Connect with us

Crypto

Here Is an Allegedly Comprehensive Map of Mr Beast's Crypto Wallets

Published

on

Here Is an Allegedly Comprehensive Map of Mr Beast's Crypto Wallets

A group of crypto sleuths have released a map of Mr Beast’s alleged crypto wallets. The investigators claim that the YouTuber is connected to 50 cryptocurrency wallets and has made around $23 million from them using a series of shady techniques including pump-and-dump schemes.

It’s been a bad few weeks for Mr Beast, real name Jimmy Donaldson. The YouTube star is battling a series of scandals, including accusations of selling moldy cheese to children, company group chats allegedly sent to the FBI, and an ongoing lawsuit filed by contestants of his upcoming Amazon show. There’s a distinct anti-Mr Beast mood in the air in some circles of the internet and the investigation into his crypto wallets is just the latest salvo.

The team that mapped Mr Beast’s crypto wallets is Kasper Vandeloock, SomaXBT, hxnterson, angelfacepeanut, and rfparson. They published the investigation on a new website that describes itself as a “work in progress” that “prioritized pushing out the Mr Beast article.”

Vandeloock and the others are known quantities in the crypto world and the investigation appears to be a thorough deep-dive into Donaldson’s crypto finances. “Their findings suggest a long history of insider trading, misleading investors, and using his influence to promote tokens, only to later dump them on the markets,” the investigation said. “This document delves into the various tokens associated with these allegations and the insider trading claims, starting with identifying the wallets tied to MrBeast.”

The investigation is both compelling and impenetrable. For readers who aren’t already well-versed in the ins and outs of crypto, it will be hard to parse. At first blush, it appears that Vandeloock and the others have the goods here. They’ve mapped out a complex web of connections between known Mr Beast wallets and other crypto assets on the blockchain.

Advertisement

There are pictures of Donaldson partying with crypto entrepreneurs, big splashy public advertisements of him announcing his association with various crypto schemes, and screenshots of tweets, text messages, and DMs that show Donaldson interacting with crypto folks. The investigation is a mess of charts, graphs, and long strings of numbers. It requires a working knowledge of cryptocurrency to decipher.

According to the investigation, Mr Beast repeatedly invested large amounts of cash into cryptocurrency projects during their pre-sale period and got massive returns. Crypto is a hard business to make money in and the investigation pointed out that Donaldson wins more than he loses, especially for someone who isn’t doing it full time.

The claim is that Donaldson had relationships with the founders of various up-and-coming crypto projects. The investigation tracks those connections and shows how Donaldson-connected wallets invested big in various crypto schemes he backed.

“With Mr Beast’s track record of consistently hitting large returns whilst being a full-time content creator and owning various businesses, there is an extremely high likelihood that his success in cryptocurrency investing is not the result of sharp trading intuition but just knowing insider information, particularly related to upcoming brand deals and partnerships within his network, including figures like KSI, GaryVee, and LazarBeam,” it said.

It’s possible that this complicated nest of crypto wallets and transactions is, in fact, masking some kind of fraud. Donaldson is a man who told TIME that he doesn’t consider himself rich and that his mother handles all the money. “I don’t have access to any of my bank accounts,” he told the magazine in February. “I have a CFO and everything, but [Parisher’s] the one who has access to the master bank account.”

Advertisement

But if there’s a smoking gun in this crypto investigation, it’s only being seen by people with eyes for crypto. It may be that Donaldson’s “aw-shucks” attitude and presentation as a North Carolina boy done good is masking a sinister crypto empire. But it’ll require someone more skilled in crypto scam forensics (like the SEC) to decipher it.

Donaldson has other problems to contend with. In September, five contestants on his forthcoming Amazon show sued him. Beast Games, as the show is called, is a riff on Squid Games and puts contestants through a variety of grueling challenges with the promise of winning $5 million. The lawsuit alleged that Donaldson’s team subjected the contestants to chronic mistreatment and sexual harassment.

Earlier this year Donaldson teamed with Logan Paul and KSI to launch Lunchly, a Lunchable-style snack. As the food hit store shelves, people online began to post videos of them finding moldy cheese inside. YouTube baking star Rosanna Pansino, who has a long-running beef with Mr Beast, published a video earlier this month of her opening up a moldy Lunchly and it supercharged the allegations. The FDA told TMZ that it had received 10 complaints about mold in Lunchlies.

On October 27, Pansino also claimed she’d contacted the FBI regarding Mr Beast. Center to Pansino’s new claim is a Telegram channel she alleges is a Mr Beast company workchat. Pansino published a seven-minute video on X that scrolls through the chat, highlighting the off-color memes and jokes shared between the participants.

Mr Beast did not respond to Gizmodo’s request for a comment.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Bitcoin drops to $63,000 as U.S. and Israel launch strikes on Iran

Published

on

Bitcoin drops to ,000 as U.S. and Israel launch strikes on Iran

Bitcoin briefly reclaimed $65,000 before pulling back to $64,700 as the Iran conflict continued to escalate through Saturday.

Iranian state media reported at least 70 killed in its Hormozgan province, per Aljazeera, including a strike on an elementary school. Israel activated air raid alerts after detecting fresh missile launches from Iran.

Trump told the Washington Post that “all I want is freedom for the people.” NATO said it was “closely following” developments, China urged an immediate ceasefire, and Turkey offered to mediate.

Bitcoin’s inability to hold $65,000 on the bounce suggests sellers remain in control, but the relative stability given the severity of the headlines points to thin weekend order books rather than active selling pressure.

Headline risks persist for BTC traders as the U.S. day progresses.

Advertisement

What happened earlier

Earlier in the day, BTC neared $63,000 in Saturday trading after the U.S. and Israel launched military strikes on Iran, pushing the largest cryptocurrency down roughly 3% in a matter of hours and extending what had already been a difficult weekend for risk assets.
The move brought bitcoin to its lowest level since the Feb. 5 crash, when the token briefly dipped below $60,000.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared an immediate state of emergency across all areas of Israel. A U.S. official confirmed American participation in the strikes, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The sell-off follows a well-established pattern. Bitcoin trades 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, while equity and bond markets are closed on weekends.

That makes it one of the only large, liquid assets available for traders to sell when geopolitical risk spikes outside of traditional market hours.

The result is that bitcoin often acts as a pressure valve for broader risk-off sentiment during weekend events, absorbing selling that would otherwise spread across equities, commodities, and currencies if those markets were open.

Advertisement

The attack risks a wider regional conflict in one of the most economically sensitive parts of the world, following a month-long U.S. military buildup and failed negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With $5,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With ,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Both Ethereum (ETH 6.03%) and XRP (XRP 3.76%) are tried-and-tested blockchains which have survived (and sometimes thrived) for years on end. That means they’re both sturdy enough to be candidates for a big investment, like $5,000, and for holding over the very long term, or even forever.

So which of these two leading coins is the better option for a forever hold?

Image source: Getty Images.

Ethereum has more ways to grow

Forever is a long time, especially for an investment in an emerging sector like crypto. Therefore, an asset’s optionality regarding where it can derive growth is a key factor, as today’s growth drivers might peter out and new ones are likely to emerge.

On that front, Ethereum has plenty of options. It already hosts a large decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem worth more than $53 billion today, powered by a massive stablecoin base of $159 billion. That existing base of capital is a strategic asset because it gives developers and financial institutions a reason to build new products right where liquidity already lives. It also gives investors exposure to many possible growth lanes at once, from the onboarding of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) to the development of new settlement rails for payments between AI agents.

Advertisement
Ethereum Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-6.03%) $-123.58

Current Price

$1924.97

Another advantage is that Ethereum has a track record of consistently shipping large protocol upgrades. The Pectra upgrade, for example, landed on the mainnet in May 2025, followed by the Fusaka upgrade in December. Two similarly large feature packages are expected for 2026, and they should help to build the chain’s ability to scale up without spiking transaction costs.

If you plan to hold an asset indefinitely, this network’s culture of iterative improvement reduces the risk that its technical capabilities will become irrelevant as emerging opportunities for growth arise. Its habit of attracting and retaining substantial capital also helps prevent that outcome.

XRP has to keep winning specific fights over time

XRP is not a bad crypto asset by any means, but its long-term burden is its far narrower positioning than Ethereum.

Ripple, the coin’s issuer, built the XRP Ledger (XRPL) ecosystem as a toolkit of financial technologies to support specific workflows in institutional finance, especially cross-border payments and money transfers, and, more recently, the management of tokenized asset capital. The coin’s value is thus derived from the utility of its ledger.

Advertisement

That focus could pay off if the financial companies the chain targets like what it’s offering, but it also concentrates risk. Financial institutions move cautiously, and winning them over is a slow, grinding process of catering to their needs and building strong relationships. Their technology adoption process can stall for years, even when the product works, and decision-makers broadly want to adopt the new tech.

To Ripple’s credit, the XRP Ledger includes plenty of features that match institutional requirements and seek to minimize their potential pain points. The network’s authorized trust lines, for instance, let tokenized asset issuers whitelist who can hold their issued tokens, which is a feature that supports regulatory constraints around who can legally custody an asset. Similarly, the ledger supports freezing tokens when suspicious activity appears, which is a control that traditional finance teams tend to expect in regulated asset workflows.

XRP Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-3.76%) $-0.05

Current Price

$1.35

Advertisement

But holding a coin forever is unforgiving of sustained competitive pressure, which XRP doubtlessly faces. Its competitors include fintech companies and other cryptocurrencies, not to mention the internal tech development capabilities of many of its target users in big banks. So it’ll need to continuously one up the other players in its space if it’s going to grow over the long term, and it’s hard to believe that it’ll win every round that counts.

The verdict

The decision here is about resilience and resources.

Advertisement

Ethereum’s “grizzled veteran” reputation today stems from surviving numerous shifts in user demand patterns while maintaining a large on-chain capital pool and growing it all the while. Its success or failure in any given crypto market segment is not guaranteed, nor was it in the past, but its constant evolution has ensured that failures are not fatal, and also that missed opportunities aren’t very damaging overall.

XRP, on the other hand, is only just starting to scale up its on-chain capital base; it has only $418 million in stablecoins. Furthermore, while it has succeeded in attracting some financial institutions to its chain, the truth is that its growth trajectory has not yet been seriously tested, and is still finding an appropriate product-market fit. Its real competitive challenges have only just begun.

So if you want a coin to buy with $5,000 and hold forever, pick the asset that can win without needing to be perfect: Ethereum. XRP is still a decent long-term hold, assuming it’s part of a diversified crypto portfolio, but it’s riskier.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Published

on

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota

Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.

There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.

Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.

Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.

Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.

Advertisement

Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users

Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.

Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.

Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.

Lawmakers weighing next steps

Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.

Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.

Advertisement

The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.

In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.

As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.

10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending