Connect with us

Northeast

FBI fires back at claims it released Crooks' body for cremation days after Trump assassination attempt

Published

on

FBI fires back at claims it released Crooks' body for cremation days after Trump assassination attempt

The FBI has fired back at claims by a GOP congressman that the agency released the body of Thomas Matthew Crooks for cremation just 10 days after his assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, last month.

The agency says it refutes allegations by Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., who says that when he requested to view Crooks’ body on Aug. 5, nobody on the ground in Butler knew it had been handed back to the suspect’s family on July 23. Higgins said the revelation “caused quite a stir and revealed a disturbing fact.”

Higgins is looking into the deadly July 13 incident as part of a bi-partisan congressional task force and made the claims in a stunning preliminary report which is highly critical of the FBI’s investigation into the matter. Higgins says the releasing of the body, and other claims of bad practice leveled at the FBI, amounts to an “obstruction to any following investigative effort.”

The FBI has snapped back against claims it released Thomas Matthew Crooks’ body for cremation just 10 days after the assassination attempt on former President Trump. Former President Donald Trump, left, Thomas Matthew Crooks, bottom right, GOP congressman Clay Higgins, top left.  (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images, main, Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call, top right, Fox News, bottom right.)

An FBI spokesperson tells Fox News Digital that any suggestion the agency is interfering with congressional efforts to look into the attempted assassination “is inaccurate and unfounded.”

Advertisement

The agency said that Crooks’ body was released to his family after coordination with the coroner’s office as well as state and local law enforcement partners “in keeping with normal procedures.”

Higgins, a former police captain, said that he visited Butler, Pennsylvania, earlier this month to investigate the crime scene and that when he asked to view Crooks’ body, he discovered that it “was gone.” 

BUTLER RESIDENTS STILL FURIOUS ABOUT TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT, SAY MORE THAN INCOMPETENCE TO BLAME

“My effort to examine Crooks’ body on Monday, August 5, caused quite a stir and revealed a disturbing fact . . . the FBI released the body for cremation 10 days after J13 [July 13],” Higgins writes in the report sent to task force chairperson Mike Kelly, R-Pa.

“Nobody knew this until Monday, August 5, including the County Coroner, law enforcement, Sheriff, etc,” Higgins writes. “Yes, Butler County Coroner technically had legal authority over the body, but I spoke with the Coroner, and he would have never released Crooks’ body to the family for cremation or burial without specific permission from the FBI.”

Advertisement

Higgins doubled down on his claims late Friday in a statement to Fox News Digital.

“My report states the precise truth, which is that the coroner released Crooks body to the family for cremation only after the FBI had specifically authorized the coroner to release Crooks’ body to the family for cremation.”

Furthermore, Higgins writes in his preliminary investigatory report that the coroner’s report and autopsy report are both “late,” and as of Aug. 5, they were a week late. 

Higgins says that the problem with him not being able to examine Crooks’ body is that he won’t know for sure if the coroner’s report and the autopsy report are accurate. 

“We will actually never know. Yes, we’ll get the reports and pictures, etc., but I will not ever be able to say with certainty that those reports and pictures are accurate according to my own examination of the body,” Higgins writes.

Advertisement

As well as the release of Crooks’ body, Higgins also panned the FBI for releasing the crime scene after three days, “much to everyone’s surprise.”

Higgins said they did this despite it being common knowledge that Congress would be investigating the shooting, which resulted in Trump being struck in the ear. Crooks killed highly regarded local firefighter Corey Comperatore, who was trying to shield his daughters from the gunfire, while two other victims suffered life-threatening injuries but are expected to make a full recovery.

LIFE-SIZE SCULPTURE OF ‘FIGHTING’ TRUMP MADE FROM NAILS UNVEILED AT ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT SITE

“They had to know that releasing the J13 crime scene would injure the immediate observations of any following investigation,” Higgins writes. 

Higgins also alleges that the FBI cleaned up biological evidence from the crime scene, which he says is “unheard of.” 

Advertisement

“Cops don’t do that, ever,” Higgins writes.

But the FBI also hit back against those claims, telling Fox News Digital that the crime scene was released to the property owners in phases and that “nothing was rushed and everything was documented as part of the investigation.”

The FBI also says it arranged for the cleaning of the location where Crooks died, which is in keeping with standard procedures.

“The FBI has been working closely with our law enforcement partners to conduct a thorough investigation into the shooting, and we have followed normal procedures in the handling of the crime scene and evidence,” the FBI says in the statement. “The FBI continues its painstaking work on the investigation to develop as complete a picture as possible of what led to the shooting, and we remain committed to maximum transparency as we continue to brief Congress and publish information for the public regarding the ongoing investigation.”

Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump reacts as multiple shots rang out during a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday, July 13, 2024.  (Reuters/Brendan McDermid)

Advertisement

The preliminary report also sheds more light on the shocking event that could have plunged the nation into a political crisis.

Higgins heaps praise on local law enforcement, particularly the Butler County Emergency Services Unit (ESU), who he says were professionally deployed and commanded.

However, one concerning point highlighted was that the Secret Service did not retrieve radios that had been set aside for them by Butler County’s tactical command, even though they had been reminded to do so by Butler County tactical command the day before and the morning of the shooting, Higgins says. 

He also discovered that before July 13, the Secret Service had never assigned a counter-sniper team to a former president, including Trump.

Higgins said Crooks fired off eight shots, and that all eight casings were recovered and are allegedly in proper possession of the FBI. He said that Crooks’ position on the roof of the gar building provided him with excellent concealment from the northern counter-sniper team due to the foliage and branches of two trees.

Advertisement

A screenshot image from James Copenhaver, one of the victims critically wounded in the July 13 assassination attempt against former President Trump, shows a figure, likely Crooks, moving across a rooftop just minutes before gunfire rang out at Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. (James Copenhaver)

The ninth shot was fired by a Butler SWAT operator from the ground, about 100 yards away from the AGR building. The shot hit Crooks’ rifle stock and fragged his face and shoulder area from the stock breaking up. Higgins believes this shot damaged the buffer tube on Crooks’ rifle, meaning that the rifle would not fire after his eight shot.

“The SWAT operator who took this shot was a total badass; when he had sighted the shooter Crooks as a mostly obscured by foliage moving target on the AGR rooftop, he immediately left his assigned post and ran towards the threat, running to a clear shot position directly into the line of fire while Crooks was firing 8 rounds,” Higgins writes.

Higgins writes that Crooks “went down” from his firing position when shot 9 was fired, recovered after just a few seconds, and “popped back up.”

The tenth, and final shot, was fired by the southern Secret Service counter-sniper team, which entered the left mouth area and exited the right ear area.

Advertisement

Officers surround Thomas Crooks on the AGR roof after countersnipers killed him. (Butler Twp Police Dept.)

Higgins also says that Crooks did not use a ladder to scale the roof and ruled out a possible second shooter being on top of the water tower. Videos circulating online show a dark figure or a shadow on the water tower, but Higgins says that ESU Commander Edward Lenz had cleared the tower with a drone that morning. 

He also says that a window below Crooks’ firing position on the roof of the AGR building did not open and never did open after videos online suggested a “muzzle flash” had come from it.

“The ‘muzzle flash’ from inside that window was either a digital fabrication or an iPhone light or iPhone camera flash reflected from the glass of the widow,” Higgins writes.

Advertisement

Higgins said he has yet to take a deep dive into how Crooks came to be a shooter or how he manufactured a remote trigger bomb.  

“I have not investigated the life and actions of Thomas Matthew Crooks outside of his actions on J13. But I will. We will. We’re just getting started, Mr. Chairman.”

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Northeast

Federal judge disqualifies US attorney, tosses subpoenas targeting NY AG Letitia James

Published

on

Federal judge disqualifies US attorney, tosses subpoenas targeting NY AG Letitia James

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge on Thursday disqualified a U.S. attorney in upstate New York and tossed out subpoenas he issued to state Attorney General Letitia James.

In a 24-page ruling, Judge Lorna Schofield, an Obama appointee, ruled that John Sarcone has been unlawfully serving as the acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of New York. 

“When the Executive branch of government skirts restraints put in place by Congress and then uses that power to subject political adversaries to criminal investigations, it acts without lawful authority,” Schofield wrote. 

FEDERAL JUDGE DISQUALIFIES ACTING NEVADA US ATTORNEY FROM HANDLING CASES

Advertisement

U.S. Attorney John A. Sarcone III delivers a speech after being sworn in on March 17, 2025, at the James T. Foley U.S. Courthouse in Albany, New York. (Will Waldron/Albany Times Union via Getty Images)

“The subpoenas are unenforceable due to a threshold defect: Mr. Sarcone was not lawfully serving as Acting U.S. Attorney when the subpoenas were issued,” the judge wrote.

James challenged Sarcone’s authority after he issued subpoenas seeking information about lawsuits she filed against President Donald Trump. She claimed he had committed fraud in his business dealings, and separately against the National Rifle Association and some of its former leaders, The Associated Press reported.

James has claimed that the subpoenas were part of a campaign over her investigations into Trump allies. 

“This decision is an important win for the rule of law and we will continue to defend our office’s successful litigation from this administration’s political attacks,” a spokesperson for James’ office told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

Fox News Digital has reached out to James and the Justice Department on the judge’s subpoena decision. 

MIKE DAVIS: WHY SCOTUS MUST REINSTATE TRUMP US ATTORNEYS ALINA HABA AND LINDSEY HALLIGAN

New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks to the media outside the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Norfolk, Oct. 24, 2025. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

The DOJ contends that Sarcone was properly appointed and that his subpoenas were valid. 

Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Sarcone an interim U.S. attorney for 120 days. When that term expired, a federal court declined to extend his tenure.

Advertisement

“On the same day that the judges declined to extend Mr. Sarcone’s appointment, the Department took coordinated steps – through personnel moves and shifting titles – to install Mr. Sarcone as Acting U.S. Attorney. Federal law does not permit such a workaround,” the ruling states. 

Federal judges have also disqualified prosecutors in Nevada, the Los Angeles area and Virginia.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Lindsey Halligan’s dismissal as Virginia’s top federal prosecutor resulted in the tossing of indictments against James and former FBI Director James Comey.

On Tuesday, a federal judge ordered Halligan to explain why she continues to call herself the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia despite another judge in November determining that she was unlawfully appointed to the role.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

New York

Video: New York City Nurses Go on Strike

Published

on

Video: New York City Nurses Go on Strike

new video loaded: New York City Nurses Go on Strike

transcript

transcript

New York City Nurses Go on Strike

Nearly 15,000 nurses at major New York City hospitals went on strike on Monday, demanding more robust staffing levels, higher pay and better safety precautions.

Chanting: “If we don’t get it — shut it down! “How can we as nurses be inside taking care of patients when we don’t have health care? We need to have good health care so we stay strong, so we can go in there day after day. Nursing is a 24/7 job. We don’t get a break. We’re there to take care of these patients, and that’s what we’re going to do. But we need the health care to do that.” “All parties must return immediately to the negotiating table and not leave. They must bargain in good faith.” “That’s right.” “And they must arrive at a deal that is satisfactory to all, that allows the nurses who work in this city to live in this city.”

Advertisement
Nearly 15,000 nurses at major New York City hospitals went on strike on Monday, demanding more robust staffing levels, higher pay and better safety precautions.

By Meg Felling

January 12, 2026

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Massachusetts Senate to finally debate Boston Mayor Wu’s contentious tax shift bill

Published

on

Massachusetts Senate to finally debate Boston Mayor Wu’s contentious tax shift bill


Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s stalled tax shift bill will be taken up by the state Senate Thursday for the first time since it was killed there more than a year ago, but this time as an amendment filed for an alternate Senate-led tax relief proposal.

State Sen. Michael Rush, a Boston Democrat, filed an amendment to state Sen. William Brownsberger’s property tax shock bill that mirrors the language included in a home rule petition the mayor has been pushing for nearly two years that would shift more of the city’s tax burden from the residential to commercial sector.

“Property tax relief is a pressing issue for my constituents — and residents throughout the state,” Rush said Monday in a statement to the Herald. “On behalf of the people of Boston, I have filed the home rule petition passed by the Boston City Council to provide property tax relief for Boston residents.

“As the Senate considers several worthy proposals designed to address affordability in the Commonwealth, I am glad this proposal will be part of the discussion,” Rush said.

Advertisement

Wu’s office told the Herald Saturday that the mayor had requested the amendment.

“Every senator has the opportunity to submit amendments related to these bills by Monday, and we have asked Boston’s senators to offer an amendment with our residential tax relief language that has been vetted thoroughly and never received a vote,” a Wu spokesperson said in a statement. “We are following closely and hope the final bills will include this needed relief for residents.”

Wu has said her legislation is aimed at lowering the 13% tax hike the average single-family homeowner is projected to face this year. Third-quarter tax bills went out to homeowners earlier this month.

The mayor’s bill seeks to shift more of the city’s tax burden onto commercial property owners, beyond the 175% state limit, for a three-year period.

It is set to be debated, along with several other amendments that have been filed by senators for Brownsberger’s property tax shock bill, at Thursday’s session.

Advertisement

“All amendments filed by members of the Senate will be considered by the full body during our session on Thursday,” a spokesperson for Senate President Karen Spilka’s office said Monday in a statement to the Herald.

A vote is expected on the bill and underlying amendments on the same day, according to state Sen. Nick Collins, a South Boston Democrat whose alternative tax relief bill and amendments will also be considered.

Collins, who opposes the tax shift element of the mayor’s home rule petition and helped lead the push to kill it on the Senate floor in late 2024, has put forward a bill and amendments that include other elements of what Wu has proposed.

He’s pushing for tax rebates for low- and middle-income homeowners who already receive the residential tax exemption by using surplus funds, along with senior, veterans and small business tax relief provisions.

“I think that the relief measures are positive in terms of the amendments that I and others have filed that are relief in nature or relief options, but I think anything that involves a tax increase is going to be difficult,” Collins told the Herald Monday when asked about the chances for the mayor’s proposal.

Advertisement

“Especially when the city is sitting on $552 million of what they consider to be free cash, it’s hard to make the case that tax increase is necessary,” Collins added.

In a statement issued by his office, Collins added that the city’s decision to hike residential property taxes by double-digits “with so much in the City of Boston’s surplus fund” was “unnecessary, unfair and clearly inequitable.”

“To cancel out that tax increase, my legislation would authorize the city to issue direct rebates to homeowners,” Collins said.

He pointed to a similar approach that he said was taken at the state level in 2022, when the governor and legislature issued rebates after tax revenues exceeded the cap established under voter-approved state law, Chapter 62F, which limits the growth of state tax collections.

In terms of Rush’s amendment, Collins said he’s also concerned that the senator’s language would make the mayor’s tax shift bill applicable statewide, rather than just in Boston.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending