Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Two very different films about women in troubled marriages

Published

on

Two very different films about women in troubled marriages

With such alibis, it’s no wonder Sandra is indicted for murder, but these stories are only a taster for the many lies and puzzles of this marriage. We find Samuel also had aspirations to be a writer but could never get down to work, while his wife published one book after another. There were money worries. There was a rift over an accident that left Daniel partially blind when Samuel didn’t get to school on time. There were Sandra’s “flings”, mostly with women, which left her husband angry and jealous.

All these issues, and more, are aired in court, where the defence and prosecution seem to speak over one another at will. It’s a reminder the French court system is noticeably different from the more familiar American version. The dialogue switches between French and English, the latter being the language in which Sandra feels more comfortable. As she is German and Samuel was French, English became the common ground of their domestic life, but even this was a source of tension.

It adds another layer of linguistic ambiguity to the already tortuous problem of separating hypothesis from fact. The prosecutor even goes so far as to quote a passage from one of Sandra’s novels in which a wife contemplates murdering her husband, but if this sort of authorial fallacy were admissible as evidence, every major writer would have seen out their days behind bars.

It doesn’t mean Sandra is not a fantasist in everyday life, or that she is being completely honest with the court, or indeed with her own lawyers.

Daniel (Milo Machado Graner) gets mixed up when questioned in court. 

Advertisement

A large part of the case hangs on Daniel’s testimony, but his story keeps changing, as he gets “mixed up”. It’s an understandable reaction to the spectacle of his parents’ relationship being put under the microscope in court. As one unpleasant secret after another is unearthed, his sympathies (and ours!) alternate between husband and wife. If Sandra can seem neither likeable nor trustworthy, Samuel had his own problems, held at bay by antidepressants.

Huller, who was so good in Maren Ade’s offbeat comedy Toni Erdmann (2016), is perfect in the lead role. Throughout the shoot, Triet allegedly refused to tell Huller whether her character was innocent or guilty. The ambiguity only seems to have bolstered a performance that has already gathered a swag of awards, with more to come.

The sheer length of Anatomy of a Fall seems designed to confirm this is no straightforward crime drama. The “fall” is not only Samuel’s plummet from the third floor, it’s the decline of a marriage, and we know that’s never a speedy process. Ingmar Bergman’s Scenes from a Marriage (1973) occupied six hour-long episodes.

The psychological struggle between Sandra and Samuel is reconstructed in the trial as the lawyers put their own portraits of the couple in front of judge and jury. In this contest, as in Sandra’s novels, it becomes impossible to separate truth from fiction – which may be one reason the lead characters have the same first names as the actors. By the end, we are left wondering if the point is not to discover what happened, but to show the impossibility of proving whether someone is ever definitively innocent or guilty.

Advertisement

Anatomy of a Fall

  • Directed by Justine Triet
  • Written by Justine Triet and Arthur Harari
  • Starring Sandra Hüller, Swann Arlaud, Antoine Reinartz, Milo Machado Graner, Samuel Theis, Jehnny Beth, Saadia Bentaïeb, Camille Rutherford, Anne Rotger, Sophie Fillière
  • France, MA 15+, 151 mins

The Color Purple

Blitz Bazawule’s new version of The Color Purple has been getting very positive responses, but when it comes to musicals, I’m the last person to ask.

I’ll listen to anything from Palestrina to Nirvana but have never had the slightest interest in seeing those blockbuster musicals on stage. It’s chiefly the music I can’t stand: syrupy and sentimental, full of forced cheerfulness with big choruses, a grotesque form of pop with operatic pretentions, made to a formula. When I’ve had to watch the film versions of musicals such as Les Miserables or Cats, it’s been a kind of torture. If this means I’m a musical snob, so be it.

And so, with The Color Purple, whenever the poor black folks in Georgia took a break from the cruelty and misery that surrounded them, and started singing and dancing, I felt a strong urge to head for the exit. Instead, I stayed the distance, and was rewarded with approximately one surprising and spontaneous laugh. The overwhelming bulk of the story is pure melodrama, in which the good people like Miss Celie (Fantasia Barrino) are so good they set your teeth on edge, while the baddies are simply horrid.

Taraji P. Henson plays Shug Avery, a woman who is not prepared to take nonsense from any man. 

On the face of it, there’s not a lot in Celie’s life that warrants musical treatment. She is raped by the man she believes to be her father, and gives birth to two children who are taken away from her. The film is strangely reticent on these points, so viewers may spend the first part of the story wondering who exactly is the father of Celie’s children.

Next, young Celie (Phylicia Pearl Mpasi) is bartered away to a widower calling himself Mister (Colman Domingo), who needs a wife for cooking, cleaning, child-raising and sexual relief. He is a violent, misogynistic bastard, and Celie is the very definition of long-suffering.

In addition, she is separated from her beloved sister Nettie (Halle Bailey), whom Mister throws out of the house when she rejects his advances. Having taken a job as a governess and gone off to Africa, Nettie sends Celie numerous letters that Mister intercepts and conceals – and he’s not even collecting the stamps!

Advertisement

Relief arrives in the curvaceous form of jazz singer Shug Avery (a no-holds-barred Taraji Henson), who is not prepared to take nonsense from any man, including Mister. Celie’s relationship with Shug, which becomes briefly sexual, is her passport to another life. She is able to give up the perpetual victimhood and seize control of her destiny.

Fantasia Barrino plays put-upon Celie. 

Connected with Celie’s story is that of Sofia (Danielle Brooks), a large, loud, brash young woman who marries Mister’s son Harpo (Corey Hawkins). Although Sofia is even harder on men’s fragile egos than Shug, she suffers under the heel of the institutionalised racism of the south, which has one law for whites and another for blacks.

Nevertheless, as this is a musical, we know that all bad things will be resolved in the end. As the director is from Ghana, he adds a little touch of Africa, which makes the last scenes even more ridiculous. Steven Spielberg’s award-winning 1985 adaptation of Alice Walker’s novel was pretty corny, but never frankly silly.

There’s no disputing that actors such as Barrino and Brooks are extraordinary singers, but the songs are so ghastly, their talent is thrown away. Along with the try-too-hard manipulation of the viewer’s emotions, this fable of empowerment delivers a familiar set of messages, alerting us that black people are nicer than whites, and women are nicer than men. I’m glad that’s finally sorted.

The entire package is bathed in an evangelical glow that would seem to be part of the problem rather than a promise of salvation. It’s a very American scenario. Whether you’re an aspiring politician or a poor, oppressed black house slave, a little of that old-fashioned religion goes a long way.

Advertisement

The Color Purple

  • Directed by Blitz Bazawule
  • Written by Marcus Gardley and Marsha Norman
  • Starring Fantasia Barrino, Taraji P. Henson, Danielle Brooks, Colman Domingo, Corey Hawkins, H.E.R., Halle Bailey, Phylicia Pearl Mpasi
  • USA, M, 141 mins
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Published

on

Fantasia Fest 2026 Review: ‘Her Private Hell’ is Boring As Hell

Share this with a friend!

During the opening ceremony of the Fantasia International Film Festival, Her Private Hell director Nicolas Winding Refn was awarded a Cheval Noir Career Achievement Award for his contributions to cinema. He made an impassioned plea on the importance of a festival like Fantasia and genre cinema as a whole:

“In the mid-90s, when I began, we really couldn’t make genre movies; we had to make important movies. But we were like, f— that! How do you piss off your parents? Make a horror movie! How to tell the politicians to f— off? Make something violent! A little fun, some sexy stuff? It’s the best thing in the world! Genre is cinema!”

“Genre is cinema” may be the truest statement the Danish provocateur has ever made, which is why it felt so painful to follow such an electric and impassioned speech with one of the least impressive movies Refn has crafted. A movie that attempts to provoke and elicit strong reactions out of us but isn’t nearly as aesthetically and thematically interesting as it should be.

With characters soaked in bisexual lighting and neon colors, one would think that Refn would want to continue in the trajectory that has defined his eclectic body of work. But dying for twenty-five minutes before being brought back to life gives him a new outlook on the world, as he’s not only stated at Fantasia but during its Cannes world premiere as well.

Advertisement

In a way, the harrowing event he experienced mirrored a lot the character he portrayed in Hideo Kojima‘s Death Stranding, which he acknowledged during the Q&A session following the screening. Unfortunately, this shift in his thematic and aesthetic conventions yielded a movie that has nothing tangible to say about any of the images it presents or the movies it references.

Plot and critical reception of Her Private Hell

One even wonders why Her Private Hell received such vitriolic reactions at Cannes. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not a very good movie, but it’s also not the kind of movie that will piss people off. People may be inclined to walk out of it, not because of its strong and explicit violence, both physical and sexual (none of them go as far as some of Refn‘s previous movies), but because of how boring it is. It attempts to morph the giallo into a cyberpunk/futuristic visual language while sprinkling in a dash of Hong Kong-inspired action, but none of these elements coalesce into anything meaningful or significant.

An astute moviegoer might notice his inspirations (Roger Vadim, Mario Bava, Seijun Suzuki, and even Kojima), but there isn’t a single one that feels decidedly singular or meaningful enough to yield a reaction from us. Oh, sure, there are plenty of scenes where the audience may be inclined to react, but once they see how little payoff it has, they might not react to them at all.

It’s even difficult to describe what Her Private Hell is about because Refn now prefers to throw the “three-act” structure out of the window and create movies that don’t necessarily adhere to preconceived audience expectations.

In fact, when pressed on this during a Q&A moderated by film critic Katie Rife the following day, Refn scoffed at the idea of a movie having an “ending,” simply stating, “What is an ending?” While some might have laughed at such a response worthy of David Lynch‘s greatest moments, it does reveal how one has to watch Her Private Hell; which is about letting yourself be absorbed by the hallucinatory images of Refn‘s storytelling and try to see the parallels he makes between the stories of Elle (Sophie Thatcher) and Private K (Charles Melton).

Advertisement

A perplexing and uninteresting film from Nicolas Winding Refn

Even then, the viewing experience of Her Private Hell remains perplexing. And from a purely thematic viewpoint, it isn’t a movie worth parsing or spending your time attempting to find meaning in what’s on screen.

It’s also very loud. Perhaps too loud. Definitely the loudest movie I’ve watched in a cinema since Christopher Nolan‘s Tenet. Unlike that movie, however, the sound isn’t a character but a deterrent. Refn is convinced he must make the audience suffer agonizingly to get a reaction out of us, but, again, there’s not much here that warrants any form of reaction. Sure, some of it is violent, and a lot of it is painfully unpleasant.

In fact, Her Private Hell might be extremely misogynistic and depicts many difficult scenes with such a regressive attitude. Again, he’ll present something provocative but never do anything with it. What changed for Refn after he died? He’s still doing the same old stuff, but with nary a thing to excavate beyond the graphic violence and depictions of alpha masculinity. That treads on similar ground to Refn‘s most well-known movies, the Pusher trilogy, Drive, and Only God Forgives. It’s violence for the sake of violence, à la Michael Winner, but without any point behind said violence.

Even the cast can’t save Her Private Hell

None of the performances from a star-studded ensemble is any good, either. Sophie Thatcher, Kristine Froseth, and Havana Rose Liu are all accomplished actors in their own right and have always been pretty great in everything they do. The latter, in particular, has such a magnetic screen presence and old-school appeal that it feels perfectly suited to Refn‘s vision for elevating her innate talents.

Advertisement

Charles Melton was recently nominated for an Emmy for his career-best work in the second season of Beef. Their talents are all wasted. If you like to see them howl like wolves, I’ve got the movie for you. Even when viewed through a giallo lens, their respective portrayals never seem fully in tune with the unwieldy, dense image-making at play.

Only Pino Donaggio‘s ethereal music gives Her Private Hell its only signs of life. At 84 years old, the Italian composer, mostly known for his collaborations with Brian De Palma (which, according to Fantasia’s Mitch Davis, is ongoing, as he’s working on his latest movie), delivers one of the most stirring and affecting scores of his entire career, one that words can barely describe. As someone who repeatedly listens to Donaggio’s Carrie and Blow Out soundtracks, Her Private Hell is destined to be relistened to on repeat in my household. However, I will never watch the movie again.

Also check out: Fantasia Fest 2026: Our Five Most Anticipated Films

 

Share this with a friend!

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

Published

on

People Shared Their Thoughts About Movies They Watched And These 67 Reviews Are Comedy Gold – AOL

If you love movies, chances are you’ve read a review or two before deciding what to watch. Most people keep things pretty simple—they talk about the acting, the storyline, or whether the film is worth your time. But then there’s Letterboxd, a popular social platform where movie lovers log, rate, and review the films they watch. While plenty of reviews are thoughtful and insightful, others take a… much more chaotic approach.

That’s exactly what the Letterboxd Reviews With Threatening Auras account celebrates. It rounds up the platform’s funniest, most unhinged, and wonderfully cursed reviews—the kind that make you stop mid-scroll and wonder what was going through the reviewer’s mind. These definitely aren’t your standard “Loved it, 4 stars” takes. They radiate such a bizarrely threatening energy that it’s almost impossible not to keep scrolling to see what wild review comes next.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

We’ve all been there—sitting through a film, hoping it gets better, only for the credits to roll and leave you wondering what on earth you just watched. But if there’s one silver lining, it’s the internet’s reaction afterward. Sometimes the reviews are so funny, dramatic, or brutally honest that they’re more entertaining than the movie itself.

Advertisement

Whether it’s an accidental masterpiece of comedy or a hilariously savage one-liner, people have a remarkable talent for putting their thoughts into words. The truth is, movie reviews come in all shapes and sizes. They vary depending on who’s writing them, where they’re published, and what they’re hope to achieve. Some are designed to help you decide what to watch on a Friday night, while others dig deep into themes, symbolism, and filmmaking techniques.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

One of the most familiar formats is the capsule review. These are the short reviews you’ll often spot in newspapers, magazines, streaming platforms, or entertainment websites. Usually just one or two paragraphs long, they quickly summarize the story, highlight a few strengths and weaknesses, and end with a clear recommendation or star rating. They’re ideal for people who don’t want spoilers or lengthy analysis—they simply want to know whether a movie is worth their time. Writing one isn’t always as easy as it looks, though. Condensing an entire film into just a few sentences while still being informative takes real skill. That’s why some of the best capsule reviews manage to say more in 100 words than others do in 1,000.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Professional critics often take a different approach. Publications such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and major newspapers publish what are commonly known as trade reviews. These aren’t just personal opinions; they also consider a film’s broader impact, commercial appeal, performances, direction, cinematography, and where it fits within the industry. Their reviews are often read by moviegoers, filmmakers, studios, and even award voters. While audiences don’t always agree with the critics, these reviews provide a structured, informed perspective that goes beyond simply saying whether a movie was enjoyable. They aim to explain why a film succeeds—or why it falls flat.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Then there are academic film reviews, which take things to an entirely different level. These aren’t written for casual viewers but for students, researchers, and people who study cinema professionally. Rather than focusing on entertainment value, they examine symbolism, storytelling techniques, historical context, editing, cinematography, and cultural influence. It’s less about asking, “Was this movie good?” and more about exploring what the film is trying to communicate and how it fits into the history of cinema. They can be dense, detailed, and surprisingly fascinating, often revealing layers that the average viewer might never notice. Even a blockbuster superhero movie can become the subject of serious academic discussion.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Of course, not every review is carefully researched. Some of the most popular today are instant reaction reviews—the videos, podcasts, TikToks, or tweets people post immediately after leaving the theater. They’re fast, emotional, and completely unfiltered. You can usually tell within seconds whether someone loved the movie or absolutely hated it. Because there’s no time to overthink anything, these reactions often feel refreshingly genuine. Sure, opinions may change after a second viewing, but that’s part of the fun. They capture that immediate emotional response we all have after watching something memorable, whether it’s excitement, disappointment, confusion, or complete disbelief.

Advertisement

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And then there’s arguably the internet’s favorite category: user reviews. Platforms like Letterboxd, IMDb, and Rotten Tomatoes have given everyday movie lovers a place to share whatever is on their minds. Some people write thoughtful essays that rival professional critics, while others somehow manage to steal the spotlight with a single sentence. One review might offer a heartfelt personal story about how a film changed someone’s life, while the next simply says something so absurd that thousands of people can’t stop laughing. Because anyone can contribute, there’s an endless variety of voices, personalities, and senses of humor. That’s exactly what makes scrolling through user reviews so addictive.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

In recent years, these reviews have taken on a life of their own. Thanks to social media, the funniest ones are regularly shared far beyond the platforms where they were originally posted. Sometimes the review becomes more famous than the movie itself. A perfectly timed joke, an oddly specific observation, or an outrageously dramatic reaction can spread across the internet within hours. It’s a reminder that people aren’t just reviewing movies anymore—they’re entertaining each other in the process. For many film fans, reading the reviews afterward has become almost as enjoyable as watching the movie itself.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

And that’s exactly where today’s collection comes in. Instead of looking at traditional movie criticism, we’re diving into the wonderfully chaotic world of Letterboxd, where movie lovers often express themselves in the most unpredictable ways imaginable. They aren’t polished critiques or carefully balanced opinions; they’re pure internet gold. Keep scrolling, Pandas, and see which review made you laugh the hardest—or left you wondering what on earth the reviewer had just watched.

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

© Photo:

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

1986 Movie Reviews – Aliens and Vamp | The Nerdy

Published

on

1986 Movie Reviews – Aliens and Vamp | The Nerdy
by Sean P. Aune | July 18, 2026July 18, 2026 10:30 am EDT

Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1986 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. It was also the start to a major shift in cultural and societal norms, and some of those still reverberate to this day.

We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly four dozen.

Yes, we’re insane, but 1986 was that great of a year for film.

The articles will come out – in most cases – on the same day the films hit theaters in 1986 so that it is their true 40th anniversary. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory. In some cases, it truly will be the first time we’ve seen them.

Advertisement

This time around, it’s July 18, 1986, and we’re off to see Aliens and Vamp.

 

Aliens

Really, what can you say about a classic?

Advertisement

Set 57 years after the events of Alien, Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) finds herself heading back to LV-426 when a colony on the planet stops communicating with Earth. Teamed up with Colonial Marines, she is still unprepared for the new horrors she will find at the claws of the xenomorphs.

I’m going to do something I normally don’t do and talk about a deleted scene. Aliens, as it stands is a heck of a follow-up to the original film, but for the life of me I will never figure out why James Cameron cut the scene about Ripley’s daughter dying. For those unfamiliar with it, there is a scene after Ripley returns to Earth where she learns her daughter passed away at the age of 66, two years before Ripley made it home. She cries over the fact she had promised her daughter she would be home in time for eleventh birthday.

This scene does so much to frame some of Ripley’s decisions throughout the rest of the movie. This scene, when included, improves the film far beyond the theatrical cut and adds immense weight to several other scenes.

The theatrical version is great, the extended cut is even better.

Where to watch: Available to stream.

Advertisement

Vamp

The 1980s seem to have already been fed up with vampire films with far more of them tackling the tropes instead of being straight-faced about the bloodsuckers.

Keith (Chris Makepeace) and AJ (Robert Rusler) are rushing a fraternity when when the latter promises the frat a stripper for their party to help their chances of getting in. They head downtown and wander into a strip club that features a dancer named Katrina (Grace Jones) that they are mesmerized by and decide she is the one they need. Little do they know she is actually an ancient vampire.

Considering this wasn’t long after Fright Night, it seems everyone was tired of the same old vampire stories. If they only knew what was coming several years later.

It’s a fine movie, and I mean that in the sense of “it’s fine.” It doesn’t do anything that new per se, but it has some fun visuals and sight gags.

Advertisement

Where to watch: Available to stream.

1986 Movie Reviews will continue on July 25, 2026, with , Maximum Overdrive, and Out of Bounds.


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending