Crypto
New York judge allows Greenidge cryptocurrency mining to continue in Finger Lakes
The cryptocurrency company Greenidge Generation has been allowed to continue to operate its power plant in Yates County for the time being, after a judge ruled Thursday that the Department of Environmental Conservation did not justify its final denial of the company’s permit application.
Greenidge burns fossil fuels at the plant, which sends energy to New York’s grid and powers machines that generate bitcoin. That process puts greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere, which contribute to climate change.
Earlier this year, the DEC upheld its previous decision to deny the company’s request to renew its permit to operate the power plant. The department said the plant’s operations were inconsistent with the state’s climate law, which requires New York to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030.
The company sued the state over that denial, arguing that the the DEC overreached in how it applied the climate law.
On Thursday, New York Supreme Court Judge Vincent Dinolfo ruled that the DEC does have the authority to deny a permit under the climate law, but the department’s justification in its final denial in this case was insufficient.
Dinolfo ordered that the DEC’s decision to deny Greenidge’s permit application be annulled and remitted the case to the department, meaning that a lower administrative court must provide more justification of how the plant’s operations are inconsistent with the climate law.
In the meantime, Greenidge is permitted to continue to operate the power plant. In a statement Thursday, the company celebrated the ruling.
“The ruling ensures our facility will continue operating and our local employees will not have their careers ripped away,” read the statement.
Greenidge also alleged that the DEC’s initial denial was “politically motivated.” The company has been fighting with the DEC for years over its permit.
“The damage caused to our company and employees by the recklessness of the DEC and all those who lied about our operation is real,” the statement continued. “Today the Court set the record straight – we were right, and the state and its allies were wrong.”
A DEC spokesperson said that the decision confirmed the department’s authority to deny permits if an application does not meet the requirements of the climate law.
“As the matter was remanded back to DEC for further administrative proceedings, DEC cannot comment further on pending litigation,” the spokesperson said.
Environmental stakes
In his ruling, Dinolfo noted that the DEC can refuse to renew a permit based on climate impacts — but it must adequately justify its decision based on the climate law.
Environmental advocates say for that reason, the ruling underscores the power of the state’s climate law.
“The judge confirmed what we knew: that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has the authority to deny air permits — including renewal air permits — under the [climate law],” said Mandy DeRoche, an attorney with Earthjustice who is representing environmental groups involved in the case. “New York now can be confident that it can make decisions to protect our climate, the health and well-being of all New Yorkers.”
However, DeRoche noted that environmental groups are disappointed that Greenidge is allowed to continue to operate as the legal proceedings continue.
“It’s a big loophole,” said DeRoche. “You can get your air permit denied or modified, and then you can continue to operate and pollute like you were before, just because you have the deep pockets and the funds to continue litigating.”
The ruling requires an administrative court to now reconsider Greenidge’s permit renewal application and to provide justification for the claim that the plant’s operations would be inconsistent with the state climate law. Then, the case will likely return to the state Supreme Court.
That process is expected to take months — a timeline that concerns other local environmental advocates.
“For years, Greenidge has been polluting local air and spewing climate-warming greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere,” said Yvonne Taylor, vice president of Seneca Lake Guardian, one of the groups involved in the case. “It’s absurd that Greenidge is still operating, and we will keep fighting until the facility is shut down.”
The state had initially ordered Greenidge to shut down the power plant by Sept. 9.
Crypto
Arthur Hayes Outlines Conditional Bitcoin Bull Case Tied to Fed Balance Sheet
Crypto
Exclusive: White House set to meet with banks, crypto companies to broker legislation compromise
Jan 28 (Reuters) – The White House on Monday will meet with executives from the banking and cryptocurrency industries to discuss a path forward for landmark crypto legislation which has stalled due to a clash between the two powerful sectors, said three industry sources.
The summit hosted by the White House’s crypto council will include executives from several trade groups. It will focus on how the bill treats interest and other rewards crypto firms can dish out on customer holdings of dollar-pegged tokens known as stablecoins, the people said.
Sign up here.
Reuters was first to report the meeting.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The sources declined to be identified discussing private policy discussions.
“We look forward to continuing to work with policymakers across the aisle so Congress can advance lasting market structure legislation and ensure the United States remains the crypto capital of the world,” she said.
Cody Carbone, CEO of The Digital Chamber, another major crypto trade group, credited the White House with “pulling all sides to the negotiating table.”
The Senate has for months been working on the bill, dubbed the Clarity Act, which aims to create federal rules for digital assets, the culmination of years of crypto industry lobbying. Crypto companies have long argued that existing rules are inadequate for digital assets, and that legislation is essential for companies to continue to operate with legal certainty in the U.S.
The House of Representatives passed its version of the bill in July.
The Senate Banking Committee was scheduled earlier this month to debate and vote on the bill, but the meeting was postponed at the last minute, in part due to concerns among lawmakers and both industries over the interest issue.
Crypto companies say providing rewards such as interest is crucial for recruiting new customers and that barring them from doing so would be anti-competitive. Banks say the increased competition could result in insured lenders experiencing an exodus of deposits — the primary source of funding for most banks — potentially threatening financial stability.
That bill prohibited stablecoin issuers from paying interest on cryptocurrencies, but banks say it left open a loophole that would allow for third parties – such as crypto exchanges – to pay yield on tokens, creating new competition for deposits.
Reporting by Hannah Lang in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Crypto
XRP Positions as Institutional Rail While RLUSD Enters Real-World Finance
-
Illinois1 week agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Pennsylvania3 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Sports1 week agoMiami star throws punch at Indiana player after national championship loss
-
Science1 week agoContributor: New food pyramid is a recipe for health disasters
-
Technology1 week agoRing claims it’s not giving ICE access to its cameras
-
Science1 week agoFed up with perimenopause or menopause? The We Do Not Care Club is here for you
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: In ‘Mercy,’ Chris Pratt is on trial with an artificial intelligence judge
-
Politics4 days agoTrump’s playbook falters in crisis response to Minneapolis shooting