Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Joker: Folie à Deux can’t find the right note (Movie Review)

Published

on

Joker: Folie à Deux can’t find the right note (Movie Review)

When director Todd Phillips released his movie Joker in 2019, there was actual concern that the film might be so powerful it would inspire real-world violence. Threats were made, screenings were canceled and there were undercover police officers in movie theaters.

Nothing ended up happening, of course — it’s a movie, not a mind control device — but at the time, you could kinda-sorta see why people were panicking. The U.S. was on edge after the Charlottesville riots a couple years prior, and Joker did indeed tap into a sort of generalized angst favored by angry young men through the ages: the government sucks, families suck, life sucks and we should burn it all down. I think Joker’s biggest problem as a movie is that it can’t reconcile its attempts at significance with how silly and thin that philosophy is — I mean, this is technically a Batman spinoff, is it really going to present us with a credible theory of humanity? But I give it credit for effectively channeling that kind of disaffected, adolescent rage. Joaquin Phoenix gives a luminous performance under assured direction from Phillips. Applause all around, moral panic or not.

I don’t think anyone will be concerned that Joker: Folie à Deux might move us to madness. Phoenix returns as failed comedian turned public menace Arthur Fleck, aka the Joker, and he’s as committed as ever, compulsively laughing in a way that looks painful and baring his flesh-stretched-over-bones body. Lady Gaga comes aboard as Lee Quinzel, better known to Batman fans as Harley Quinn, and turns in a solid performance. And Phillips still knows how to compose a frame and pace a scene. The problem is none of it seems to add up to much this time.

The movie doesn’t lack for ideas, but too many feel half-formed. Take the love story. Arthur is in prison following the events of the first film, where he meets Lee in a music therapy class. She’s an admirer of the Joker and may be just as crazy as he is. They quickly fall in love. At one point the movie raises the possibility that Lee has ulterior motives, which is interesting, but that angle is quickly dropped, as if the movie can’t quite decide what to do with the character.

In the end, Lee isn’t sketched with as much detail as Arthur himself, who goes on a bit of perplexing journey. The first Joker movie traces his arc from pathetic malcontent to symbol of chaos. Folie à Deux takes him back to the start; he’s again sheepish and unsure of himself, beaten down by prison life out of the spotlight. He has to work back up to his Joker persona again.

Advertisement

When it finally emerges, we get probably the best scene of the movie, where Arthur belittles a witness as he represents himself during his own murder trial. This scene radiates the same kind of “I didn’t ask to be born, dad” energy the first movie channeled so well. But Folie à Deux is far more skeptical of this outlook. It’s interesting that the movie is asking us to look at that ethos in a new way, but it also means it’s cutting itself off from the wellspring of its energy. Folie à Deux has less of the dark resentful joy that made the first Joker pop, and more resigned dreariness.

JOKER2_VERT_TSR_STANDARD_2764x4096_DOM

Here’s another big element we haven’t addressed yet: Folie à Deux is a musical, specifically a jukebox musical featuring mainly big band hits from the 1940s, ’50s, and ’60s. The idea is that Arthur and Lee are so full of emotion that they must break out into song when words fail, which is standard operating procedure for musicals.

It works about half the time. Some of the musical sequences, most of which are set in Arthur’s fantasy world, are among the best scenes in the film. I really enjoyed the soulful rendition of “Gonna Build a Mountain,” featuring Lady Gaga wailing on piano and belting full force while Joaquin Phoenix dances up a storm. I also liked the Sonny-&-Cher variety show fantasy where the two of them sing “To Love Somebody.”

Other moments fall flatter, like Arthur’s first growly rendition of “For Once In My Life.” Audiences have been skeptical of musicals for decades; it takes a lot to win them over, and giving the first big number to Phoenix, who is far outclassed by Lady Gaga in the singing department, isn’t the best move. Gaga herself is only allowed to really let rip in the pure fantasy sequences; in the “real world,” she purposefully constricts her voice so she can sound more like an ordinary person. I get why they want to do this for realism purposes, but also: why are you hiring Lady Gaga, one of the greatest pop stars of her generation, if you’re not going to let her give it all she has?

So we have some songs that are played for realism and some that are played as fantasy; overall, the fantastical bits are far more successful, although I did like Phoenix’s desperate singing phone call towards the end of the movie.

Joker: Folie à Deux spends a lot more time than you might expect rehashing the events of the first movie; the plot, which revolves around Arthur’s trial, kind of prevents it from forming an identity of its own. And then, right at the end, as if Phillips and company remembered this is a Batman spinoff during the last day on set, there’s a big action moment with practically nothing in the way of buildup.

Advertisement

So we have all these elements thrown into a blender: reassessing Arthur’s raison d’être from the first movie, a love story, a musical, an 11th hour action movie, and there’s a bit of a slice-of-life prison drama in there too. I feel like Folie à Deux should have picked something and committed. Much of the movie is striking to look at, but it never really finds a way through itself.

Movie Grade: C

dark. Next. Joker: Folie à Deux director promises this is his last DC movie (which he said last time). Joker: Folie à Deux director promises this is his last DC movie (which he said last time)

To stay up to date on everything fantasy, science fiction, and WiC, follow our all-encompassing Facebook page and Twitter account, sign up for our exclusive newsletter and check out our YouTube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=videoseries

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: A Home Invasion turns into a “Relentless” Grudge Match

Published

on

Movie Review: A Home Invasion turns into a “Relentless” Grudge Match

I’d call the title “Relentless” truth in advertising, althought “Pitiless,” “Endless” and “Senseless” work just as well.

This new thriller from the sarcastically surnamed writer-director Tom Botchii (real name Tom Botchii Skowronski of “Artik” fame) begins in uninteresting mystery, strains to become a revenge thriller “about something” and never gets out of its own way.

So bloody that everything else — logic, reason, rationale and “Who do we root for?” quandary is throughly botched — its 93 minutes pass by like bleeding out from screwdriver puncture wounds — excruciatingly.

But hey, they shot it in Lewiston, Idaho, so good on them for not filming overfilmed Greater LA, even if the locations are as generically North American as one could imagine.

Career bit player and Lewiston native Jeffrey Decker stars as a homeless man we meet in his car, bearded, shivering and listening over and over again to a voice mail from his significant other.

He has no enthusiasm for the sign-spinning work he does to feed himself and gas up his ’80s Chevy. But if woman, man or child among us ever relishes anything as much as this character loves his cigarettes — long, theatrical, stair-at-the-stars drags of ecstacy — we can count ourselves blessed.

Advertisement

There’s this Asian techie (Shuhei Kinoshita) pounding away at his laptop, doing something we assume is sketchy just by the “ACCESS DENIED” screens he keeps bumping into and the frantic calls he takes suggesting urgency of some sort or other.

That man-bunned stranger, seen in smoky silhoutte through the opaque window on his door, ringing the bell of his designer McMansion makes him wary. And not just because the guy’s smoking and seems to be making up his “How we can help cut your energy bill” pitch on the fly.

Next thing our techie knows, shotgun blasts are knocking out the lock (Not the, uh GLASS) and a crazed, dirty beardo homeless guy has stormed in, firing away at him as he flees and cries “STOP! Why are you doing this?”

Jun, as the credits name him, fights for his PC and his life. He wins one and loses the other. But tracking his laptop and homeless thug “Teddy” with his phone turns out to be a mistake.

He’s caught, beaten and bloodied some more. And that’s how Jun learns the beef this crazed, wronged man has with him — identity theft, financial fraud, etc.

Advertisement

Threats and torture over access to that laptop ensue, along with one man listing the wrongs he’s been done as he puts his hostage through all this.

Wait’ll you get a load of what the writer-director thinks is the card our hostage would play.

The dialogue isn’t much, and the logic — fleeing a fight you’ve just won with a killer rather than finishing him off or calling the cops, etc. — doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny.

The set-piece fights, which involve Kinoshita screaming and charging his tormentor and the tormentor played by Decker stalking him with wounded, bloody-minded resolve are visceral enough to come off. Decker and Kinoshita are better than the screenplay.

A throw-down at a gas-station climaxes with a brutal brawl on the hood of a bystander’s car going through an automatic car wash. Amusingly, the car-wash owners feel the need to do an Idaho do-si-do video (“Roggers (sic) Car Wash”) that plays in front of the car being washed and behind all the mayhem the antagonists and the bystander/car owner go through. Not bad.

Advertisement

The rest? Not good.

Perhaps the good folks at Rogers Motors and Car Wash read the script and opted to get their name misspelled. Smart move.

Rating: R, graphic violence, smoking, profanity

Cast: Jeffrey Decker, Shuhei Kinoshita

Credits:Scripted and directed by Tom Botchii.. A Saban Entertainment release.

Running time: 1:34

Advertisement

Unknown's avatar

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

403 Forbidden

Published

on



403 Forbidden <br />

Forbidden

Access to this resource on the server is denied!


Proudly powered by LiteSpeed Web Server

Please be advised that LiteSpeed Technologies Inc. is not a web hosting company and, as such, has no control over content found on this site.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

UNTIL DAWN Review

Published

on

UNTIL DAWN Review
UNTIL DAWN is a horror movie based on a video game about a group of friends who find themselves trapped in a time loop, reliving the same night repeatedly with increasingly terrifying, fatal threats. One year after her sister Melanie vanished without a trace, Clover and her friends look to find more information about her disappearance. Clues lead them to an abandoned mining town implied to be in Pennsylvania. This place of unimaginable horrors traps them all in a horrifying time loop where they’re murdered again and again. They must work together to survive without losing themselves in the never-ending time loop of gruesome murder.

UNTIL DAWN is nicely shot and paced well, with believable performances. However, the movie has a strong humanist worldview featuring gruesome violence, lots of strong foul language, and excessive gore. The violence includes psychopathic killers, people spontaneously exploding, stabbings, kidnapping, demonic possession, and more. The frequent dying over and over in the plot of UNTIL DAWN puts the sanctity of life into question. It forces the characters to conduct abhorrent and unacceptable immoral actions for survival.

(HH, Pa, C, O, Ho, LLL, VVV, S, M):

Dominant Worldview and Other Worldview Content/Elements:

Strong humanist worldview that twists the concept of modern psychology into a supernatural hellscape with unexplained time loops and reoccurring nightmarish horror filled with excessive violence and gore, but with unexplained pagan supernatural elements (such as a storm circling a house, the appearance of more buildings, the time loop itself, and many more), the time loop perverts the laws of mortality and implies that the consequences of violence, murder, suicide, etc., don’t apply, the psychologist controlling the time loop discusses the situation with modern psychology in vague circles meant to confuse and disorient the nature of the reality in which the victims are trapped, religion or God is not explicitly discussed, but there’s an unexplained cross in front of a house that isn’t explained and a character references the belief that a possessed person cannot become possessed through contact but rather weakness of faith, and some occult content where one woman is a self-described psychic and is into “woo-woo” stuff as another character describes it, she tries to amplify her psychic abilities with help from the others by holding hands and meditation, and she often has strong feelings and seems to have a sense the others do not have, but no worship or symbols are shown, plus a girl dating a guy is said to have previously dated a girl as well as other men;

Advertisement

Foul Language:

At least 101 obscenities (including 62 “f” words), two strong profanities mentioning the name of Jesus, and four light profanities;

Violence:

Very severe violence and gratuitous blood and gore throughout including but not limited to dead bodies, monsters, scarred masked psychopath, stabbing, beating, and people spontaneously exploding;

Sex:

Advertisement

No sex shown, but a person puts on a VHS tape and a pornographic movie is heard playing briefly but not shown, and a woman is said to date a lot of people and one time dated another woman;

Nudity:

No nudity;

Alcohol Use:

No alcohol use;

Advertisement

Smoking and/or Drug Use and Abuse:

No smoking or drugs; and,

Miscellaneous Immorality:

A psychologist is a callous antagonist whose motives are relatively unknown beyond having a morbid curiosity that led to awful experiments and playing games with other people, he purposely keeps people trapped for no known reason other than his sick and twisted observations that end in gruesome murder and unnecessary torture.

UNTIL DAWN is a horror movie based on a video game about a group of friends who find themselves trapped in a time loop, reliving the same night repeatedly with increasingly terrifying, fatal threats.
Advertisement

One year after her sister Melanie vanished without a trace, Clover and her friends look to find more information about her disappearance. Clues lead them to an abandoned mining town. This place of unimaginable horrors traps them all in a horrifying time loop where they will be murdered again and again.

UNTIL DAWN is nicely shot and paced well, with believable performances, but it has a strong humanist worldview overall with some occult elements is filled with gruesome violence, gore, lots of strong foul language, and a time loop that leads to an increasing amount of horrific murder and unacceptable immoral actions for survival.

The movie begins with a woman named Melanie clawing her way through the dirt with an unknown monster chasing after her. Digging her way out, she looks up to a masked psychopath standing over her with a scythe. She begs him, “No! Please not again. I can’t!” He fatally stabs her without a thought. It cuts to the main title, and an hourglass is shown with a ticking clock sound and unsettling music.

Cut to a group pf people in a red car driving up a winding mountain, an obvious nod to THE SHINING. It’s been one year after Clover’s sister Melanie vanished without a trace. The group consists of Max, Nina, Megan, Abe, and Clover. Shortly after their mother died, Melanie had decided to start a new life in New York. Clover decided to stay, which created tension between the sisters before Melanie left.

Clover and her friends are looking for more information about her disappearance. Their last stop is the last place she was seen in a video message taken in front of a middle-of-nowhere gas station. Megan, a proclaimed psychic, wants to join hands outside and see if they can feel any mystical energy regarding Melanie. Their attempt is cut short when an RV blares its horn and almost hits them, scaring them all.

Advertisement

Clover goes inside the gas station for a cup of coffee while the others talk outside. Clover asks the man behind the register if he worked here last year. After confirming he’s been working there for years, she shows him a picture of Melanie from the video. He asks if she was missing and clarifies saying that Clover is not the first to come asking. When she asks if many people around here go missing, he says people “get in trouble” in Glore Valley. As their only lead, the group decides to go there and stick together.

Nervously driving to the valley in an increasingly dangerous storm, the group begins to question what they are doing. Suddenly the storm stops but is still raging behind them. They park in front of a house with a “Welcome Center” sign, with the storm circling around the area but leaving the house dry. Confused, they get out of the car and look around. Nina decides to see if there’s anyone inside so they can come up with a plan. Everyone goes in except Clover, who walks up to the strange rain wall.

Inside the house, they find a dated and dusty interior. The power and water don’t work, and they conclude that they are the first people to come there in years. There is a strange hourglass with a skull on the wall. Checking the guest book, Nina finds Melanie’s name signed multiple times, with increasingly shaky handwriting. In another room, Abe finds many missing posters with faces on a bulletin board and finds poster with Melanie’s face.

Outside, Clover thinks she sees a person in the rain. She also hears Melanie’s voice and runs after it. Concerned, Max calls after her and he pulls her back in. As Nina signs the guestbook, the sun suddenly sets and the clock starts ticking.

Inside the house now with the hourglass turned over, they try to understand what’s happening. The car is out in the rain now with someone revving the engine threateningly. Some of them go to the dark basement, where the lights don’t work. There is an eerie sense of dread as Abe goes to check out a noise, and Nina finds a scarred and masked psychopath standing in a room as the top half of Abe’s body falls to the ground.

Advertisement

Hearing the commotion upstairs, the others go to see what happened and Max spots the killer. They run to hide, and the apparently invincible psychopath horrifically stabs each of them as they try to fight back. The sand in the hourglass runs back, as each character returns to where they were when Nina originally signed the book (she now signs it a second time). They remember what had just taken place, and how they were all murdered. Clearly stuck in this time loop escape room situation, they will now have to figure out how to escape this terrifying hellscape as the situations get worse with every loop.

UNTIL DAWN is nicely shot and paced well, with believable performances. However, the movie has a strong humanist worldview featuring gruesome violence, lots of strong foul language, and excessive gore. The violence includes psychopathic killers, people spontaneously exploding, stabbings, kidnapping, demonic possession, and more. The frequent dying over and over in the plot puts the sanctity of life into question. It forces the characters to conduct abhorrent and unacceptable immoral actions for survival.

Continue Reading

Trending