Connect with us

Ohio

2024 election will shape the future of the Ohio Supreme Court as it faces some critical issues

Published

on

2024 election will shape the future of the Ohio Supreme Court as it faces some critical issues


The following article was originally published in the Ohio Capital Journal and published on News5Cleveland.com under a content-sharing agreement.

The Ohio Supreme Court could see significant changes if Republicans on the ballot take two seats in November currently held by incumbent Democrats. Meanwhile, two Democrats are facing off in the primary Tuesday for the nomination to run for a third seat up this year.

The 2024 election holds not only potential changes to congressional representation and seats in the Statehouse, but also the bench of the state’s highest court, which decides the legality and constitutionality of state legislation and other issues affecting the entire state.

In 2024, three Ohio Supreme Court seats will be up for election in November. Incumbent Democratic Justice Michael P. Donnelly is being challenged by Republican Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Megan Shanahan. Incumbent Democratic Justice Melody Stewart is being challenged by incumbent Republican Justice Joseph Deters, who declined to run for his current seat in favor of challenging Stewart.

Advertisement

In a third race — for the seat Deters currently holds — Republican Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Dan Hawkins will face one of two Democrats running for the nomination in the primary tomorrow, Tuesday, March 19: 10th District Court of Appeals Judge Terri Jamison or Eighth District Court of Appeals Judge Lisa Forbes.

The Ohio Supreme Court has been in the spotlight for a number of issues in the last few years, starting with multiple rulings as the state’s redistricting commission went back and forth on Statehouse and congressional voting district maps.

While a majority of the court was consistent in the last two years of decisions, rejecting Statehouse maps five times and congressional maps twice, most recently, bipartisan agreement by members of the Ohio Redistricting Commission drove the conservative justices on the court to keep Statehouse maps adopted in September 2023 after anti-gerrymandering groups sued claiming undue partisan lean.

The biggest change from the previous redistricting decisions was the departure of former Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor, who left the court because of age limits. O’Connor, a Republican, acted as the swing vote in past redistricting decisions, siding with Democratic justices who agreed that the maps unduly favored the Republican Party in a way that didn’t match voting trends of the last 10 years.

O’Connor has now moved on to support reform in the redistricting process as part of a ballot initiative currently in the signature-collecting process to get to the Ohio ballot.

Advertisement

The court was also called upon to rule on issues related to the six-week abortion ban, a piece of legislation that’s been in court almost since its enactment. Most recently, the court ruled against putting the six-week ban back in place while a Hamilton County common pleas court ultimately rules on whether the law is constitutional.

In deciding that the ban would not be put back in place, the bipartisan majority of the court said the appeal would be dismissed because of “a change in law,” likely the newest constitutional amendment in the state that legalizes abortion rights and other reproductive services.

Justice Deters recused himself from the abortion ban case due to his previous position as Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney. He was listed in the lawsuit because of his capacity as prosecutor.

But Deters was one of the Republican justices who voted to keep the Statehouse redistricting maps in place, signing on to Republican Chief Justice Sharon Kennedy’s opinion that the bipartisan agreement “is a changed circumstance that makes it appropriate to relinquish our continuing jurisdiction over these cases.”

Deters also previously served as Ohio Treasurer but resigned from office in 2004 amid a pay-to-play scandal where his former chief of staff, Matt Borges, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges related to steering state business to Deters campaign donors. Deters was appointed to the state supreme court by Gov. Mike DeWine in 2023 after Kennedy moved up to the chief justice’s chair. Also last year, Borges was sentenced to five years in federal prison after being convicted on racketeering charges related to Ohio’s House Bill 6 utility bailout and bribery scandal.

Advertisement

Now Deters wants to replace fellow Justice Stewart on the Ohio Supreme Court.

Deters has faced criticism – not unlike the criticism fellow Justice Pat DeWine received when he ruled over redistricting cases involving his father, Gov. Mike DeWine – when he acted as a justice in a Hamilton County case, despite his previous recusals.

However, the justice said this was “consistent with Ohio’s Code of Judicial Conduct” and done as part of a plan he divulged to Chief Justice Kennedy, wherein he would not hear Hamilton County cases for one year. After the year, he said he planned to “recuse from those cases in which I participated personally and substantially or about which I expressed an opinion.”

Stewart has been on the court since 2018, previously serving on the Eighth District Court of Appeals and as assistant law director in Cleveland and East Cleveland as well as in academic roles at various Ohio law schools. Donnelly was also first elected in 2018 and previously served as a Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court judge.

In the Democratic primary for the seat currently held by Deters, Eighth District Court appellate judge Forbes is a former private litigator who was elected to her current position in 2020 and is endorsed by the Ohio Democratic Party. The 10th District Court’s Jamison is a former public defender and Franklin County Court of Common Pleas judge who previously launched an unsuccessful challenge against Ohio Supreme Court Justice Pat Fischer in 2022.

Advertisement





Source link

Ohio

Licking County real estate transfers for June 1-5, 2026, hit $865,000

Published

on

Licking County real estate transfers for June 1-5, 2026, hit 5,000



Real estate transfers in Licking County, Ohio, range from $85,000 to $865,000

The following are property transfers recorded in Licking County from June 1-5, 2026.

Advertisement

First name indicates the seller; second name represents the buyer

Buckeye Lake

  • 502 Providence Lane; Cohagen, Christopher C and Lori A; Adams, Jeffrey L and Boyce-Adams, Jo Anna; 6/1/2026; $511,000
  • 131 Cranberry Lane; Smart, Amy and Kidwell, Kevin K; Sew and Minor, Christian; 6/1/2026; $262,000

Etna Township

  • 116 Cameron Drive SW; Ray, Erica L; Darjee, Sanjay and Laxmi and Dil; 6/2/2026; $412,000  
  • 119 Kraner St. SW; Adkins, Zane and Amy; Culbertson, Brenton Howard; 6/1/2026; $368,500
  • 160 Dusky Willow Drive; Willow Reserve LLC; Martin, Alaina K; 6/2/2026; $290,940

Granville

  • 119 Derwyn Del Way; Lifer, David C and Julia H; Martin, Michael and Lisa; 6/1/2026; $865,000
  • 39 Victoria Drive; Acton, Wendy S and Paul J; Cannon, Matthew Evan and Zywica, Natalie Nicole; 6/2/2026; $835,000

Granville Township

  • 49 Alberry Drive; Halliday, Lucas and Breayne; Howe, Jason and Kathryn; 6/2/2026; $570,000

Harrison Township

  • 102 Whirlaway Loop; Rice, Dawn (Trustee); Bope, Maria and Shane; 6/2/2026; $420,000

Heath

  • 1306 Kacey Court; Fischer Homes Columbus II LLC; Owens, Blake Andrew and Taylor Marie; 6/2/2026; $437,779
  • 805 Fieldson Drive; Flowers, Ingrit; Harder, Noah C; 6/2/2026; $250,000

Hebron

  • 802 Cumberland Meadows Circle; Lines, Marlene S; Gerhart, Jamie A and Ralph W Jr; 6/2/2026; $232,000

Johnstown

  • 101 Bigelow Drive; McGovern, Matthew S and Jennifer L; Sanford, Jessica; 6/2/2026; $442,500

Liberty Township

  • 5844 Nichols Lane Road NW; La Jeunesse, Garth E and Debra; Nesselroad, William Heath and Annie; 6/1/2026; $629,000
  • 7211 Northridge Road NW; Devault, Robert E Jr and Joann; Esbenshade, Travis M and Lowe, Shelby M; 6/1/2026; $495,000

Newark

  • 2110 Overlook Way; D.R. Horton-Indiana LLC; Tarsha, Michele A; 6/1/2026; $433,335
  • 1162 Taylor Ave.; Heath Fluid LLC; Anglada, Gabriel P and Salina T; 6/1/2026; $200,000
  • 32 Postal Ave. W.; Palmisano, Phil; Moore, Dominic Michael and Miksich, Paige Elizabeth; 6/1/2026; $198,900
  • 75 Gay St.; Velez, Marcos A; Camell, Campbell; 6/1/2026; $155,000
  • 655 Evans St.; TNL; McRada Properties LLC; 6/1/2026; $145,000
  • 63 Wallace St.; FDA Peachtree LLC; Burns, Amber L; 6/2/2026; $86,500
  • 404 10th St.; Synergy Group Properties LLC; Busy Boys Restoration LLC; 6/2/2026; $85,000

Reynoldsburg

  • 8447 Rodebaugh Road; Collins, Carol J; Thorpe, Kimberley Lynn and Henry, Steven; 6/2/2026; $340,000



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Court orders Ohio restrictions on kids’ use of social media restored

Published

on

Court orders Ohio restrictions on kids’ use of social media restored


COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio’s law requiring children under 16 to get parental consent to use social media apps must be restored, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

The decision comes as a blow to NetChoice, which has won court victories against identical digital identification laws in other states, including Arkansas, Louisiana and Georgia. The trade group representing TikTok, Snapchat, Meta and other major tech companies said the Ohio decision went against “clear national consensus” and that it intended to keep fighting.

“An unconstitutional law protects no one, and we remain focused on ensuring the First Amendment rights of Ohioans are protected,” said Paul Taske, director of the NetChoice Litigation Center.

Netchoice brought suit against Ohio’s law in 2024, arguing that it was overly broad, vague and represented an unconstitutional impediment to free speech.

Advertisement

The Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit’s panel disagreed. In a 2-1 decision, it found that the law was not unconstitutional and sent it back to a lower court to have a block on the law’s enforcement vacated.

“At bottom, the Act imposes a parental consent requirement,” Judge Eric Clay wrote in the lead opinion. “That requirement constitutes a marginal burden that precisely targets the multi-faceted problem that Ohio has identified: Children’s unsupervised assent to terms and conditions for use of platforms that take advantage of and harm them.”

Judge Alice Batchelder concurred, writing that “a statute is not vague just because it has a wide berth.”

Known as the Social Media Parental Notification Act, the Ohio law was part of an $86.1 billion state budget bill that Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed into law in July 2023.

The administration pushed the measure as a way to protect children’s mental health, with then-Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, now a U.S. senator, saying at the time that social media was “intentionally addictive” and harmful to kids.

Advertisement

The law requires companies to get parental permission for social media and gaming apps and to provide their privacy guidelines so families know what content would be censored or moderated on their child’s profile.

Sign up for Morning Wire:
Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.

Advertisement

Republican Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson called Thursday’s ruling “a win for Ohio families.”

“The court agreed that parents –- not social media companies –- should get a say in what kids see online,” he said in a statement. “We have an obligation to keep our children safe, and today, the most dangerous place for our kids is the internet. This decision gives parents the tools to be involved and provide oversight.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Storm’s path of power outages and road closures

Published

on

Storm’s path of power outages and road closures


Piketon, Ohio (WSAZ) – Folks in southern Ohio are waking up to power outages and road closures.

Route 32 in Pike County is down to one westbound and one eastbound lane due to debris on the roadway.

Drivers are also dealing with tree limbs on roadways.

The Athens County 911 dispatcher told WSAZ that it’s not believed a tornado touched down, but there is storm damage.

Advertisement

The dispatcher said storm damage from flooding and trees being knocked down has affected US 50.

Power outages are being reported in Athens, Pike, Vinton, Scioto and Meigs Counties and even as far south as Boyd County, Ky.

If you’re in a tornado warning area, you’re urged to get to the lower part of your home.

Keep checking the WSAZ app for the latest.

Copyright 2026 WSAZ. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending