Connect with us

North Dakota

School choice task force should hold meetings in public

Published

on

School choice task force should hold meetings in public


On Aug. 14, I watched with great interest the interim Education Committee meeting that took place at the state Capitol. Toward the end of the meeting, committee Chair Sen. Michelle Axtman updated the committee on the work of the school choice task force (SCTF). Axtman went on to say that the task force “is not legislatively driven” and has met “multiple times.” Excellent reporting by Amy Dalrymple in the North Dakota Monitor notes that the SCTF has met three times, and Axtman has indicated that it will meet in the future as the task force inches “closer to really cementing what possible legislation would look like.”

According to Axtman, because this committee/task force “is not legislatively driven,” this group does not have to post notifications of its meetings, open the meetings to the public, produce minutes of the meetings, or otherwise comply with our state’s open meetings requirements. I know she is following the advice of the director of Legislative Council, but that advice is causing many people in North Dakota — including members of Axtman’s interim Education Committee — great concern about transparency.

I am not surprised to learn that “school choice” is being studied this interim. When the Legislature narrowly passed HB 1532 then failed to override Gov. Doug Burgum’s veto of that voucher bill, it was clear that the proponents of giving public dollars to private, parochial and homeschools would be back with another plan to accomplish their goal.

What I am surprised about, however, is that an ad hoc “not legislatively driven” task force is doing the work of drafting legislation to be considered, rather than a subcommittee of the interim Education Committee. Section 13 of

Advertisement

SB 2284

says “… the legislative management shall study school choice models,” yet, the SCTF that Sen. Axtman has referenced includes just three of the interim Education Committee’s 21 members. It is worth noting that the lobbyist for the State Association of Nonpublic Schools and the vice president of academic affairs for the Light of Christ Catholic Schools, among others, have seats at the table as the SCTF gets “closer to really cementing what possible legislation would look like.”

Now, while I disagree with the notion that North Dakota taxpayers should be paying to support private and parochial schools in North Dakota, I welcome the discussion. But that discussion should occur in public, not in secrecy. Just because one can hold “not legislatively driven” meetings in private, does not mean that one should. When legislation is being crafted that will impact something as important as the education of our children, why wouldn’t all of us want to see how that legislation develops?

The closed-to-the-public meetings lead North Dakotans to question the motives of those involved. The Department of Public Instruction ought not be using taxpayer monies to pay the Hunt Institute to facilitate private legislator retreats or this “not legislatively driven” task force that are not open to the public. It is not a good look for DPI, Hunt or our legislators.

Look, I believe Axtman when she says that she and the others are working hard to improve education for all students. I know her to be an honorable and resolute public servant. All I would ask, however, is for that work to be done in public with an opportunity for all voices on the matter to be heard.

Advertisement





Source link

North Dakota

Morton County did not violate North Dakota’s open records law when the County Auditor, within a reasonable time, informed the requester that the requested records were not in the County’s possession.. – North Dakota Attorney General

Published

on


Morton County did not violate North Dakota’s open records law when the County Auditor, within a reasonable time, informed the requester that the requested records were not in the County’s possession..

February 27, 2026

Media Contact: Suzie Weigel, 701.328.2210

BISMARCK, ND – Karen Jordan requested an opinion from this office under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-21.1 asking whether Morton County violated N.D.C.C. § 44-04-18 by failing or refusing to provide records.

Conclusion: It is my opinion that Morton County’s response was in compliance with N.D.C.C. § 44-04-18.

Advertisement

Link to opinion 2026-O-06

###



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

ND Supreme Court Justice Daniel Crothers retiring, stepping onto new path

Published

on

ND Supreme Court Justice Daniel Crothers retiring, stepping onto new path


BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – The North Dakota Court System threw a reception for a retiring member of the state Supreme Court.

Justice Daniel Cothers is leaving after serving for more than 20 years.

He plans to step down on Feb. 28.

Before Crothers became a judge, he served as a lawyer and as president of the State Bar Association of North Dakota.

Advertisement

Mark Friese is set to replace Crothers starting March 9.

“He knows what is important and what to keep focused on. Justice Friese will be an exceptional replacement to me on the bench,” said Crothers.

Crothers plans to keep up on teaching gigs and spend time at his family’s farm as he steps into retirement.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota ambulance providers losing money on every run, according to survey

Published

on

North Dakota ambulance providers losing money on every run, according to survey


By: Michael Achterling

FARGO (North Dakota Monitor) – North Dakota ambulance service providers lost nearly $500 on average for every patient transported to a medical facility last year, according to a survey.

The recent survey of three dozen providers in the state, conducted by PWW Advisory Group, was the result of a study created by House Bill 1322 passed during the 2025 legislative session.  The group presented the results to the Legislature’s interim Emergency Response Services Committee on Wednesday.

The average revenue generated from an ambulance transport was about $1,100 during 2025, but the expenses were nearly $1,600, said Matt Zavadsky, an EMS and mobile health care consultant with PWW, based in Pennsylvania.

Advertisement

“They are losing money every time they respond to a call,” Zavadsky said during the meeting. “That financial loss has to be made up, typically, by local tax subsidies, fundraisers, bake sales, or all too often, service reductions to try and match expenses with the revenue they can generate.” 

He said the problem cannot be fixed by billing reform alone because the revenue generated isn’t enough to fund the cost of readiness, such as personnel, equipment and supplies, among other items.

The survey highlighted 74% of ambulance provider expenses went to personnel costs, but equipment costs have also increased in recent years.

Zavadsky said survey respondents plan to invest about $12.9 million into vehicle and equipment purchases over the next five years, averaging to about $358,000 per provider. However, the cost of a new ambulance has risen to between $275,000 to $480,000 per vehicle. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a new ambulance could cost up to $250,000, he said.

There are more than 100 ambulance service providers in North Dakota. The 36 survey respondents represented a diverse group of providers from city and county services to district-owned, hospital-based and private providers, he said. The average patient transport distance is 34 miles, according to the survey.

Advertisement

Zavadsky said the survey respondents reported 53% of their total revenue was generated from fees for service with the remaining 47% coming from local tax subsidies, state grants and other fundraising.

“What you guys are experiencing in North Dakota and what is happening in the local communities … is not the fault of the local communities, not the fault of the state, this is just our new normal,” Zavadsky said.

Rep. Todd Porter, R-Mandan, owner of Metro-Area Ambulance Service which serves Morton and Burleigh counties, said Medicare patients reimburse ambulance providers at a much lower rate than private insurance and Medicaid patients. He added Medicare patients make up about 60% of the call volume in the Bismarck-Mandan area.

“If we’re being underpaid for 60% of our call volume, then we have to make it up some place,” Porter said.

He said some providers can make up that difference in reimbursement with tax dollars, but not all providers have that option.

Advertisement

“We do other contracted work for nursing homes, hospitals, funeral homes in order to make up that difference,” Porter said. “This is a federal government problem. This is a CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) problem that we’ve known about for years.”

Porter also said ambulance services are not reimbursed for responding to a call with a Medicare patient that doesn’t require a transport to a hospital. According to the survey, about 17% of all ambulance calls don’t require transport to a medical facility.

The survey also showed about 2,300 of the nearly 33,600 patient transports billed last year ended up in collections after being more than 90 days delinquent, totalling $2.7 million, Zavadsky said. The average total of a claim sent to collections was about $1,100.

Zavadsky estimated the total of unpaid claims for more than 100 providers across North Dakota was about $5.8 million in 2025. Some providers don’t have procedures to pursue delinquent billing in collections, he said.

Rep. Jim Grueneich, R-Ellendale, chair of the committee, said the committee will take a deeper look at the data presented on Wednesday and may have recommendations, and possible draft legislation, to address the issue in the 2027 legislative session.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending