Connect with us

Crypto

New York judge allows Greenidge cryptocurrency mining to continue in Finger Lakes

Published

on

New York judge allows Greenidge cryptocurrency mining to continue in Finger Lakes

The cryptocurrency company Greenidge Generation has been allowed to continue to operate its power plant in Yates County for the time being, after a judge ruled Thursday that the Department of Environmental Conservation did not justify its final denial of the company’s permit application.

Greenidge burns fossil fuels at the plant, which sends energy to New York’s grid and powers machines that generate bitcoin. That process puts greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere, which contribute to climate change.

Earlier this year, the DEC upheld its previous decision to deny the company’s request to renew its permit to operate the power plant. The department said the plant’s operations were inconsistent with the state’s climate law, which requires New York to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030.

The company sued the state over that denial, arguing that the the DEC overreached in how it applied the climate law.

On Thursday, New York Supreme Court Judge Vincent Dinolfo ruled that the DEC does have the authority to deny a permit under the climate law, but the department’s justification in its final denial in this case was insufficient.

Advertisement

Dinolfo ordered that the DEC’s decision to deny Greenidge’s permit application be annulled and remitted the case to the department, meaning that a lower administrative court must provide more justification of how the plant’s operations are inconsistent with the climate law.

In the meantime, Greenidge is permitted to continue to operate the power plant. In a statement Thursday, the company celebrated the ruling.

“The ruling ensures our facility will continue operating and our local employees will not have their careers ripped away,” read the statement.

Greenidge also alleged that the DEC’s initial denial was “politically motivated.” The company has been fighting with the DEC for years over its permit.

“The damage caused to our company and employees by the recklessness of the DEC and all those who lied about our operation is real,” the statement continued. “Today the Court set the record straight – we were right, and the state and its allies were wrong.”

Advertisement

A DEC spokesperson said that the decision confirmed the department’s authority to deny permits if an application does not meet the requirements of the climate law.

“As the matter was remanded back to DEC for further administrative proceedings, DEC cannot comment further on pending litigation,” the spokesperson said.

Environmental stakes

In his ruling, Dinolfo noted that the DEC can refuse to renew a permit based on climate impacts — but it must adequately justify its decision based on the climate law.

Environmental advocates say for that reason, the ruling underscores the power of the state’s climate law.

Advertisement

“The judge confirmed what we knew: that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has the authority to deny air permits — including renewal air permits — under the [climate law],” said Mandy DeRoche, an attorney with Earthjustice who is representing environmental groups involved in the case. “New York now can be confident that it can make decisions to protect our climate, the health and well-being of all New Yorkers.”

However, DeRoche noted that environmental groups are disappointed that Greenidge is allowed to continue to operate as the legal proceedings continue.

“It’s a big loophole,” said DeRoche. “You can get your air permit denied or modified, and then you can continue to operate and pollute like you were before, just because you have the deep pockets and the funds to continue litigating.”

The ruling requires an administrative court to now reconsider Greenidge’s permit renewal application and to provide justification for the claim that the plant’s operations would be inconsistent with the state climate law. Then, the case will likely return to the state Supreme Court.

That process is expected to take months — a timeline that concerns other local environmental advocates.

Advertisement

“For years, Greenidge has been polluting local air and spewing climate-warming greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere,” said Yvonne Taylor, vice president of Seneca Lake Guardian, one of the groups involved in the case. “It’s absurd that Greenidge is still operating, and we will keep fighting until the facility is shut down.”

The state had initially ordered Greenidge to shut down the power plant by Sept. 9.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Arthur Hayes Outlines Conditional Bitcoin Bull Case Tied to Fed Balance Sheet

Published

on

Arthur Hayes Outlines Conditional Bitcoin Bull Case Tied to Fed Balance Sheet
Bitcoin’s next major move hinges on central bank balance sheets, with Arthur Hayes arguing that liquidity expansion, currency stress and bond market distortions could mechanically lift crypto prices regardless of short-term sentiment.
Continue Reading

Crypto

Exclusive: White House set to meet with banks, crypto companies to broker legislation compromise

Published

on

Exclusive: White House set to meet with banks, crypto companies to broker legislation compromise

Jan 28 (Reuters) – The White House on Monday will meet with executives from the banking and cryptocurrency industries to discuss a path forward for landmark crypto legislation which has stalled due to ​a clash between the two powerful sectors, said three industry sources.

The summit hosted by the White House’s crypto council ‌will include executives from several trade groups. It will focus on how the bill treats interest and other rewards crypto firms can dish out on customer holdings of dollar-pegged tokens known as stablecoins, the people said.

Sign up here.

The White House meeting could help the industries, which have been fighting head-to-head over the bill, reach a compromise, and underscores how keen President Donald Trump’s administration is to get the legislation across the line. Trump courted crypto ‌cash on the campaign trail, promising to promote the adoption of crypto assets.

Reuters was first to report ​the meeting.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The sources declined to be identified discussing private policy discussions.

Advertisement
Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association which represents crypto giants including Coinbase (COIN.O), opens new tab, Ripple and Kraken, said in a statement the group ‍is “proud to participate in next week’s meeting.”

“We look forward to continuing to work with policymakers across the aisle so Congress can advance lasting market structure legislation and ensure the United States remains the crypto capital of the world,” she said.

Cody Carbone, CEO of The Digital Chamber, another major crypto trade group, credited ⁠the White House with “pulling all sides to the negotiating table.”

The Senate has for months been working on the bill, dubbed the Clarity ‍Act, which aims to create federal rules for digital assets, the culmination of years of crypto industry lobbying. Crypto companies have long argued that existing ‌rules are ‌inadequate for digital assets, and that legislation is essential for companies to continue to operate with legal certainty in the U.S.

The House of Representatives passed its version of the bill in July.

The Senate Banking Committee was scheduled earlier this month to debate and vote on the bill, but the meeting was postponed at the last minute, in part due to concerns among lawmakers and both industries over the interest ⁠issue.

Advertisement
There were also disagreements among Republicans ⁠about the bill’s stablecoin provisions, ​according to two other people with knowledge of the discussions, and senators leading the effort bill were concerned that it would not get enough votes to advance.

Crypto companies say providing rewards such as interest is crucial for recruiting new customers and that barring them from doing so would be anti-competitive. ‍Banks say the increased competition could result in insured lenders experiencing an exodus of deposits — the primary source of funding for ⁠most banks — potentially threatening ⁠financial stability.

A report from Standard Chartered on Tuesday estimated that stablecoins could pull around $500 billion in deposits out of U.S. banks by the end of 2028.
The provision at issue stems from ​a law passed last year which created a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, potentially paving ‍the way for greater stablecoin adoption.

That bill prohibited stablecoin issuers from paying interest ‌on ‌cryptocurrencies, but banks say it left open a loophole that would allow for third parties – such ​as crypto exchanges – to pay yield on tokens, creating new competition for deposits.

Reporting by Hannah Lang in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Continue Reading

Crypto

XRP Positions as Institutional Rail While RLUSD Enters Real-World Finance

Published

on

XRP Positions as Institutional Rail While RLUSD Enters Real-World Finance
XRP is cementing its role in live institutional payment infrastructure as Ripple’s RLUSD anchors regulated stablecoin settlement, signaling blockchain rails are now trusted, production-grade systems for global liquidity, cross-border payments, and high-value financial flows.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending