North Carolina
What They’re Saying After Saturday's Loss to North Carolina
The Washington Spirit fell 0-1 to the North Carolina Courage on Saturday night in front of the fourth largest home crowd in Spirit history. After the match, Interim Head Coach Adrián González, Hal Hershfelt, and Tara McKeown spoke with the media.
Adrián González
On the way the team dealt with North Carolina keeping their wingers high and wide to occupy the fullbacks:
“Well, I think today, we hadn’t had the game that we were expecting. We need to take this game as a learning experience. I think behind every game there is learning, especially when you lose, and we need to identify what happened today. Right now, the feeling that I have is that we knew that they wanted to progress through the middle. They wanted to create numbers inside. Dropping their nine with (Ashley) Sanchez, with two midfielders, sometimes also with a fullback there inside. We knew that that would happen. That and I think we haven’t adjusted properly. Especially during the first half and then second half I think we had a lot of performance. Again, not too many chances today but even though we didn’t have the best game today, we could’ve scored at least one, I think, but if we see the big picture I think we need to be honest. I think today we didn’t deserve a victory. When we created chances other games, I said like, ‘Okay, maybe we could’ve scored more goals and maybe we could’ve had better results.’ Today, my feeling is we haven’t had what we wanted, and it wasn’t enough. Maybe we could tie today because you push until the end. The team, they have been working hard until the end, but I think today we needed to do much more to win a game. We’ve done that during many, many games, but this week we couldn’t, and we need to learn from that.”
On the reshuffling of positions on the field:
“We wanted Makenna (Morris) on the left side, but we were expecting because we didn’t know about Casey (Kreuger), if she could continue or not. So, just in case Casey couldn’t continue, we were expecting to put Makenna there, so that’s why she was a little bit confused with Trin (Trinity Rodman) there, but we wanted to have Makenna on left side and Trin more as a nine with Hatchy (Ashley Hatch). Two forwards and trying to thread behind because we knew especially behind the fullbacks and center backs, we could’ve had more advantage, but I think today we couldn’t find those walls and those spaces.”
On the impact Andi Sullivan not playing had on the team’s performance:
“Huge. Huge impact. She’s a player that brings leadership, brings patience for the buildup, during the buildup, she’s helping us a lot. Also, defensively she has the ability to organize the team and when things are not going good, or as we were expecting, she’s the first one who always takes that step forward and today for sure we missed her. We need to learn, and we need to be able to do that also with all the players as a team. We need to have also that ambition and also that leadership with all the players on the pitch because sometimes things are not as you were expecting, and we need to be ready to face those situations, too. Yesterday, the last training session, she fell a little bit. Her hip again, and at this point, it doesn’t make sense to push any player, I think. We have that summer break and thinking about next game, we want the players as fresh as possible, and that’s why we decided today to give her a rest because she needed it. Of course, we have other players that also are competing good and that’s why we couldn’t play today with her.”
On what they will do improve communication between the midfield and the forwards:
“Well, we’ve been talking about, especially in the middle today we couldn’t find, especially Hal and Paige Metayer behind the forwards. We’ve been working on that this week and other games. During the buildup, we could find those players and those spaces much better. Once you find those players there, your attack is better because you can progress and then you can find maybe Croix (Bethune) or Courtney (Brown) in those pockets. Today, we knew that they had a lot of players in the middle. It wasn’t easy to progress through the middle, but I think we could’ve done a better job especially facing forward because sometimes we could receive them but facing backwards and we needed a lot of time just to turn and we couldn’t progress. We’re going to continue working on that because this is nothing new. We’ve been working on that because the way that we want to play is very important. So, when the ball goes there, you can have a better attack. I think today also we could have done maybe a better job with Trin, Ouleye (Sarr), Croix, with those players because when the ball arrived there, we were not as accurate as other games, maybe, with last pass or with the decision making. We wanted to progress and to finish fast with shooting or with maybe with just kicking the ball. It’s something that we’ve been working on, especially when we are in the half, we know that we need to be more patient, and if you cannot attack fast, we need to have longer possessions. Again, we need to learn from that and try to be better next week.”
On having to make decisions on the last two subs:
“Performance. I didn’t like what I was seeing, and we have enough players to move the team. I’m not criticizing them for sure. I’m talking about the energy, about the feeling that I have. We couldn’t find those players. I was feeling that today we were sometimes a little bit down. I don’t know why, to be honest. Sometimes you need to move the team. You need to provoke different things, different relationships. Bringing Hatchy and Britt (Brittany Ratcliffe), they have a great energy, and we’ve seen that at other games. We wanted to create different options. Ouleye, Croix, Trin, a lot of players, they’ve been playing a lot of games and sometimes when we see that the performance is maybe going down or the energy is not 100%, we need to move the team. I think it’s good to have that competition, and all the players can play, all the players can start, and they need to be 100% for sure.”
On Tara McKeown’s plays throughout the end of the game:
“Well, I think during the last minutes there are a lot of emotions and a lot of players, they want to go forward. She can do that, but I think today it wasn’t easy to dribble because the field, to be honest, is not so good for that especially in the middle. We wanted to progress more through the width, and those last minutes we’ve been working on that to try to put balls inside the box, to provoke set pieces, but she has that energy and for sure she wants to help the team going forward. I think we need to manage a little bit better those minutes because sometimes we need to be a little bit more patient and try to identify when it is a good time to put that ball or when to dribble and try to find the better option.”
Hal Hershfelt & Tara McKeown
On the problem North Carolina posed:
Hal: “I honestly think our lack of chances – well, we had quite a bit of chances that came from our rhythm and our energy. I feel like we had a good five to 10 minutes where we would be up in their half working it, but then we would kind of die off. I feel like that’s really where we went wrong this game. Yes, they are a good team, and I feel like they were able to expose us, especially through the middle a little bit, playing those slip balls into our box and stuff like that, but at the end of the day, I think it was up to us to really turn it up, and we didn’t do that.”
On defending Ashley Sanchez:
Tara: “It’s definitely a little weird seeing her on the other team. I think we had a game plan, and we just didn’t execute it as well as we probably hoped. Like Hal said, they were able to find slip passes in the pockets and behind our backs. Going forward we need to work on that this week.”
Hal: “She is a great player and she’s very good at finding those spaces in the midfield. She is a great player.”
On going to the Olympic Games:
Hal: “I’m really excited. Obviously, when you’re growing up playing soccer, that’s a big dream for everybody. I am so grateful that I have been given this opportunity, and I am so excited to go to Paris.”
On Jonatan Giráldez transitioning into the head coach role:
Tara: “I think we knew this moment was coming. We’re obviously still going to have Adrián on the sideline and as an assistant coach, and we are really looking forward to working with both of them going forward.”
On the biggest improvement that needs to be made before the next game:
Hal: “Just repeating what I touched on already, just the consistency of our rhythm and our intensity. I feel like that is something we really need to improve on. I hope we can take that into Bay.”
Tara: “I agree. I feel like our energy was just a little down today, and, like Aubrey (Kingsbury) said, we haven’t been shut out since the season opener. Just getting back at it this week and scoring more goals this upcoming weekend.”
On the North Carolina goal:
Tara: “Aubrey is a great player. Everyone has a mistake once or twice in their career, and that just happened to be her one. We are all behind her. We should have scored three goals to make up for it, so it is not on Aubrey, it’s on the defenders not giving enough pressure so she couldn’t shoot the ball, its everyone around, it is a team effort.”
On missing Andi Sullivan:
Hal: “First of all, Andi (Sullivan) brings so much leadership to our team. I think that was also something we were missing on the field. Obviously, we have leadership everywhere, like Trin (Rodman), Aubrey (Kingsbury), people like that, Tara (McKeown). Andi is really our central leader, and I feel like we did miss that quite a bit today, especially when it came to keeping the rhythm and intensity because I feel like we work really well off each other. Paige (Metayer) stepped up great, though I thought. She kind of came in, but North Carolina was just so good at taking advantage of those opportunities.”
On if McKeown’s drives were forcing an attempt or trying to pin North Carolina deeper:
Tara: “Probably a little of both. We were losing, obviously, so I think we just needed to get the ball up the field, and there was space in front of me to dribble, so I just took the space and looked for the passes up higher.”
On the condition of the pitch:
Tara: “It wasn’t great, but we both played on the same field, so it’s not really an excuse. It could be better.”
On the energy levels and leadership in critical moments:
Hal: “Honestly, I think that we could have been better at that throughout the game. Maybe being more upbeat during opportunities that we were crashing at their goal to make something happen. I also honestly thought that we could have used some calmness. It’s all about balance. I feel like there were sometimes where we could have taken control of the game in a different way, but we were too frantic. I think finding that good balance was very important for us, and we missed the mark on that tonight.”
North Carolina
North Carolina Rep. Valerie Foushee holds narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam
Nida Allam in 2022; Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-NC) in 2025.
Jonathan Drake/Reuters; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Jonathan Drake/Reuters; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Incumbent Rep. Valerie Foushee holds a narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam in the Democratic primary for North Carolina’s 4th Congressional district as ballots continue to be counted.
In a race seen as an early test of whether Democratic voters desire generational change within the party, Foushee holds a lead of just over 1,000 votes with 99% of results in so far, according to the Associated Press.
Under state law, provisional votes will be counted in the coming days in a district that includes Durham and Chapel Hill. If the election results end up within a 1% margin, Allam could request a recount.
Successfully ousting an incumbent lawmaker is often extremely difficult and rare. However, there have been recent upsets in races as some voters are calling for new leaders and several sitting members of Congress face primary challengers this cycle.
Allam, a 32-year-old Durham County Commissioner, is running to the left of Foushee, 69, framing her candidacy as part of a broader rejection of longtime Democratic norms.
On the campaign trail, Allam ran on an anti-establishment message, pledging to be a stronger fighter than Foushee in Congress, both in standing up against President Trump’s agenda and when pushing for more ambitious policy.
“North Carolina is a purple state that often gets labeled red, but we’re not a red state,” she told NPR in an interview last month, emphasizing the need to address affordability concerns. “We are a state of working-class folks who just want their elected officials to champion the issues that are impacting them.”
She drew a contrast with the congresswoman on immigration, voicing support for abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Foushee has declined to go that far, advocating instead for ICE to be defunded and for broader reforms to the federal immigration system.
Allam also clashed with Foushee over U.S. policy towards Israel. As a vocal opponent of Israel’s war in Gaza, Allam swore off campaign donations from pro-Israel lobbying groups, such as AIPAC, and repeatedly criticized Foushee for previously accepting such funds.
Though Foushee announced last year that she would not accept AIPAC donations this cycle, she and Allam continued to spar over the broader role of outside spending in the race.
Their matchup comes four years after the candidates first squared off in 2022, when Allam lost to Foushee in what became the most expensive primary in the state’s history, with outside groups spending more than $3.8 million.
However, this year is poised to break that record. Outside groups have reported spending more than $4.4 million on the primary matchup, according to Federal Election Commission filings.
WUNC’s Colin Campbell contributed to this report.
North Carolina
Building for tomorrow’s storms: North Carolina updates flood strategy
North Carolina is beginning to plan for floods that have not happened yet.
State officials this year advanced the next phase of the state’s Flood Resiliency Blueprint, incorporating updated modeling that factors in heavier rainfall, future development and sea-level rise — a shift away from relying solely on historic data and FEMA’s regulatory maps.
“We can make decisions and plan for that future, not just the exposure to flooding that we see now,” said Stuart Brown, who manages the Flood Resiliency Blueprint for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.
For a state that has endured record-breaking rainfall from Hurricane Helene in the mountains to Tropical Storm Chantal in the Triangle, the move reflects a growing recognition: past standards no longer capture present risk.
Beyond outdated flood lines
Multiple North Carolina studies have found that between 43% and 60% of flood damage occurs outside FEMA’s regulatory flood zones. Those maps shape insurance requirements and local zoning decisions, yet they are largely based on historical rainfall data.
“A lot of the regulatory floodplains really haven’t kept up with what we know is happening,” said Elizabeth Losos, executive in residence at Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainability.
Climate data show rainfall intensity in the Triangle has increased by about 21% since 1970. Warmer air holds more moisture, fueling heavier downpours that overwhelm drainage systems designed for a different climate.
“Fixing what we know is flooding right now is good,” Losos said. “It’s better than nothing, but it’s definitely not enough.”
Brown said the blueprint incorporates projections for future precipitation and development — a critical factor in one of the fastest-growing states in the country.
“Development can be an issue for flooding in two categories,” Brown said. “One is when that development is occurring in areas that are flood prone. The other is when that development is done in ways that don’t account for the additional stormwater that will be produced.”
Thousands of projects, limited dollars
Unlike states that rely on massive levee systems, North Carolina’s flood risk is scattered across river basins, coastal plains and rapidly developing suburbs. Brown said resilience here will require thousands of localized projects.
“We were asked by the General Assembly to provide specific, actionable projects,” Brown said. “We want to know what specific geography and what specific action is proposed.”
That planning push comes as federal support for flood research and mitigation is shrinking.
The Trump administration has proposed a roughly 30% cut to NOAA’s 2026 budget, targeting climate research and ocean services that provide the rainfall and coastal data states use to model flood risk. At FEMA, the administration has cut staff by more than 6%, reduced funding for local hazard mitigation projects and added new approval layers for grants.
For North Carolina, that means fewer dollars for buyouts, drainage upgrades and flood control projects — and less federal data to guide long-term planning — just as the state is trying to build a more forward-looking flood strategy.
Brown said North Carolina is trying to “leverage the limited dollars that we have in the state with any federal sources that are available” and embed resilience into routine investments in transportation, water treatment and conservation.
“Funding is always going to be an issue,” Brown said.
The policy gap
Researchers have long argued that resilience investments save money. Studies show every $1 spent on mitigation can yield $4 to $13 in avoided losses.
“The problem is that the policies don’t align the people who pay the cost with the people who get the benefit,” Losos said.
A developer may not directly benefit from downstream flood reduction. A town may shoulder upfront infrastructure costs while insurers, neighboring communities or future taxpayers capture part of the savings.
Without policy changes that align costs and benefits, resilience can remain politically and financially difficult.
“In the most severe cases, there are some communities that will have to eventually abandon if they don’t begin to think about how they can adapt to these conditions,” Losos said.
North Carolina now has updated tools to better measure future flood risk. Whether the state can secure stable federal support — and align its own policies with the risks ahead — will determine how effectively communities prepare for the next storm rather than recover from the last one.
North Carolina
North Carolina primary could mean Roy Cooper vs Michael Whatley in pivotal fall Senate race
RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina’s primary will be the official starting gun for one of the country’s most closely watched U.S. Senate campaigns, likely pitting former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper against former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley.
Each candidate is the most high-profile contender for their party’s nomination, which should be sealed on Tuesday. Scores of other races also are on the ballot, including for the U.S. House, state legislature and judicial seats.
North Carolina, a traditional battleground where Democrats have been able to hold the governor’s seat even as voters helped send President Donald Trump to the White House, is one of three states kicking off this year’s midterm elections, along with Texas and Arkansas. Tuesday’s slate of primaries comes against the backdrop of the U.S. and Israel attack on Iran.
The war, which began over the weekend, has killed at least six U.S. service members, spiraled into a regional confrontation as Iran retaliated and sent oil and natural gas prices soaring. The president, who campaigned on an isolationist “America First” agenda and went to war without authorization from Congress, faces mounting questions over its rationale and an exit strategy.
North Carolina’s election this year could be crucial for determining which party controls the U.S. Senate, where Republicans currently have the majority. The seat is open because Sen. Thom Tillis decided to retire after clashing with President Donald Trump. Political experts say a typhoon of outside money could make the race the most expensive Senate campaigns in U.S. history, perhaps reaching $1 billion.
Many Democrats see Cooper, who served two terms as governor and has been successful in state politics for decades, as the party’s best shot at victory. Democrats need to pick up four seats to take back control of the Senate, and they view the most likely path as winning in North Carolina, Maine, Alaska and Ohio.
Cooper faces five lesser-known rivals on Tuesday. Other Republicans on the Senate ballot include Navy officer Don Brown and Michele Morrow, who was the party’s nominee for state schools chief in 2024.
Republican U.S. Senate candidate Michael Whatley, arrives to an early voting site to cast his vote on Thursday, Feb. 12, 2026, in Gastonia, N.C. Credit: AP/Erik Verduzco
Cooper formally entered the race weeks after Tillis announced last summer he wouldn’t seek a third term, as did Whatley, who was buoyed by Trump’s backing when the president’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump declined to enter. The two candidates have been campaigning for months against each other with little focus on intraparty opposition.
Whatley promises to keep pushing Trump’s agenda if elected, one that he says has cut taxes and spending and restored U.S. military might.
“It’s very important for us to have a conservative champion and for President Trump to have an ally in the Senate,” he said while voting early in Gastonia. “We’re going to be fighting for every family and every community in North Carolina.”
Some primary voters say Congress needs Democratic control as a counterweight to Trump and what they consider disastrous policies.
President Donald Trump listens as Michael Whatley speaks to soldiers and their families at Fort Bragg, N.C., Friday, Feb. 13, 2026. Credit: AP/Matt Rourke
“I think we need to send a message. And I think the more Democrats that show up, and the more independents that show up for this midterm election, and the more seats we can take from the Republicans, the more he might get the message,” said Lisa Frucht, 67, said as she cast a ballot for Cooper at an early voting site north of Raleigh.
Republican voter Gary Grimes, who chose Whatley, said Democratic control of Congress could lead to more impeachment efforts against Trump that ultimately won’t succeed.
“It’ll be a repeat of what they did to Trump in the first term,” said Grimes, 71, “And they can’t see anything except getting Trump, at any cost.”
A Democrat hasn’t won a Senate race in North Carolina since 2008. Meanwhile, Cooper, 68, hasn’t lost a North Carolina election going back to first running for the state House in the mid-1980s, leading to 16 years as attorney general and eight as governor through 2024.
Whatley, 57, previously worked in President George W. Bush’s administration, for then-North Carolina Sen. Elizabeth Dole and as an energy lobbyist.
Cooper and his allies have centered campaign attacks on Whatley’s allegiance to the president and Trump policies, saying he backs higher tariffs and Medicaid spending reductions and must take blame for slow Hurricane Helene recovery aid.
Voting recently in Raleigh, Cooper said he wants to “make sure that I’m a strong, independent senator who can work with this president when I can, stand up to him when I need to and recognize that people are struggling right now.”
Whatley, Trump and other Republicans have blistered Cooper on criminal justice matters, accusing him of promoting soft-on-crime policies while governor. They’ve repeatedly highlighted last August’s fatal stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a Charlotte light-rail train. Trump identified Zarutska’s mother in attendance at last week’s State of the Union address.
Cooper told reporters recently that his career is about “prosecuting violent criminals and keeping thousands of them behind bars.”
Tuesday’s election also includes primary elections in all but one of North Carolina’s U.S. House districts. They include a five-candidate GOP primary in the northeastern 1st Congressional District, which is currently represented by Democratic Rep. Don Davis, who faced no primary opposition.
The Republican-controlled General Assembly created last fall a more right-leaning 1st District to join Trump’s multistate redistricting campaign ahead of the 2026 elections to retain the House. Davis won in 2024 by less than 2 percentage points.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts7 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO7 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon5 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies
