In “The Game of Life,” landing on the “Inherit a House”  square is one of the most coveted on the board. In real life, a home or condo is also one of the greatest financial gifts that can be passed on, especially in a housing-strapped state like Colorado.

More Coloradans are seeing the big wheel spin in their favor each year. But the pace won’t be enough to make up for a housing shortfall estimated at more than 106,000 units in 2023, according to a report from the Colorado Department of Local Affairs.

About one in eight homes that traded hands in Colorado last year represented an inheritance, which is a little below the share that new home sales represented, according to data from the real estate research firm Cotality.

“Inheritance in the 12 months ending in 2025 totaled nearly 12,000 homes, which happened to be almost 12% of all total property transfers. This is higher, both in terms of the number and the share, than previous years — in line with the national trend,” said Matt Delventhal, a principal economist at Cotality.

Cotality measured the 12-month pace of home sales, new and existing, and inheritance transfers in Colorado through October for the odd-numbered years from 2019 to 2025. Existing home sales were down sharply between 2021 and 2025, falling from 128,899 in 2021 to 75,833 in 2025.

Likewise, new home sales fell from 22,064 in 2021 to 15,610 in 2023 to 12,755 in 2025, according to Cotality.

Inheritances, by contrast, continued to chug along, going from 10,052 in 2021 to 10,243 in 2023 to 11,945 in 2025. The gap between new home sales and inheritances was only 810. Inheritances are contributing almost as much to inventory as new home construction.

A lack of enough new construction, especially for first-time buyers, has pushed up existing home prices. High prices, when combined with higher mortgage rates, have resulted in fewer sales. Because home sales have fallen so much, the “inheritance” share of all home transfers has nearly doubled in Colorado, from 6.2% in 2021 to 9.9% in 2023 to a record 11.9% in 2025.

“The increase in the share is a bit sharper than the national trend, mostly because Colorado resales drop off a bit more sharply in 2023-25 than the national average,” Delventhal said.

Nationally, the market share of inherited homes went from just under 5% in 2021 to 6.8% in 2023 to 8.7% in 2025, which translated into 412,174 homes and condos passed down. Those percentages also reflect the 12-month tally through October.

“The behavior around inherited homes does feel different from what it did pre-2022. Historically, most estate transfers functioned as pass-through transactions. Heirs would inherit the property, do some light clean-up or updates, and put it on the market fairly quickly. That still happens, but I am seeing more cases where families pause and evaluate other options first,” said Cooper Thayer, a Realtor with the Thayer Group in Castle Rock.

Because inherited homes have little or no debt and strong rent potential, and because selling has become more difficult, heirs are increasingly looking at keeping the homes as rentals or to move into, he said.

While Colorado’s share of inherited homes is above average, it lags behind California, a more expensive market where 18% of home transfers involved an inheritance, according to Cotality.

In California, favorable tax laws locked in lower property tax rates and provided beneficiaries with an incentive to use an inherited home as a primary residence. For the first time this year, passed-down homes ran more than double the number of new homes sold in the state, according to Cotality.

Prop 19, passed in 2020, limited the transfer of a lower tax base only to homes that a child or heir actually occupied, and excluded rental homes. It also excluded only the first $1 million in added value beyond the original value used to determine property taxes. The state, however, could see a ballot measure this year that would restore some of the more generous property tax breaks to heirs.

At first glance, the increase in home inheritances seems to validate the “Silver Tsunami” hypothesis. Baby Boomers, those born between 1946 and 1964, were not only huge in numbers, but also more likely to own homes than earlier generations. By the time they turned 65, individuals born in 1948 owned 50% more homes than those who were born in 1938 did at the same age.

Compared to prior generations, baby boomers have also shown a greater propensity to hold onto their homes more tightly, adding a different meaning to “until death do us part.” About six in 10 say they don’t plan to ever sell their homes, and three in 10 are holding on so they can pass the properties down, according to HousingWire.

“They are going to have to take me out of there in a box, even though it is a two-story home,” said Jennifer Antonio, an agent with Sotheby’s International Realty in Denver.

Antonio, who puts herself in the never-sell boomer group, said she and her husband purchased their first home when she was 23. They did so on two minimum wage salaries, proof of just how much better the market did in matching options to incomes. Now the average age of a first-time homebuyer is 38, she said.

Her four millennial children still don’t own, despite being college-educated. With her parents too old to host big events, her home has become a stable gathering place for the family, where adult children can flow in and out, and where everyone gathers for Thanksgiving and Christmas.

“I need to stay in that home,” she said. Antonio said her older clients complain about a lack of good options if they do sell, which can keep them locked into homes that have become burdensome. Builders, seeking to get as much square footage as they can on a lot, aren’t building enough products like ranch homes that would appeal to older buyers.

That baby boomer hesitancy, Cotality says, is “effectively freezing the anticipated flow of supply.”  Boomers can’t hold on forever, but it could be well into the 2030s before a substantial amount of older housing stock better-suited for young families emerges. Younger generations could find themselves stuck renting for longer than they would like.

In what turned out to be a an offseason of highs and lows for Mariners general manager Justin Hollander and team president Jerry Dipoto. However, they were able to cap off a frustrating few weeks by acquiring infielder and 2024 All-Star, Brendan Donovan.

Wile the club saw last year’s second baseman, Jorge Polanco, and third baseman, Eugenio Suarez depart, Donovan may be a better fit for the club. He doesn’t hit with anywhere near the power of those two former Mariners, but he’s much more consistent. He ranks among MLB’s best in on-base percentage over his for years in the big leagues, and he’s a skilled defender who won a GoldGlove in his rookie season.

A career .282 hitter, Donnie gives the M’s a lot of options in the batting order and fills one of the two vacancies in the Seattle infield. The other spot seems to come down to a comperition between young players, with top prospects Colt Emerson and Cole Young battling it out with second-year man Leo Rivas during Spring Training. The most likely scenario would involve a platoon or a rotating system among at least two of them.

CLICK FOR MORE: Seattle host says Mariners’ trade for Brendan Donovan is ‘what contending teams do’

The Mariners have certainly re-loaded with enough ammo to repeat as the division champs in 2026, but are they still looking to pull off an 11th hour deal as pitchers and catchers will begin reporting to Arizona? COuld there be one more deal up the sleeve of the team’s fantastic front office?

The Mariners seem content with what they have

Heading into the new season, Seattle seems set as they look to repeat as American League West Division Champions. Although you can never put anything past the dealing duo of Hollander and Dipoto, the team can win with the cards they’ve already been dealt.

But as Spring Training unfolds and the cleats hit the field, the team will have a bird’s-eye view of what they’re working with. If management feels like they’re faltering because they’re relying on players like Emerson too much and too fast, look for them to try to bring in a stopgap veteran. Otherwise? There’s no reason to mess with this roster until at least mid-May.

More Seattle Mariners News & Opinions

• Are Mariners supporters still miffed at manager Dan Wilson for last year’s ALCS loss?

• The Seattle Mariners must cut down the clutter in the outfield

• The 2001 Seattle Mariners will be honored with a statue at T-Mobile Park

• Rick Rizzs, iconic voice of the Mariners, announces he will retire after 2026 season

I was on a whale-watching trip Wednesday aboard the Legacy off San Diego when dolphins stole the spotlight in spectacular fashion.

We had just observed a southbound gray whale that did not stay near the surface long enough for quality views, so our captain ventured farther offshore.

We saw common dolphins in the distance, beyond Point Loma. But they, too, moved lazily atop a calm ocean during an unseasonably warm afternoon.

But as we approached, still a few hundred yards away, the dolphins changed behavior as if they had been activated by a switch.