Connect with us

Washington

Fifty years ago, baseball was back in Washington, D.C. — until it wasn’t

Published

on

Fifty years ago, baseball was back in Washington, D.C. — until it wasn’t


A half-century ago, the San Diego Padres were so close to relocating to the nation’s capital that longtime Washington Post sports columnist Shirley Povich sent a two-word telegram to Commissioner Bowie Kuhn, a D.C. native who had championed a new team for his hometown: “MAZEL TOV.”

The traditional Jewish congratulations came after National League owners approved the team’s move to Washington in December 1973, Kuhn recalled in his autobiography.

Earlier that year, Joseph B. Danzansky, president of the Giant supermarket chain, had signed a deal with the troubled owner of the Padres to purchase the team for $12 million and place it in the nation’s capital to replace the Washington Senators, who had relocated to Texas the previous season.

But a lawsuit by the city of San Diego, followed by McDonald’s chairman Ray Kroc swooping in to buy the team and keep it in Southern California, wound up sinking the D.C. effort. The conclusion came Jan. 31, 1974 — 50 years ago Wednesday — when NL owners unanimously approved the sale of the team to Kroc.

Advertisement

“So Ray Kroc got the Padres as spring training approached and Washington’s window of hope closed again,” Kuhn recalled in his memoir. “There would be only robins and Redskins at RFK Stadium.”

It represented a stunning switcheroo, coming less than two months after the mazel tov-inducing vote approved the team’s relocation to D.C. And it set up decades of heartbreak for Washington baseball fans, who lived with fleeting hope and constant uncertainty for more than 30 years before the arrival of the Washington Nationals in 2005 finally ended the city’s baseball drought.

Congressional pressure for a Washington team

The saga really started at the end of the 1971 season, when Senators owner Bob Short got permission to move the team to Texas, where they would become the Rangers in 1972. That angered many members of Congress, and they began agitating for a new team in the nation’s capital.

At baseball’s December 1971 winter meetings in Phoenix, four members of Congress presented a petition signed by 238 members — more than half of the House’s 435 — calling on MLB to reestablish baseball in Washington. The top of the petition listed several House heavyweights, including Speaker Carl Albert (D-Okla.), Minority Leader Gerald Ford (R-Mich.), Judiciary Committee Chairman Emanuel Celler (D-N.Y.) and Rep. B.F. Sisk (D-Calif.), chairman of the “D.C. Baseball Steering Committee,” according to a Chicago Tribune story at the time.

Advertisement

Celler, a colorful longtime Brooklyn lawmaker, had been furious when the Dodgers left his home borough for Los Angeles in 1958. At the 1971 winter meetings, he delivered a letter to MLB in his typically brash style, criticizing the owners “who in the name of the public interest successfully maintain their blanket exemption from our antitrust laws, occasionally exhibit precious little concern for the community welfare.”

Celler also referenced the NFL’s New York Giants’ announcement earlier that year that they would be leaving Yankee Stadium for New Jersey.

“The recent exit of the baseball Senators from the nation’s capital — and indeed that of the football Giants from New York City, where they have prospered for years — is symptomatic of a long‐standing pattern,” Celler wrote.

Sisk was even more blunt: “We want a team by next year if possible and we must have one by 1973,” he said, according to the New York Times. Kuhn, the baseball commissioner, said the owners “heard the message” and that he would name a blue-ribbon panel to get a team back in D.C.

“The choices seem to be that baseball could expand again or could move some troubled franchise to Washington from perhaps Cleveland, Oakland or San Diego,” the Times wrote in what almost turned out to be a prophetic line.

Advertisement

Eighteen months later, in late May 1973, came the news that a group led by Danzansky had a deal to buy the Padres and move them to D.C., contingent on the team terminating its lease with city-owned San Diego Stadium and on the approval of NL owners. Two years earlier, Danzansky had tried to buy the Senators and keep them in Washington, but he couldn’t meet Short’s asking price of $12 million (about $90 million today). This time, his group came up with that figure for the Padres that, improbably, was $2 million more than George Steinbrenner and fellow investors had paid for the New York Yankees in January 1973. The plan was for the Padres to relocate in time for the 1974 season.

The new D.C. team was to play at federally owned RFK Stadium under favorable lease terms — 10 cents for every customer up to 1 million and 30 cents over that threshold, the Times reported.

The team didn’t have a new name lined up for its new city, although fans did get a sneak peek at the road uniform, which minor league pitcher Dave Freisleben modeled in a photo. Freisleben, who would make his MLB debut in 1974, sported a baby-blue 1970s-style jersey with the word “Washington” across the chest and a white baseball cap featuring a “W” that had a red star protruding from the top.

“Baseball’s Back! San Diego Padres Play Here in ’74,” blared a May 28, 1973, front-page headline in The Post, above the fold and just below a story about the spiraling Watergate scandal.

The Padres had a losing tradition that would have fit in with Washington’s. Since their birth as an expansion franchise in 1969, they had come in last place in the NL West every season, never finishing with a winning percentage above .400. They had averaged barely 7,000 fans per game in their first four years, even worse than the paltry crowds the Senators drew in their final season in D.C. (around 8,000 per game).

Advertisement

“There are some who will scoff that no treasure was snatched from San Diego in preparing Washington for its reentry into major league baseball in 1974,” Povich wrote. “But for two brooding, silent summers, Washington baseball fans have been deprived of most of the sights and all the sounds of the game while lesser cities could give out with whoops. At this point, the caliber of the Padres, which can be subject to change, is less important than their presence in the city.”

Danzansky told Channel 5′s Maury Povich — Shirley Povich’s son — that his prospects for team manager included “Frank Robinson at the head of my list,” which would have made him the majors’ first Black manager. Robinson would go on to break that barrier with the Cleveland Indians, who named him player-manager for the 1975 season. Thirty years later, Robinson would become the first manager of the Washington Nationals.

“I’m very flattered [Danzansky] feels that way,” Robinson told The Post at the time, adding he wasn’t deterred by the Padres’ losing track record. “I don’t shy away from tough situations. The Padres are a young expansion team, and it’s only fair to give them five to eight years to become a good club.”

And the team did have some exciting young players, such as rookie outfielder Dave Winfield. After the 1973 season, they traded for veteran superstar Willie McCovey.

Kevin Dowd, a longtime Washington baseball fan, recalled that when the Senators left town, he was optimistic the city would soon land a new team.

Advertisement

“A year or two went by, I was getting impatient, but here come the Padres, and Danzansky had a deal in place,” he said in a recent interview. “When that happened, I was saying: ‘Take it to the bank. It’s done.’ ”

Dowd, who was 29 at the time, had already planned to attend a bunch of games in 1974. “I was single, and that was a good date. It was cheap,” he said, recalling attending Senators games at RFK for $1.50 and paying the same price for a beer. “So you could have a nice date for 10 bucks.”

As the Padres wrapped up what appeared to be a lame-duck season in San Diego, which ended with an NL-worst 60-102 record, President Richard M. Nixon, a California native and huge baseball fan, cheered the team’s expected move. After the Senators left town, Nixon had strategized with D.C. Mayor Walter E. Washington on finding a replacement team, a White House tape recording shows.

“I just want to cast my own vote in favor of returning major-league baseball to the Nation’s Capital,” the president wrote to NL President Chub Feeney in September 1973. “You can be sure all of us in the Washington metropolitan area would enthusiastically welcome a National League team.”

On Dec. 6, 1973, the NL owners conditionally approved the team’s move to Washington. That same day, Congress deliberated Nixon’s choice of Ford as his new vice president, following the resignation of Spiro Agnew. Sisk, the congressional D.C. baseball booster, broke into the floor debate to announce the Padres news.

Advertisement

“Mr. Sisk and Representative Frank Horton, Republican of Upstate New York, who together had led a Congressional effort to secure a new baseball franchise for Washington, paid tribute to Mr. Ford, a onetime football star and still a sports enthusiast, for his support of their effort,” the Times reported. Ford was sworn in as the new vice president later that day after winning congressional confirmation.

The Post reported that Washington would open the 1974 season at RFK Stadium for a 2:30 p.m. game against the Philadelphia Phillies, a day before the rest of MLB’s teams started their season. That winter, Topps printed a 1974 set of baseball cards of 15 San Diego players with “Washington Nat’l Lea.” printed on them.

But San Diego officials soon made it clear they wouldn’t give up their lousy baseball team without a fight.

“We’ll see them in court,” warned San Diego Mayor Pete Wilson, a Republican and future California governor, at a news conference the same day of the NL owners’ vote.

“The U.S. Congress, as watchdog of the public purse, has decided that subsidizing the piracy of the San Diego Padres is an urgent national priority, warranting the expenditure of federal taxpayers’ funds,” he added.

Advertisement

Wishful thinking for D.C.

The next week, San Diego followed through on its threat, filing an antitrust lawsuit against the NL, alleging a conspiracy dating from 1971 to yank the Padres from the city and move them to Washington. The other defendants were each of the league’s 12 teams; Padres owner C. Arnholt Smith; and Sisk.

Among the alleged co-conspirators: Vice President Ford, Albert (the House speaker), Celler, Rep. Peter Rodino (D-N.J.) and Missouri Sen. Thomas Eagleton (D); as well as the American League.

Looking to get out from the San Diego lawsuit, Smith tried to find another buyer. That’s when Kroc, who had failed in his attempt to buy his hometown Chicago Cubs, reached out. In January 1974, he came to an agreement to buy the Padres and keep them in San Diego.

“That was almost, but not quite as big, a betrayal as Bob Short,” said Dowd, the longtime D.C. baseball fan.

Advertisement

After the NL approved the sale to Kroc, Danzansky sent a telegram to the league asking owners to consider D.C. as the first city to get an expansion team and said he had several encouraging comments from owners.

“There has been some indication that there is a definite feeling among the owners that we are going to be favored,” he said.

But that proved to be wishful thinking. MLB expanded in 1977, 1993 and 1998 but bypassed Washington each time. Instead, D.C. had to turn to relocation again when the Montreal Expos moved to Washington in 2005.

Meanwhile, the Padres finished last again in Kroc’s first year, 1974. At the Padres’ home opener, which they dropped, 9-5, in the midst of a six-game losing streak to start the season, Kroc went into the press box and told the crowd on the public address mic: “I suffer with you. I’ve never seen such stupid ball-playing in my life.”

Kuhn recalled ordering Kroc to apologize and soon met with him on Kroc’s yacht in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

Advertisement

“I knew right away we had another fascinating egocentric in the world of baseball,” he wrote.



Source link

Washington

Bridge collapse on Washington Avenue leaves emergency crews racing to rescue victims

Published

on

Bridge collapse on Washington Avenue leaves emergency crews racing to rescue victims


Emergency crews are responding to a major incident at the Washington Avenue Bridge, which has collapsed into Wheeling Creek.

Multiple police and firefighter units are on the scene, working swiftly to rescue those injured in the collapse.

Three injured workers have been taken to the hospital. Officials say one is a serious injury and two are non-life threatening.

Access to the area has been closed to facilitate rescue operations.

Advertisement

The bridge was closed in early December for a replacement that was expected to take nearly a year.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Stick with NEWS9 and WTOV9.com as we learn more.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Dynamite, Floods and Feuds: Washington’s forgotten river wars

Published

on

Dynamite, Floods and Feuds: Washington’s forgotten river wars


After floodwaters inundated western Washington in December, social media is still filled with disbelief, with many people saying they had never seen flooding like it before.

But local history shows the region has experienced catastrophic flooding, just not within most people’s lifetimes.

Advertisement

A valley under water

What may look like submerged farmland in Skagit or Snohomish counties is actually an aerial view of Tukwila from more than a century ago. Before Boeing, business parks and suburban development, the Kent Valley was a wide floodplain.

  (Tukwila Historical Society)

Advertisement

In November 1906, much of the valley was underwater, according to city records. In some places, floodwaters reached up to 10 feet, inundating homesteads and entire communities.

“Roads were destroyed, river paths were readjusted,” said Chris Staudinger of Pretty Gritty Tours. “So much of what had been built in these areas got washed away.”

Advertisement

Staudinger has been sharing historical images and records online, drawing comparisons between the December flooding and events from the late 1800s and early 1900s.

“It reminded me so much of what’s happening right now,” he said, adding that the loss then, as now, was largely a loss of property and control rather than life.

When farmers used dynamite

Advertisement

Records show flooding was not the only force reshaping the region’s rivers. In the late 1800s, farmers repeatedly used dynamite in attempts to redirect waterways.

“The White River in particular has always been contentious,” explained Staudinger. “For farmers in that area, multiple different times starting in the 1890s, groups of farmers would get together and blow-up parts of the river to divert its course either up to King County or down to Pierce County.”

1906 Washington flooding

Staudinger says at times they used too much dynamite and accidentally sent logs lobbing through the air like missiles.

Advertisement

In one instance, King County farmers destroyed a bluff, permanently diverting the White River into Pierce County. The river no longer flowed toward Elliott Bay, instead emptying into Commencement Bay.

Outraged by this, Pierce County farmers took their grievances to the Washington State Supreme Court. The court ruled the change could not be undone.

Advertisement

When flooding returned, state officials intervened to stop further explosions.

“To prevent anyone from going out and blowing up the naturally occurred log jam, the armed guards were dispatched by the state guard,” said Staudinger. “Everything was already underwater.”

Rivers reengineered — and erased

Advertisement

Over the next century, rivers across the region were dredged, dammed and diverted. Entire waterways changed or disappeared.

“So right where the Renton Airport is now used to be this raging waterway called the Black River,” explained Staudinger. “Connected into the Duwamish. It was a major salmon run. It was a navigable waterway.”

Today, that river has been reduced to what Staudinger described as “the little dry trickle.”

Advertisement

Between 1906 and 1916, the most dramatic changes occurred that played a role in its shrinking. When the Ballard Locks were completed, Lake Washington dropped by nine feet, permanently cutting off its southern flow.

A lesson from December

Despite modern levees and flood-control engineering, December’s storms showed how vulnerable the region remains.

Advertisement

“For me, that’s the takeaway,” remarked Staudinger. “You could do all of this to try and remain in control, but the river’s going to do whatever it wants.”

He warned that history suggests the risk is ongoing.

Advertisement

“You’re always one big storm from it rediscovering its old path,” said Staudinger.

MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE

New Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson talks homelessness, police tensions and World Cup countdown

Advertisement

Seattle leaders combat ‘misinformation’, say open-air drug use still means arrests

Here’s everything to know about the 2026 Super Bowl

Seattle ranks as the best US city for keeping New Year’s resolutions in 2026, data shows

Advertisement

WA trooper struck, injured in multi-car crash on SR 512

To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.

Advertisement

Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.

The Source: Information in this story came from the Tukwila Historical Society, MOHAI, Pretty Gritty Tours, and FOX 13 Seattle reporting and interviews.

FloodingWashingtonTukwilaNews
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Deputies shoot armed suspect in Leesburg Walmart parking lot

Published

on

Deputies shoot armed suspect in Leesburg Walmart parking lot


Deputies shot an armed suspect in the parking lot of a Walmart store in Leesburg, Virginia, late Tuesday morning, authorities say.

Detectives, deputies and special agents from the FBI had tracked the suspect down after he tried to rob the Bank of America at Dulles Crossing on Monday, the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office said. The suspect, who still hasn’t been named, didn’t get any money before taking off from the bank.

Authorities found the suspect was parked at the back of the Walmart parking lot just before noon Tuesday.

Deputies pulled up behind the suspect’s blue sedan at the back of the Walmart parking lot about 11:40 a.m. Tuesday. As they approached, the suspect got out with a gun, Sheriff Mike Chapman said.

Advertisement

Deputies then fired their guns at the suspect, hitting him. Chapman did not say how many times the suspect was shot or give specific information about his injuries.

Medics took the suspect to a hospital.

No deputies were injured, the sheriff’s office said.

Chapman said it was too early in the investigation to say if the suspect fired his gun or how many officers were involved in the shooting.

Stay with News4 for updates to this developing story.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending