Connect with us

Alaska

Seatbelt ‘saved’ life of passenger on Boeing 737 Max flight that lost panel, lawsuit says

Published

on

Seatbelt ‘saved’ life of passenger on Boeing 737 Max flight that lost panel, lawsuit says



Two Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 passengers were sitting a row behind the gaping hole left in the Boeing 737 Max 9 jet when a door plug panel blew off. They have now sued the companies for negligence.

play

A seatbelt apparently saved the life of a passenger on the Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 jet that lost a door-sized panel of its fuselage just after takeoff Jan. 5, 2024 from Portland, Oregon.

Cuong Tran, of Upland, Calif., who said the suction from the blowout took away his shoes and socks and pulled him towards the opening and injured his foot, is one of seven passengers on Flight 1282 that day who filed the lawsuit Thursday in Washington state’s King County Superior Court in Seattle.

He and six other passengers – including five members of a Claremont, Calif. family – charge Alaska Airlines, Boeing, and Spirit Aerosystems with negligence, construction and manufacturing defect liability, and failing to protect passengers from harm.

The passengers have suffered physical and psychological trauma from the event, said attorney Timothy Loranger, who filed the lawsuit for the passengers. “Our clients – and likely every passenger on that flight – suffered unnecessary trauma due to the failure of Boeing, Spirit AeroSystems, and Alaska Airlines to ensure that the aircraft was in a safe and airworthy condition,” Loranger said in a press release announcing the lawsuit.

Suction lifted Tran’s body off his seat “and his legs were pulled towards the opening all while the aircraft climbed through 16,000 feet above Portland,” but the seatbelt “saved him,” he said. “Tran’s leg was jerked so violently that his foot was injured when it got trapped in the seat structure in front of him.”    

Advertisement

FAA’s audit of Boeing: Agency finds multiple quality control issues in 6-week audit of Boeing

When asked for comment about the lawsuit Thursday by The Associated Press, Boeing said, “We have nothing to add.” Alaska Airlines and Spirit AeroSystems did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.

This is the second lawsuit filed in the incident. Last month, 22 other passengers on the flight filed a lawsuit accusing Boeing and Alaska Airlines of negligence. That suit was also filed in King County Superior Court.

Advertisement

In that suit, the passengers said after hearing a “whistling sound” emitting from “the vicinity of the door plug,” they told flight attendants about it. The suit alleges that a pilot was “reportedly informed,” but the pilot found the plane’s instrument readings to be normal and no further action was taken.

What happened to the Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 Max 9 on Jan. 5?

Shortly after Flight 1282 took off from Portland headed for Ontario, California, a mid-cabin door plug separated from the fuselage at about 16,000 feet. The plane made an emergency landing and some passengers required medical attention.

A 15-year-old boy onboard had his shirt “sucked off” after the mid-cabin door plug separated from the fuselage, one passenger said.

The Federal Aviation Administration grounded all Max 9s in the U.S. the day after the incident. Three weeks later the FAA allowed the planes to return to the air after inspections of the door plugs. On some planes the bolts meant to help secure the door plug were loose, airlines discovered.

Advertisement

The National Transportation Safety Board said in a preliminary report last month the aircraft was missing four bolts that keep the door plug in place. The bolts were removed during other repair work and were not replaced before the interior wall panels were reinstalled, the agency said. The repairs were done by contractors working for Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems.

Alaska Airlines flight graphic: A Boeing 737 MAX 9 lost a panel midair, terrifying passengers. Here’s how it happened.

Earlier this week, The Wall Street Journal reported the Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation into the Boeing jetliner incident. The probe would assist the DOJ’s review of whether Boeing complied with a 2021 settlement resolving a federal investigation into the 737 Max aircraft’s safety after two deadly crashes in 2018 and 2019, which killed 346 people.

In the lawsuit, the defendants allege the aircraft’s bolts were either not installed or installed incorrectly. The lawsuit also lists 10 unnamed defendants – John Does 1-10 who they allege were involved in the design, manufacture, upkeep, inspection and testing of the aircraft – with negligence and liability in the incident.

Advertisement

“The level of apparent negligence and disregard for safety protocols is astonishing, and terrifying,” said Loranger, senior partner at L.A.-based Wisner Baum and a one-time aircraft mechanic in the Marine Corps.

What do the passengers say happened when the Boeing blowout happened?

Cuong Tran and friend Huy Tran, of Garden Grove, Calif., who began shooting video when the incident occurred, were seated in row 27 right behind the row where the door plug blew out.

They say a “deafening explosion” was followed by “an immediate and rapid decompression, exposing the passengers to the noise of the wind and the freezing outside environment,” Loranger said in the release. 

Advertisement

The Claremont, Calif. family, made up of father Ket Tran, mother Tram Vo, and their three young sons, “also feared for their lives,” he said. The parents and Cuong Tran and Huy Tran have been friends since middle school, the law firm says.

The family is now in counseling to address the trauma they experienced, Loranger said.

“This lawsuit isn’t only about the unimaginable fear and suffering of the passengers on that plane, it is about a failure that should have never occurred,” said Ari Friedman, partner at Wisner Baum, in the release. “We’re talking about a gaping hole ripping open mid-flight in the side of  a commercial jet. Properly installed bolts are the difference between safety and disaster, so there is no excuse for why those would be left out, or why quality control checks and routine inspections would miss them.”

Contributing: Zach Wichter and The Associated Press.

Follow Mike Snider on X and Threads: @mikesnider & mikegsnider.

Advertisement

What’s everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day





Source link

Alaska

Alaska study sees mixed results on links between kelp farms and CO2 levels – Homer News

Published

on

Alaska study sees mixed results on links between kelp farms and CO2 levels – Homer News


Alaska study sees mixed results on links between kelp farms and CO2 levels

Published 5:30 am Thursday, June 18, 2026

A study into the amount of CO2 absorbed at a pair of Alaska kelp farms is throwing some cold water on hopes that seaweed could be an answer to climate change.

Alaska kelp farms, which have been viewed as a potential boon for reducing local carbon-dioxide levels, have surprisingly murky effects on atmospheric CO2 removal, according to a new study.

A University of Alaska Fairbanks-led project measured the amount of CO2 that was emitted and absorbed at two kelp farms in the Gulf of Alaska during the 2023-2024 growing season. The outcome was mixed — one farm slightly reduced carbon dioxide in the local environment while the other added more to it.

Advertisement

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) has been touted as a potential strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, with the ocean serving as a sink for human-produced CO2.

The study, which was recently published in the journal Ocean Science, is the first to measure mCDR in Alaska waters. It focused on kelp farms, which can draw down CO2 through the process of photosynthesis.

“It’s easy to jump on the bandwagon that seaweed is going to change the world, but ultimately we want to be honest to the public,” said Amanda Kelley, an associate professor at UAF’s College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences and a contributor to the study.

“Really, it’s very nuanced, and there are a lot of factors that affect kelp’s ability to do that.”

Josianne Haag, who led the project as a UAF doctoral student, installed sensors both inside and outside kelp farms in Windy Bay near Cordova and Kalsin Bay on Kodiak Island. From seeding to harvest, hourly data was collected on ocean chemistry, temperature, salinity and oxygen levels.

Advertisement

The two sites had numerous differences, including the type of seaweed being planted, the timing of their growing seasons and the size of the farms. Also, Windy Bay’s tides are more extreme than Kalsin Bay’s.

The results were striking and varied. The farms flipped between absorbing and releasing carbon dioxide depending on the amount of sunlight and the time of day. Extreme low tides affected CO2 levels by flushing groundwater into the area, briefly raising carbon dioxide levels.

A film of marine fauna grew on some of the farm equipment in Kalsin Bay, leading to a burst of carbon dioxide production through their respiration.

Overall, the Windy Bay farm slightly reduced nearby atmospheric marine carbon dioxide levels while the Kalsin Bay farm boosted them. Measurements will continue at the farms for at least two more years, but the first season revealed that a kelp farm’s recipe for carbon intake and output is surprising and complex.

“It’s really not doing much in either direction,” Haag said. “The farms aren’t necessarily harming anything, but we shouldn’t be blowing out of proportion that they’re going to save us from climate change.”

Advertisement

The study was part of the Mariculture Research and Restoration Consortium project, which is an ongoing effort to look at the impacts and benefits of mariculture in Alaska. Mar ReCon research is funded by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Gagnon Coal Seam Fire reported near Healy

Published

on

Gagnon Coal Seam Fire reported near Healy


At approximately 7:30 p.m. Wednesday evening, a fire was reported off Healy Spur Road. The Division of Forestry & Fire Protection, along with the Tri-Valley Volunteer Fire Department and Anderson Fire Department, responded to the Gagnon Coal Seam Fire (#206).

Estimated at 3 acres, the fire was burning in grass with approximately 50% of the perimeter actively burning. A five person Initial Attack squad, helicopter, and engine responded. Light rain was reported at the incident upon arrival.

There are no structures threatened, and there are no evacuations in place. This will be the last update on this incident, unless conditions change.

Advertisement
This map shows the location of the Gagnon Coal Seam Fire (#206) located on the Healy Spur Road east of Usibelli on Wednesday, June 17, 2026. Click on the image to download a PDF type file to enlarge or print.
‹ DFFP is responding to the Bulchitna Fire in the Fish Lakes area of the Yentna River 

Categories: Active Wildland Fire, Alaska DNR – Division of Forestry & Fire Protection (DFFP)

Tags: 2026 Alaska Fire Season, coal seam, DFFP Northern Region, Gagnon Coal Seam Fire



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Shootout with police at South Anchorage Walmart leaves man dead and officer injured, police chief says

Published

on

Shootout with police at South Anchorage Walmart leaves man dead and officer injured, police chief says


Anchorage police shot and killed a shoplifting suspect, who also allegedly shot two officers, during an attempted arrest at a Walmart on the city’s southside late Tuesday.

That’s according to Anchorage Police Chief Sean Case, who shared preliminary details of the incident in a press conference with news media Wednesday morning.

One officer remained hospitalized in stable condition Wednesday after the shoplifting suspect shot him in the lower body, Case said. Another officer was shot in the chest, but protective armor stopped the shots, the police chief said.

“We almost lost an officer last night, probably two, at what took place,” Case said. “This went from a simple misdemeanor arrest to a very violent act at the snap of a finger in close quarters.”

Advertisement

Case described a chaotic struggle between the man – whose name police have not yet released – and three officers responding to a reported shoplifting at the Walmart store on the Old Seward Highway near Dimond Boulevard at about 10:25 p.m. Tuesday.

Walmart staff had stopped the man and brought him to a loss prevention office at the store, because they believed he had some stolen merchandise that was hidden on his person, Case said. The man was sitting in the office with Walmart employees when officers arrived, Case said.

In the small room, the officers were getting some basic information when the man tried to flee, Case said.

“The three officers and the suspect went down to the ground,” Case said. “During the struggle, the suspect fired rounds at one of the officers that hit him twice in the lower body. The suspect then fired some additional rounds that struck another officer in the chest. That round was stopped by a ballistic plate in his vest.”

Wesley Early

Advertisement

/

Alaska Public Media

Anchorage Police Chief Sean Case discusses a police shooting with news media on June 17, 2026. The shooting occurred at a Walmart near Dimond Boulevard the night before.

Case said officers were unaware the man had a gun on him until he began firing.

The officer struck in the chest returned fire, killing the man, Case said.

“The officer that was struck in the lower body was immediately transported to a local hospital,” he said. “The other two officers that were in the room also sustained injuries, and they went to the hospital later and were cleared.”

Advertisement

Case said the shooting was contained to the loss prevention office and did not spill out into the rest of the store.

Calls to Walmart went unanswered Wednesday morning. An Anchorage Reddit user who said they were at the store described employees rushing shoppers out after the shooting.

The store remained closed Wednesday as yellow tape blocked the entrance and investigators appeared to be inside analyzing the scene.

Under Anchorage Police Department policy, the names of the officers involved in the incident will be released after 72 hours. Case said the officers were part of the department’s Patrol Division.

This is the third fatal police shooting in Anchorage so far in 2026 and the fifth police shooting overall. Case said the city has seen “too much gun violence” in recent months and that the community needs to come together to address solutions.

Advertisement

“The Anchorage Police Department is going to keep these conversations going even if these conversations lead to criticism on how we do and conduct our business,” Case said. “We are open for all the conversations, so that we can move forward as a community to see some of these numbers go down.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending