Connect with us

South-Carolina

South Carolina Senate: Judicial Reform Bill Set For 'Special Order' – FITSNews

Published

on

South Carolina Senate: Judicial Reform Bill Set For 'Special Order' – FITSNews


Will Palmetto State lawmakers finally give up this corrosive power?

A bill to reform the way South Carolina picks judges has been put on the front burner in the Palmetto State Senate – a move supporters hope will clear they way for a fairer, less conflicted judicial branch of government.

The bill – S. 1046 – was previewed by this media outlet earlier this month.

As we reported, the proposed legislation would enact multiple changes to the composition and operation of the state’s scandal-scarred Judicial Merit Selection Commission (JMSC). For starters, instead of having ten members appointed by legislative leaders, the reconfigured panel would be comprised of nine appointees: Two named by the governor, two named by the speaker of the House, one named by the Senate president, one by the Senate judiciary chairman, one chosen by the state’s sixteen solicitors, one chosen by the state’s public defenders and one chosen by the chief justice of the S.C. supreme court.

Advertisement

None of the appointees to the reconfigured panel would be allowed to be members of the S.C. General Assembly – or family members of state lawmakers.

According to state senator Wes Climer – one of the lead sponsors of the proposed legislation – the provision removing lawmakers from the JMSC is the part of the bill most likely to encounter opposition.

***

“The hill we’re going to have to charge is keeping legislators off of the JMSC completely,” Climer told me this week. “That could be the dividing line between the real reformers and everybody else.”

Can it be done?

“The votes are pretty close for real reform,” Climer said.

Advertisement

Along with state senators Josh Kimbrell and Rex Rice, Climer blocked judicial elections in the Palmetto State earlier this year – insisting senators pass a judicial reform bill prior to voting on any new judges.

Why was such bold action warranted? Because the current method is rife with opaqueness, corruption and unfairness – yielding all manner of adverse and inherently unjust outcomes for the people who rely on our system.

And the people have had enough of it …

***

RELATED | JUDICIAL REFORM WINS IN A LANDSLIDE

***

South Carolina is one of only two states in America in which lawmakers picks judges. That process is led by the JMSC, a shady screening committee dominated by a handful of powerful lawyer-legislators. These political attorneys routinely reap the rewards of their influence over this process – receiving preferential treatment on behalf of their clients at the expense of judicial integrity.

This inherently unfair system has enabled institutional corruption, shredded the rights of victims, empowered violent criminals and materially eroded public safety. It has also turned the judiciary into little more than a political annex of the legislature – a problem which is getting worse, not better.

Advertisement

Also getting worse? The overt politicization of legislative elections for judges – a process invariably driven by corrupt insider dealmaking.

As I noted earlier this week, the bill being advanced in the Senate is a far cry from the sweeping constitutional overhaul I have proposed – but it is a starting point. This week, Senate leaders set the measure for special order – meaning they voted to bring it forward to the top of their calendar for a debate on the floor.

In exchange for the reform bill moving to the top of the calendar, Climer, Kimbrell and Rice released their hold on judicial elections. Rather than hold some of these controversial votes right away, lawmakers have scheduled most of them for April – right after the filing period closes for this spring’s partisan primary elections.

“They want to make sure none of their votes come back to haunt them,” one State House observer told me.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR …

(Travis Bell Photography)

Will Folks is the founding editor of the news outlet you are currently reading. Prior to founding FITSNews, he served as press secretary to the governor of South Carolina and before that he was a bass guitarist and dive bar bouncer. He lives in the Midlands region of the state with his wife and seven (soon to be eight) children.

***

Advertisement

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to proactively address? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.





Source link

South-Carolina

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston

Published

on

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston


Six Republican candidates vying to become South Carolina’s next governor met in downtown Charleston for a wide-ranging debate that put abortion, infrastructure and the future of data centers at the center of the race.

The forum was held at the Sottile Theatre, where Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, Lowcountry businessman Rom Reddy and Attorney General Alan Wilson took the stage.

Questions included whether they would support a state hate crime law, how they would address concerns about growth and infrastructure, how to navigate collaboration, abortion and the future of data centers in the state.

One issue that drew near-unanimous opposition was state Senate Bill 1095, a proposed total abortion ban that passed out of committee earlier in the day. All of the candidates opposed the bill, but they differed on what they would do if it reached the governor’s desk.

Advertisement

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Norman said he would sign it.

“You know, this is an emotional issue, but I will tell you if this bill came to my desk as governor. If it passed the House and the Senate, I would sign it,” Norman said.

All of the other candidates on stage said they would veto the bill if it came across their desk as governor, with Reddy arguing the question should be decided by voters.

“The Supreme Court did not say the loudest voice in the ruling class prevails. It said it’s up to the people in the state, so let’s put it to a referendum,” Reddy said.

Advertisement

On infrastructure, candidates discussed reforming the South Carolina Department of Transportation and allowing private-sector involvement to help pay for improvements.

Wilson outlined ideas that included leasing interstate easements and expanding private express lanes.

“We privatized that grass between the interstates. We turn it into private express lanes that can be told we leased the easements on the sides of interstates to telecommunication companies and energy companies, and charge them for natural gas line and fiber optic fiber optic cables,” Wilson said.

Evette also pointed to public-private partnerships and the possibility of fast-pass lanes.

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Advertisement

“We want to make sure that we’re innovative public private partnerships coming in and creating fast pass lanes to allow people that are in a hurry to be able to utilize that,” Evette said.

The final question focused on data centers, with candidates agreeing corporations should “pay their way.”

“They should pay for their water. They should pay for their infrastructure, any roads around it, and we should look at what Governor Ron DeSantis has done in Florida with the large data centers that are coming to Florida. That should be the model in South Carolina and everywhere,” Mace said.

Kimbrell said the state should set limits to protect natural resources and guard against higher power costs for residents.

“Put parameters around data centers to ensure that the water consumption does not impact places like the ACE Basin,” Kimbrell said. “Ensuring that the Public Service Commission makes absolutely sure nobody’s power rate goes up and we try to get behind the meter energy grids in place so they can be self-sufficient.”

Advertisement

Two more debates are planned ahead of the primaries on June 9.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances

Published

on

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances


A bill that could make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion is moving to the full South Carolina Senate with just a few weeks left in the legislative session.

The South Carolina Senate medical affairs committee continued a debate of Senate Bill 1095 on April 21 in Columbia. The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson, builds on a restrictive abortion bill that failed to progress in the fall.

The committee passed the measure in an 8-4 vote, moving it to the full Senate for consideration. Lawmakers have until May 14, the last day of the 2026 legislative session, to pass the bill for it to become law.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 1095, also called the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” bans performing an abortion or supplying abortion drugs. It makes it illegal for a woman to get an abortion, with the only exception being to save a pregnant woman’s life.

It also makes mifepristone and misoprostol Schedule IV controlled substances. Alprazolam (Xanax) and zolpidem (Ambien) are two other examples of Schedule IV substances.

Pro-Life Greenville, an anti-abortion organization based in Greenville, responded to the bill’s progress with “full endorsement” of the legislation.

“Unborn children, like all human beings, deserve to have their lives protected under law here in the Palmetto State,” Pro-Life Greenville stated. “Today’s vote by the SC Senate Medical Affairs Committee brings that urgent need one step closer to reality.”

Advertisement

Under the bill, a woman who has an abortion could face misdemeanor charges. The maximum sentence would be two years in jail with a $1,000 fine.

Those found guilty of performing an abortion or providing a pregnant woman with abortion-inducing drugs could face felony charges, a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail, and a possible $100,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT), a firm opponent of the bill, decried the Senate committee passage. PPSAT Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said in a statement that the bill will cost people their lives, and it will make it more difficult for women to get reproductive and pregnancy healthcare.

“Abortion bans have and will continue to cost people their lives,” Ringer stated. “As this ban inches closer to the governor’s desk, it is becoming increasingly clear just how many of our lives anti-abortion lawmakers are willing to endanger in service to their agenda.”

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands

Published

on

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands


BARNWELL, S.C. (WRDW/WAGT) – An officer was injured, and the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) has issued a Blue Alert for an “armed and dangerous” woman.

According to the Blue Alert, Cushman is wanted in connection with an officer being injured.

The location of the assault was Gardenia Road in Blackville, S.C.

On Monday night around 10:35 p.m., officials said they were looking for Lacey Cushman, 37, a white woman who is 5 feet 9 inches tall and weighs about 210 pounds.

Advertisement
SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Barnwell County(WRDW)

According to SLED, she has brown eyes and an unknown hair color. Her hairstyle and clothing are unknown.

She was last seen driving a 2011 white Chevrolet Traverse with an S.C. tag, 706IRU, in Barnwell County.

Her last known direction of travel was toward Bamberg County.

If you see her or have information, call 911 immediately.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with FOX Carolina. For more free content like this, download our apps.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WHNS. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending