Connect with us

World

What’s the beef with alternative proteins?

Published

on

What’s the beef with alternative proteins?

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not represent in any way the editorial position of Euronews.

As the European Green Deal enters a critical phase, a major effort is needed to help alternative proteins take off and play their part in delivering EU food and climate security, Nusa Urbancic, Pieter de Pous, Dustin Benton and Nico Muzi write.

ADVERTISEMENT

Something extraordinary is happening in the world of energy. 

After at least 400,000 years of burning carbon for its energy (and cooking) needs, a combination of clean energy policies and market dynamics is helping the world power past burning. 

For the first time ever, the EU generated more electricity from wind and solar than gas last year. 

Across the world, cheap wind and solar energy are driving fossil fuels out of the power mix, and electric vehicles and heat pumps are destroying demand for oil and gas from some of the most energy-hungry applications.

Advertisement

The world of food may be about to experience a similar transformation, and not a moment too soon. 

Scientists warn that there’s no chance to limit global warming to 1.5ºC without major changes to what we eat and how we produce it.

Industrial animal agriculture plays an outsized role in driving emissions in the food sector. 

Over a third (36%) of emissions linked to consumption in the EU comes from the food we eat, with animal products accounting for 70% of that impact, most of it coming from industrial animal farming. 

Moreover, meat and dairy production are the single largest source of methane emissions in the EU. 

Advertisement

With projections showing meat production in Europe to keep growing until 2030, urgent and effective interventions in the meat sector are necessary to reach net zero by 2050.

Major technological advancements in plant-based, fermentation-derived and cultivated meats, collectively known as alternative proteins (APs), are now offering an additional option to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with meat production by up to 90% and reduce land use by up to 95% — the livestock sector takes up over 70% of Europe’s farmland.

The biggest climate bang for the buck

Alternative proteins open up an opportunity to forego the most intensive, large-scale livestock farming because they are like-for-like products that rival industrial meat in taste, price, nutrition, and convenience. 

Alongside pulses, legumes and whole grains, APs can provide an alternative to industrial meat production as demand for protein soars in coming years. 

Nature-friendly farmers should welcome this new technology, not least because the more alternative proteins that are consumed, the more space there will be for less intensive, smaller-scale farming and the wilder habitats that are essential for any sustainable farming system. 

Advertisement

In fact, high uptake of alternative proteins would free up enough land to meet Europe’s 25% organic farming target while meeting its goal of climate neutrality. 

Moreover, given how consolidated the meat and dairy industries are, publicly-supported and well-regulated alternative protein production has the potential to redistribute power among farmers and decrease monopolies in food systems.

Investments in plant-based meat provide the biggest climate bang for the buck. Each euro invested in improving and scaling up the production of APs results in 14 times more emissions savings than clean power. 

However, private and public investments in alternative proteins (€4.6 billion and €920 million respectively) are still tiny compared to the approximately €1.56 trillion that goes to clean energy annually.

ADVERTISEMENT

A major risk to climate change and nature protection efforts

More worryingly than the low levels of investment is the fact that the promising AP technology is at risk of getting entangled in the more extreme manifestations of the emotionally charged politics of food, land and identity. 

Italy’s far-right government, supported by the influential farm lobby Coldiretti, has recently moved to ban cultivated meat (“artificial food” as they call it) and “meat terms” for plant-based products as part of an effort to “safeguard domestic production from the attacks of multinational companies”. 

Advertisement

Several other countries have since made similar moves, and are now taking the debate to the EU’s Agriculture Ministerial gathering in Brussels this week.

As a result of this, APs are joining the ranks of solar panels, windmills, batteries, EVs and heat pumps, a set of technologies that have come to symbolise the success of the European Green Deal but also turned into a lightning rod for the far-right and their strategy of fueling culture wars and promoting conspiracy theories to gain power. 

Unlike these other energy-related tech, APs are still at a much earlier stage of development, both in terms of maturity of the technology and market penetration. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Thus, APs are more vulnerable to their growth being stymied at the moment, posing major risks for EU efforts to fight climate change and protect nature.

Even with a modest global market share of 11% by 2035, APs would save 850 million tonnes of CO2 by 2030, equivalent to 95% of global aviation emissions. Moreover, scaling up AP production has the potential to generate up to 83 million jobs and create nearly €645bn worth of economic activity by 2050 worldwide.

In addition to creating jobs, the emerging sector comes with significant benefits for public health. By promoting plant-based and alternative proteins, we can potentially avoid many of the projected 390,000 deaths per year in the EU due to the excessive use of antibiotics in farmed animals. 

Advertisement

Additionally, industrial livestock is a key driver of zoonotic diseases like COVID-19, while red and processed meat consumption is a leading risk factor for colorectal cancer, diabetes and heart attacks. A shift to plant-based diets can help reduce costs for healthcare systems associated with these diseases.

Alternative proteins need help to play their part

The reliance on crops for feeding animals has far-reaching implications for food security too. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Two-thirds of all cereals consumed in the EU don’t end up on the plates of Europeans but in the bellies of cows, pigs and chickens, driving up grain prices and pushing out smallholders and pastoralists from their land. 

Most soy and cereals for animal feed are imported, increasing the continent’s dependence on foreign land.

Governments of EU member states and the European Commission have mobilised billions of euros and passed legislation to support research, innovation and deployment of renewables and EVs to clean up energy and transport, promote energy security and deliver a just transition. 

As the European Green Deal now enters a critical phase, an equivalent effort is needed to help alternative proteins take off and play their part in delivering EU food and climate security.

Advertisement

Nusa Urbancic is CEO of Changing Markets; Pieter de Pous is Programme Leader of E3G: Dustin Benton is Policy Director at Green Alliance; and Nico Muzi serves as Managing Director of Madre Brava.

ADVERTISEMENT

At Euronews, we believe all views matter. Contact us at view@euronews.com to send pitches or submissions and be part of the conversation.

World

Ukrainian capital Kyiv under massive Russian attack, officials say

Published

on

Ukrainian capital Kyiv under massive Russian attack, officials say

Dec 27 (Reuters) – The Ukrainian capital Kyiv came under a massive Russian attack early on Saturday, with explosions sounding in the city, air defences in operation and the Ukrainian military saying missiles were being deployed.

The Russian action took place two days before a meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy says he is due to hold in the United States with President Donald Trump to work out details of an accord for settling the nearly four-year-old war pitting Russia against Ukraine.

Sign up here.

Reuters eyewitnesses said air defences were in action in the city and unofficial Telegram channels reported explosions.

A military Telegram channel said cruise and ballistic missiles were being deployed in the city.

Advertisement

Reporting by Ron Popeski; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Continue Reading

World

Israel becomes first country to recognize Somaliland; Trump ‘not ready’

Published

on

Israel becomes first country to recognize Somaliland; Trump ‘not ready’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Israel has officially become the first country to formally recognize Somaliland as an independent nation, marking a significant diplomatic development for the coastal territory in Africa.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the decision Friday, Dec. 26, along with Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and the president of the Republic of Somaliland. 

Israel and Somaliland signed a mutual declaration “in the spirit of the Abraham Accords,” which were brokered by President Trump.

IS TRUMP CONSIDERING BOLD AFRICA PLAY TO PUSH BACK ON CHINA, RUSSIA AND ISLAMIC TERRORISTS?

Advertisement

Sa’ar shared in a statement on X that relations between Somaliland and Israel have grown, “based on extensive and ongoing dialogue.”

Full diplomatic relations include Israel’s appointment of ambassadors and opening of embassies in the state, according to Sa’ar.

Somaliland’s President, Dr. Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi, said in a statement that the Republic of Somaliland, “warmly welcomes and deeply appreciates” Israel’s decision to recognize the state’s sovereignty.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed a joint agreement recognizing Somaliland as a sovereign nation Friday, Dec. 26.  (Benjamin Netanyahu via X)

“This recognition represents a milestone in Somaliland’s longstanding pursuit of international legitimacy, reaffirming its historical, legal and moral entitlement to statehood,” Abdullahi said in the statement.

Advertisement

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs for Somaliland said this decision was a “constructive contribution to peace, stability and cooperation” in the Horn of Africa and across the Middle East in a release issued Friday.

US DRAMATICALLY ESCALATES SOMALIA AIRSTRIKES AS TRUMP ADMIN TARGETS ISIS, AL QAEDA TERRORISTS

“The Republic of Somaliland hereby expresses its firm intention to accede the Abraham Accords, … Somaliland looks forward to engaging with the State of Israel on the foundation of formal diplomatic relations and mutual recognition,” said Somaliland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

A general view of the city of Hargeisa, Somaliland, on September, 2021.  (EDUARDO SOTERAS/AFP via Getty Images)

Shortly after Israel’s decision, South Sudan reportedly became the second country to officially recognize Somaliland, with some now questioning whether the U.S. will follow suit.

Advertisement

President Donald Trump was reportedly “looking into” the recognition of Somaliland in August. The official recognition would land the U.S. a new foothold in the Horn of Africa through a new air and sea base near the entrance of the Red Sea at Berbera Port. 

President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he arrives at the West Wing of the White House in Washington, D.C., Sept. 29, 2025 (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

When asked about the state’s recognition and the potential resettlement of Gazans there, Trump told reporters Aug. 8, “We’re looking into that right now.”

This would position U.S. defense forces directly across from Yemen and the Houthi terrorists, an Iran-backed group prominently known for its attacks against Israel and shipping in the Red Sea.

Thirty percent of the world’s container ship traffic is reported to pass through its waters en route to or from the Suez Canal, according to previous Fox News Digital reports.

Advertisement

Somaliland security personnel stand watch in front of shipping containers being stored at Berbera Port. (Ed Ram/AFP via Getty Images)

YEMEN SEPARATIST FORCES SEIZE KEY OIL REGION, URGE US TO PARTNER AGAINST IRAN-BACKED HOUTHIS

Trump is scheduled to meet with Netanyahu Monday, Dec. 29, at his Mar-a-Lago residence to discuss “next steps” in the Gaza peace deal. 

Despite previous talks, Trump is reportedly, “not ready” to embrace Somaliland’s independence and was reportedly “unimpressed” by its expressed interest in joining the Abraham Accords.

Trump told the New York Post he has to “study” Netanyahu’s pitch and asked from his golf course, “Does anyone know what Somaliland is, really?”

Advertisement

Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdallah on a phone call with Netanyahu Friday, Dec. 26. (Benjamin Netanyahu via X)

“We’ll study it. I study a lot of things and always make great decisions, and they turn out to be correct,” Trump told the Post.

Somalia has been battling Islamist fundamentalist fighters for decades, with the U.S. Africa Command increasing attacks against ISIS and al-Shabab terrorists, according to previous Fox News Digital reporting.

The breakaway has allegedly “eliminated radicalism” and it has aligned itself with the U.S. Somaliland Minister of the Presidency Khadar Hussein Abdi said that, for over three decades, Somaliland has “remained democratic, peaceful and self-governing — unlike Somalia.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

“It’s time for Somalia to focus on its own challenges and to be constructive. The illusion of Somali unity ended long ago.” Somaliland declared independence from Somalia in 1991.

Netanyahu reportedly invited Abdullahi to Israel and “praised his leadership and commitment to promoting stability and peace.”

Continue Reading

World

NATO chief Rutte rejects calls for EU defence independence from US

Published

on

NATO chief Rutte rejects calls for EU defence independence from US

By&nbspEuronews

Published on

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte rejected proposals for independent European security structures, insisting the EU does not need to break from the US on defence matters despite calls from senior European politicians.

Manfred Weber, head of the conservative EPP party and its European Parliament group, had called for deploying European troops under EU command to secure peace in Ukraine.

Advertisement

“I wish that soldiers with the European flag on their uniforms, together with our Ukrainian friends, would ensure peace,” Weber told German media outlet Funke.

Rutte disagreed with the proposal in an interview with German news agency dpa published Thursday.

“I’m absolutely convinced that the US is completely invested in NATO. There’s no doubt. There was one big expectation. Indeed, us spending more, Europe taking more responsibility,” Rutte said.

The NATO chief emphasised that increased European defence efforts should occur alongside the US, not independently.

“When we talk about Europe and NATO, it’s more than just the EU,” Rutte said, noting that the 23 EU countries within NATO account for only about a quarter of the alliance’s total economic output.

Advertisement

US and Europe to work together

Rutte pointed to shared US-European interests in defending the Arctic and North Atlantic.

“The US has its own specific interests in NATO, which is, of course, Europe staying safe, but also the Arctic. A safe Arctic is crucial for the United States, and we can only defend that together, European and American NATO allies.”

“The Arctic is a big issue. We see Chinese and Russian ships travelling there. And we can only defend the Arctic together – European and American NATO allies together.”

The NATO secretary general warned that Russia could pose a serious threat as early as 2027, according to some intelligence assessments.

“I will not speculate on where and when and how exactly. In the end, if there is an attack on NATO, then we are all under attack – because that is Article 5, which means that an attack on one is an attack on all,” Rutte said.

Advertisement

“If we do those two things, we are strong enough to defend ourselves, and Putin will never try,” he stated, referring to maintaining strong support for Ukraine and increasing NATO defence spending.

In the interview on Thursday, Rutte praised Germany’s commitment to reaching 3.5% of GDP on defence by 2029, ahead of the 2035 deadline agreed at the alliance’s summit in The Hague in June.

He called Germany’s approach “very impressive” and said Berlin was “leading the pack” among European allies.

Additional sources • AP, dpa

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending