TULSA, Okla. (KOKH) — One person has been arrested after allegedly trying to sell stolen property on Facebook.

On April 10, an officer with the Tulsa Police Department saw a post on Facebook Marketplace for a projector lens that was stolen from the condemned Promenade Mall.

The lens, which is worth $20,000, was listed for just $500.

The officer used a fake Facebook account to message the seller and arranged a trade for the lens in exchange for a minibike.

Earlier this week, 19-year-old Zachery Scrivner met with the officer and was arrested.

According to the police department, Scrivner said he knew the lens was stolen but decided to try to sell it anyway.

He was arrested on a complaint of knowingly concealing stolen property.

COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – The latest effort to ban abortion in South Carolina will go before a full Senate committee on Thursday.

The South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Committee will take up S.1095, a day after it was approved by a subcommittee. That vote came following a two-hour hearing on Tuesday.

The latest proposal, known as the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” would effectively replace the state’s current ban on abortion after six weeks.

The bill would prohibit abortions once a pregnancy is clinically diagnosable and eliminate existing exceptions for rape, incest and fatal fetal anomalies. Abortions would be permitted only in cases of medical emergencies to prevent a woman’s death or a “substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function.”

The current law allows for abortions up to 12 weeks in cases of rape or incest.

Supporters of the new bill argue that those exceptions do not go far enough. Sen. Richard Cash, a Republican from Anderson County and a sponsor, said he has pushed for stricter abortion laws since taking office in 2017.

“The right to life is an unalienable right that comes from God, and the state needs to recognize that and codify that in law,” Cash said Tuesday.

Under the proposal, doctors who illegally perform abortions could face felony charges punishable by up to 20 years in prison. Pregnant women could also face misdemeanor charges, carrying a potential sentence of up to two years in prison. Both parties’ would face hefty fines.

Opponents say the bill goes too far and would have serious consequences for patients and medical providers. Outside the committee room, advocates for abortion rights and LGBTQ+ rights rallied outside the South Carolina State House on Tuesday.

Carey Shofner with the Palmetto State Abortion Fund emphasized the existing six‑week ban has not satisfied some lawmakers.

“Even with that six‑week ban in place, that’s never going to be good enough for some people,” Shofner said. “Some people today were testifying that they didn’t think this total abortion ban was extreme enough because women couldn’t be charged with the death penalty.”

Back inside the committee room, Ashlyn Preaux, also with the Palmetto State Abortion Fund, said criminalizing women would harm families.

“You’re not protecting families by passing this bill,” she said. “You’re actually tearing them apart, because when you criminalize a mom, you’re not just punishing her — you’re punishing her children.”

The bill would also classify abortion medications such as Mifepristone as Schedule IV controlled substances under state law.

“Last year, this subcommittee rejected a bill just like this one because they saw it for what it was: disgraceful government overreach and abject cruelty,” Vicki Ringer, Director of Public Affairs at Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said in a statement after Wednesday’s vote. “And yet today they voted to advance the same total abortion ban that criminalizes doctors and patients, threatening to throw a woman who has an abortion in prison. We have to meet this assault on our rights. Keep calling, keep emailing, keep speaking out — let your legislator know that you’re watching, and your rights are not for the taking.”

Some argued the bill is a step in the right direction, but said it does not go far enough. Mark Corral with Equal Protection South Carolina said abortion should be treated as homicide under state law.

“Would you want your death to be treated as a mere misdemeanor?” Corral said. “Failing to treat the willful killing of a preborn child as homicide violates God’s law.”

Gov. Henry McMaster has previously said he believes South Carolina’s six‑week abortion ban reflects the views of most residents.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.

Copyright 2026 WIS. All rights reserved.

The Tennessee General Assembly passed House Bill 1446, known as the Recognizing Judea and Samaria Act, sending the measure to the governor’s desk as part of an effort to standardize terminology in state government communications, the National Association of Christian Lawmakers (NACL) said.

The legislation requires state agencies to use the term “Judea and Samaria” in official materials. Supporters argue the terminology reflects ancient Jewish historical ties to the land, while “West Bank,” widely used internationally, dates to Jordan’s control of the territory after 1948 and is viewed by backers of the bill as a later political label.

The measure, which goes into effect July 1, 2026, was advanced by Chris Todd, who also serves as NACL Tennessee State Chair. The organization said the directive is intended to create consistency across government entities and align language with what it describes as established historical references.

NACL Founder and President Jason Rapert framed the bill as part of a broader national effort. He said Todd had shown “principled leadership” by promoting legislation rooted in what he described as historical accuracy. Rapert added that the group has backed similar initiatives across the country and views the measure as part of a growing push for government language to reflect “reality, not political convenience.”

Todd, who chairs the House Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee, framed the legislation as a matter of how public institutions present information, arguing that “accuracy and integrity must be the standard in official government communications.”

He said requiring agencies to use what he described as “historically grounded terms” would create consistency across state entities and avoid taxpayer-funded messaging that reflects politically driven language.

Todd also pointed to broader disputes over historical narratives, saying official terminology influences how information is conveyed to the public and taught to future generations.