Prosecutors are urging a judge to deny accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson’s bid to disqualify a prosecutor, arguing there is no conflict of interest.

In a sweeping 33-page filing, submitted under seal earlier this month and now released in redacted form, the state argues the deputy prosecutor at the center of Robinson’s motion has no personal conflict despite the fact that his 18-year-old child was in the crowd when Kirk was assassinated at a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025.

Prosecutors say the teen, a student at UVU, was one of “thousands of other witnesses” and had no personal knowledge of the actual murder, never saw the shooting, and never saw a weapon.

The filing includes text messages exchanged between the prosecutor and his teenager in the minutes after the shooting, which prosecutors argue underscore that lack of firsthand knowledge.

ERIKA KIRK HAS ‘NOTHING TO SAY’ TO THE MAN ACCUSED OF KILLING HER HUSBAND

In the messages, the teen initially texts, “SOMEONE GOT SHOT,” and reassures family members, “I’m okay, everyone is going inside.” Only later, after hearing information from others, does the teenager text, “CHARLIE GOT SHOT,” followed by messages relaying what “people were saying” about where Kirk was hit and where the shooter may have been positioned.

Prosecutors argue the texts reflect confusion and secondhand information — not emotional trauma or direct involvement that could improperly influence prosecutorial decision-making.

Read the filing here:

The filing further details that the teen was roughly 85 feet away, had no line of sight to the shooter due to buildings blocking the view, and fled the area after hearing what sounded like a loud “pop.”

TAXPAYER COST FOR SUSPECTED CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSIN’S DEATH PENALTY CASE PREDICTED BY UTAH COMMISSIONER

In a sworn affidavit, the teen described being scared in the moment but suffered no lasting trauma, required no counseling and quickly returned to normal school and work activities.

Robinson’s motion also points to the prosecution’s decision to seek the death penalty on the same day charges were filed, arguing it reflects bias or a rush to judgment.

Prosecutors reject that claim, saying the decision was based on the strength of the evidence, Utah law and a desire to curb speculation and misinformation in a case that immediately drew national and international attention.

PROSECUTORS PLAN TO ‘DIRTY UP’ KIRK SUSPECT TYLER ROBINSON TO SWAY JURY TOWARD DEATH PENALTY: FMR US ATTY

Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot while answering a question during the outdoor forum attended by roughly 3,000 people. Robinson is charged with aggravated murder and faces the possibility of the death penalty if convicted.

Defense attorneys argue that while the trauma of the shooting is undeniable, it makes prosecutorial neutrality even more essential — not less. They contend the presence of a prosecutor’s family member at the event creates an unacceptable risk that decisions could be influenced by emotion rather than evidence.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A judge is scheduled to hear arguments on the motion Friday, Jan. 16. If the court grants Robinson’s request, the entire Utah County Attorney’s Office could be removed from the case, forcing the appointment of a special prosecutor and potentially delaying trial proceedings — including the state’s pursuit of the death penalty.

Fox News’ Lee Ross and Michael Ruiz contributed to this report. 

Stepheny Price covers crime, including missing persons, homicides and migrant crime. Send story tips to stepheny.price@fox.com.

SAN FRANCISCO – Attorneys are wrapping up closing arguments in the high-profile trial of a man accused of killing an elderly San Francisco man five years ago in a brazen attack.

Closing arguments for the trial of Antoine Watson continued Tuesday, beginning with Judge Linda Colfax reading jury instructions. Watson faces charges of murder, elder abuse, and assault in connection with the 2021 death of 84-year-old Vicha Ratanapakdee.

The attack, captured on a neighbor’s security camera, shows Ratanapakdee being violently shoved to the ground.

Defense cites emotional distress

What they’re saying:

The defense does not dispute that Watson shoved Ratanapakdee. Instead, attorneys argued the then-19-year-old defendant was experiencing extreme emotional distress following a family argument and a car crash. They contended Watson “snapped” when his car would not start that January morning.

The defense further argued that the prosecution failed to meet the burden of proof for a premeditated killing, suggesting that childhood trauma may have contributed to Watson’s actions.

Prosecutors allege defendant acted recklessly

The other side:

Prosecutors described Watson’s actions as reckless and deliberate. During their closing argument, they said the defendant was “angry that his car wouldn’t start, and he spotted a target for his anger.”

Family glad case nearing end

Outside the Hall of Justice, the victim’s family, who affectionately called him “Grandpa Vicha,” gathered on the court steps. While they are gratified that the case is nearing a conclusion, they voiced concerns that the judge has not been evenhanded during the proceedings.

“I’ve been here one month for the trial,” said Monthanus Ratanapakdee, the victim’s daughter. “It has been traumatizing for my family.”

The victim’s son-in-law, Eric Lawson, added: “We really hope the jury can see through all the court procedures and know what happened with grandpa was a horrible, awful murder.”

Closing arguments are expected to resume on Wednesday, followed by jury deliberations.