Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska House speaker suggests election bill was blocked because it would have improved rural Alaskans’ access to voting

Published

on

Alaska House speaker suggests election bill was blocked because it would have improved rural Alaskans’ access to voting


Alaska House Speaker Cathy Tilton suggested on a talk radio show that Republican members of the House majority blocked an election bill because it would have increased the likelihood of Alaska’s Democratic congresswoman holding on to her seat by making it easier for predominantly Alaska Native residents of rural Alaska to vote.

On the “Michael Dukes Show” last week, Tilton said the election bill, which was blocked by House Republicans on the final day of the legislative session, would have benefited U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, who is running for reelection against Republican challenger Nick Begich III.

The bill would have eliminated the state’s witness signature requirement on absentee ballots. Witness signatures are meant to prevent voting misconduct, but the Alaska Division of Elections currently has no method of verifying the signatures, and accepts any mark on the signature line without review.

Advertisement

The witness signature requirement led to the disqualification of ballots disproportionately in rural parts of the state in the 2022 special primary election, the state’s first all by-mail election. In one rural district, nearly 11% of all ballots cast were rejected for missing witness signatures.

Alaska Native voters, who make up the majority in some rural districts, have overwhelmingly supported Peltola, the first Alaska Native woman to serve in Congress.

”The changes in that bill definitely would have leaned the election towards Mary Peltola, to be quite honest, with no signatures on ballots in, you know, in rural areas,” Tilton said on the radio show last week.

Tilton did not respond to requests for comment from the Daily News.

In response, the Alaska Federation of Natives, which represents 177 federally recognized tribes, expressed “deep concern” over Tilton’s comments. AFN released a statement saying those comments “bring to light troubling implications” that state legislators would “actively work to disenfranchise voters to prevent the election of a specific candidate.”

Advertisement

The state’s witness signature requirement on by-mail ballots has disproportionately affected Alaska Native voters in rural parts of the state, AFN said.

”It is important to ensure that laws affecting Alaskans’ right to vote are fair and non-partisan. Protecting the constitutional right to vote is a responsibility that all legislators share, regardless of their affiliations, and they should work to uphold this right for all Alaskans,” said Joe Nelson, co-chair of AFN and Peltola’s ex-husband, in a prepared statement.

The state has a history of repeatedly failing to make voting accessible in some rural communities. In the August primary election, several polling locations in rural parts of the state did not open, meaning voters in those communities had no way to cast their ballots altogether.

Election data shows that the witness signature requirement also impacts other voters for whom English is not a primary language, including low-income voters in some neighborhoods of Anchorage.

“Alaska Natives are not a monolith,” Shannon Mason, a spokesperson for Peltola’s campaign, said by text message.

Advertisement

”Mary has been working for All Alaskans for two years — and we hope to earn their votes in the election. It’s disrespectful that her opponent’s supporters would attempt to prevent Alaska Natives from voting. We hope all Alaskans and especially Natives send a signal to Nick and his allies that this type of scam will not be tolerated,” Mason said.

The bipartisan election package Tilton referenced in her comments failed to pass the House in the final hours of the legislative session in dramatic circumstances. The bill was introduced by Homer Republican Rep. Sarah Vance to allow the state to remove ineligible voters from its rolls more quickly. The Senate added several other elements, including same-day voter registration, a method for voters to correct errors on absentee ballots and the elimination of the witness signature requirement on by-mail ballots.

After the amended bill passed the Senate on the final day of the legislative session, key House Republicans wanted to block the measure from passing, including Vance, according to Tilton. Vance did not respond to a request for comment. As the clock wound down to midnight on the final day of the session, Anchorage independent Rep. Calvin Schrage, the House minority leader, made a motion for the House to consider the elections bill. The motion failed 20-20.

For the next two hours, the elections bill was at the center of a standoff between the Republican-led House majority opposed to hearing the bill and the Democrat-dominated House minority in support, with outgoing Republican Rep. Jesse Sumner joining the minority in stalling the House from adjourning.

“It was one of the major disappointments of the session. That election bill failed as it did right at the very end — and by a single vote or two,” said Dillingham independent Rep. Bryce Edgmon, who caucused with the mostly Republican majority but supported the legislation.

Advertisement

Edgmon is one of four non-Republican members in the House majority. He said the elections bill was a priority for the influential Bush Caucus, which is made up of lawmakers representing rural Alaska districts. Rep. CJ McCormick, a Bethel Democrat and a member of the Bush Caucus, echoed Edgmon’s comments and said that the state’s “current election system is not acceptable and needs to meet the needs of rural voters and not silence them.”

He said the state’s signature requirements “are incredibly ineffective” and “prohibitive for communities that struggle.” Edgmon said that he wasn’t surprised by “the mentality” in Tilton’s comments that suggested Republicans blocked the elections bill because it was seen as benefiting Peltola.

