Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie Review – Dune: Part Two

Published

on

Movie Review – Dune: Part Two

Read Time:4 Minute, 32 Second

I have read all of Frank Herbert’s DUNE books many times, and a few that were written by his son Brian. I can unequivocally say that the DUNE is my favorite science fiction series. The depth of the universe that Herbert creates is rivaled only by Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. This is why it is so hard to recreate DUNE for the screen. If I had a choice, I would have preferred that DUNE were created as a streaming mini-series that could have taken as much time as needed to tell the story. The visuals and music may not have been as spectacular as what Denis Villeneuve was able to pull off, but the story could have explored the depths of the characters and plot much more deeply.

What I love about the movie

What I love most about Denis Villeneuve’s DUNE is the visuals. The mood Villeneuve creates with his cinematic eye provides hints into the depth of the story that cannot be told through dialog or acting. Arrakis, the planet DUNE, is a character in the book, and Villeneuve treats it as such. I think I might agree with someone who said that Arrakis is the best-developed character in the movie.

—–Content continues below——

Every actor performs magnificently. Of course, the actors deserve credit for their talent, but I believe that the only way to get great acting from an entire cast is through great script and great direction.

Advertisement

What I dislike about the movie

I’m not one who thinks that any movie based on a book should try to be completely faithful to the source material. Each medium should stand on its own. That being said, there are things that are changed in the movie that I don’t think transfer. The most glaring is that Gurney Halleck was convinced that Lady Jessica was the traitor and not Dr. Yueh. That was instrumental to the motivation for Paul to take the water of life. Speaking of which, in the book, Lady Jessica did not want her son to take the water of life. For that matter, neither did Paul. It was only done after much trepidation. This plot line is completely removed from the movie. The Harkonnens launch an attack on Sietch Tabr and destroy it; Paul says, “Well, I didn’t see that coming. I guess I should take the water of life so that I can see the future more clearly.” That’s about how glibbly the movie treats it whereas in the book it’s a crucial decision that has enormous repercussions.

Also, Alia is born in the book and she’s the one who kills the Baron. The events in the movie are massively compressed as compared to the book. The events in the book span about four years. The events in the movie are compressed into less than nine months since Jessica is pregnant when she arrives on Arrakis and Alia is yet to be born by the end.

I’m also not sure what to think of the changes made to Chani and the relationship between Paul and Chani. On the one hand I like that Chani has more agency in the book. That works well for the story, but now I’m unsure how they will make amends without diminishing Chani’s agency. Villeneuve has said that he is already working on the script for Children of Dune and so Paul and Chani will have to have a reconciliation before they can actually have children. I’m going to guess that the third movie will pick up a number of years into the future, just as the book does. But to have Paul and Chani fix things off-screen now would be weak sauce.

I wish more details were given to the motivations of the characters. As I mentioned earlier, Frank Herbert created a detailed universe filled with conflict and did a masterful job of putting his characters in situations where they were forced to make sacrifices. Paul did not want to be the Kwisatz Haderach. He only chose that path as a last resort. The movie expressed his fear of taking the water of life, but the motivation for taking that risk wasn’t sufficiently expressed in the movie.

Conclusion

I’m glad that Villeneuve took on the daunting task of making DUNE. It’s hard to be critical given the constraints of cramming twenty hours of material into the five hours of DUNE 1&2. The visuals and music are masterpieces. With any hope this will inspire someone else to tackle the source material someday and give it the proper attention to detail it requires.

Advertisement

Grade: B

About The Peetimes: I think the first two Peetimes are the best, but none of them are bad. The only issue is with the forth Peetime, there is an important scene that begins as the Peetime ends that you don’t want to miss.

There are no extra scenes during, or after, the end credits of Dune: Part Two.

Rated: (PG-13) Sequences of Strong Violence | Brief Strong Language | Some Suggestive Material
Genres: Action, Adventure, Drama
Starring: Florence Pugh, Timothée Chalamet, Rebecca Ferguson
Director: Denis Villeneuve
Writer(s): Denis Villeneuve, Jon Spaihts, Frank Herbert
Language: English
Country: United States, Canada

Plot
Duke Paul Atreides joins the Fremen and begins a spiritual and martial journey to become Muad’dib, while trying to prevent the horrible but inevitable future he’s witnessed: a Holy War in his name, spreading throughout the known universe.

Don’t miss your favorite movie moments because you have to pee or need a snack. Use the RunPee app (Androidor iPhone) when you go to the movies. We have Peetimes for all wide release films every week, including DUNE part II, Drive Away Dolls, and coming soon King Fu Pana, The American Society of Magical Negroes, Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, and Godzilla x Kong: The new Empire  and many others. We have literally thousands of Peetimes—from classic movies through today’s blockbusters. You can also keep up with movie news and reviews on our blog, or by following us on Twitter @RunPee.
If there’s a new film out there, we’ve got your bladder covered.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘The Drama’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘The Drama’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – Many potential brides and grooms-to-be have experienced cold feet in the lead-up to their nuptials. But few can have had their trotters quite so thoroughly chilled as the previously devoted fiance at the center of writer-director Kristoffer Borgli’s provocative psychological study “The Drama” (A24).

Played by Robert Pattinson, British-born, Boston-based museum curator Charlie Thompson begins the film delighted at the prospect of tying the knot with his live-in girlfriend Emma Harwood (Zendaya). But then comes a visit to their caterers where, after much wine has been sampled, the couple wanders down a dangerous conversational path with disastrous results.

Together with their husband-and-wife matron of honor, Rachel (Alana Haim), and best man, Mike (Mamoudou Athie), Charlie and Emma take turns recounting the worst thing they’ve ever done. For Emma, this involves a potential act of profound evil that she planned in her mind but was ultimately dissuaded from carrying out, instead undergoing a kind of conversion.

Emma’s revelation disturbs all three of her companions but leaves Charlie reeling. With only days to go before the wedding, he finds himself forced to reassess his entire relationship with Emma.

As Charlie wavers between loyalty to the person he thought he knew and fear of hitching himself to someone he may never really have understood at all, he’s cast into emotional turmoil. For their part, Rachel and Mike also wrestle with how to react to the situation.

Advertisement

Among other ramifications, Borgli’s screenplay examines the effect of the bombshell on Emma and Charlie’s sexual interaction. So only grown viewers with a high tolerance for such material should accompany the duo through this dark passage in their lives. They’ll likely find the experience insightful but unsettling.

The film contains strong sexual content, including aberrant acts and glimpses of graphic premarital activity, cohabitation, a sequence involving gory physical violence, a narcotics theme, about a half-dozen uses of profanity, a couple of milder oaths, pervasive rough language, numerous crude expressions and obscene gestures. The OSV News classification is L — limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. The Motion Picture Association rating is R — restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

Read More Movie & Television Reviews

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Thimmarajupalli TV Movie Review: A grounded rural drama that works better in the second half

Published

on

Thimmarajupalli TV Movie Review: A grounded rural drama that works better in the second half

The Times of India

TNN, Apr 18, 2026, 3:39 PM IST

3.0

Story-The film is set in a quiet, close-knit village, Thimmarajupalli, where life follows a predictable rhythm, shaped by routine, relationships and unspoken hierarchies. The arrival of a television set marks a subtle but significant shift, slowly influencing how people see the world beyond their immediate surroundings. What begins as curiosity and shared entertainment starts to affect personal dynamics, aspirations and even conflicts within the community.Amid these changes, the film follows a group of villagers whose lives intersect through everyday interactions, simmering tensions and evolving relationships. As the narrative progresses, seemingly ordinary incidents begin to connect, revealing a layer of mystery beneath the surface.Review-There’s a certain patience required to settle into Thimmarajupalli TV. It doesn’t rush to impress, nor does it lean on dramatic highs early on. Instead, director Muniraju takes his time — perhaps a little too much, to establish the world, its people and their rhythms. The first half feels like a long, observational walk through the village, capturing its textures, silences and small interactions. This slow-burn approach may test your patience initially. Scenes linger, conversations unfold without urgency, and the narrative seems content simply existing rather than progressing. But there’s a method to this stillness. By the time the film begins to reveal its underlying tensions, you’re already familiar with the space — its people, their quirks and their unspoken conflicts.It is in the second half that the film finds its footing. The mystery element, hinted at earlier, begins to take shape, pulling the narrative into a more engaging space. The shift isn’t dramatic but noticeable, the storytelling gains purpose, and the emotional stakes become clearer. What once felt meandering now starts to feel deliberate. The film benefits immensely from its rooted setting. The rural backdrop isn’t stylised for effect; it feels lived-in and authentic. The cast blends seamlessly into this world, delivering natural performances that add to the film’s grounded tone. There’s an ease in how the characters interact, making even simple moments feel genuine.The background score works effectively in enhancing mood, particularly in the latter portions where the mystery deepens. It doesn’t overpower but gently nudges the narrative forward, adding weight to key moments. Visually too, the film stays true to its setting, capturing the quiet beauty and isolation of rural life. That said, the pacing remains inconsistent. Even in the more engaging second half, certain stretches feel slightly indulgent, as though the film is reluctant to let go of its observational style. A tighter edit could have made the experience more cohesive without losing its essence.Thimmarajupalli TV is not a film that reveals itself instantly. It asks for time and patience, but rewards it with sincerity and a quietly engaging narrative. It may stumble along the way, but its rooted storytelling and stronger latter half ensure that it leaves a lasting impression.—Sanjana Pulugurtha

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Roommates’ Review: Sadie Sandler Navigates the Highs and Lows of Freshman Year in Chandler Levack’s Formulaic Netflix Comedy

Published

on

‘Roommates’ Review: Sadie Sandler Navigates the Highs and Lows of Freshman Year in Chandler Levack’s Formulaic Netflix Comedy

The new Netflix comedy “Roommates” wastes no time before immersing audiences in campus co-habitation drama. We see a girl running through the quad before helplessly looking up to see her angry roommate throwing her underwear and used sanitary products out the window. A screaming match ensues, and we’re immediately left to wonder how they got here and how the feud will be resolved.

Except they’re not the eponymous roommates we’re supposed to care about. Chandler Levack‘s new film is structured like a Russian nesting doll of roommate stories, as the two girls are confronted by a guidance counselor who decides to tell them another story of freshman year roommates who didn’t get along at first. Aside from the occasional “How I Met Your Mother”-style reaction cutaway, that’s the last we see of those initial foes.

Patton Oswalt, Jason Momoa, Timothée Chalamet, Zendaya and Denis Villeneuve at Warner Bros. Pictures “The Big Picture” Presentation during CinemaCon 2026, the official convention Cinema United, at The Dolby Colosseum Caesars Palace on April 14, 2026 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The real story is about Devon (Sadie Sandler), a soon-to-be freshman who is going through the universal experience of hoping that everything clicks for her in college after failing to find the right friends in middle school and high school. She’s cautiously optimistic when Celeste (Chloe East) agrees to be her roommate after a chance meeting at orientation, hoping the party-loving free spirit will help her come out of her shell and separate her from the nerdy image she maintained in high school.

But Devon quickly has to learn the lesson that hits so many of us sitcom and rom-com enthusiasts hard in early adulthood: the notion that opposites attract is utter nonsense, and trying to merge your day-to-day life with someone dramatically different is far more trouble than it’s worth. The two girls instantly clash, and Celeste remains a consistent thorn in Devon’s side as she tries to navigate all the familiar story beats of freshman year (parties, boys, missed homework assignments, Thanksgiving, et al).

Levack, a promising indie filmmaker with credits like “I Like Movies” and “Mile End Kicks” to her name, does serviceable work on what is clearly a director-for-hire job. There’s only so much visual wiggle room when you’re working with the all-too-familiar Netflix comedy aesthetic, but she gets distinct and compelling performances out of her two leads, executing the “Odd Couple” schtick without devolving into caricature. Jimmie Fowlie and Ceara O’Sullivan’s script relies on formulaic coming-of-age beats before drifting unexpectedly into absurdism in the third act. The film would have been stronger and more consistent by embracing that weirder tone from the beginning, but we’ll take what we can get.

While “Roommates” boasts plenty of familiar faces in supporting roles of varying consequence — Nick Kroll runs through all of the cliched “liberal dad” tropes, while Natasha Lyonne shows up as Devon’s endlessly supportive mom in a role that makes little use of her myriad talents — it’s primarily a star vehicle for its two leads. The film was produced through Adam Sandler’s Happy Madison production label, and it’s fair to assume that it exists to showcase Sadie’s talents as a performer. (Fittingly, parts of the film deal with the idea that being a nepo baby isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.) The young actress demonstrates a wide range of comedic and light drama chops, suggesting that she might be just as successful at playing approachable everywoman types as her father is.

Advertisement

While the comedy is hit-or-miss, “Roommates” does its best work when it shows how daunting teenage friendships can feel. Anyone who has ever defined themselves by an arbitrary social order designed by the cruelest and stupidest people on the planet (which is to say, anyone who has been a college freshman), should be able to relate to some of Devon’s struggles, and the film treats her problems with an admirable amount of empathy.

The film won’t be remembered as a campus classic, or even in the upper half of college movies, but it’s also not hard to see a world where somebody watches it at exactly the right time in their lives and proceeds to cherish it forever. “Roommates” has a real chance at being a formative experience for someone, which is more than a lot of movies can say. But those of us who have already been sufficiently formed? We can find better things to stream this weekend.

Grade: C+

“Roommates” is now streaming on Netflix.

Want to stay up to date on IndieWire’s film reviews and critical thoughts? Subscribe here to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best new reviews and streaming picks along with some exclusive musings — all only available to subscribers. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending