World
Will South Korea’s President Yoon survive second impeachment motion?
Seoul, South Korea – South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol is set to face a second impeachment motion in the National Assembly on Saturday, just a week after a previous attempt by the political opposition fell short.
The stakes are high following Yoon’s controversial declaration of martial law on December 3, which triggered nationwide protests and heightened uncertainty for Asia’s fourth-largest economy.
For the latest impeachment motion to succeed, it must secure at least 200 votes – a two-thirds majority – in South Korea’s 300-seat National Assembly.
The opposition bloc holds 192 seats, leaving it eight votes short of the number required.
However, in recent days, a small yet growing number of legislators from Yoon’s governing People Power Party have openly supported the motion, making impeachment increasingly more likely.
In a defiant televised address on Thursday, Yoon dismissed the idea of voluntary resignation, stressing, “Whether they impeach me or investigate me, I will stand firm.”
What happens if Yoon is impeached?
If the National Assembly passes the impeachment motion, a series of legal and constitutional processes will unfold, starting with the official delivery of the impeachment resolution from the National Assembly to the President’s Office and the Constitutional Court.
From that moment, Yoon’s presidential powers will be suspended. He will still retain the title and some privileges associated with the presidency, including the presidential residence, and continued security protection.
During this period, South Korea’s prime minister will assume the role of acting president under Article 71 of the Constitution.
However, the opposition is also considering impeaching Prime Minister Han Duck-soo in connection with his possible role in the martial law declaration. If Han is impeached, too, the deputy prime minister for the economy would take over as acting president.
The acting president will handle essential duties such as military command, issuing decrees, and managing state matters.
While the Constitution does not clearly limit the scope of an acting president’s authority, precedent suggests powers should be limited to maintaining the status quo rather than initiating major policy changes.
Review at the Constitutional Court
The impeachment process then moves to the Constitutional Court, where justices will review the case to determine whether Yoon’s removal is justified.
At least six out of the nine justices must support the motion for it to be upheld.
However, only six justices currently sit on the bench, meaning Yoon needs just one supportive ruling to survive the impeachment attempt.
The three vacant seats are positions that the National Assembly can nominate. While legislators are now rushing to fill those seats, the president has the final authority to approve the appointments, raising the possibility of delays or rejections.
The court is required to issue its decision within 180 days of receiving the case. The Constitutional Court took 63 days to rule on former President Roh Moo-hyun’s impeachment in 2004 and 91 days for former President Park Geun-hye’s case in 2016.
Yoon’s potential legal defence
Yoon’s speech on Thursday appeared to preview his defence strategy should the case reach the Constitutional Court.
He is likely to argue that declaring martial law was within his constitutional powers and did not constitute an illegal act or an insurrection.
He framed the martial law declaration as a “highly political decision” falling under the president’s powers, which are “not subject to judicial review”.
Yoon insisted that his decision was an “emergency appeal to the public” amid what he described as a severe political crisis, which he blamed on the opposition-controlled National Assembly.
Constitutional Court’s ruling
If the court upholds the impeachment, Yoon will be removed from office.
He will lose privileges afforded to former presidents, such as pensions and personal aides, though he will continue to receive security protection.
A presidential election must then be held within 60 days to elect a new leader.
If the impeachment is rejected, Yoon will be reinstated as president and resume his duties.
Separate investigations
Even if he survives the second impeachment bid, Yoon still faces criminal investigations.
Although a sitting president enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution, this protection does not extend to charges of insurrection.
Multiple investigative agencies, including the police, the prosecution, and the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials, are investigating senior officials and military commanders on charges of insurrection.
This means that Yoon could potentially be arrested, which would mark the first such case involving a sitting president in South Korea.
World
Video: Landslide in Sicily Leaves Homes Teetering on Edge
new video loaded: Landslide in Sicily Leaves Homes Teetering on Edge
By Monika Cvorak and Meg Felling
January 28, 2026
World
Spain legalizes up to 500,000 undocumented migrants, sparking backlash
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
As the United States experiences negative net migration due to President Donald Trump policies, Spain is heading in the opposite direction, announcing plans to grant legal status for up to half a million illegal migrants.
Spain’s Socialist-led government approved a royal decree on Tuesday, allowing unauthorized immigrants who entered the country before the end of 2025 and who have lived there for at least five months and have no criminal record to obtain one-year residency and work permits with possible pathways to citizenship.
While many European governments have moved to tighten immigration policies — some encouraged by the Trump administration’s hardline approach — Spain has taken a different path. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and his ministers have repeatedly highlighted what they describe as the economic benefits of legal migration, particularly for the country’s aging workforce.
WHITE HOUSE ROADMAP SAYS EUROPE MAY BE ‘UNRECOGNIZABLE’ IN 20 YEARS AS MIGRATION RAISES DOUBTS ABOUT US ALLIES
Spain’s Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance María Jesús Montero and second Deputy Prime Minister and Labor Minister Yolanda Díaz at the Spanish Parliament in Madrid, Spain, March 14, 2024. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)
Spain “will not look the other way,” Migration Minister Elma Saiz told reporters at a news conference, saying the government is “dignifying and recognizing people who are already in our country.”
The plan has sparked a fierce political battle, as conservatives and the populist Vox party have condemned what they describe as an amnesty that could fuel irregular migration.
Vox leader Santiago Abascal wrote on social media that the measure “harms all Spaniards,” arguing critics of his party are motivated by fear of Vox’s growing influence.
“They are not worried about the consequences of Sánchez’s criminal policies,” Abascal wrote. “They are worried that Vox will gain more strength.”
Alan Mendoza, executive director of the Henry Jackson Society, told Fox News Digital that “Spain’s decision appears calculated to increase the lure of Europe as a destination for illegal migrants in general, causing problems for all of its neighbors.
“If Spain wishes to become a repository for such people, then I’m sure other European countries would appreciate signing agreements to transfer their own illegal migrants there. Absent this, we will all be paying the price for Spanish largesse.”
TRUMP SAYS HUNGARY’S BORDER STANCE KEEPS CRIME DOWN, SAYS EUROPE ‘FLOODING’ WITH MIGRANTS
A migrant walks by a makeshift settlement where migrants evicted from a former high school were camping outdoors in the middle of winter in Badalona, Spain, Dec. 26, 2025. (Bruna Casas/Reuters)
Ricard Zapata-Barrero, a political science professor at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona, told Fox News Digital, “This is not a symbolic gesture. It is a direct challenge to the dominant European approach, which treats irregular migration primarily as a policing issue. Spain, instead, frames it as a governance problem, one that requires institutional capacity, legal pathways and administrative realism rather than more detention centers and externalized borders.”
Migrants in Madrid, Spain, April 9, 2024. (Francesco Militello Mirto/Nur Photo via Getty Images)
He said Spain’s immigration system had been showing signs of strain for years.
“When hundreds of thousands of people live in irregularity for years, the issue stops being an individual failure and becomes a structural one,” Zapata-Barrero said. “In this context, regularization is not leniency — it is governability.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Migrants wait to disembark at the Port of Arguineguin after being rescued by a Spanish Coast Guard vessel on the island of Gran Canaria, Spain, Nov. 14, 2025. (Borja Suarez/Reuters)
“In a Europe closing in on itself, Spain has taken a step that sets it apart — not because it is ‘softer,’ but because it is more pragmatic,” he added. “Whether this becomes a model or a counter-model inside the EU remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: Spain has launched a political experiment that Europe will watch closely.”
Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
World
Free trade or fair play? MEPs go head-to-head on Mercosur in The Ring
Published on
What are the pros and cons of the EU-Mercosur trade deal? Why did the European Parliament send the text to the Court of Justice for clarification? Why did the EU sign an EU-India trade deal this week, and how will it impact you?
Some of the questions we pose on our latest episode of The Ring – Euronews’ weekly debating show, brought to you from the European Parliament studio in Brussels.
Irish MEP Ciaran Mullooly from Renew Europe and Swedish MEP Jörgen Warborn from the European People’s Party have a heated debate about their interpretation of the deal that was signed in Paraguay recently, after over two decades of negotiations.
Supporters of the deal say it shows the EU is open for business and can act decisively in a world of turmoil and geopolitical competition. Jörgen Warborn argues new trade deals are essential for growth, diversification, and global influence.
Critics of the pact fear low standards in food safety and inadequate support for European farmers. Ciaran Mullooly worries about farmers being undermined, environmental standards and public trust being eroded.
This episode of The Ring is anchored by Méabh Mc Mahon, produced by Luis Albertos and Amaia Echevarria, and edited by Zacharia Vigneron.
Watch The Ring on Euronews TV or in the player above and send us your views by writing to thering@euronews.com
-
Illinois6 days agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Pittsburg, PA1 week agoSean McDermott Should Be Steelers Next Head Coach
-
Pennsylvania2 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Lifestyle1 week agoNick Fuentes & Andrew Tate Party to Kanye’s Banned ‘Heil Hitler’
-
Sports1 week agoMiami star throws punch at Indiana player after national championship loss
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoNortheast Ohio cities dealing with rock salt shortage during peak of winter season
-
Technology6 days agoRing claims it’s not giving ICE access to its cameras
-
Science1 week agoContributor: New food pyramid is a recipe for health disasters