Connect with us

Denver, CO

Who could be the next Broncos quarterback for Sean Payton?

Published

on

Who could be the next Broncos quarterback for Sean Payton?


Who comes next after Russell Wilson for the Broncos at quarterback?

First things first — it’s unlikely to be a rookie, at least at the start of the 2024 season. This doesn’t mean the Broncos won’t draft one. But they’d like the luxury of not having to rush that rookie into action.

Despite the massive dead-money figure facing the Broncos — a number that is already assured to be at least $45 million, and could rise further with more moves in the coming days — the mood at Centura Health Training Center is not about waving a white flag of surrender on the season. Four of the five teams with the highest dead-money hit last year made the playoffs.

Of course, all were in the NFC. The conference where quarterbacks do not include names like Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen, C.J. Stroud, Joe Burrow and reigning NFL MVP Lamar Jackson. And that doesn’t even mention standouts such as Justin Herbert, Tua Tagovailoa and Trevor Lawrence, although an injury sapped his effectiveness late last season.

Still, the Broncos will take their shot — with a name that, at least for now, is unlikely to land on marquees like Wilson’s did.

Advertisement

Who could be the next Broncos quarterback in line?

The first possibility is the one on hand.

IF THEY STAND PAT …

JARRETT STIDHAM, DENVER: Sean Payton still possesses a belief in the potential of Stidham, which means that the sixth-year veteran still has the attention of the most important set of eyes in the room. But the clock is ticking. His last three starts — two of which came with the Broncos to close the 2023 season — weren’t impressive.

Stidham as the first-teamer is likely only sellable to the public if there is a first-round quarterback waiting in the wings. Going into the 2024 season with Stidham and without a first-round pick would be a tough sell.

For that matter, Stidham and a bridge-type QB, reclamation project or a fringe backup/starter with some potential would be a difficult product to peddle without having a clearly-established quarterback of the future — which comes with Round 1 status.

Advertisement

BEN DiNUCCI, DENVER: He didn’t play a snap last year, but the Broncos kept him around with a reserve-future contract. He knows the scheme and has enough skills to where Sean Payton wanted to keep going down the path with the James Madison product.

IS THERE UPSIDE HERE?

If you’re looking for the “next Baker Mayfield,” this pool could yield it.

JAKE BROWNING, CINCINNATI: CBS’ Boomer Esiason raised the notion during Super Bowl week. Working in Zac Taylor’s highly-structured offense, Browning hit his marks and flourished, finishing 8th in EPA/play and 11th in success rate among the 32 passers with at least 300 plays last season. Browning is an exclusive-rights free agent, so he’d require a trade. But there is no logical reason why Cincinnati would part ways with a cheap backup option who did exactly what one hopes a reserve can do: keep the team afloat. That is, unless a team made an absurd offer.

SAM DARNOLD, SAN FRANCISCO: He spoke at length during Super Bowl week of how much he learned with the 49ers. The question now is this: Can he apply it going forward? The measurables and tools have always been there, but it’s never all come together. Yet he remains young — still just 26 years of age, and now potentially on to his fourth team.

SAM HOWELL, WASHINGTON: The Commanders are expected to use the No. 2 overall pick on a quarterback, and they likely want that passer to play sooner rather than later. Howell’s promising early-season form — including an outstanding game at Denver’s expense in Week 2 — showed the potential he possesses if he can get better protection and learn that he doesn’t need to be the hero every time he drops back. But Howell is a cost-controlled No. 2 option for Washington with starting experience who won’t rock the boat if he has to be a bridge or handle relief duty. As with Browning, there’s no reason why the Commanders would part with that unless blown away by a trade offer.

Advertisement

TYLER HUNTLEY, BALTIMORE: You might remember him from the comeback he led against the Broncos in December 2022 after Lamar Jackson succumbed to what would be a season-ending injury. Huntley did just enough as a dual-threat quarterback to eke the Ravens into the playoffs, where only the “Fumble in the Jungle” prevented Baltimore from advancing with an upset at Cincinnati. But his metrics aren’t great; his EPA/play is 57th among 83 quarterbacks with at least 150 plays over the last four seasons, and his success rate is 63rd.

MAC JONES, NEW ENGLAND: It would take a trade to acquire the 2021 first-round pick. And the clock is ticking loudly in the final year of his rookie deal, which also limits his cost-controlled window. Among 32 quarterbacks with at least 400 plays last year, his EPA/play last year of minus-0.133 was 30th, but his success rate was 23rd, showing a lower variance than other options.

GARDNER MINSHEW II, INDIANAPOLIS: He is Mr. Excitement, no doubt about it. But for all the buzz, he was 34th of 65 QBs (minimum 40 plays) in EPA/play and 38th in success rate. It is fair to wonder if he could stay on schedule enough for Payton’s liking. But he can be dynamic and he was a reason why the Colts stood at the brink of a shock playoff trip last season. (Spotrac assessed market value: one year, $4,967,594)

MASON RUDOLPH, PITTSBURGH: His insertion into the Steelers lineup revived Pittsburgh’s flagging hopes, making possible a return to the playoffs. But there’s a significant gap between his EPA/play — 0.169 last year, good for sixth among 65 QBs with at least 40 plays — and his success rate (46.7 percent, 26th), revealing a high variance.

VETERAN BRIDGES (YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE GETTING)

JACOBY BRISSETT, WASHINGTON: At this point in his career, the 31-year-old Brissett knows the drill: Be on standby in case the young quarterback falters or isn’t ready. That he has learned how to handle this role with professionalism and support — while also playing credible football when asked — makes him a potentially ideal fit. Among the 83 quarterbacks with at least 150 plays since 2020, Brissett is 29th in EPA/play and 33rd in success rate. This is solid work. And also better than Russell Wilson in both metrics in that span (35th and 42nd, respectively).

Advertisement

Keep an eye on Brissett. He fits the mold on multiple levels.

JIMMY GAROPPOLO, LAS VEGAS: Even before an injury preceded his trip to the bench, Garoppolo was enduring a rough season. Now he faces a two-game suspension to start the 2024 campaign, atop the fact that injuries continue to accumulate for the former 49ers Super Bowl starter. He can execute the rhythm-and-timing throws Payton requires well, but he should have been able to flourish in Josh McDaniels’ scheme early last season, too.

MARCUS MARIOTA, PHILADELPHIA: At this point, he’s likely a backup. He’s on the wrong side of 30 years of age. Maybe there’s some Geno Smith revival potential here, but that seems unlikely.

RYAN TANNEHILL, TENNESSEE: The Titans are moving on to 2023 second-round pick Will Levis. Tannehill remains reasonably capable, and his success rate of 50.9 percent over the last four seasons ranks 10th among 83 quarterbacks with at least 150 plays to their name. But mobility has always been a part of Tannehill’s game … and with his 36th birthday coming in July, it’s fair to wonder if he can be as effective as Father Time chases him down. His 78.5 passer rating last year in eight starts was also his lowest figure since his rookie season. (Spotrac assessed market value: one year, $4,967,594)

TYROD TAYLOR, N.Y. GIANTS: Taylor is about to begin his 14th season. It’s fair to ask whether he brings anything Stidham wouldn’t at this stage. But if part of the role is to offer wise counsel to a first-round pick, Taylor fits the bill well. (Spotrac assessed market value: two years, $6,750,391)

Advertisement

MITCHELL TRUBISKY, EX-PITTSBURGH: The Steelers already parted ways with the former No. 2 overall pick, and he appears to be in decline. A Trubisky-Stidham competition wouldn’t make many hearts in Broncos Country flutter with anticipation.

JAMEIS WINSTON, NEW ORLEANS: It’s Year Nine for the former No. 1 overall pick, so the clock is most definitely ticking. But he knows Payton’s offense better than anyone on the market. If familiarity matters in determining the next Broncos quarterback, Winston has an edge. But his small sample size last year was unimpressive; among the 65 QBs with at least 40 plays, Winston ranked 53rd in EPA/play and 63rd in success rate.

DO THE BRONCOS DARE GO THERE AGAIN?

DREW LOCK, SEATTLE: Among 65 quarterbacks with at least 40 plays last year, Lock ranked 47th in EPA/play — but 66th in success rate. That discrepancy reveals that he remains a relatively high-variance quarterback, and thus, not a likely fit for Sean Payton.

JOE FLACCO, CLEVELAND: The NFL’s Comeback Player of the Year hit a brick wall once he got to the wild-card round against Houston. He actually had a negative EPA/play last year (minus-0.016, placing him 39th among 65 QBs). His success rate — 43.6 percent — was 37th. Were he younger, there’d be hope for improvement. But at this point, Flacco is who he is.

BRETT RYPIEN, SEATTLE: His turn in brief action for the Rams last year was so dreadful that Los Angeles released him shortly thereafter. He finished last in the league in EPA/play and success rate. The Seahawks brought him onto their practice squad. But given that Payton chose not to bring back Rypien last year, the notion of a Ryp return to the team with whom he started three games seems DOA.

Advertisement

DREAM ON …

KIRK COUSINS, MINNESOTA: Despite his Achilles injury, he should have one more big contract score, and his ability to run the Shanahan-McVay offense to precise perfection makes him an ideal candidate for a slew of teams. It would be no surprise if his price tag reaches $40 million a season.

BAKER MAYFIELD, TAMPA BAY: His price tag is likely too rich for the Broncos as they navigate a cap crunch. They wouldn’t mind finding the next Baker Mayfield. But Mayfield’s expected price should soar north of $30 million. And one wonders if the Bucs’ ability to keep future Hall of Fame wide receiver Mike Evans around augurs well for retaining Mayfield, who has made it clear he wants to remain on the West Coast of Florida.



Source link

Advertisement

Denver, CO

Proposed September 2026 Service Changes

Published

on

Proposed September 2026 Service Changes


RTD’s Proposed September Service Changes are designed to further enhance and strengthen RTD’s transit network by refining service, improving reliability, and better aligning resources with customer needs.

As part of the September 2026 Service Change, RTD is advancing a coordinated set of transit service enhancements designed to strengthen reliability, restore key frequencies, and improve access to major destinations across the system. These proposed changes reflect observed utilization trends, operational performance, and lessons learned during recent reconstruction activities, while maintaining flexibility for future evaluation and adjustment. Several of the recommended enhancements are supported by Clean Transit Enterprise (CTE) grant funding and are intended to restore and expand service consistent with the System Optimization Plan (SOP), noting that final CTE allocations are still in development. 

You can view all the proposed changes below and learn more by watching our presentation in English or Spanish.

Customer feedback on the Proposed September Service Changes will be collected through July 8. We invite you to virtually attend our public meetings and Ask a Service Planner sessions, or share your feedback through the online survey. Customer feedback is important to RTD, and we thank you for participating however you can!

Advertisement

Public Meetings

Interpretation is available at no cost. Call 303.299.2051 or email [email protected] at least 5 business days before the meeting and tell us the meeting name, date, and the language(s) you need.

Ask a Service Planner 1: Monday, June 22 at noon

Public Meeting 1: Monday, June 22 at 5:30 p.m.

Ask a Service Planner 2: Tuesday, June 23 at noon

Public Meeting 2: Wednesday, June 24 at 5:30 p.m.

Advertisement

Proposed September 2026 Service Changes

In addition to the routes listed below, the following routes also have proposed changes:

23 – West 20th Avenue

Route Adjustment, Schedule Timing

Proposed Change

It is proposed to split the existing Route 20 into Route 20 and Route 23, with Route 23 serving the western portion of Route 20 along 20th Ave., terminating at Union Station on the eastern end.

Advertisement

Reason

Maintains connectivity between Lakewood and Edgewater to downtown Denver.

Updated Map

Survey Link

AL – Denver International Airport to Longmont

Advertisement

Service Increase

Proposed Change

New route would provide hourly service from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily, with service operating from 8th Ave. and Coffman St. to US 287 with a stop at Niwot Park-n-Ride and into Lafayette Park-n-Ride to E-470 to Denver International Airport (DEN).

Reason

Requested by policymakers, stakeholders and customers, service will provide connections from Longmont to Denver Airport via the Lafayette Park-n-Ride

Advertisement

Updated Map

Survey Link

BMFX – Broomfield FlexRide

Service Increase

Proposed Change

Advertisement

Extend weekday service to 9 p.m., with an extra vehicle added during a.m. and p.m. peaks. Add a second vehicle during Saturday peak hours; and implement Sunday service from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Reason

The City and County of Broomfield requested additional service, which can be supported through available grant funding.

Survey Link

WGFX – Wagon Road FlexRide

Advertisement

Service Reduction

Proposed Change

Discontinue service.

Reason

Low utilization, with service averaging 1 boarding per hour at a cost of $158.33 per boarding.

Advertisement

Survey Link

Dashboard: Routes and Lines

A

Union Station – Denver Airport

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Service Reduction

C

Littleton•Mineral – Union Station

  1. Service Increase

D

18th•California – Littleton•Mineral Station

  1. Service Reduction

L

30th•Downing – 16th•Stout

  1. Route Adjustment

T

Lincoln Station – I-25•Broadway Station

  1. Schedule Timing

W

Union Station – JeffCo Gov’t Center•Golden Station

  1. Schedule Timing

1

West 1st Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing

9

West 10th Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

10

East 12th Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

11

Mississippi Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment

14

West Florida Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing

15

East Colfax Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

15L

East Colfax Limited

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

20

20th Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment
  3. Route Adjustment

24

University Blvd

  1. Seasonal Adjustment

32

West 32nd Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

35

Hampden Avenue

  1. Service Increase
  2. Seasonal Adjustment

37

Smith Road Industrial

  1. Schedule Timing

42

Montbello via Albrook / Green Valley Ranch

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment

45

Montbello / Green Valley Ranch

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment

51

Sheridan Blvd

  1. Service Increase
  2. Seasonal Adjustment

52

West 52nd Avenue / South Bannock

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

53

North Sheridan Blvd / Broomfield

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

59

West Bowles

  1. Route Adjustment

65

Monaco Parkway

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment

72

72nd Avenue

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Service Increase
  3. Route Adjustment

73

Quebec Street

  1. Seasonal Adjustment
  2. Route Adjustment

83L

Cherry Creek / Parker Road Limited

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Route Adjustment

105

Havana Street

  1. Schedule Timing

153

Chambers Road

  1. Schedule Timing

204

Table Mesa / Moorhead / North 19th

  1. Schedule Timing

206

Conestoga / Arapahoe / Fairview High School

  1. Schedule Timing

225

Boulder / Lafayette via Baseline

  1. Seasonal Adjustment
  2. Route Adjustment

228

Lafayette / Louisville / Broomfield

  1. Service Reduction

323

Skyline Crosstown

  1. Schedule Timing

AB1

Airport to Boulder

  1. Schedule Timing

AB2

Airport to Boulder

  1. Schedule Timing

ART

Art District Connector

  1. Route Adjustment

DASH

Boulder / Lafayette via Louisville

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment
  3. Route Adjustment

FREERIDE

16th Street FreeRide

  1. Schedule Timing

JUMP

Boulder / Lafayette / Erie via Arapahoe

  1. Route Adjustment

LD

Longmont / Denver

  1. Schedule Timing

LX2

Longmont / Denver Express

  1. Schedule Timing

NB1

Boulder / Nederland / Eldora

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment
  3. Route Adjustment

NB2

Boulder / Nederland / Eldora

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment
  3. Route Adjustment

SKIP

Broadway (Boulder)

  1. Schedule Timing
  2. Seasonal Adjustment

ILFX

Interlocken / Westmoor FlexRide

  1. Service Increase



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Fire destroys home under construction in northwest Denver

Published

on

Fire destroys home under construction in northwest Denver


DENVER (KDVR) — An early morning fire on Friday left a home completely ablaze in the Highlands neighborhood, just a week after another house under construction went up in flames in the same area.

The Denver Fire Department shared photos of the incident, as crews were called to 3643 Mariposa, where images show a fully consumed home under construction.

“I think they [firefighters] kicked in the neighbor’s door just to make sure nobody was at home,” neighbors Lucy and Kyle said. “Some of the other houses, their windows got blown out from the heat!”

Just 11 days earlier, on June 8, a home under construction caught fire in the same neighborhood near West 33rd and Navajo. Nobody was hurt in either fire.

Advertisement

And just about two years earlier, in July, another fire in the same area ignited around West 36th and Osage. All of the properties are/were under development by the same group.

“I wasn’t present for any of the fires,” Ryan Yoffe, a member of the developer group, said.

Yoffe does say he thinks he knows how the last two fires had been set, saying it’s the City of Denver that needs to do better with surveillance.

“It’s likely related to the amount of homelessness in the area, looking for properties under construction to live in or burn down,” Yoffe said. “The City and the Police Department need to do a better job patrolling to limit the number of homeless people camping in the neighborhood.”

Denver Fire Department officials say the most recent incidents are under investigation, but that nobody was hurt in either.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Rockies ride Kyle Freeland’s gem, Braxton Fulford’s double to 4-3 win over Pirates

Published

on

Rockies ride Kyle Freeland’s gem, Braxton Fulford’s double to 4-3 win over Pirates


The night belonged to Kyle Freeland, who joined the 1,000 K Club. The moment belonged to Braxton Fulford. The ninth inning — and a big sigh of relief — belonged to closer Antonio Senzatela.

Fulford hit a two-run, two-out, pinch-hit double in the eighth inning off Mason Montgomery to lead the Rockies to a 4-3 win over the Pirates at Coors Field in front of a Friday night crowd of 33,596.

Fulford drove in Tyler Freeman and Cole Carrigg, who scratched out back-to-back two-out singles off Montgomery.

“I had been warming up in the cage for that at-bat for a couple of innings, so I felt pretty prepared,” Fulford said. “I got an advantage count (3-1) and I knew he was going to come with the heater and I was all over it.”

Advertisement

Fulford caught Montgomery for three seasons at Texas Tech, so he knew the left-hander’s tendencies.

“It’s kind of unfortunate for pitchers that you catch, because you kind of get to see their stuff,” Fulford said. “You kind of understand more of who they are. So I do feel like I had the advantage there.”

In the ninth, the Pirates loaded the bases against Senzatela with no outs on a single by Marcell Ozuna and an error on a groundball by shortstop Ezequiel Tovar. But Senzatela struck out pinch-hitter Tyler Callihan and induced Jared Triolo to ground to Tovar, who started the game-ending double play.

“It was kind of a crazy ending to the game — bases loaded and no outs,” Freeland said. ” ‘Senza’ got a big punchout in that situation, picks up Tovar. Then Tovar gets another opportunity to turn a double play, and he gets it done.”

Before all of the late-game drama, Freeland pitched his best game of the season: 7 1/3 innings, two runs allowed on four hits, no walks, and eight strikeouts. It marked the fourth time in his career that he pitched 7 1/3 or more innings.

Advertisement

“Tonight, I thought he was absolutely exceptional,” manager Warren Schaeffer said. “I thought his body language was impressive. He attacked the strike zone — relentlessly. His heater had good ‘vert’ tonight. The breaker was good. It seemed like he was in control all night.”

“Gritty” is the word often used to describe Freeland. Dominant was a more apt description on Friday night. History-making works, too. Freeland’s eight Ks gave him 1,001 for his career, joining right-hander German Marquez (1,069) as the only two pitchers in franchise history to eclipse 1,000. Freeland struck out Marcell Ozuna in the seventh for No. 1,000, and then promptly fanned Brandon Lowe for 1,001.

The hard-core Rockies fans behind the dugout gave Freeland a standing ovation.

“I’m very grateful for the fans always supporting me, and for making it this long in my career to reach some of these milestones, especially with one ballclub,”  said Freeland, who struck out eight and walked none for the second time in his career. “I definitely hear those fans when I pop out of the dugout after every inning.”

The 33-year-old Denver native blanked the Pirates for the first seven innings, giving up just two hits. Pittsburgh finally got to Freeland in the eighth, putting up back-to-back doubles by Esmerlyn Valdez and Triolo to cut Colorado’s lead to 2-1. Up to that point, it looked as if Freeland had the juice to throw a complete game, especially since he threw just 81 pitches.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending