Connect with us

Vermont

At least six Vt. towns are considering a declaration of inclusion on Town Meeting Day

Published

on

At least six Vt. towns are considering a declaration of inclusion on Town Meeting Day


On Town Meeting Day this year, at least six Vermont municipalities will have voters decide whether to adopt a declaration of inclusion. A sample version of the statement says that the town condemns racism and commits to fair treatment of everyone regardless of race, religion, gender, and several other traits.

Since 2021, a nonprofit has led the effort to have each of Vermont’s 247 towns and cities adopt the declaration.

Al Wakefield, a Mendon resident and retired executive consultant who is one of the founding members of the declaration initiative, spoke with Vermont Public’s Nathaniel Wilson about the project. This interview was produced for the ear. We highly recommend listening to the audio. We’ve also provided a transcript, which has been edited for length and clarity.

Nathaniel Wilson: What purpose does the declaration of inclusion serve? And why do Vermont cities and towns need to declare themselves as inclusive communities?

Advertisement

Nina Keck

/

Vermont Public

Al Wakefield

Al Wakefield: If Vermont is going to continue to grow and prosper, it needs to be able to attract people from all walks of life. We felt that the declaration of inclusion was one way of doing it. We are an aging population. We’re losing our youth, young folks are not returning to Vermont. And the declaration of inclusion says that we welcome all people, especially those who’ve been historically marginalized. We welcome them to come, bring their families, build their businesses here, and over the long term, that should have a positive impact on Vermont’s vitality and prosperity.

Advertisement

Nathaniel Wilson: Heading into this year’s Town Meeting Day, 135 of Vermont’s 247 towns and cities have already adopted a declaration of inclusion. What kind of work went into making that happen?

Al Wakefield: Certainly. There are five of us, Nathaniel, working on this. We started off with Bob Harnish and me and subsequently joined by Norm Cohen, Patti Lancaster, and Barbara Noyes Pulling.

And each of us, we almost – we work at this almost like account managers in that each one of us has X number of towns assigned to us. And so we started with the largest towns and cities and municipalities in Vermont, working towards the smallest.

And so the five of us each have responsibility for making initial contact with the town manager or the town administrator or town clerk – or the head of the select board if there’s no town management, working with them to get on to the town’s select board agenda. We make a five- to seven-minute presentation, answer any questions, and then the hope is that they will vote affirmatively – or as we are discussing right now, some select boards opt to defer to the town for a town vote.

Nathaniel Wilson: We’ve seen some pushback on the declaration as well. Highgate and Hubbardton approved statements before rescinding them last year. Select board members have said existing laws serve the same purpose or that their communities are already inclusive. How do you respond to people who say that the declaration is not needed in 2024?

Advertisement

Al Wakefield: Well, it’s very interesting, Nathaniel, none of the towns, and there are two that you named, have told us explicitly why they decided to reject, to not adopt the declaration. Several others have tabled it for further visitation.

We respond in that Vermont may well be known for being a place for all people to come prosper and thrive. But there are many of us, and especially those who are marginalized know that while it’s a good place to be, it’s nowhere near as good as it can be, and certainly not where it says it actually is.

Implicit bias happens almost daily to many of us who are in those marginalized groups, and what we’re saying with the declaration is that it’s an opportunity to make Vermont unique, as it thinks it is – to say to the rest of the world that we are welcoming, especially those who have been historically marginalized.

Nathaniel Wilson: What kind of work goes into ensuring that cities and towns are holding up their end of the bargain after adopting a declaration?

Al Wakefield: Just yesterday, in fact, some 20 to 30 surveys went out to the original 30 towns that signed the declaration of inclusion. We’re going systematically through from town number one to town number 135 or so over the next year to year and a half to see where they are. And so we’ll hopefully begin to get some feedback on that survey in the next two or three weeks or so from towns. And we’ll know whether they’ve not only agreed to adopt, but they’ve done something relevant to the adoption.

Advertisement

Nathaniel Wilson: And so we’re now more than three years removed from the beginning of the declaration initiative. What are some of the lasting impacts of previously signed declarations across the state?

Al Wakefield: Several towns – notably, I think Middlebury, which was an early adopter – have established an equity committee. The town of Bethel, a contrasting town to Middlebury in many ways, was very, very aggressive about establishing a declaration, inclusion and equity committee. Winooski had moved along in doing the same thing, begun to implement many of the things that are outlined on our website.

Some towns are working with both the state’s Office of Racial Equity as well as the Vermont League of Cities and Towns – they have a program in conjunction with Abundant Sun to train managers and town people on how to implement the principles of the declaration of inclusion.

Nathaniel Wilson: And what kind of work is your team doing now to grow the list of towns with declarations moving forward?

Al Wakefield: We’ve got 115, 116 towns to go and so we’re working day by day to get to the remaining 116 while, as I said earlier, following up on the original 135.

Advertisement

This piece of it, quite honestly, is going to be more difficult. We’re talking about smaller towns that are more remote, that don’t have Zoom or other virtual platforms. And so the labor is more intense, and quite honestly, smaller towns don’t see themselves as having an opportunity, as expressed through the declaration of inclusion and so that there probably is more in the way of dialogue that has to occur with them than perhaps has to occur with communities that are more diverse now, such as the ones that I just named.

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

WCAX Investigates: Police participation in border program draws scrutiny

Published

on

WCAX Investigates: Police participation in border program draws scrutiny


BURLINGTON, Vt. (WCAX) – Vermont police officers are working overtime shifts along the Canadian border under a federal program that critics say could violate the state’s anti-bias policing laws.

“Up here, we’re so small we rely on our partner agencies,” said Swanton Village Police Chief Matthew Sullivan.

On a recent frosty Friday, Sullivan was patrolling along the Canadian border as part of Homeland Security’s Operation Stonegarden. The chief and other local officers work overtime shifts for the U.S. Border Patrol.

“It acts as a force multiplier because we’re able to put more officers out in these rural areas in Vermont,” Sullivan said.

Advertisement

During an exclusive ride-along, Sullivan showed us a field where, as recently as last fall, migrants were smuggled across the border. “These people are really being taken advantage of,” he said.

From 2022 to 2023, U.S. Border Patrol encountered just shy of 7,000 people entering the country illegally in the region, more than the previous 11 years combined.

In several instances, police say cars have tried to crash through a gate in Swanton along the border. Others enter from Canada on foot and get picked up by cars with out-of-state plates.

The chief says the illegal crossings strike fear among local parents. “They didn’t feel safe allowing their kids outside to play, which is extremely unfortunate,” Sullivan said.

Through Operation Stonegarden — which was created in the wake of 9/11 — Sullivan and his officers get overtime pay from the feds. “We’re kind of another set of eyes and ears for border patrol,” Sullivan said. His department also gets equipment and training.

Advertisement

Six agencies in Vermont participate in Stonegarden: The Vermont State Police, Chittenden County Sheriff’s Department, Essex County Sheriff’s Department, Orleans County Sheriff’s Department, Newport City Police Department, and the Swanton Village Police Department. Some three dozen across New England participate in Stonegarden. These agencies collect relatively small amounts from the feds — $760,000 in Vermont, $190,000 in New Hampshire, and $1 million in Maine.

But amid the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, Stonegarden is under scrutiny.

“This has become quite relevant to a lot of people once again,” said Paul Heintz, a longtime Vermont journalist who now writes for the Boston Globe. “These three states have dramatically different policies when it comes to local law enforcement working with federal law enforcement.”

Vermont has some of the strictest rules about police assisting federal immigration officials. The Fair and Impartial Policing Policy limits cooperation with the feds and says immigration status, language, and proximity to the border cannot be the basis of an investigation.

“Vermonters have made clear through their elected representatives that they want state and local law enforcement to be focusing on state and local issues,” said Lia Ernst with the ACLU of Vermont. She says Stonegarden is crossing the line. “They don’t want their police to be a cog in the mass deportation machinery of any administration but particularly the Trump administration,” Ernst said.

Advertisement

The ACLU and other critics are concerned that Stonegarden creates a cozy relationship between local police and immigration officials that can be used to enforce the president’s immigration crackdown.

Heintz says the distinction between civil and criminal immigration enforcement can be fluid. In most civil cases in which the feds seek to deport, Vermont law enforcement can’t play a role because it’s against the law. In criminal cases, which local police can enforce, immigrants can be detained and charged.

“An operation may start out appearing to focus on a federal criminal immigration issue and may turn into a civil one over the course of that investigation,” Heintz said.

“There is a lot of nuance to it,” admitted Sullivan. He insists his department is not the long arm of federal law enforcement and is instead focused on crime, including guns, drugs, and human trafficking. However, if someone is caught in the act of crossing the border illegally, that constitutes a crime, and the chief said he calls for federal backup. Though he said that rarely happens.

“It’s a criminal violation to cross the border outside of a port of entry, and technically, we could take action on that. But again, we’re not here to enforce civil immigration while working Stonegarden,” Sullivan said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Catholic Church receives bankruptcy court’s OK to sell Rutland property – VTDigger

Published

on

Vermont Catholic Church receives bankruptcy court’s OK to sell Rutland property – VTDigger


Rutland’s former Loretto Home senior living facility, as pictured in recent advertisements offering it for sale. Pomerleau Real Estate photo

Vermont’s Roman Catholic Diocese, now seeking to reorganize its depleting finances in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, has received permission to sell its former Loretto Home senior living facility in Rutland.

In a ruling this week, Judge Heather Cooper said she’d allow the state’s largest religious denomination to accept a $1 million offer from Rutland’s nonprofit Cornerstone Housing Partners, which wants to transform the Meadow Street building into transitional and long-term affordable apartments.

“The proposed sale represents the highest and best offer for the property,” church lawyers argued in court papers, “and the proceeds of the sale will assist the diocese in funding the administration of this bankruptcy case and ultimately paying creditors.”

Cornerstone said it had a $3.9 million commitment from the state Agency of Human Services to help it buy and rehabilitate the 20,000-square-foot facility.

Advertisement

The nonprofit could immediately launch its first-phase plan for 16 units of emergency family housing under a new state law that expands locations for shelters. But the $1 million sale is contingent on receiving a Rutland zoning permit for a second-phase plan for at least 20 long-term apartments.

“We’re not going to purchase the building if we can’t create affordable apartments there,” Mary Cohen, the nonprofit’s chief executive officer, told VTDigger. “The goal is to create permanent housing.”

Cornerstone already has heard questions from neighbors as it seeks a zoning permit from Rutland’s Development Review Board.

“I think it’s a lack of understanding,” Cohen said. “We’re good landlords. We house people and take good care of our property. The application process will allow a public conversation about what our plans are.”

The Vermont Catholic Church filed for Chapter 11 protection a year ago after a series of clergy misconduct settlements reduced its assets by half, to about $35 million. Since then, 119 people have submitted new child sexual abuse allegations — almost double that of an earlier 67 accusers who previously settled cases over the past two decades.

Advertisement

To raise money, the diocese enlisted Pomerleau Real Estate to market the Loretto Home after the facility closed in 2023. The property, under the control of the church since 1904, was initially listed at $2.25 million before being reduced to $1.95 million and, by this year, $1.3 million, court records show. The diocese received an unspecified number of offers before accepting Cornerstone’s $1 million bid this summer.

Under the Chapter 11 process, the Vermont church must receive court approval for all major purchases and sales until a judge decides on its call for a reorganization plan.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont soccer’s Rob Dow reportedly eyeing move to Big Ten program

Published

on

Vermont soccer’s Rob Dow reportedly eyeing move to Big Ten program


Vermont soccer head coach Rob Dow appears to be headed to a bigger conference.

The longtime Catamounts head coach who guided Vermont to the 2024 NCAA championship in historic fashion is reportedly set to be hired by Penn State, according to Jon Sauber of Centre Daily Times. Shortly before Sauber’s online report on Wednesday, Dec. 11, WCAX-TV’s Jack Fitzsimmons and Michael Dugan broke news that Dow and the Nittany Lions were in “deep negotiations.”

UVM athletics officials declined to comment until there is an official announcement. 

Advertisement

Dow’s ninth season at Vermont ended with an upset loss to Hofstra in the second round of the NCAA Tournament at Virtue Field. The Catamounts had entered this year’s tournament unbeaten and as the top overall seed. They also started 2025 as the top-ranked team in the nation in the United Soccer Coaches preseason poll.

Under Dow, the Catamounts have advanced to the NCAA Tournament in five straight seasons (2021-2025). They reached the NCAA quarterfinals in 2022, the third round in 2023 and then last year’s unseeded run to capture their first national championship with an overtime victory over Marshall at the College Cup in Cary, North Carolina.

Through his nine seasons at Vermont, Dow has gone 109-41-21 with four America East tournament crowns and three conference regular-season titles. His 11 NCAA Tournament wins are a program record. He stands five wins shy of matching Cormier and Ron McEachen for most victories in program history.

Dow spent five seasons as an assistant coach at Vermont before earning a promotion to head coach in 2017 following the departure of Jesse Cormier.

According to UVM’s salary records online, Dow’s current base salary is $200,000. In 2017, in his first year at the helm, it was $80,000.

Advertisement

If hired, Dow would be taking over at Penn State following Jeff Cook’s exit. Cook stepped down in November after an eight-year run and three NCAA Tournament appearances. The Nittany Lions went 5-8-4 this past season.

Penn State’s operating budget for the 2024 fiscal year for men’s soccer was 10th in the country at $2,099,653, according to data collected by Matt Brown of Extra Points. Vermont was slotted 28th in Brown’s story.

Rob Dow: Season-by-season record with Vermont soccer

2025: 14-1-5 (NCAA second round)

2024: 16-2-6 (national champions)

Advertisement

2023: 13-6-2 (NCAA third round)

2022: 16-4-2 (NCAA quarterfinals)

2021: 13-5-2 (NCAA first round)

2020-21: 5-2-1 (America East final)

2019: 11-6-1 (America East semifinals)

Advertisement

2018: 11-7-1 (America East quarterfinals)

2017: 10-8-1 (America East semifinals)

Total: 109-41-21

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending