Austin, TX
Amid Protests of Students, Faculty, and Staff, the State Tightens Its Grip on the University of Texas at Austin
In April, state leaders’ attempted stranglehold over the University of Texas at Austin, Texas’s premier public university, came to a head in several ways. The month began with the university laying off dozens of employees who formerly worked in positions that dealt with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The month ended with state troopers marching on campus to disrupt anti-war protests at the direction of Gov. Greg Abbott and with the approval of UT Austin President Jay Hartzell.
In this week’s Hotline, we dive into this dark month at Texas’s flagship university.
State, City, & University Police Assail, Arrest Peaceful Anti-War Protesters
Over the past two weeks, hundreds of peaceful protestors, many of them UT students, have been arrested for protesting the war in Gaza and demanding an end to the university’s and the nation’s involvement in the conflict.
Last Wednesday, a coalition of student groups, including the Palestine Solidarity Committee, organized an event on UT’s south lawn to protest the war in Gaza. Event organizers referenced the encampments that have occupied other universities like Columbia, Yale, and Brown, but there was no evidence that this group was connected to groups on those other campuses, apart from the organizing inspiration. The schedule for UT’s event included peaceful actions: teach-ins, pizza breaks, and an art workshop.
A listed demand of the protesters was for the University of Texas to divest from companies that they view as supporting the war in Gaza. The University of Texas’ endowment, totaling $68 billion, is the largest of any public university and the fifth largest of any university system generally. Students have taken issue with the endowment’s investments in companies that manufacture weapons, including Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, BAE Systems, and others. Because weapons produced by these companies and used by the Israeli military have resulted in the deaths of civilians, protestors claim that the University of Texas is complicit in these tragedies and demand divestment.
However, a state law from 2017 that forbids Texas public investments from boycotting Israel seems to forbid such divestment.
Protestors at UT-Austin, who were told by the university to cancel the protest because of a “declared intent to violate our policies and rules, and disrupt our campus operations,” were met with a large police presence, declaring that the protest was unlawful as students didn’t have the proper permits to protest. Campus police officers initially seemed to be willing to negotiate with the protesters, but dialogue seemed to end when Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) officers arrived at the scene dressed in riot gear. State police quickly moved to break up the protests. Police arrested 57 people present at the protest, including a photographer for FOX 7 News who was covering the incident. All those arrested were released the following morning.
It was later revealed that Hartzell had invited DPS onto campus to break up the peaceful protests. Abbott, who directs DPS, supported the arrests on social media. In his comments, Abbott took issue with the content of the protests, not the manner in which they were done. In the United States, the content of protests is protected by the First Amendment.
Protestors were arrested for trespassing on university campus because they were directed to leave due to not having a permit to hold the event, but the university had previously allowed similar protests to occur in the same location and the same manner without a permit. Similar protests were held at public universities across Texas, including Texas State University and the University of Texas at Dallas, but these protests were not met with a similar police presence.
Protestors reconvened the next day but were not met with a police presence, and the protest continued peacefully as planned. On this second day, the protest was much larger than the day before. At this protest, many community leaders spoke, including Congressman Greg Casar (D-Austin), and condemned the police action. UT-Austin AAUP President Pauline Strong also spoke at the protest. She announced that UT-Austin AAUP was collecting signatures from faculty to call for a vote of no confidence in Hartzell for bringing state police to campus. Thus far, they have collected over 600 signatures.
This week, on Monday, the protests continued and were met by hundreds of law enforcement agents. After protesters refused to vacate the south lawn despite officers’ demands, officers began arresting protestors one by one and soon broke up the encampment. The protesters were assailed with pepper spray and flash bangs.
In response to the events this past Monday, the House Democratic Caucus released a letter explaining to Democratic members what transpired. Ali Zaidi, the executive director of the House Democratic Caucus, penned the letter and was present to observe the Monday protest. Zaidi explained that he and Rep. Gina Hinojosa (D-Austin), who was also in observance of the protest, felt the effects of the pepper spray used on the protestors, despite being yards away. The letter declared, “It is our belief that this behavior by law enforcement created further chaos and harm to the health and well-being of students which must not go unaddressed.”
Students had planned to resume protests Wednesday but postponed the protest until this coming Sunday.
Employees and Students Fight Back Against Anti-DEI Efforts
In a previous edition of the Hotline, we explained how an estimated 60 employees at UT Austin and 20 employees at UT Dallas were either demoted or given termination notices. These affected employees, which included both faculty and staff, previously worked in positions that related to DEI initiatives but had since been reassigned to new positions to comply with Senate Bill 17, which banned DEI initiatives. These layoffs occurred despite the fact that the legislators who sponsored SB 17 publicly made assurances that employees in DEI positions would not be terminated.
Since these terminations and demotions were announced, a wide public outcry, from within the UT community and from without, has emerged, demanding that these termination orders be reversed. During the week following the dismissals, state legislators joined the Texas NAACP and Texas AAUP-AFT at a press conference at the Texas AFL-CIO headquarters denouncing the layoffs. The state legislators present were Rep. Ron Reynolds (D-Missouri City), chairman of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, Rep. Gina Hinojosa (D-Austin), whose district includes the UT Austin campus, and Rep. Sheryl Cole (D-Austin).

The 60 affected employees mostly occupied student services positions that supported students outside of their academic pursuits. In addition to the affected employees themselves, students are also victims of this move.
Students are fighting back against these layoffs. Over the intervening weeks since the layoffs were first announced student groups, such as Texas Students for DEI, which has been active at campuses across the state in opposition to the state’s attacks against DEI, and individual students began posting the hashtag #NotOurTexas on social media, as a condemnation of the layoffs. Post-It notes with the message #NotOurTexas were also left in prominent locations around UT Austin campus, including the university’s iconic fountain.
This past Monday, a coalition led by the Texas State Employees Union (TSEU), in concert with Texas AAUP-AFT and the Texas AFL-CIO, rallied on UT Austin’s campus to demand that the university’s actions be reversed. Austin City Council members Vanessa Fuentes and Zohaib “Zo” Qadri, whose district includes UT’s campus, as well as Texas AFL-CIO President Rick Levy and UT Austin AAUP executive board member Karma Chavez, spoke at the rally in support of the affected employees. Hundreds of students, faculty, staff, and community members joined the rally.

The next chapter in this saga is uncertain. Many of the affected employees are scheduled to be officially terminated after their mandatory 60-day termination notice expires. Senate Education Committee Chairman Brandon Creighton’s letter to Texas public universities, which kicked off these layoffs, demanded UT Austin send representatives to a committee hearing to detail compliance with Senate Bill 17 in May, but the date of the hearing has not been set. Additionally, the Senate was tasked in Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s interim charges with studying the implementation of SB 17. This interim hearing will also likely take place over the summer.
Austin, TX
Texas Governor Threatens Austin, Dallas and Houston’s World Cup Funding Over ICE Fight
Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s office turned preparations for the 2026 World Cup into the latest front in the U.S. battle over immigration enforcement, with the threat of pulling or withholding public safety grants from Houston, Dallas, and Austin unless the cities changed policies that state officials said limited police cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
According to The Texas Tribune, the funding at risk totaled about $200 million across the three cities, including World Cup-related public safety money for Dallas and grants tied to Houston’s role as one of the tournament’s host cities. The 2026 World Cup is scheduled to begin June 11 and will be played across the United States, Mexico, and Canada.
Houston, the largest city in Texas, moved first. Its City Council voted 13-4 to amend an ordinance that had restricted police from detaining people solely on ICE administrative warrants. Mayor John Whitmire’s office said the change would protect $114 million in state funding while preserving protections against unreasonable detention, Reuters reported.
The original Houston ordinance had removed a requirement that police wait up to 30 minutes for ICE agents to pick up people named in civil immigration warrants. The amendment dropped language that explicitly barred that practice and removed a description of ICE administrative warrants as not having been reviewed by a judge.
Abbott’s office called the Houston change “a step in the right direction.” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton had already sued Houston officials over the policy, arguing that it violated Senate Bill 4, the state law that bars local governments from adopting measures that “materially limit” immigration enforcement.
Dallas also revised its police policy after Abbott’s office warned that the city could lose more than $32 million in public safety grants and more than $55 million in World Cup public safety funding. The new policy says officers may ask about immigration status when a person is lawfully detained or arrested, share that information with federal authorities, and assist ICE agents when “reasonable or necessary.”
Dallas Police Chief Daniel Comeaux said the department’s mission had not changed. “Our officers will follow the law, and our updated policy will affirm that we will cooperate with federal authorities when required,” Comeaux said, according to FOX Dallas-Fort Worth. “DPD exists to protect the safety of everyone in Dallas, and we will not stop individuals only to determine their immigration status.”
Civil rights groups criticized the pressure campaign. “Houston city council caved to the governor’s threats and intimidation,” Caro Rivera Nelson, an attorney with the ACLU of Texas, told Reuters. “The effective repeal of Proposition A is a stain on our state.”
Abbott’s office said the state expects cities to comply with Texas law. “Governor Abbott has been clear: cities in Texas must fully comply with state law and cooperate with federal immigration authorities to keep dangerous criminals off our streets,” spokesperson Andrew Mahaleris said.
.
© 2025 Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Austin, TX
1 killed in Runaway Bay after severe storms tear across North Texas
RUNAWAY BAY, Texas – At least one person was killed and numerous others have been injured after a powerful storm that apparently produced at least one tornado ripped across North Texas on Saturday night.
What we know:
Wise County Judge J.D. Clark confirmed at least one fatality in Runaway Bay after an apparent tornado hit the town on the banks of Lake Bridgeport. He said numerous other people have been injured and at least 20 families have been displaced.
A photo shared by FOX 4 News viewer Chad Casey showed what appeared to be a funnel that was backlit by lightning near Runaway Bay.
A FOX 4 News crew that arrived in the town about 50 miles northwest of Fort Worth found emergency vehicles along a highway, with power lines down and debris in the roadway.
The National Weather Service had issued a Tornado Warning for the area of Wise County where Runaway Bay is located at the time the damage happened. The NWS also warned people in the path of the storm of very large hail and damaging winds.
A Tornado Warning was also in effect for the Springtown area in Parker County when the same storm caused damage about 25 miles northwest of Fort Worth.
Parker County officials reported a structure had collapsed in the Springtown area, and two people may be trapped inside. Chad Casey also shared video with FOX 4 News that showed damage to structures, billboards and vehicles.
What we don’t know:
The identity of the person killed by the storm has not yet been released.
The NWS will likely survey the damage Sunday to determine if a tornado indeed happened. If so, the agency will also assign a rating to the twister.
What they’re saying:
Clark said the American Red Cross is headed to the scene in Runaway Bay to help displaced families.
“A Reunification Center has been established at: 513 Port O’ Call Drive, Runaway Bay,” Clark wrote in a Facebook post. “Families seeking information about loved ones or needing assistance are encouraged to report to this location.”
He said everyone but first responders should avoid the Runaway Bay area.
This is a developing story. Refresh this page for updates.
The Source: Information in this story comes from FOX 4 News and the National Weather Service.
Austin, TX
Texas cooks up new rules for food trucks
TEXAS — Beginning this summer, food trucks across Texas will no longer be bound to city limits. The state Legislature passed House Bill 2844 last year, and it strikes away the city-by-city permit structure and introduces a statewide approach instead.
For example, before the law passed, food truck operators wanting to work in the city of Austin one week then travel and cook in the city of Georgetown the next would have to apply and pay for each city’s approval.
“Every single city in Texas, and sometimes county as well, gets to currently regulate how food trucks work,” said Samuel Hooper from Institute for Justice, a legislative counsel. “They get to issue their own health permits. They get to run their own inspections. So as you can imagine, that gets really expensive really fast.”
But starting July 1, mobile vendors can operate from Lubbock to Austin using the same permit.
“Just one health inspection, one permit,” said Hooper. “You maintain public safety, but you get rid of all this bureaucracy.”
Hooper has lobbied for this type of food-business policy for years, including with his support of a similar bill introduced last year under HB 2683. The new HB 2844 was a parallel bill and took over as main legislation. A food truck enthusiast himself, Hooper said he is happy to see the policy come into full effect.
“Let food trucks focus on what they actually do best, which is cooking food and not doing paperwork,” Hooper said.
One Austin-based food truck owner, Suresh Mogili, carries the same philosophy while cooking burgers in his truck, Eat Love Repeat.
“I’ve been doing this business since 2019,” he said. “I’m from a different country; I’m from New Zealand, so last year I came to introduce the concept in the USA, so it’s a fusion style burger.”
Hooper said food trucks should have a less rigid structure to help aspiring operators like Mogili cook and serve instead of dealing with paperwork. Part of the roadblock is due to fears that brick-and-mortar businesses will suffer, he said, and pointed to a 2022 study that shows the opposite.
“It’s meant to be a way for people with less capital, less access to capital, maybe who are new to the country or state, to get up and running and start a business quickly,” Hooper said.
Texas joins the list of other states that have implemented similar structures for their food trucks, including Utah and Maryland.
Despite the growing trend nationwide, Hooper advises it might be best to max out control at the state level.
“You kind of have to strike that balance between wanting it to be local enough to respond genuinely to local and regional issues, and not so broad that it kind of erases those,” Hooper said.
-
New York47 minutes agoHow Jesse Tyler Ferguson of ‘Modern Family’ Is Showing His Range
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoSpencer Torkelson homers in 5th straight as Tigers avoid sweep by Reds
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoDrizzle Clings To San Francisco, Then Sunshine Cranks Up The Heat
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoDallas Mavericks’ Top Choice for GM May Actually Be ‘Gettable’
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoMiami Claims Sixth Straight Series Win, Defeating Cal Without Superstar Hitter
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoNo-show Bruins embarrassed by Sabres on home ice
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoChristian Braun, Denver Nuggets confident with backs against wall
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoRefsnyder’s pinch-hit HR lifts Seattle Mariners over Cards