Connect with us

California

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter

Published

on

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter


The second quarter was an important litmus test for restaurant operators with a footprint in California, as it marked the first reporting period following the state’s implementation of AB 1228 on April 1. The law raised the minimum wage at quick-service restaurants to $20 an hour, or by 25%.

The legislation initially raised some hell in the industry, to put things lightly. Some companies blamed the hike for layoffs, others for closures. Some operators vowed not to include California in their expansion plans. For public companies, however, the reaction has been a bit more measured. In summary, it’s full speed ahead in California, a state that is experiencing population growth for the first time in three years. But, it’s full speed ahead with significant price increases to offset the labor inflation, and those price increases have impacted traffic at many, if not most, concepts. According to Revenue Management Solutions, traffic in California has declined by 5.9% since January versus the U.S. average of negative 3.6%.

RMS’ data finds that menu prices in California have risen over four percentage points more than the U.S. average since January, or 7.5% compared to 3.1%. Domino’s, Shake Shack, and Chipotle are three such companies that took high-single-digital pricing increases in the state following the implementation of AB 1228.

Advertisement

Labor optimization

In addition to taking pricing, several chains are sharpening their focus on “labor optimization” to offset wage inflation. California-based The Habit Burger Grill is one of them.

“… A comprehensive store level labor optimization effort … contributed to an impressive 520 basis point expansion of restaurant level margins from the first quarter, despite a double-digit increase in restaurant level labor rates in California stores,” David Gibbs, CEO of parent company Yum Brands, said during his company’s earnings call earlier this month.

El Pollo Loco, which has a massive footprint in California, is exploring “labor productivity initiatives,” like deployment and scheduling, in addition to increased menu prices. CFO Ira Fils said traffic in California was “a little more” down compared to other markets, but overall, “we didn’t see a whole lot of difference between the markets.”

Sweetgreen is also making improvements to its labor optimization, according to CFO Mitch Reback, while Portillo’s is testing kiosks in the California market.

Advertisement

QSRs hit

Of course, QSRs have beared the brunt of this inflation and executives acknowledged as much during their respective Q2 calls. McDonald’s chief financial officer Ian Borden simply called wage pressures in California “a headwind we’re working through,” adding that margins could be “down a little bit” from 2023 accordingly, but still good considering the “overall context of what we’re working through.” McDonald’s experienced its first negative same-store sales quarter since 2020.

As for Wendy’s, CEO Kirk Tanner called California “unfortunate from a wage and labor standpoint,” adding that the company is focused on “driving more productivity.”

“If you look at where consumers are, our focus is on winning and competing well in this environment. And we’re doing that with that strategy, including places like California. It goes to delivering our core, having compelling innovation and having relevant value,” Tanner said. Wendy’s sales were essentially flat in Q2.

Jack in the Box felt a swift impact, with labor costs up 200 basis points from the prior year, while franchise-level margin was $74.6 million, compared to $75.3 million a year ago. CEO Darin Harris said the chain will “regain” its margin through improved sales, and “ongoing equipment, technology, and financial fundamentals initiatives.” The chain has adopted a new oil management process, for instance, and is in the process of testing a fryer automation system, while its sister chain, Del Taco, is testing kiosks. Jack in the Box also worked with its franchisees to take a “surgical approach” to pricing. Despite the early hit on margins and sales, executives remain optimistic about California.

Advertisement

“California fared substantially better than we thought,” CEO Darin Harris said.

“This was the first full quarter of operating under the increased minimum wage law and we are proud of how our teams executed through this change,” CFO Brian Scott said. “[For] Jack in the Box company-owned restaurants, which are predominantly in California, same-store sales performance was better than all but one market. Del Taco had a similar result, with California being one of their top markets in the quarter.”

Full-service insulated?

Despite the law only applying to QSRs, full-service wasn’t completely insulated. Consider Kura Sushi as an example here. The company’s second quarter performance fell well short of expectations, with chief executive officer Hajime Jimmy Uba citing AB 1228 as a main culprit given that comparable same-store sales decelerated in California in April.

“What we have seen … is a general perception that restaurants as a category have become expensive, introducing industry-wide pressures regardless of a given restaurant’s relative value,” he said.

Advertisement

Still, many full-service concepts have experienced no change at all, or even a small tailwind from the QSR-focused legislation. For example, Texas Roadhouse’s handful of California stores are doing “fine,” according to executives.

BJ’s Restaurants, which is headquartered in Huntington Beach, Calif., also hasn’t seen changing trends from its consumers, perhaps because gas prices have come down, according to chief financial officer Tom Houdek. BJ’s executives made it a point to also note that labor levels haven’t been impacted by higher wages at QSRs and that the company is “in a better place” than in 2019 with staffing. That said, Houdek called the statewide pricing increases a “sticker shock” for consumers.

Denny’s has leaned into a silver lining from California’s wage increases, expanding its virtual Banda Burrito brand to over 300 restaurants with a priority on the state to add the revenue channel. CEO Kelli Valade said traffic outperformed QSRs during the quarter because of lower menu prices relative to QSRs, as well as the expansion of Banda Burrito. Notably, Denny’s is also targeting California as one of its growth markets for its Keke’s brand.

“We have not experienced a material increase in team wages at our 22 California company restaurants as a result of AB 1228. We believe this is in part due to our servers earning well above the AB 1228 minimum wage when factoring in tip income,” CFO Robert Verostek said, adding,The [market share] gap we were experiencing to overall QSR, we’ve cut in half in California specifically.”

Cheesecake Factory is also seeing consistency across its geographies with no added pressure from California. CEO David Overton said the legislation mostly impacts QSRs, “which is positive for us.”

Advertisement

Notably, full-service brands aren’t the only ones with optimism. Wingstop had a meteoric second quarter relative to the rest of the industry, AB 1228 be damned. Wingstop did not experience transaction changes after implementing pricing increases to offset wage increases at its 400-ish California locations.

“In fact, the trends in California are following a very similar trend to what we see outside of California for our business,” CFO Alex Kaleida said.

Further, Dutch Bros experienced a 60-basis-point year-over-year increase in labor costs primarily driven by the wage increase in California, where about 20% of its system is located. The company took a 1.5% pricing increase to help offset the pressure but has otherwise been focused on business as usual.

“We had two of our top first week performers in California in the first half of this year,” CEO Christine Barone said. “We continue to be very bullish on our prospects in California and continue to look for sites and opening shops in California.”

Contact Alicia Kelso at [email protected]

Advertisement

 



Source link

California

Two Republicans lead race to be next California governor—New poll

Published

on

Two Republicans lead race to be next California governor—New poll


Two Republican candidates are leading the latest poll in California’s gubernatorial race amid concerns that Democrats could be locked out of the general election in the solidly blue state.

Newsweek reached out to the California Democratic and Republican parties for comment via email.

Why It Matters

California is a solidly Democratic state that rarely elects Republicans to statewide office. However, Democrats are facing a potential challenge in next year’s gubernatorial race. The Golden State uses a unique “jungle primary” system where all candidates, regardless of their party, appear on the same ballot and the two candidates who receive the most votes advance to the general election. This means there is a possible, even if unlikely, scenario where two Republicans could advance to the general election and lock Democrats out of the race.

A string of recent polls suggests that could be a possibility in the race next year to replace retiring Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, who cannot run for a third term due to term limits.

Advertisement

What To Know

California’s gubernatorial race has drawn the interest of several well-known Democrats in the state including Representative Eric Swalwell, former Representative Katie Porter, former Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Xavier Becerra, businessman Tom Steyer, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond and former Controller Betty Yee.

By contrast, two well-known Republicans—Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and commentator Steve Hilton—are in the race.

The math problem for Democrats would be if the high number of Democrats split the vote in a way that allows Bianco and Hilton to narrowly advance to the general election. Early polls show that as a possibility, though there is still time for Democratic voters to coalesce around specific candidates before June’s primary.

On Thursday, pollster Civic Lens Research released a survey showing Bianco and Hilton advancing to the general election. Hilton led with just under 18 percent of the vote, while Bianco followed with about 14 percent.

Swalwell placed third with about 12 percent support, while Porter and Steyer followed with 9 and 7 percent support, respectively. Still, many voters are still unsure of who they are going to support—and could be decisive in the race. Thirty-one percent said they were undecided in the poll.

Advertisement

The poll surveyed 400 likely California primary voters via a web questionnaire sent by text message between December 14 and 16.

Other polls have also showed a Democratic lockout as a possibility. An Emerson College poll, which surveyed 1,000 likely voters from December 1-2, showed Bianco leading with 13 percent, while Hilton and Swalwell were tied at 12 percent. An FM3 poll showed Hilton lead with 18 percent, followed by Bianco and Swalwell at 17 percent. It surveyed 821 likely voters from November 30 to December 7 and had a margin of error of plus or minus four percentage points.

Zev Yaroslavsky, a former member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and director of the Los Angeles Initiative at the University of California, Los Angeles, told Newsweek polls are “largely reflecting name identification and party identification.”

“Voters are not focused on the June primary yet,” he said. “With only two Republicans in the mix along with half a dozen or more well-known Democrats, it is not surprising that most of the candidates are bunched up.”

Democratic and undecided voters are likely to “consolidate behind one or two prominent candidates” by the spring, Yaroslavsky said, noting that other candidates will either drop out or “just be relegated to electoral irrelevancy.”

Advertisement

“The top Democrat will assuredly receive far more than 13% in June. Republicans have a ceiling of what they can hope to get in California, and when Democratic and independent voters coalesce around on or two candidates, at least one of the leading Democratic candidates will come in first or second and advance to the general election. At that point, it’s the Democrats’ to lose,” he said.

What People Are Saying

Corrin Rankin, chairwoman of the California Republican Party, told Newsweek in November: “Poll after poll shows Californians are tired of the decades of failure and corruption by Democrats, and they are turning to Republicans for real solutions and leadership on issues like affordability, public safety, and homelessness.”

Rusty Hicks, chair of the California Democratic Party, told Newsweek in November: “We look forward to electing another Democrat as California’s next Governor in 2026.”

What Happens Next?

The primary is set for June 2, 2026, so candidates will spend the first half of next year making their case to voters to convince them they are the best option to lead the nation’s most populous state.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California orders Tahoe Truckee schools to leave Nevada sports over transgender athlete dispute

Published

on

California orders Tahoe Truckee schools to leave Nevada sports over transgender athlete dispute


The California Department of Education is requiring the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District to follow state law in another clash over transgender athletes in youth sports in the state. 

Currently, student-athletes in Tahoe Truckee Unified play sports in Nevada because of how close they are. But Nevada now bans transgender athletes in girls’ sports, which is against California state law. 

So after decades of playing in Nevada, California’s Department of Education is requiring the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District to compete in California to comply with state laws that allow student athletes to compete based on their gender identity.

David Mack is the co-founder of Tahoe Pride and describes the new youth sports divide in the Tahoe region.

Advertisement

“So no one’s happy, it’s really sad, it’s quite tragic in that way,” Mack said. “People feel really upset that the school moved so fast on this. They feel blindsided, they feel not listened to, and then other people, like the trans kids, are getting steamrolled over like they’re not recognized in this argument.”

Nevada state lawmakers passed a law in April requiring a mandatory physical signed by a doctor to deem the athlete male or female based on their birth sex. 

“This is a politically manufactured issue to try to divide people,” Mack said. 

The Tahoe Truckee Unified School District is responding to the California Department of Education with a solution that the district legally join the California Interscholastic Federation in 2026, but continue to play in the Nevada Interscholastic Activities Association through 2028.

When asked if transgender athletes would be able to compete while operating in the NIAA, the district said it’s “still in the early stages of this transition, and many details are still being developed.”

Advertisement

In an October letter addressed to the California Department of Education, the school district’s attorney, Matthew Juhl-Darlington, said the Tahoe Truckee Unified is “not aware of any transgender youth who have expressed interest in participating in its 2025-2026 athletic programs.”

“While the NIAA recently updated its polices to define ‘male’ and ‘female’ based on sex assigned at birth and not as reflected in an individual’s gender identity, as required under California law, the District is interpreting and implementing this policy in a manner consistent with California’s legal requirements,” Juhl-Darlington said in the letter. 

California Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley is opposed to the state order, arguing the weather conditions in Tahoe need to be considered.

“So in order to compete in a California league, you have to deal with this snowy weather and the travel dangers and so forth,” Kiley said.

The school board was expected to explain its solution to both join California’s CIF while playing in the NIAA through 2028 to parents and students Wednesday night at a board meeting.

Advertisement

So far, the California Department of Education has not said if it will accept this as a solution.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California wants Verizon to compromise more on DEI

Published

on

California wants Verizon to compromise more on DEI


A CA judge recommends approval for Verizon/Frontier but thinks more DEI commitments are neededNotably, the judge determined Verizon’s letter to the FCC doesn’ | A state judge recommended California approve the Verizon/Frontier deal, if the operator agrees to some DEI and workforce commitments.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending