Connect with us

News

German insolvencies set to rise as Covid aid ends and economy stagnates

Published

on

German insolvencies set to rise as Covid aid ends and economy stagnates

German companies are expected to go bust at a higher rate this year following a sharp increase in insolvencies in 2023, as businesses hit by high energy costs and the end of pandemic aid throw in the towel.

Restructuring experts warn that many “zombie” companies kept afloat after the coronavirus pandemic by generous government aid and a suspension of the obligation to file for bankruptcy — which caused insolvencies to drop to unusually low levels — are now collapsing.

Since the start of this year, several well-known German companies — including the department store chain Galeria Karstadt Kaufhof and Hamburg-based bag maker Bree, whose customers include Chancellor Olaf Scholz — have filed for insolvency.

The ranks of struggling companies have been swelling because of Germany’s economic stagnation, combined with high interest rates, rising wages, elevated energy prices and a government budget squeeze. This is expected to push insolvencies up by between 10 per cent and 30 per cent this year, experts warn, taking them above pre-pandemic levels.

One such company is 85-year-old wooden toymaker Haba. Delivery failures caused by “wrong decisions” on IT systems at Haba’s online children’s clothing operation compounded the “heavy burden” the company was already enduring from the soaring cost of energy and wood, according to spokesperson Ilka Kunzelmann. 

Advertisement

Ultimately, it was too much for the family-owned business based in Bad Rodach, a spa town in central Germany. Haba was granted insolvency by a court in December and expects to emerge in March after it has shed about a third of its 1,500 employees, shut its online clothing arm and sold a school furniture factory.

Haba, a wooden toymaker in Bad Rodach, central Germany, was granted insolvency by a court in December, and expects to emerge in March after shedding about a third of its 1,500 employees © Dreamstime

Steffen Müller, head of bankruptcy research at the Halle Institute for Economic Research, said the monthly rate of German insolvencies it tracks, which excludes unregistered companies that have few employees, has risen since last summer above the pre-pandemic average for the first time. In December, it hit its highest level for at least seven years.

“For the next two to three months we will definitely see higher insolvency numbers, you can see that from the early filing numbers,” said Müller. “The government gave a lot of aid to firms that had low productivity before the pandemic. That prolonged their lives. But now they have to repay the aid and many are struggling to do so.”

Figures released last week by the federal statistics agency showed the number of companies filing for bankruptcy in district courts had increased more than 24 per cent in the 10 months to October, compared with the same period of 2022. 

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

Germany’s economics ministry said the business environment was “challenging” but played down the scale of the problem, saying: “In the longer-term perspective, and in comparison to the period before the pandemic, corporate insolvencies are currently not at a noticeably high level.”

Wolfgang Steiger, head of the opposition CDU party’s economic council, blamed the government’s “disastrous economic policy” for causing Germany’s insolvency rate to rise faster than many other countries. “High costs for energy and labour, which are a home-made problem, combined with the skills shortage, are causing financial distress for an increasing number of companies in Germany.”

The German economy contracted 0.4 per cent in the third quarter compared with the same period a year earlier after sharp falls in retail sales, exports and industrial production. 

Growth in the country is expected to pick up to 0.6 per cent this year, according to the OECD. But it would still be one of the world’s weakest large economies and several analysts have cut their forecasts since the government slashed spending plans to fill a €60bn hole in its budget left by a constitutional court ruling against off-balance sheet funds.

As part of the budget cuts, Berlin this month ended the temporary low rate of VAT on restaurant meals it introduced during the pandemic, prompting warnings that thousands of eateries would go out of business. More than 15,000 restaurants, snack bars and cafés in Germany are at risk, according to data provider Crif, which estimated that insolvencies in the sector would rise again this year after jumping 36.5 per cent to 1,600 last year.

Hackescher Market in Berlin
Hackescher Market in Berlin: Berlin has now ended the temporary low rate of VAT on restaurant meals it brought in during the Covid-19 pandemic © Carsten Koall/Getty Images

The German insurance association recently warned of a “massive increase in payment defaults” after credit insurers paid out more than €1.2bn in 2023, up 44 per cent on 2022. “We see significantly more and greater damage from insolvencies and delayed payments than in the previous year,” said the GDV’s Thomas Langen, who predicted German insolvencies would rise 10 per cent this year.

Jonas Eckhardt, specialist at restructuring advisers Falkensteg, said the weak economy was making it harder for companies to pass on higher energy, labour and raw material costs via higher prices. “The big question is — how much of this can I offload on my customers?”

Advertisement

He is predicting that insolvencies will rise more than 30 per cent in 2024 among companies with annual revenues in excess of €10mn.

The sharp rise in interest rates by the European Central Bank to tackle inflation has also made it harder for companies to emerge from insolvency by finding new investors, Eckhardt added. Only 52 per cent of companies could be saved through insolvency at the end of last year, down from 62 per cent two years ago, according to data from Falkensteg.

“Investors have become more risk-averse, and are holding back,” he said. “Those that still want to [take over an insolvent company] face higher financing costs. So it’s a high-risk transaction.”

This drying-up of investment and financing has hit younger, more vulnerable companies. Almost 300 German start-ups filed for insolvency last year, a 65 per cent increase from 2022, according to data provider Startupdetector. Among them was solar-powered car company Sono Motors, online trader Social Chain and anti-fraud software maker Fraugster. 

Many of the bigger companies going bust last year were fashion retailers, transport providers, real estate companies and auto suppliers. There were also high numbers of collapses among German care homes and clinics as they struggled to pass on higher wage and energy costs to the health insurance system. 

Advertisement
Bar chart of Insolvencies expected in 2024 (% change from 2019) showing Some countries have bankruptcies rising far above pre-Covid levels

Bankruptcies have been rising across much of the world, according to German insurer Allianz, which forecast a 6 per cent increase in global insolvency numbers last year and a 10 per cent rise this year.

“Germany was lagging behind other countries, such as France, the Nordic countries and the Netherlands,” said Maxime Lemerle, lead adviser on insolvency research at Allianz. “But it is catching up with the trend definitely to the upside.”

While it is yet to match the high levels of corporate distress after the 2008 financial crisis, Lemerle said the recent rise of bankruptcies in Germany and elsewhere was now “more than a normalisation, but not yet a tsunami”.

News

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Published

on

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Trump says US stockpiles mean “wars can be fought ‘forever’”

In a late night post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said that the US munitions stockpiles “at the medium and upper medium grade, never been higher or better”.

He added that the US has a “virtually unlimited supply of these weapons”, meaning that “wars can be fought ‘forever’”.

This comes after Trump said that the US-Israel war on Iran could go beyond the four-five weeks that the administration initially predicted. The president also did not rule out the possibility of US boots on the ground in Iran during an interview with the New York Post on Monday.

Advertisement

“I rebuilt the military in my first term, and continue to do so. The United States is stocked, and ready to WIN, BIG!!!,” he wrote.

Share

Key events

During his opening remarks, Senate judicicary committee chairman, Chuck Grassley, blamed Democrats for the ongoing shutdown Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but highlighted four agencies: the Secret Service, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and the Coast Guard.

Democrats are demanding tighter guardrails for federal immigration enforcement, but a sweeping tax bill signed into law last year conferred $75bn for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which means the agency is still functional amid the wider department shuttering.

Share
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending