World
EU Ombudsman blasts Commission over chemicals safety
Many highly dangerous substances have remained on the market, sometimes for years, while the EU executive flouts legal deadlines on authorisation decisions, the Ombudsman has found, warning of a ‘threat to health and environment’.
Systematic delays to decisions on the authorisation of dangerous chemicals amount to “maladministration” by the European Commission and the practice is putting people and ecosystems at risk, the EU Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly has found.
The Commission is required by law to table a draft decision within three months of a request for a permit to continue using a banned substance – possible in cases where a producer or manufacturer can demonstrate that risks can be minimized and there is no viable alternative.
But the results of an investigation launched last year on O’Reilly’s initiative and made public today show the EU executive takes over 14 months on average to take such decisions, and sometimes several years.
‘Threat to health’
“These delays represent a threat to human health and the environment as companies are able to continue using the chemical substances, which may be carcinogenic, mutagenic, toxic for reproduction, or have endocrine disrupting properties, during the authorisation process,” her office said in a statement.
The findings came as no surprise to environmental campaigners, who have complained for years about the glacial pace of the EU chemicals restriction process.
For the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), an NGO umbrella group, the probe clearly shows that “EU officials broke the law by delaying bans on dangerous chemicals over the course of nearly two decades”.
But the Commission has blamed delays on the complicated process set out under the EU’s main chemicals regulation, known as REACH.
In a publicly available response to the Ombudsman’s initial request, the Commission said in August that it “in principle avoids proceeding to votes [on the decisions] if there is no reassurance of sufficient support” from the EU’s 27 member states, represented in a committee of government delegates that meets behind closed doors in Brussels.
Another excuse given was the “limited availability of suitable meeting rooms at Commission premises”.
For Tatiana Santos, a chemicals specialist at the EEB, the Commission should not be swayed by political considerations. “What we are talking about here is really the Commission’s failure to even draft a proposal to put to the vote,” she told Euronews.
“One of the arguments they use is that they have internal political discussions within the Commission,” Santos said. “And what we claim is, you don’t have to do that because the political discussions should take place in the REACH Committee, not in the Commission.”
The Ombudsman also criticised the secrecy surrounding the committee, concluding that the Commission’s lack of transparency also constituted maladministration. Public records of the meetings contain scant information on the reasons for delays or the positions of individual governments, O’Reilly found.
‘Reckless’
Hélène Duguy of the legal charity ClientEarth, said the findings suggest a “reckless” attitude towards chemicals regulation. “This unacceptable behaviour undermines the rule of law and people’s trust in EU institutions,” she said. “It’s now time that EU officials pay heed to the Ombudsman’s recommendations and prioritise public interest over the profits of toxic companies.”
The EU executive said it had “taken note” of the Ombudsman’s criticism. “Some of these procedures for adopting these decisions are quite complex,” a spokesperson told reporters in Brussels. “Some of the timelines are not within the control of the Commission.”
The Commission has three months to respond in detail, but was “willing to examine how our internal procedures can be improved”, the spokesperson said. President Ursula von der Leyen had pledged to “simplify” regulations during her second term, having been criticised for shelving a planned revision of the REACH regulation during her first.
Environmentalists are concerned more broadly that the Green Deal agenda of von der Leyen’s first term will be replaced with a sharper focus on industrial competitiveness in her second, with environmental standards allowed to slip.
Commissioner designate for environment Jessika Roswall is tasked with overseeing chemicals policy reform, and is likely to face a tough parliamentary hearing on 5 November.
Green MEP Jutta Paulus told Euronews she expects Roswall and Frenchman Stéphane Séjourné, who is in line for the industrial portfolio, to demonstrate a commitment to maintaining health and environmental standards.
“They should give assurances that the simplification of REACH will not undermine this protection, but rather accelerate the regulation of hazardous and whole groups of substances,” Paulus said.
World
A pardon for a price? How Donald Trump has reimagined presidential clemency
Limits to pardon powers
But there are limits to presidential clemency, and already, Trump has brushed against them.
In December, Trump announced that he would pardon Tina Peters, a former county clerk in Colorado who supported Trump’s false claims of voter fraud during the 2020 election.
Peters, however, was also convicted of state-level crimes, after she used her office to allow an unauthorised person to access her county’s election software.
A president may only pardon federal charges, not state ones. Peters continues to serve a nine-year prison sentence. Still, Trump has sought to pressure Colorado officials to release her.
“She did nothing wrong,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!”
While Trump has argued that presidents have the “complete power to pardon”, legal experts have repeatedly affirmed that clemency is not without bounds.
Pardons, for example, cannot be used to avoid impeachment or to undercut the Constitution, nor can they be used to absolve future crimes.
Still, the question remains how to enforce those limits — and whether new bulwarks should be created to prevent abuse.
Love points to the state pardon systems as models to emulate. Delaware, for example, has a Board of Pardons that hears petitions in public meetings and makes recommendations to the governor. More than half of the petitions are granted.
Like other successful clemency systems, Love said it offers public accountability.
She measures that accountability by certain standards: “Can people see what’s going on? Do they know what the standards are, and is the decider a respected and responsible decision-maker?”
Trump’s sweeping actions, however, have prompted calls for presidential pardons to be limited or eliminated altogether.
Osler cautions against doing so: It would be a “permanent solution to a temporary problem”.
“If we constrain clemency, we’ll lose all the good things that come from it,” Osler said.
World
More conflict in curling as Canadian women are accused of the same violation as men
CORTINA D’AMPEZZO, Italy (AP) — Canada’s women’s curling team at the Milan Cortina Olympics was accused Saturday of the same violation that prompted an expletive-laden outburst from a Canadian men’s curler a day earlier.
The latest accusation in a controversy that has divided the curling community led to more tense moments on the ice at the Cortina Curling Center.
In the first end of the women’s game against Switzerland, which the Swiss ultimately won 8-7, officials called a foul, saying that skip Rachel Homan had touched her stone again after releasing it.
In curling, that’s known as “double-touching,” and it’s against the rules.
Swedish curler Oskar Eriksson accused Canada ’s Marc Kennedy of the same infraction during Canada’s 8-6 win in round-robin play late Friday. On the ice, Kennedy repeatedly used profanity while denying he broke any rules. Although video of his throw appeared to confirm the accusation, Kennedy maintained his innocence into Saturday and went so far as to accuse Sweden of having a “premeditated” plan.
Though the Canadian women were not as fired up in response to the allegation of double-touching, they surely looked incredulous after the call.
“Like, absolutely not,” said Homan, who is known as one of the best skips in the world. “Zero-percent chance.”
Homan’s teammate, Emma Miskew, could be heard briefly engaging with an official on the sidelines, asking why video could not be used to review the call. The official explained that the team needed to trust the umpire. By rule, World Curling does not use video to review game play.
Before restarting the match, the Canadian women huddled with their coaches. Expletives could be heard from those in the circle, though it was not clear who uttered them.
After the game, Homan said she felt she’d been unfairly scrutinized because of the controversy on the men’s side.
“I don’t understand the call. I’ll never understand it. We’ve never done that,” she said. “It has nothing to do with us.”
After an early win over Denmark, the Canadian women have lost their last three matches. They lost to the United States on Friday, the first time in Olympic history that the U.S. had beaten Canada in women’s curling.
Also in women’s action on Saturday, Sweden women beat Italy 8-6, Denmark beat Korea 6-3 and the U.S. beat Japan 7-4.
___
AP Olympics: https://apnews.com/hub/milan-cortina-2026-winter-olympics
World
Global protests call for Iran regime change in major cities worldwide after bloody crackdown
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Anti-Iran regime protesters gathered in major cities across the globe on Saturday calling for a leadership change in the Global Day of Action Rally.
Over 250,000 protesters rallied in Munich, Germany on Saturday on the backdrop of the Munich Security Conference.
“With the number of participants recorded, this gathering is one of the largest rallies held in Munich in recent years,” the Munich Police reported in a press release. “The peaceful atmosphere is particularly noteworthy, despite the high number of participants in the meeting.”
IRAN REGIME REPORTEDLY ISSUED NATIONWIDE SHOOT-TO-KILL ORDERS AS PROTEST DEATH TOLL SURGES
Crowds reportedly chanted “change, change, regime change” and “democracy for Iran” with green-white-and-red flags with lion and sun emblems waving in the air with a few “Make Iran Great Again” red hats spotted.
Exiled Iranian crown prince Reza Pahlavi was among the hundreds of thousands protesting, telling Reuters, a possible attack on Iran will either weaken the regime or accelerate its fall.
“Global Day of Action” protests were held in major cities across the globe on Saturday. (Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)
“It’s a matter of time. We are hoping that this attack will expedite the process and the people can be finally back in the streets and take it all the way to the ultimate regime’s downfall,” said Pahlavi.
He shared that he hopes President Trump will have the United States intervene and “have the people’s back.”
UPROAR AFTER IRAN NAMED VICE-CHAIR OF UN BODY PROMOTING DEMOCRACY, WOMEN’S RIGHTS
On Friday, President Trump said regime change in Iran would be the “best thing” to happen while speaking to troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina.
Senator Graham said anti-regime protesters should “keep protesting.” ( James Willoughby/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
“People are hoping that at some point the decision will be made that there’s no use, there’s no point, we’re not going to get anywhere with negotiations,” said Pahlavi. “”Intervention is a way to save lives.”
South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham was present in Munich for the security conference and echoed a similar sentiment in a sideline interview on Friday.
NIKKI HALEY URGES TRUMP TO MAKE IRAN ACTION A ‘LEGACY-DEFINING MOMENT’ BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE
“There’s no negotiating with these people, in my view. They’re hell-bent on enacting an agenda based on religion that teaches them to lie, teaches them to destroy in the name of God,” said Graham.
“There’s no negotiating with these people, in my view,” said Graham at a rally in Munich. (Hannes Magerstaedt/Getty Images)
He shared that the regime is the weakest they have been since 1979, adding, “it is a regime with American blood on its hand,” calling on protesters to “keep protesting.”
The senator also took the stage at the Global Day of Action speaking to the crowd and holding up a “Make Iran Great Again” black hat.
Large demonstrations were also held in Toronto, Melbourne, Athens, Tokyo, London, and Los Angeles.
An estimated 350,000 people marched on the streets of Toronto, the city’s police spokesperson, Laura Brabant, told the Associated Press (AP).
Over 250,000 protesters rallied in Munich, Germany on Saturday on the backdrop of the Munich Security Conference. (Marijan Murat/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Iranian American activist and Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Sheila Nazarian told Fox News Digital the protests across the globe represent a universal truth.
“When regimes silence their people, the people eventually find their voice. Whether in the streets of Tehran or in diaspora communities around the world,” she said.
Nazarian left Iran when she was 6 years old along with her family.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“As someone who came to this country from Iran, I know firsthand that these protests are not about politics, they’re about basic human dignity, women’s rights, and the fundamental freedom to live without fear,” she added.
The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.
-
Politics1 week agoWhite House says murder rate plummeted to lowest level since 1900 under Trump administration
-
Alabama1 week agoGeneva’s Kiera Howell, 16, auditions for ‘American Idol’ season 24
-
Ohio1 week agoOhio town launching treasure hunt for $10K worth of gold, jewelry
-
Culture1 week agoVideo: Farewell, Pocket Books
-
Science1 week agoVideo: Rare Giant Phantom Jelly Spotted in Deep Waters Near Argentina
-
News1 week agoVideo: Investigators Say Doorbell Camera Was Disconnected Before Nancy Guthrie’s Kidnapping
-
Technology1 week agoApple might let you use ChatGPT from CarPlay
-
Technology1 week agoRepublicans attack ‘woke’ Netflix — and ignore YouTube