Connect with us

World

Bosnia's future is in the EU — but it needs help to get there

Published

on

Bosnia's future is in the EU — but it needs help to get there

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not represent in any way the editorial position of Euronews.

Our commitment and destiny lie within the EU, but the speed of our journey towards membership will directly impact democracy and the living standards of our citizens, Member of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina Denis Bećirović writes.

ADVERTISEMENT

For decades, Bosnians and Herzegovinians have been waiting for good news from Brussels. My compatriots, who are no strangers to ill fortunes, always knew that the road to European Union membership is not without significant obstacles.

If anything, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s path has been an echo of its domestic troubles, and years of a lack of movement in EU’s own accession plans meant that many came close to losing all hope, despite personal feelings of belonging to the greater European family.

All of this changed, and my country is now on the cusp of opening membership negotiations with Brussels — the final step that ultimately leads to full-fledged membership.

Neither side can let this opportunity to finally unite us under the same banner slip away, especially not amidst the bloodiest conflict on European soil since World War II. Nearly three decades after a gruesome war in their own country, Bosnians and Herzegovinians know full well how much is at stake.

Advertisement

Negotiations imminent — with a caveat

Several EU member states strongly advocated for opening negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) as early as December 2023, aligning its path with Ukraine and Moldova.

However, the European Council ultimately followed the European Commission’s conditional recommendation.

In this way, a message was conveyed to Bosnia and Herzegovina that a decision on the opening of negotiations is imminent, following additional progress that needs to be made in the coming months.

At the same time, it should be noted that Bosnia and Herzegovina, despite numerous internal obstacles, has achieved significant progress in the process of European integration.

A set of important laws was adopted at the state-level Parliament and the Council of Ministers. The Presidency of BiH has signed off on a series of crucial decisions and ratified numerous agreements that strengthen regional cooperation and the European path of the country.

Advertisement

Further delays could come with a price

The opening of negotiations for membership would be an important political signal demonstrating the EU’s readiness to commence a process with Bosnia and Herzegovina that would result in substantial and visible reforms.

This process would undoubtedly have a positive societal effect and would also signify the recognition and valorisation of the progress made along the European path.

On the other hand, further delays and prolonged waiting will inevitably contribute to the loss of enthusiasm and, importantly, erode citizens’ trust in the credibility of European integration.

According to a survey conducted in May and June of last year, 73.3% of citizens support Bosnia and Herzegovina’s accession to the EU. 

This represents a robust foundational consensus for implementing reforms along the European path, something that Brussels should not hesitate to capitalise on.

Advertisement

I anticipate that the European Council in March will provide an opportunity for Bosnia and Herzegovina to demonstrate its dedication to European values — a chance to strengthen and deepen our mutual interconnectedness and cooperation.

The EU is learning from its mistakes

The primary culprits behind the ongoing blockade of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s European path are domestic “anti-Europeans”.

They show little concern for EU membership because they understand that entry into the union entails compliance with EU rules and standards.

The European legal environment would mean the loss of existing privileges for many of them and, for some, the loss of freedom as they are associated with criminal activities and corruption.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is equally important that the EU avoids making new miscalculations concerning Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Some of the major mistakes the EU has made include its unwillingness to consistently implement European principles and standards in BiH; a lenient policy towards destructive politicians who openly threaten the Dayton Peace Agreement and the Constitution of BiH; and a reluctance to sanction extremist politicians who threaten peace in BiH and the wider Western Balkan region.

Advertisement

Had Brussels taken a more decisive stance over the last ten years, Bosnia and Herzegovina would have been spared from many crises, and this part of Europe would have been much more stable.

However, there are indications that a shift is occurring. Following my visits in 2023 to both NATO and EU headquarters in Brussels, along with subsequent trips to Paris, Berlin, Washington, and London, I have become convinced that the West’s support for Bosnia and Herzegovina is gaining momentum.

During my visit to the Federal Republic of Germany, I spoke with Chancellor Olaf Scholz and received clear and unequivocal messages affirming Germany’s support for Bosnia and Herzegovina.

ADVERTISEMENT

Encouraging messages were also conveyed to me by French President Emmanuel Macron. In discussions at the Élysée Palace, President Macron offered steadfast support for preserving the independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Anticonstitutional acts must end

And Bosnia and Herzegovina needs more of that same kind of backing. In the coming period, the EU should more vigorously and concretely bolster the country’s pro-European and democratic forces.

It’s essential not to forget that pro-Russian and separatist forces in the entity of the Republika Srpska (RS) intentionally obstruct my country’s European and Euro-Atlantic paths.

Advertisement

For six months now, there has been an overt attack against the fundamental provisions of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement — part of which is BiH’s de facto constitution — and the constitutional order of the country.

The situation is extremely grave. This is not just my personal assessment, but also an often-repeated statement made by almost all key leaders in the West.

ADVERTISEMENT

In that vein, the West should put a stop to all anti-Dayton Peace Agreement and unconstitutional acts, the first of which is the upcoming 9 January “Day of the RS” celebration in this Bosnian entity, a holiday the Constitutional Court of BiH deemed discriminatory and unconstitutional.

Despite conclusive and binding court decisions, the entity’s leaders persist in unlawfully commemorating it, perpetuating a perilous and systematic attack on the Dayton Peace Agreement and Bosnia and Herzegovina’s future.

If attempts to destroy the Dayton Peace Agreement are not stopped, the lack of action might be read as an encouragement to proceed to the next phase of increasing tensions, which could lead to the destabilisation of the entire region.

Knowing what it knows now after nearly two years of Russia’s war against Ukraine, the West can and should prevent the Kremlin’s act of aggression from triggering conflicts in the Western Balkans and further across Europe.

Advertisement

Our destiny lies within the EU

Ever since the country’s independence in 1992, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s future has been intricately tied to that of Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

Should the EU demonstrate a willingness to leverage Bosnia and Herzegovina’s geopolitical, economic, and cultural advantages positively, it stands to benefit, and so does our country.

Given the evolving geopolitical dynamics, there’s a pressing need for the EU to strategically consider an expedited and more adaptable approach to its enlargement policy concerning Bosnia and Herzegovina and the rest of the countries in the region.

Moreover, the acceleration of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s path towards full EU membership would represent not only a reinforced economic and political connection but also the establishment of a new form of solidarity and shared values essential to the European identity on the whole.

Our commitment and destiny lie within the EU, and the speed of our journey towards the union will directly impact democracy and the living standards of our citizens.

Bosnia and Herzegovina is at the heart of Europe, and its rightful place is within the EU.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

Denis Bećirović serves as Member of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

At Euronews, we believe all views matter. Contact us at view@euronews.com to send pitches or submissions and be part of the conversation.

World

2 people killed in collision between jet and vehicle at New York’s LaGuardia Airport, source says

Published

on

2 people killed in collision between jet and vehicle at New York’s LaGuardia Airport, source says

NEW YORK (AP) — An Air Canada regional jet struck a fire truck on the runway after landing at New York’s LaGuardia Airport late Sunday night, crushing the nose of the plane, according to authorities and photos of the wreckage.

Two people were killed, according to a person familiar with the investigation into the crash. The person spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss an active investigation.

Two Port Authority employees who were traveling in the fire truck also were injured, the person said.

There were 72 passengers and four crew members aboard the aircraft, a Jazz Aviation flight operating on behalf of Air Canada, according to a statement from the airline. The flight originated at Montréal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport, the major airport serving Montreal.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said in a statement that the jet had struck a rescue and firefighting vehicle that was responding to a separate incident at about 11:45 p.m. The airport was closed as of 3 a.m. to facilitate the investigation, officials said.

Advertisement

Photos and videos from the scene showed severe damage to the front of the aircraft, with cables and debris hanging from a mangled cockpit. Nearby, a damaged emergency vehicle lay on its side.

Stairways used to evacuate passengers from aircraft were pushed up to the emergency exits on the jet, a Bombardier CRJ. The impact left the jet with its crumpled nose tilted upward.

In the moments before the crash, an air traffic controller could be heard on a radio transmission giving clearance to a vehicle to cross part of the tarmac, then trying to stop it.

“Stop, Truck 1. Stop,” the transmission says. The controller can then be heard frantically diverting incoming aircraft from landing.

Jazz Aviation issued a statement confirming the accident and noting the passenger and crew list was preliminary and subject to confirmation.

Advertisement

The National Transportation Safety Board said it was investigating the incident.

Continue Reading

World

Trump, Starmer agree Strait of Hormuz must reopen as Middle East conflict escalates

Published

on

Trump, Starmer agree Strait of Hormuz must reopen as Middle East conflict escalates

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump spoke with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Sunday to discuss escalating tensions in the Middle East, with a focus on the urgent need to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restore global shipping.

The leaders discussed the current situation in the Middle East, and in particular, the need to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to resume global shipping, Downing Street said in a statement.

STEALTH BOMBERS LANDING AT UK BASES ‘IN DAYS’ AFTER TRUMP PRESSURES STARMER: REPORT

Keir Stamer, UK prime minister, during a news conference providing an update on the situation in the Middle East, at Downing Street in London, UK, on Thursday, March 5, 2026.  (Tolga Akmen/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

“They agreed that reopening the Strait of Hormuz was essential to ensure stability in the global energy market. They agreed to speak again soon.”

The call came amid a rapidly intensifying conflict in the region, with Iran blocking the strategically vital strait since the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iranian targets on Feb. 28.

The military action triggered swift retaliation from Tehran and has since escalated into a broader regional war as Iran has sent missiles into numerous neighboring countries not directly involved in the initial conflict.

UK NUCLEAR SUBMARINE DEPLOYED TO ARABIAN SEA BEFORE IRAN TARGETS KEY US-UK BASE: REPORTS

President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters during a meeting with Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin in the Oval Office of the White House, on St. Patrick’s Day, Tuesday, March 17, 2026, in Washington.  (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Advertisement

On March 21, Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Iran demanding the reopening of the key maritime route, through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply passes.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump warned that failure to comply would result in further U.S. action, including potential strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure.

EU PUSHES FOR END OF IRAN WAR IN A MANNER WHERE ‘EVERYBODY SAVES FACE’

Bulk Carrier, Belray, in the Gulf, near the Strait of Hormuz on March 22, 2026 in northern Ras al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates. (Getty Images/Getty Images)

Sunday’s conversation between Trump and Starmer perhaps reflected a thaw in the tense relationship between the two leaders.

Advertisement

Trump had publicly criticized the U.K. government, stating that Britain “should have acted a lot faster” in allowing the U.S. to use British military bases for strikes targeting Iranian missile sites.

Starmer had also maintained that the use of U.K. bases could only be justified under the principle of “collective self-defense” in the region.

He had initially declined to support the U.S.-Israeli military operation, drawing repeated criticism from the White House.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Meanwhile, Trump appeared to apply public pressure, sharing a “Saturday Night Live” clip Sunday mocking the British prime minister’s handling of the crisis.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

French elections: Paris stays left as far right makes mixed gains

Published

on

French elections: Paris stays left as far right makes mixed gains

France’s municipal runoff delivered a mixed verdict for the country’s main political forces on Sunday: the Left held Paris with Socialist Emmanuel Grégoire, the far-right and its allies scored a major symbolic win in Nice, and mainstream parties pointed to resilience in several big and mid-sized cities ahead of the 2027 presidential race.

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

Municipal elections in France are local contests to elect mayors and local councils, but they are closely watched because they test party organisation, alliance-building, and grassroots strength before national campaigns begin.

In the capital, Socialist Emmanuel Grégoire defeated conservative rival Rachida Dati, ensuring Paris remains under left-wing control after outgoing mayor Anne Hidalgo chose not to seek another term.

The result extends a quarter-century of left-led rule of the capital and hands to the Socialists one of the most visible prizes of the night. Grégoire presented the result as a mandate for a progressive vision of the city.

Advertisement

Elsewhere, the left also had reasons to celebrate. In Marseille, Socialist incumbent Benoît Payan was re-elected after the far right had hoped to seize France’s second-largest city.

While in Lyon, Green mayor Grégory Doucet held on after a hard-fought race against his conservative rival, which was reshaped by a last-minute merger with the list of hard-left party France Unbowed.

Socialists record strong showing

The Socialists also held or performed strongly in several regional cities, reinforcing the impression of a broader recovery for the traditional left.

For the far right, the picture was more complex. National Rally (RN) leader Jordan Bardella hailed what he called the party’s biggest local breakthrough, and RN kept the southwestern city of Perpignan while also winning smaller municipalities.

But the party fell short in several of the larger cities it had targeted, notably Marseille, Toulon and Nîmes. The exception was Nice, where Éric Ciotti — once a senior figure in the mainstream right and now allied with RN — won the race, giving the far right and its partners control of France’s fifth-largest city.

Advertisement

The elections also brought clearer signs of fragmentation on the centre-right and in President Emmanuel Macron’s camp.

Former prime minister Édouard Philippe was re-elected in Le Havre, strengthening his standing as a possible 2027 contender, while Macron’s centrist forces could point to a symbolic win in Bordeaux, where Renaissance candidate Thomas Cazenave defeated outgoing Green mayor Pierre Hurmic.

At the same time, the loss of Macron’s former PM, François Bayrou, in southwestern Pau, underlined the vulnerabilities of the broader presidential alliance.

Turnout remained a concern. According to the Interior Ministry, participation in mainland France stood at 48.1% at 5 p.m., higher than the Covid-disrupted 2020 election but still below pre-pandemic levels.

Taken together, the results do not predict who will succeed Macron in 2027. But they do sketch the political landscape from which that contest will emerge: a left that can still win major cities, a mainstream right that remains locally entrenched, a centre searching for durable footholds, and a far right that is growing but may still face limits in the country’s biggest urban battlegrounds.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending