Connect with us

Movie Reviews

About Dry Grasses Review: Everyone Wants to Matter

Published

on

About Dry Grasses Review: Everyone Wants to Matter

Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s About Dry Grasses centers on a village unknown to the outside world with a lead character unable to see beyond his own sense of self-importance. 


I’ve often wondered about the lives that are lived in the places we never see on big screens. Towns you get a glimpse of while on a road trip, places you notice while driving from the airport to your final destination, the towns and villages in between where you came from and where you planned to go. Seeing these towns I’ll never know firsthand even implores me to think about all the places I’ll never get to see. They’re not along a path I’d travel or perhaps a destination I’d never even know to set as a goal to see one day. About Dry Grasses (Kuru Otlar Üstüne)  is a film that takes place in a village in Eastern Turkey far off the path of anywhere that someone may desire to travel. 

Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s film leans into the desolate area as a character of its own. It’s a village with only two seasons, winter and summer, and this story takes place during the long, unforgiving winter. With a desolate backdrop and a genuinely unlikable main character, the film stands as an interesting character study about those who want a better hand than what life has dealt them

The film opens in pure whiteness, caused by the unrelenting snow. From the nothingness comes our main character, Samet (Deniz Celiloglu). He has just returned to his small village in eastern Anatolia from school break to his home he shares with fellow teacher and housemate Kenan (Musab Ekici). Samet is known around the village as “Teacher” and has settled into the community as he works as an art teacher at the local school. He is contracted to work at this particular school under a four-year mandatory service, but his time to transfer schools is on the horizon and he has big aspirations of being moved to a school in Istanbul. 

While unhappy with where he is in life, he finds hope in a young student named Sevim (Ece Bagci) who seems to embody all the things Samet lacks: unbridled potential, natural kindness and easy popularity. Samet’s adoration begins to cross over to a hyper-fixation and after stealing a love note that Sevim wrote to another student, Samet clearly wishing it was about him, their relationship quickly turns sour. Soon after, both Samet and Kenan are called to the school district’s main office to be told they have been accused of inappropriate conduct by two students. 

Advertisement

About Dry Grasses is a film about a man who believes he is owed more than what life has given him. Samet is a disgruntled, even hateful man who harbors the weight of a massive chip on his shoulder, desperate to mean something to somebody. He is a truly dislikable character who takes his anger carelessly out on others. After being accused, he lashes out at his class, telling his young pupils they would be nothing but beat farmers, and physically intimidates Sevim and tells the other students to isolate her completely as punishment. 

a man looks at a lake surrounded by nature in the film About Dry Grasses
About Dry Grasses (Janus Films)

It comes across that Samet is jealous of his students, even if he won’t admit to it. He is jealous that these children are at the very beginning of their lives: even though they come from this remote, rural town, they do have a future of endless possibilities ahead of them. Sevim serves as the cumulation of all the potential that Samet lacks. Samet blames this village on his lack of opportunity and the fact he feels stuck in life, but in truth, it feels that Samet wouldn’t even know what to do with the potential he so desperately desires. 

Samet is set up with a fellow teacher, Nuray (Merve Dizdar) a young woman who lost her leg in a terrorist attack who chooses to teach in this village as it’s close to her family who stands as the only character able to call Samet out on his self-pitying ways. Nuray points out that he blames all his problems on his environment, but that is not what is making him miserable: it’s his outlook on life. She acknowledges his selfishness and brings into perspective that he is not a victim of circumstance as he believes but rather a victim of his own selfishness. 

Samet is such an unlikable character that it makes the film hard to watch. His motives are so thinly veiled, his entitlement is so aggressively arrogant and his hatred and disdain towards his life in this small village is proof of his inability to see beyond himself. The best part of the film is when Nuray tells him exactly the kind of man he is, but this moment is frustratingly ruined by Samet’s inability to grasp her incredibly spot-on points. 

Nurary and Sevim are the two characters able to see Samet for who he truly is. Merve Dizdar and Ece Bagci play these roles with a subtlety and ease that speaks volumes to their talent. They are able to convey so much without having to really say anything. While Deniz Celiloglu’s performance is impressive, as he is able to relay his character’s inferiority complex in a way that truly infuriates the viewer, these two women steal every scene they are in. They exude a level of comfort in these characters, really selling the concept that Nuray and Sevim are just comfortable in their own skin, that is enough to understand why Samet finds them characters worthy of such envy and admiration.  

Nuri Bilge Ceylan has created a film that stands as a truly intricate study of an unlikable character. However, Samet is not a character an audience needs a three-hour runtime to dislike and understand why. There are some worlds built in film that are so intriguing and so complex, you feel almost saddened when the credits roll and you have to return to reality. About Dry Grasses is not one of those films, it feels more so that it overstays its welcome. 

Advertisement

About Dry Grasses: Trailer (Janus Films)

While there are certain creative decisions Ceylan takes that really utilize the environment the story takes place in, there are also some decisions he makes that seem hard to justify. At one point, Samet walks through a door revealing a sound stage, full of working crew members, and takes a walk to a different indoor set. Not only does this moment feel completely out of place with the themes and premise of the film, but stylistically it does not make sense either. The film imposes on itself at times, reproving points that felt sufficiently made earlier on, and drags on seemingly not knowing what is completely necessary to keep and what scenes are not needed to prove the points the film wants to make. 

About Dry Grasses is not a comfortable viewing experience. It’s a film that wants to make you uncomfortable from its subject matter to the lack of a character arc Samet has (if he has any growth throughout the film it is virtually undetectable). The treatment of Sevim and the other students throughout the film is deplorable, not to mention the complete hatred he has for the village he has called home for the past four years. It is interesting, however, how all this animosity Samet has for his surroundings really stands as a reflection of his hatred for himself. He is unable to act, almost cowardly in his approach to life. He is surrounded by children who have their youth and their full lives ahead of them while he withers away in a village unknown to the outside world, helplessly longing to be someone more than who he is.


About Dry Grasses will be released at at Film Forum (LA) and in select US cities on February 23, 2024.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Published

on

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Share this with a friend!

During the opening ceremony of the Fantasia International Film Festival, Her Private Hell director Nicolas Winding Refn was awarded a Cheval Noir Career Achievement Award for his contributions to cinema. He made an impassioned plea on the importance of a festival like Fantasia and genre cinema as a whole:

“In the mid-90s, when I began, we really couldn’t make genre movies; we had to make important movies. But we were like, f— that! How do you piss off your parents? Make a horror movie! How to tell the politicians to f— off? Make something violent! A little fun, some sexy stuff? It’s the best thing in the world! Genre is cinema!”

“Genre is cinema” may be the truest statement the Danish provocateur has ever made, which is why it felt so painful to follow such an electric and impassioned speech with one of the least impressive movies Refn has crafted. A movie that attempts to provoke and elicit strong reactions out of us but isn’t nearly as aesthetically and thematically interesting as it should be.

With characters soaked in bisexual lighting and neon colors, one would think that Refn would want to continue in the trajectory that has defined his eclectic body of work. But dying for twenty-five minutes before being brought back to life gives him a new outlook on the world, as he’s not only stated at Fantasia but during its Cannes world premiere as well.

Advertisement

In a way, the harrowing event he experienced mirrored a lot the character he portrayed in Hideo Kojima‘s Death Stranding, which he acknowledged during the Q&A session following the screening. Unfortunately, this shift in his thematic and aesthetic conventions yielded a movie that has nothing tangible to say about any of the images it presents or the movies it references.

Plot and critical reception of Her Private Hell

One even wonders why Her Private Hell received such vitriolic reactions at Cannes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not a very good movie, but it’s also not the kind of movie that will piss people off. People may be inclined to walk out of it, not because of its strong and explicit violence, both physical and sexual (none of them go as far as some of Refn‘s previous movies), but because of how boring it is. It attempts to morph the giallo into a cyberpunk/futuristic visual language while sprinkling in a dash of Hong Kong-inspired action, but none of these elements coalesce into anything meaningful or significant.

An astute moviegoer might notice his inspirations (Roger Vadim, Mario Bava, Seijun Suzuki, and even Kojima), but there isn’t a single one that feels decidedly singular or meaningful enough to yield a reaction from us. Oh, sure, there are plenty of scenes where the audience may be inclined to react, but once they see how little payoff it has, they might not react to them at all.

It’s even difficult to describe what Her Private Hell is about because Refn now prefers to throw the “three-act” structure out of the window and create movies that don’t necessarily adhere to preconceived audience expectations.

In fact, when pressed on this during a Q&A moderated by film critic Katie Rife the following day, Refn scoffed at the idea of a movie having an “ending,” simply stating, “What is an ending?” While some might have laughed at such a response worthy of David Lynch‘s greatest moments, it does reveal how one has to watch Her Private Hell; which is about letting yourself be absorbed by the hallucinatory images of Refn‘s storytelling and try to see the parallels he makes between the stories of Elle (Sophie Thatcher) and Private K (Charles Melton).

Advertisement

A perplexing and uninteresting film from Nicolas Winding Refn

Even then, the viewing experience of Her Private Hell remains perplexing. And from a purely thematic viewpoint, it isn’t a movie worth parsing or spending your time attempting to find meaning in what’s on screen.

It’s also very loud. Perhaps too loud. Definitely the loudest movie I’ve watched in a cinema since Christopher Nolan‘s Tenet. Unlike that movie, however, the sound isn’t a character but a deterrent. Refn is convinced he must make the audience suffer agonizingly to get a reaction out of us, but, again, there’s not much here that warrants any form of reaction. Sure, some of it is violent, and a lot of it is painfully unpleasant.

In fact, Her Private Hell might be extremely misogynistic and depicts many difficult scenes with such a regressive attitude. Again, he’ll present something provocative but never do anything with it. What changed for Refn after he died? He’s still doing the same old stuff, but with nary a thing to excavate beyond the graphic violence and depictions of alpha masculinity. That treads on similar ground to Refn‘s most well-known movies, the Pusher trilogy, Drive, and Only God Forgives. It’s violence for the sake of violence, à la Michael Winner, but without any point behind said violence.

Even the cast can’t save Her Private Hell

None of the performances from a star-studded ensemble is any good, either. Sophie Thatcher, Kristine Froseth, and Havana Rose Liu are all accomplished actors in their own right and have always been pretty great in everything they do. The latter, in particular, has such a magnetic screen presence and old-school appeal that it feels perfectly suited to Refn‘s vision for elevating her innate talents.

Advertisement

Charles Melton was recently nominated for an Emmy for his career-best work in the second season of Beef. Their talents are all wasted. If you like to see them howl like wolves, I’ve got the movie for you. Even when viewed through a giallo lens, their respective portrayals never seem fully in tune with the unwieldy, dense image-making at play.

Only Pino Donaggio‘s ethereal music gives Her Private Hell its only signs of life. At 84 years old, the Italian composer, mostly known for his collaborations with Brian De Palma (which, according to Fantasia’s Mitch Davis, is ongoing, as he’s working on his latest movie), delivers one of the most stirring and affecting scores of his entire career, one that words can barely describe. As someone who repeatedly listens to Donaggio’s Carrie and Blow Out soundtracks, Her Private Hell is destined to be relistened to on repeat in my household. However, I will never watch the movie again.

Also check out: Fantasia Fest 2026: Our Five Most Anticipated Films

 

Share this with a friend!

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

Published

on

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

If you love movies, chances are you’ve read a review or two before deciding what to watch. Most people keep things pretty simple—they talk about the acting, the storyline, or whether the film is worth your time. But then there’s Letterboxd, a popular social platform where movie lovers log, rate, and review the films they watch. While plenty of reviews are thoughtful and insightful, others take a… much more chaotic approach.

That’s exactly what the Letterboxd Reviews With Threatening Auras account celebrates. It rounds up the platform’s funniest, most unhinged, and wonderfully cursed reviews—the kind that make you stop mid-scroll and wonder what was going through the reviewer’s mind. These definitely aren’t your standard “Loved it, 4 stars” takes. They radiate such a bizarrely threatening energy that it’s almost impossible not to keep scrolling to see what wild review comes next.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

We’ve all been there—sitting through a film, hoping it gets better, only for the credits to roll and leave you wondering what on earth you just watched. But if there’s one silver lining, it’s the internet’s reaction afterward. Sometimes the reviews are so funny, dramatic, or brutally honest that they’re more entertaining than the movie itself.

Advertisement

Whether it’s an accidental masterpiece of comedy or a hilariously savage one-liner, people have a remarkable talent for putting their thoughts into words. The truth is, movie reviews come in all shapes and sizes. They vary depending on who’s writing them, where they’re published, and what they’re hope to achieve. Some are designed to help you decide what to watch on a Friday night, while others dig deep into themes, symbolism, and filmmaking techniques.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

One of the most familiar formats is the capsule review. These are the short reviews you’ll often spot in newspapers, magazines, streaming platforms, or entertainment websites. Usually just one or two paragraphs long, they quickly summarize the story, highlight a few strengths and weaknesses, and end with a clear recommendation or star rating. They’re ideal for people who don’t want spoilers or lengthy analysis—they simply want to know whether a movie is worth their time. Writing one isn’t always as easy as it looks, though. Condensing an entire film into just a few sentences while still being informative takes real skill. That’s why some of the best capsule reviews manage to say more in 100 words than others do in 1,000.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Professional critics often take a different approach. Publications such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and major newspapers publish what are commonly known as trade reviews. These aren’t just personal opinions; they also consider a film’s broader impact, commercial appeal, performances, direction, cinematography, and where it fits within the industry. Their reviews are often read by moviegoers, filmmakers, studios, and even award voters. While audiences don’t always agree with the critics, these reviews provide a structured, informed perspective that goes beyond simply saying whether a movie was enjoyable. They aim to explain why a film succeeds—or why it falls flat.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Then there are academic film reviews, which take things to an entirely different level. These aren’t written for casual viewers but for students, researchers, and people who study cinema professionally. Rather than focusing on entertainment value, they examine symbolism, storytelling techniques, historical context, editing, cinematography, and cultural influence. It’s less about asking, “Was this movie good?” and more about exploring what the film is trying to communicate and how it fits into the history of cinema. They can be dense, detailed, and surprisingly fascinating, often revealing layers that the average viewer might never notice. Even a blockbuster superhero movie can become the subject of serious academic discussion.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Of course, not every review is carefully researched. Some of the most popular today are instant reaction reviews—the videos, podcasts, TikToks, or tweets people post immediately after leaving the theater. They’re fast, emotional, and completely unfiltered. You can usually tell within seconds whether someone loved the movie or absolutely hated it. Because there’s no time to overthink anything, these reactions often feel refreshingly genuine. Sure, opinions may change after a second viewing, but that’s part of the fun. They capture that immediate emotional response we all have after watching something memorable, whether it’s excitement, disappointment, confusion, or complete disbelief.

Advertisement

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And then there’s arguably the internet’s favorite category: user reviews. Platforms like Letterboxd, IMDb, and Rotten Tomatoes have given everyday movie lovers a place to share whatever is on their minds. Some people write thoughtful essays that rival professional critics, while others somehow manage to steal the spotlight with a single sentence. One review might offer a heartfelt personal story about how a film changed someone’s life, while the next simply says something so absurd that thousands of people can’t stop laughing. Because anyone can contribute, there’s an endless variety of voices, personalities, and senses of humor. That’s exactly what makes scrolling through user reviews so addictive.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

In recent years, these reviews have taken on a life of their own. Thanks to social media, the funniest ones are regularly shared far beyond the platforms where they were originally posted. Sometimes the review becomes more famous than the movie itself. A perfectly timed joke, an oddly specific observation, or an outrageously dramatic reaction can spread across the internet within hours. It’s a reminder that people aren’t just reviewing movies anymore—they’re entertaining each other in the process. For many film fans, reading the reviews afterward has become almost as enjoyable as watching the movie itself.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And that’s exactly where today’s collection comes in. Instead of looking at traditional movie criticism, we’re diving into the wonderfully chaotic world of Letterboxd, where movie lovers often express themselves in the most unpredictable ways imaginable. They aren’t polished critiques or carefully balanced opinions; they’re pure internet gold. Keep scrolling, Pandas, and see which review made you laugh the hardest—or left you wondering what on earth the reviewer had just watched.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

1986 Movie Reviews – Aliens and Vamp | The Nerdy

Published

on

1986 Movie Reviews – Aliens and Vamp | The Nerdy
by Sean P. Aune | July 18, 2026July 18, 2026 10:30 am EDT

Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1986 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. It was also the start to a major shift in cultural and societal norms, and some of those still reverberate to this day.

We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly four dozen.

Yes, we’re insane, but 1986 was that great of a year for film.

The articles will come out – in most cases – on the same day the films hit theaters in 1986 so that it is their true 40th anniversary. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory. In some cases, it truly will be the first time we’ve seen them.

Advertisement

This time around, it’s July 18, 1986, and we’re off to see Aliens and Vamp.

 

Aliens

Really, what can you say about a classic?

Advertisement

Set 57 years after the events of Alien, Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) finds herself heading back to LV-426 when a colony on the planet stops communicating with Earth. Teamed up with Colonial Marines, she is still unprepared for the new horrors she will find at the claws of the xenomorphs.

I’m going to do something I normally don’t do and talk about a deleted scene. Aliens, as it stands is a heck of a follow-up to the original film, but for the life of me I will never figure out why James Cameron cut the scene about Ripley’s daughter dying. For those unfamiliar with it, there is a scene after Ripley returns to Earth where she learns her daughter passed away at the age of 66, two years before Ripley made it home. She cries over the fact she had promised her daughter she would be home in time for eleventh birthday.

This scene does so much to frame some of Ripley’s decisions throughout the rest of the movie. This scene, when included, improves the film far beyond the theatrical cut and adds immense weight to several other scenes.

The theatrical version is great, the extended cut is even better.

Where to watch: Available to stream.

Advertisement

Vamp

The 1980s seem to have already been fed up with vampire films with far more of them tackling the tropes instead of being straight-faced about the bloodsuckers.

Keith (Chris Makepeace) and AJ (Robert Rusler) are rushing a fraternity when when the latter promises the frat a stripper for their party to help their chances of getting in. They head downtown and wander into a strip club that features a dancer named Katrina (Grace Jones) that they are mesmerized by and decide she is the one they need. Little do they know she is actually an ancient vampire.

Considering this wasn’t long after Fright Night, it seems everyone was tired of the same old vampire stories. If they only knew what was coming several years later.

It’s a fine movie, and I mean that in the sense of “it’s fine.” It doesn’t do anything that new per se, but it has some fun visuals and sight gags.

Advertisement

Where to watch: Available to stream.

1986 Movie Reviews will continue on July 25, 2026, with , Maximum Overdrive, and Out of Bounds.


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending