initial setup, recalls Saving Private Ryan. Lieutenant Gerkens (Schütter) is ordered to rescue Colonel Von Harnenburg, stranded behind enemy lines. From there, the film becomes a journey through an infernal landscape of ruined cities, corpses, forests, and fog—a setting that, thanks to the way it is shot, feels more fantastical than realistic.

That choice is no accident. As the journey begins to echo Apocalypse Now, it becomes clear that the film is less interested in conventional suspense—mines on the road, the threat of ambush—than in the strangeness of its situations and environments. When the tank plunges into the water and briefly operates like a submarine, one may reasonably wonder whether such technology actually existed in the 1940s, or whether the film has deliberately drifted into a more extravagant, symbolic territory.

This is the kind of film whose ending is likely to inspire more frustration than affection. Though heavily foreshadowed, it is the sort of conclusion that tends to irritate audiences: cryptic, somewhat open-ended, and more suggestive than explicit. That makes sense, given that the film is less concerned with depicting the daily mechanics of war than with grappling with its aftermath—ethical, moral, psychological, and physical.

Advertisement

In its own way, The Tank functions as a kind of mea culpa. The platoon becomes a microcosm of a nation that “followed orders” and committed—or allowed to be committed—horrific acts in its name. The flashbacks scattered throughout the film make this point unmistakably clear. The problem is that, while these ideas may sound compelling when summarized in a few sentences (or in a review), the film never manages to turn them into something fully alive—narratively, visually, or dramatically.

Only in brief moments—largely thanks to Gerkens’s perpetually worried, anguished expression—do those ideas achieve genuine cinematic weight. They are not enough, however, to sustain a two-hour runtime that increasingly feels repetitive and inert. Unlike the films by Steven Spielberg, Wolfgang Petersen, Francis Ford Coppola, and others it so clearly references, The Tank remains closer to a concept than to a drama, more an intriguing reflection than a truly effective film.


Continue Reading

Trending