”It was not lost on me that those forces were in the background and at play,” Edgmon said. “The measures in the bill would have benefited rural Alaska, and it’s disappointing that not everyone shares the objective of making it easier for rural voters to vote.”

Kotzebue independent Rep. Thomas Baker, who serves in the House majority as a member of the Bush Caucus, voted against hearing the elections bill on the last day of the session. He was appointed to the House by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, and initially served as a Republican before changing his affiliation. Baker said on Tuesday by text message that he was not aware of Tilton’s comments.

“My opinion on that legislation is that there were many changes made once it left the House and got through the Senate which the House did not have time to thoroughly review before it came back to the House floor,” he said on Tuesday.

Advertisement

In 2020, the Alaska Supreme Court ordered for the state to pause the witness signature requirement on by-mail ballots due to safety concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic. In oral arguments, state attorneys were unable to cite a case where that requirement had exposed voter fraud in Alaska.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska sued the state in 2022, arguing that voters’ constitutional rights were being violated because Alaska does not have a method for voters to correct mistakes on their by-mail ballots, including by adding a witness signature after the fact. That lawsuit is still open in state court.

• • •





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Bear injures two US soldiers during military training in Alaska | The Jerusalem Post

Published

on

Bear injures two US soldiers during military training in Alaska | The Jerusalem Post


Two US soldiers were wounded by a brown bear during a training exercise in Alaska on Thursday, the US Army stated.

Anchorage Daily News reported that the soldiers were from the 11th Airborne Division, and that the exercise had been a “land navigation training event” near Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson.

State wildlife officials said that the bear attack seemed to be a defensive one, from a bear which had recently emerged from its den. Staff members from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game collected evidence at the scene in an attempt to learn more about the bear, such as its species and gender.

“The incident is currently under investigation, and we are working closely with installation authorities and local wildlife officials to gather all relevant information and ensure the safety of all personnel in the area,” the 11th Airborne Division said in a statement, reported ABC News.

Advertisement

ABC News also cited an 11th Airborne Division spokesperson, Lt.-Col. Jo Nederhoed, who said that the two soldiers had been seriously wounded, but were receiving care at a hospital in Anchorage, and had shown improvement by Saturday morning.

“We hope both individuals have a full and quick recovery, and our thoughts are with them during this time,” Fish and Game Regional Supervisor Cyndi Wardlow said in a statement reported by Anchorage Daily News. “In this case, having bear spray with them in the field may have saved their lives.” 

Both of the soldiers reportedly had and used bear spray during the attack.

The bear’s condition and whereabouts are currently unknown.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Travel prices are going up, up and away. Here’s what to watch.

Published

on

Travel prices are going up, up and away. Here’s what to watch.


Up, up and away … that’s where most travel prices are going.

It’s true. Not only are our nation’s geopolitical thrusts in the Mideast affecting the cost of your fill-ups, every component of your trip from airfares to car rentals and hotel stays are subject to price hikes.

Imagine filling up a jetliner with jet fuel that’s doubled in price. It’s enough to melt your credit card, regardless of the number of points you get for every dollar spent!

Because the price of oil affects everything, higher prices are eating away at your travel budget in many ways.

Advertisement

Bag fees

There’s lots of press on this. All airlines are increasing their checked-bag fees because of the jump in fuel prices.

Back in 2009, Alaska Airlines instituted a $15 fee for the first checked bag and $25 for the second bag. At the time, there was no charge for the first bag and a second bag was $25.

Last week, Alaska Airlines, along with other major airlines, increased its fees to $45 for the first checked bag and $55 for the second bag. Delta Air Lines charges the same.

Even if the cost of oil comes down, I don’t expect bag fees will ever be reduced.

Travelers who live in Alaska are somewhat insulated from the new hikes because both Delta and Alaska Airlines offer two free checked bags, with conditions:

Advertisement

1. Alaska offers two free checked bags for travelers flying to or from Alaska who are enrolled in Club 49. This does not affect other flights on Alaska. Separately, ATMOS credit card holders can get a free checked bag. Also, elite members of the ATMOS scheme get one or two free checked bags systemwide.

2. Delta offers two free checked bags for travelers flying to or from Alaska who are SkyMiles members who live in Alaska. Again, this does not apply to other Delta flights. Separately, Delta American Express cardholders can get a free checked bag.

3. Elite-level travelers with the oneworld airline cartel, including Alaska Airlines, can get one or two checked bags on American, British Airways, Japan Airlines, Qantas or other oneworld carriers.

[Anchorage’s international airport rolls out self-driving wheelchairs]

Main Cabin vs. Basic Economy

The spread between the lowest available price, Basic Economy, and a more flexible ticket, Main Cabin, has increased. While the difference used to be $20-$30 each way when the Basic Economy scheme was introduced in 2018, the round-trip upcharge now can exceed $100.

Advertisement

For example, the lowest Basic fare to Portland is $337 round-trip on Alaska Airlines. The upcharge to Main Cabin, with full loyalty points, pre-assigned seats and more flexibility on changes and cancellations, is $447, a 33% upcharge.

This trend is not specifically attributable to the new Iran War. It’s just a cost that continues to rise.

New fees

I’m impressed at the creativity of airline people who dream up new fees. Here are some of my favorites from Alaska Airlines:

1. Phone reservations: $15

2. Partner award booking fee: $12.50

Advertisement

3. Pet travel fee: $100 in the cabin, $200 in the baggage compartment with a kennel

4. Left on board item return fee: $20

On Condor Airlines, operating the only nonstop service from Anchorage to Europe, travelers can choose from four different bundles in economy class. The least-expensive, Economy Zero, from $840 round-trip, features fees for travelers:

1. Carry-on bag fee, up to 8kg: $35; a small bag like a purse always is included for free

2. Checked bag: $75

Advertisement

3. Airport check-in: $30

All three of these fees are included in the next-highest fare bucket, Economy Classic, from $900 round-trip. It’s cheaper to buy the bundle than it is to buy the components a la carte. Seat assignments are additional, from $25 for economy.

Airfares on the rise

There are a few good deals available for travel to select West Coast/Intermountain destinations in May, including:

1. Anchorage-San Francisco on Alaska Airlines, from $307 round-trip. Fly May 15-28 only. Add $90 round-trip for Main cabin.

2. Anchorage-Los Angeles on Alaska Airlines, from $317 round-trip. May 15-25 only. Add $90 round-trip for Main.

Advertisement

3. Anchorage-Phoenix on United, Delta or Alaska, from $267-$287 round-trip. Fly May 8-June 9 only. Add $90-$100 for Main.

4. Anchorage-Denver $357 round-trip on Delta. Fly May 8-June 9 only. Add $90 round-trip for Main.

For travel to other destinations, or later in the summer, be prepared to pay more.

Flying to Hawaii? Alaska Air’s nonstop prices out at $706 round-trip between May 30 and June 6. Add $110 round-trip for Main.

Nonstop flights from Anchorage to Salt Lake City start at $669 round-trip with Delta on May 17. That’s $100 more than the cost for the same flights last month. Add $90 more for Main.

Advertisement

Hotel costs continue to rise, accompanied by pesky resort fees.

The Outrigger on the Beach in Waikiki is a very nice beachfront hotel. It’s not plush, or the nicest property. But it’s solid. The cost is $334 per night.

But there’s more: a $50 per night resort fee, plus a variety of taxes and charges, totaling $112.55 per night.

Down in Seattle, the Sound Hotel in the Belltown neighborhood is marketed by Hilton. The discounted rate for “Honors” members — it’s free to join — is $313.34 per night for a king room in late May. Taxes and fees add an extra $56.40 per night.

There’s no appreciable bump yet for hotel rates as a result of the oil price surge. Yet. But if these hotel rates seem high, they’re in line with hotel rates in Anchorage this summer. At the Sheraton in Anchorage in June, it’s $450 per night, plus $54 in taxes and fees, when booked at Expedia.

Advertisement

Car rentals are not cheap

My go-to site for car rentals is the Costco site, which compares major brands and automatically includes Costco discounts.

In Las Vegas, for a one-day rental in May, Budget charges $67 per day, which includes taxes and fees of $22.77. In Anchorage, the same kind of car, medium SUV, costs $92.97 with Alamo.

The biggest differences so far in car rental rates seems to be the bill you’ll pay when you fill up the tank before returning. There’s no appreciable jump in prices because of the new war.

When it comes to making travel arrangements for the spring and summer, it’s more risky making completely non-refundable arrangements.

I made the decision to purchase most of my summer travel plans in advance, but only after determining I would not need to change the dates. Particularly with airline tickets, it’s expensive to change your dates.

Advertisement

There’s lots of uncertainty regarding travel arrangements, particularly international travel. As fuel prices go up due to oil shortages, travel companies will look for ways to recoup the increased costs. In most cases, those higher costs will be borne by travelers.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Murkowski warns decreasing national fuel prices could spell disaster for rural Alaska

Published

on

Murkowski warns decreasing national fuel prices could spell disaster for rural Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz has led to a decrease in oil prices nationally, but Alaska’s senior senator said the state faces a different situation that could threaten rural communities.

“If you can’t produce power because you don’t have the diesel or you just can’t pay the prices, your little communities can collapse,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said at a Friday press conference at the Arctic Encounter Summit in Anchorage.

The price of oil has been a double-edged sword for Alaska. On one hand, the increased price of North Slope oil brings more revenue to the state, but consumer prices can also rise.

North Slope oil prices were $106.36 a barrel on Thursday.

Advertisement

“This is a very precarious time,” Murkowski said. “Our state has enjoyed a bounty because we have benefited from the higher prices of oil that goes into our treasury, but it’s the Alaskans in … the off-road communities that are threatened to be hit most hard.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending