Austin, TX
Elon vs. Grimes: Custody Battle Heats Up! – Reform Austin
In the ongoing custody battle between Elon Musk and Grimes over their three shared children, recent legal documents reveal a contentious disagreement over Musk’s claimed residency in Texas.
According to Business Insider, Grimes, whose legal name is Claire Boucher, alleges that Musk, despite relocating Tesla’s headquarters to Texas in 2021, spends less than half his time in the Lone Star State.
The dispute gains significance as both parties engage in legal battles in Texas and California, contesting which state should have jurisdiction over their custody case.
Musk accuses Grimes of attempting to evade Texas courts, where child-support payments are capped at $2,760 per month for three children. Grimes rejects Musk’s claim, arguing that she and two of their children have been residing in California when Musk filed his petition – California has no limit on child support payments.
In the realm of residential custody disputes, courts typically grant jurisdiction based on the state where the children have lived for the previous six months. Musk contends that the kids’ primary residence is in Austin, Texas, where they lived for at least six consecutive months.
Grimes disputes this, stating that she and the two youngest children have been living in California since December 31, 2022. While X, the eldest child, was not physically present with Grimes in California, Musk had custody of the child in Texas against Grimes’ objections.
Despite Musk’s frequent travels between Texas and California for his various companies, Grimes claims that he spent only 45% of his time in Austin, according to her filing. Musk’s travel details alone may not sway jurisdiction, however, Grimes argues that the two youngest children have been with her in California since December, making a strong case for California jurisdiction.
As the legal battle unfolds, Musk’s critique of California’s divorce laws and Grimes’ claims present a complex narrative that could influence the outcome of their custody dispute, as first reported by Business Insider.
Austin, TX
Austin’s left-turn pilot program shows promising results
AUSTIN, Texas — The City of Austin recently released a report about a year and a half-long pilot program aimed at reducing the number of left-turn crashes. City officials say the tools used in the pilot seem to work.
Left-turn calming treatments were installed at 16 intersections across Austin as part of the city’s Vision Zero program.
“We have some posts on a curb system and a low-profile speed cushion, which is high visibility, including at night, and they can extend to the crosswalk and also a little bit beyond,” said Michael Kiel, a program manager for Austin’s Vision Zero. “Or have a curb extension made out of white materials on the other side.”
The city adopted Vision Zero 10 years ago, aimed at eliminating traffic deaths and serious injuries.
“We’ve seen a 46% reduction in crashes involving pedestrians, as well as a 50% reduction in crashes involving pedestrians that led to injury,” Kiel said regarding the calming treatment pilot.
It involves leveraging highly visiblity posts to reduce the risk of pedestrians getting hit by a car making a left turn. It cost about $5,400 to install at each location.
“Building on our own research and that from other cities, we designed a pilot program to install low-cost treatments at intersections to reduce the speed and improve the angle that vehicles are turning left,” Kiel said.
The findings also revealed the treatments at each location saved more than $180,000 in crash costs, which includes emergency response, medical bills and other damages. Because of its success, the city may expand the treatment to other intersections.
“We find those results, as well as some video observation and engineering observation about turning behavior, very promising and encouraging to potentially use these treatments in different locations throughout the city,” Kiel said.
Austin, TX
Heading into 2026, polling shows close primary races in Texas
AUSTIN, Texas — With just 70 days to go until the Texas primary election date, major races across the state are ramping up with competitive poll numbers.
Recent polling shows races within just single digits for the high-profile Senate nomination races in both parties. The primary is scheduled for Tuesday, March 3.
The Democratic field, made up of U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett and Texas State Rep. James Talarico, is proving to be a close race after a shakeup earlier this month.
Polling from the Barbara Jordan Public Policy and Survey Center at Texas Southern University shows Crockett leading with 51% and Talarico with 43% among likely Democratic primary voters.
On the other side of the aisle, Republican incumbent Sen. John Cornyn’s race against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is proving to be a three-way race, with U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt gaining traction in recent polls.
A Dec. 4 poll by J.L. Partners shows Paxton leading with 29%, just a few points ahead of Cornyn and Hunt at 24%. Still, 23% of likely Republican primary voters surveyed were undecided.
“I think we’re clearly in a three-way race now for the Republican Senate,” said Mark P. Jones, political science professor at Rice University.
The other big races that are an uphill battle for lesser-known democrats. The latest polling from the Barbara Jordan Center focused in on the Democratic races for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general.
The polling shows Texas State Rep. Gina Hinojosa is leading the Democratic field for the gubernatorial race with 41%. Her biggest challenger, however, is voters who are still unsure—making up 42% of those polled.
Jones explained the lack of name recognition in much of the Democratic state primary races.
“Whoever the Democratic nominee is for U.S. Senate can count on tens of millions of dollars coming in from outside of the state to support their candidacy. That simply isn’t going to happen for, say, someone like Gina Hinojosa running for governor, or Vikki Goodwin running for lieutenant governor,” he said.
43% of voters surveyed said they don’t know enough about Hinojosa. 81% said they don’t know enough about Goodwin.
“Even the best known candidates generally are only known by about a third of Democratic primary voters,” Jones said.
That presents a major challenge, with just 70 days and counting until the March primary.
If in any of these races, a candidate does not reach the 50 percent threshold, a runoff primary election will happen at the end of May.
Austin, TX
Texas law age-restricting app stores blocked by federal judge
08 January 2019, Hessen, Rüsselsheim: ILLUSTRATION – The App Store (M) logo can be seen on the screen of an iPhone. Photo: Silas Stein/dpa (Photo by Silas Stein/picture alliance via Getty Images)
A federal judge has blocked a Texas law aimed at keeping minors from using app stores without an adult’s consent.
The decision is a win for major developers of app stores represented in the federal lawsuit, including Apple, Google and Amazon.
Texas app store law blocked
What we know:
Senate Bill 2420 would have gone into effect on Jan. 1, requiring anyone under the age of 18 in Texas to get parental consent to download an app or make an in-app purchase.
U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin issued a preliminary injunction against the law, saying it likely violates the First Amendment.
The case against the law, known as the App Store Accountability Act, was brought by Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) on behalf of operators of app stores (like Google, Apple, and Amazon) and developers of mobile apps (like YouTube, Audible, Apple TV, IMDB, and Goodreads).
What’s next:
The law can not go into effect as litigation proceeds.
Texas AG Ken Paxton is the sole defendant in the case, and is enjoined from enforcing or allowing enforcement of the law during that time.
Texas lawsuit over SB 2420
The backstory:
Attorneys for the CCIA argued the law violates First Amendment free speech rights. Before the Austin court hearing last week, CCIA Senior VP Stephanie Joyce issued the following statement:
“We shall show the judge that this law is unconstitutional and should not take effect. This law is grossly overbroad, involves forced-speech mandates, and is not remotely tailored to its stated purpose. It is a deeply flawed statute that the Court should block under the First Amendment.”
Other cell phone restrictions
Dig deeper:
Australia recently passed a total social media ban for people under age 16. Texas attempted a similar law with House Bill 18, which was enjoined prior to SB 2420.
A recent report about a school in Kentucky with a cellphone ban quoted administrators about an unexpected benefit. They claim a 61 percent increase in books being checked out from its library since the ban started.
In that Kentucky report, 38 percent of their disciplinary issues involved violating the cellphone ban. The administrators said they hope that number will drop after students come back from the holiday break. It’s too early to tell if that kind of data will be collected as part of the TEA review.
The Source: Information in this article came from a federal court filing and previous FOX Local coverage.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
New Mexico1 week agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMIT professor Nuno F.G. Loureiro, a 47-year-old physicist and fusion scientist, shot and killed in his home in Brookline, Mass. | Fortune
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Maine1 week agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off
-
World5 days agoPutin says Russia won’t launch new attacks on other countries ‘if you treat us with respect’