Connect with us

World

Watchdog files complaints over UK’s GPS-tracking of migrants

Published

on

Watchdog files complaints over UK’s GPS-tracking of migrants

Privateness Worldwide, an anti-surveillance watchdog, has filed two complaints with UK regulators in opposition to the House Workplace’s new scheme of GPS monitoring of migrants. 

Since June, the UK House Workplace started utilizing GPS ankle bracelets on asylum seekers. 

These tags observe migrants’ actions 24/7 for a vast period of time whereas they look ahead to a call on their immigration standing.

Privateness Worldwide argues that this follow is inhumane and threatens information rights within the UK.

The group Privateness has filed a criticism with the Info Commissioner’s Workplace and the Forensic Science Regulator.

Advertisement

This one-year pilot programme considerations migrants that enter the UK by means of irregular routes equivalent to, for instance, by way of small boats by means of the English Channel.

The GPS units are much like those used within the justice system to watch criminals.

The UK House Workplace justified this scheme as an experiment to see whether or not this might cease sure migrants from disappearing in addition to forestall abuse of the immigration system.

However based on a Freedom of Info request by Migrants Organise, these absconding charges had been as little as 1% in 2020 and three% in 2019.

In accordance with Privateness Worldwide and different NGOs, this technique faces a number of technological points and will trigger psychological hurt for asylum seekers.

Advertisement

For instance, the organisation has flagged the difficulty of the standard of the batteries of the ankle bracelets. 

“There’s an enormous drawback with the battery life of those tags. Individuals are having to plug themselves right into a wall for hours on finish. They worry leaving their home as a result of it’d run out of cost. If it does run out of cost, it is a breach of bail notification and they are often prosecuted,” Camilla Graham-Wooden, a sollicitor for Privateness Worldwide, informed Euronews. 

As well as, fixed surveillance could cause a whole lot of stress for a lot of asylum seekers. 

“The tags are very huge and heavy. It is troublesome to play any sport or lead a traditional life,” stated Graham-Wooden. “It isn’t simply the sensation of fixed surveillance, it is the truth that you’re always having every part you do tracked.”

Privateness Worldwide additionally claims that the information location on these GPS units is just not correct sufficient. 

Advertisement

This might end in some migrants being wrongfully accused of breaching their restrictions and going through prosecution.

For instance, the watchdog says that these ankle bracelets don’t work on the London Underground or in locations with poor telephone sign.

The House Workplace plans to make use of people’ GPS location information as a substitute of proof from third events to tell selections on their asylum and immigration purposes.

However what most considerations Privateness Worldwide is that it’s nonetheless unclear how this large quantity of very intimate and delicate information on asylum seekers will likely be processed and used.

“This can be a large change within the surveillance of people within the UK… The House Workplace additionally needs to course of the information for behaviour analytics. There’s much more occurring than what the federal government is portraying the scheme in how precisely they need to use the information,” stated Camilla Graham-Wooden. 

Advertisement

The UK has lately launched a large programme of surveillance to attempt to discourage migrants from crossing the English Channel.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

GameStop is becoming a poorly run bank

Published

on

GameStop is becoming a poorly run bank
GameStop’s actual business – selling video games and associated paraphernalia – isn’t doing so hot. Its other business – earning interest on cash that was handed over irrationally – is helping. But that makes GameStop more akin to a bank than a retailer. Shareholders would be better off sticking with an actual savings account.
Continue Reading

World

WikiLeaks’ Assange is free after pleading guilty in deal with Justice Department

Published

on

WikiLeaks’ Assange is free after pleading guilty in deal with Justice Department

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange pleaded guilty Tuesday in connection with a deal with federal prosecutors to close a drawn-out legal saga related to the leaking of military secrets that raised divisive questions about press freedom, national security and the traditional bounds of journalism.

The plea to a single count of conspiring to obtain and disclose information related to the national defense was entered Wednesday morning in federal court in Saipan, the capital of the Northern Mariana Islands, an American territory in the Pacific.

Advertisement

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, second from right, arrives at the United States courthouse where he is expected to enter a plea deal in Saipan, Mariana Islands, Wednesday, June 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko) (AP )

Assange said that he believed that the Espionage Act under which he was charged contradicted his First Amendment rights but that he accepted that encouraging sources to provide classified information for publication can be unlawful.

“I believe the First Amendment and the Espionage Act are in contradiction with each other but I accept that it would be difficult to win such a case given all these circumstances,” he reportedly said in court. 

Under the terms of the deal, Assange is permitted to return to his native Australia without spending any time in an American prison. He had been jailed in the United Kingdom for the last five years, while fighting extradition to the United States.

A conviction could have resulted in a lengthy prison sentence. 

Advertisement

AUSTRALIAN LAWMAKERS SEND LETTER URGING BIDEN TO DROP CASE AGAINST JULIAN ASSANGE ON WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY

Julian Assange after being released from prison

Screen grab taken from the X account of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange following his release from prison on Tuesday June 25, 2024. Assange has arrived in Saipan ahead of an expected guilty plea in a deal with the U.S. Justice Department that will set him free to return home to Australia. (@WikiLeaks, via AP)

WikiLeaks, the secret-spilling website that Assange founded in 2006, applauded the announcement of the deal, saying it was grateful for “all who stood by us, fought for us, and remained utterly committed in the fight for his freedom.”

Federal prosecutors said Assange conspired with Chelsea Manning, then a U.S. Army intelligence analyst, to steal diplomatic cables and military files published in 2010 by WikiLeaks. Prosecutors had accused Assange of damaging national security by publishing documents that harmed the U.S. and its allies and aided its adversaries.

Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison. President Barack Obama commuted the sentence in 2017 in the final days of his presidency.

Assange has been celebrated by free press advocates as a transparency crusader but heavily criticized by national security hawks who say he put lives at risk and operated far beyond the bounds of journalism.  

Advertisement

SUPPORTERS OF JULIAN ASSANGE RALLY AT JUSTICE DEPT. ON 4-YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF DETAINMENT

Julian Assange boarding a plane

Julian Assange seen boarding an airplane. (Getty Images)

Weeks after the 2010 document cache, Swedish prosecutors issued an arrest warrant for Assange for allegedly raping a woman and an allegation of molestation. The case was later dropped. Assange has always maintained his innocence. 

In 2012, he took refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he claimed asylum on the grounds of political persecution, and spent the following seven years in self-exile there. 

The Ecuadorian government in 2019 allowed the British police to arrest Assange and he remained in custody for the next five years while fighting extradition to the U.S. 

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

France elections: Germans prepare for seismic change in EU politics

Published

on

France elections: Germans prepare for seismic change in EU politics

As France gears up for the shocking snap elections that French President Emmanuel Macron called during the EU elections, Germans are preparing for a seismic change in EU politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

With the upcoming French elections just around the corner, Germany is bracing itself for the results, which are expected to swing to the right.

Climate, migration and gender equality policies are likely to be affected on a national level in France if far-right Marine Le Pen’s National Rally party wins. Yet, political scientist Prof Dr Miriam Hartlapp warned the effects could ripple across the European Union.

“Policymaking in Brussels will change because members of this right-wing populist party could sit in the Council of Ministers. This creates a different situation for countries like Germany and other European nations,” Hartlapp said.

“France is not a small member state, but a large and important one. We can expect that European climate policy, asylum and migration policy, and gender equality policy at the European level will then look different,” she added.

Hartlapp said the swing to the right has spread across Europe as the dissatisfaction with current governments is reflected in the political climate.

Advertisement

Germans are aware of the changes and this “causes concern,” Harlapp said, pointing at German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s recent interview where he said he hopes “that parties that are not [Marine] Le Pen, to put it that way, are successful in the election. But that is for the French people to decide.”

Hartlapp added that the EU can expect immigration-related cases to be brought to the European Court of Justice.

“Some points in the National Rally‘s program clearly contradict the fundamental rights of the European constitution. For example, immigrants in France not having the same rights as French citizens when it comes to housing and social benefits. This directly contradicts EU law,” she said.

Meanwhile, in Germany, individual politicians from the far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD) and extreme-right Die Heimat announced their plans to form factions in the eastern state of Brandenburg this week, after AfD outperformed all of the parties in the ruling coalition government during the EU elections.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending