Wyoming
Trump's deportation agenda taking hold with Wyoming Legislature, some sheriffs – WyoFile
CHEYENNE—The Legislature and some sheriffs are simultaneously pursuing programs to align Wyoming with incoming President Donald Trump’s deportation agenda, and make the state an unwelcoming place for people in the country without permission.
House lawmakers aligned with the Wyoming Freedom Caucus have brought bills to punish employers who hire undocumented immigrants and local government officials who fail to cooperate with federal authorities. They also seek to make it illegal for undocumented immigrants to drive in the state, even with a valid license from another state.
Meanwhile, a growing number of sheriffs are pursuing agreements with the federal government to position county jails more firmly in the service of federal immigration enforcement.
Sheriffs in Laramie, Campbell and Carbon counties recently told WyoFile about discussions with U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials regarding agreements to assist with the deportation of noncitizens arrested for non-immigration offenses. Sweetwater County has had such an agreement in place since 2020.
All of those counties line either Interstate 80 or Interstate 90.
Taken together, lawmakers and the sheriffs could make Wyoming hostile territory for people who have entered the country illegally, even if they’re just passing through. If the driver’s license bill becomes law, for example, undocumented immigrants licensed to drive by other states who are traveling through Wyoming could run the risk of being jailed and slated for deportation.
Gov. Mark Gordon has also touted immigration enforcement, noting in his State of the State address that he deployed a contingent of the Wyoming Highway Patrol to support Texas during its standoff with the federal government this past summer.
Since then, he said, Texas’ governor sent a detachment of its law enforcement to Wyoming, to talk with local police agencies about “what we need to do in our heartland.”
Counter lobby
Advocates for the state’s immigrant population say muddling local law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement will make communities less safe by fostering distrust between police and those they’re sworn to protect and serve.
The enforcement drive will also hurt the state’s economy, advocates say, by driving off undocumented workers who came to the country to work.
“This isn’t going after what they think it’s going after,” American Civil Liberties Union of Wyoming Advocacy Director Antonio Serrano said.
“Wyoming is finally starting to grow. There’s a lot of construction, there’s a lot of stuff going up and immigrants are building that. They’re helping Wyoming grow. In the Wyoming I grew up in, we respected people who wanted to work and work hard.”
Undocumented immigrants and their advocates are principally up against the Freedom Caucus, an ascendant political bloc committed to supporting Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda across the board.
The measure to punish errant employers, a bill brought by freshman Rep. Gary Brown, R-Cheyenne, is sparking broader opposition. Lobbyists for the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation and the Wyoming Hospitality and Travel Coalition told WyoFile their members were likely to oppose that measure.
“We do not support the intentional hiring of illegal workers,” Chris Brown, executive director of the hospitality coalition, said. “We also don’t support new, heavy-handed regulations that could hurt Wyoming’s main street businesses.”
Wyoming farmers’ longtime lobbyist Brett Moline agreed. “For my agricultural guys it’s so hard to get somebody here legally,” he said. “[The federal government] has made it so difficult to get labor legally, that’s why people are coming illegally.”
State lawmakers are wading into a federal issue, Moline cautioned. “I’m wondering if this is even appropriate for the state. This is something that needs to be settled at the federal level,” he said.

Whether business interests will also throw their weight against measures like the driver’s license bill remains to be seen.
House Bill 116, “Driver’s licenses-unauthorized alien restrictions,” would invalidate the licenses issued to undocumented immigrants by as many as 19 states. State legislatures like California’s created such licenses to reduce the number of unlicensed and uninsured drivers on the road, as well as embrace undocumented immigrants they consider valuable to economies and communities.
That view isn’t shared by many lawmakers in Cheyenne. “In Wyoming, we shouldn’t provide legal privileges to those here illegally,” Rep. Pepper Ottman, a Riverton Republican and the bill’s principal sponsor, wrote in an email to WyoFile.
Law enforcement chiefs interviewed by WyoFile said they weren’t entirely certain if undocumented immigrants driving with such licenses would be detained. In many cases, they said, offenders would be issued a ticket then — if someone else could take the wheel — travel on. But if not, they may end up stranded or, if there are other criminal charges, even jailed.
“If you don’t have a driver’s license you can’t drive,” said Col. Tim Cameron, who directs the Wyoming Highway Patrol. “They would need an alternative method of transportation or another driver.”
Community resources
Community organizers around the state are beginning to network with each other to oppose the bills, and prepare immigrants for increased policing activity by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Serrano said. But the state’s network of immigrant advocates is spread out and somewhat disconnected.
“We’re trying to bring everybody together,” Serrano said. “People are scared and they want to know their rights. [Lawmakers and law enforcement] are sending a lot of signals to immigrant folks that ‘you’re not welcome in Wyoming.’”
The state also has a dearth of attorneys practicing immigration law, both to help people pursue legal status and to defend them in deportation proceedings.
Rosslyn Read, legal director of the Wyoming Immigrant Advocacy Project, estimated there are six or seven attorneys including herself dedicated to immigration law in the state. Read’s approach is even rarer since she runs a nonprofit and charges clients based on their income.
Demand for her legal services has skyrocketed, she said, as people scramble for asylum status or to rectify expired work visas. “Supply to demand is totally out of control,” she said of immigrants seeking legal help in a system she views as stacked against them.
“The rhetoric of ‘just get in line’ is completely false,” she said. “The system is not really designed to encourage authorized immigration.”
Caucus agenda
Freedom Caucus members see Ottman’s driver’s license bill as another layer of protection against illegal voting. The legislation is a part of the Freedom Caucus’ leading five priorities the bloc hopes to pass out of the House within the first 10 days. It’s also backed by Secretary of State Chuck Gray.
In a legislative meeting Wednesday, Gray cited one case of someone voting in Wyoming while in the country illegally, in 2020. In 2023 the federal government discovered the fraud and the Campbell County clerk removed the person from the voting roll.
Rep. Joel Guggenmos, also aligned with the caucus, has brought House Bill 133, “Sanctuary cities, counties and prohibition,” which would charge government officials who don’t cooperate with federal immigration authorities with a felony. The charge carries up to five years in prison.
The bill would ban the passage of any “sanctuary” laws in the state that prevent local law enforcement from sharing information with federal immigration authorities (there are none today), and cut funding to counties or cities that try such legislation.
Recent conservative attention on Teton County Sheriff Matt Carr is driving the bill, Guggenmos told WyoFile. Carr drew the ire of Wyoming’s Republican Congresswoman Harriet Hageman and conservative state lawmakers when ICE reported Carr did not hold undocumented immigrants in jail until federal agents could collect them for deportation.
“Every elected official and law enforcement agent takes an oath to protect and defend the Constitution,” Guggenmos said. “That is the number one thing that they swear an oath to.” In doing so, Guggenmos said, those officials align themselves with the federal government, whose “number one task is to protect us from foreign invaders.”
Carr has not held people on ICE detainers — a request from the agency that jails hold people until they can be picked up for deportation — because they are not signed by a judge, according to other news reports.
Carr did not respond to WyoFile requests for comment. But his defenders argue that what really runs afoul of the Constitution is holding people in jail after a judge releases them.
Federal courts have found ICE detainers to be unconstitutional in some cases, particularly when a sheriff hasn’t entered a legal agreement with the federal government to participate in immigration enforcement.
Read, the Jackson attorney, said she believes Carr does cooperate with ICE, by alerting them to undocumented immigrants who go into the jail. What Hageman and the Freedom Caucus are asking of him goes beyond the law, she said.
“He and I disagree about this,” Read said. “I wish [Carr] wouldn’t call ICE, but I am defending him because he is doing what is legally required.”
Growing cooperation
Other sheriffs are not hesitating to hold immigrants in their jails for ICE.
Conservatives accuse Carr of ignoring ICE’s requests over a nearly two-year period from February 2023 to mid-December 2024. During the same period, sheriffs in the state’s six most populous counties complied with every detainer they received, according to data provided by ICE.
A mounting number of sheriffs are now seeking to solidify their relationships with ICE through contracts called 287g agreements. Those agreements allow deputies to serve ICE warrants on people in the jail, streamlining deportations and blunting questions about the legality of holding undocumented immigrants after their release date for the local crime.
The agreements only cover people brought to jails on suspicion of committing a non-immigration offense. Deputies could not arrest someone solely for being an undocumented immigrant, sheriffs say, and are also not supposed to ask people about their immigration status while conducting police work. But civil liberty advocates say the system is ripe for racial profiling and abuse, if motivated deputies start looking for a way to detain people they think are in the country illegally.
“People forget how mixed-status families are,” ACLU advocate Antonio Serrano said. “Maybe some of the kids are citizens, but one of them isn’t, or one parent isn’t.”
As a consequence, opponents of the agreements like Read and Serrano say public safety degrades in communities where local law enforcement works closer with the federal government.
“It’s not just a constitutional or jurisdictional principle,” Read said. “When immigrants don’t trust the police, it hinders the police’s ability to do their jobs and arrest people who are dangerous. If you don’t have cooperative witnesses or [you have] people who are afraid to call and report a crime because it puts their immigration status in jeopardy, it makes everyone less safe.”
Campbell, Carbon and Laramie counties’ sheriffs all emphasized in interviews with WyoFile that their deputies would not be checking immigration status when going about their jobs pulling people over and investigating crimes.
Laramie County Sheriff Brian Kozak, who is pursuing the more aggressive of the two types of agreements the federal government extends to sheriffs, said he is aware that Cheyenne’s immigrant community might perceive heightened risks from his deputies. He insists that is not the case.
“We want people to come to us to report crimes,” he said. “Our priority is to get criminals who commit crimes.”
He will engage in continued community outreach to ensure immigrants in his jurisdiction know that “we are there to help you. If you call us we are going to help you,” he said.
But Kozak is also outspoken about his desire to aid ICE, and he’s generated headlines for his enthusiasm about engaging with federal immigration enforcement. He recently posted a splashy neon “vacancy” sign above his jail door, in the style of a roadside motel, to advertise that he has space to house more detainees, including federal ones.
The pro-deportation sentiment from the Capitol and sheriffs’ departments will inevitably degrade a sense of trust in Wyoming’s communities, Serrano, the ACLU advocate, said. And if deportations do ramp up to extremes, as Trump is promising, it’s only a matter of time before people being detained and removed from the country start straining Wyoming communities, and families, he said.
“People forget how mixed-status families are,” he said. “Maybe some of the kids are citizens, but one of them isn’t, or one parent isn’t. It’s going to cause a lot of problems.”
Wyoming
Property Tax Relief vs. Public Services: Weed & Pest Districts Enter the Debate
As property tax cuts move forward in Wyoming, schools, hospitals, public safety agencies and road departments have all warned of potential funding shortfalls. Now, a new white paper from the Wyoming Weed & Pest Council says Weed & Pest Districts could also be significantly affected — a concern that many residents may not even realize is tied to property tax revenue.
Wyoming’s Weed & Pest Districts didn’t appear out of thin air. They were created decades ago to deal with a very real problem: invasive plants that were chewing up rangeland, hurting agricultural production and spreading faster than individual landowners could manage on their own.
Weeds like cheatgrass and leafy spurge don’t stop at fence lines, and over time they’ve been tied to everything from reduced grazing capacity to higher wildfire risk and the loss of native wildlife habitat.
That reality is what led lawmakers to create locally governed districts with countywide authority — a way to coordinate control efforts across both public and private land. But those districts now find themselves caught in a familiar Wyoming dilemma: how to pay for public services while cutting property taxes. Property taxes are among the most politically sensitive issues in the state, and lawmakers are under intense pressure to deliver relief to homeowners. At the same time, nearly every entity that relies on those dollars is warning that cuts come with consequences.
The Weed & Pest Council’s white paper lands squarely in that debate, at a moment when many residents are increasingly skeptical of property tax–funded programs and are asking a simple question — are they getting what they pay for?
That skepticism shows up in several ways. Critics of the Weed & Pest District funding model say the white paper spends more time warning about funding losses than clearly demonstrating results. While few dispute that invasive species are a problem, some landowners argue that weed control efforts vary widely from county to county and that it’s difficult to gauge success without consistent performance measures or statewide reporting standards.
Others question whether residential property taxes are the right tool to fund Weed & Pest Districts at all. For homeowners in towns or subdivisions, the work of weed and pest crews can feel far removed from daily life, even though those residents help foot the bill. That disconnect has fueled broader questions about whether funding should be tied more directly to land use or agricultural benefit rather than spread across all residential taxpayers.
There’s also concern that the white paper paints proposed tax cuts as universally “devastating” without seriously engaging with alternatives.
Some lawmakers and taxpayer advocates argue that Weed & Pest Districts should at least explore other options — whether that’s greater cost-sharing with state or federal partners, user-based fees, or more targeted assessments — before framing tax relief as an existential threat.
Ultimately, critics warn that leaning too heavily on worst-case scenarios could backfire. As Wyoming reexamines how it funds government, public entities are being asked to do more than explain why their mission matters. They’re also being asked to show how they can adapt, improve transparency and deliver services as efficiently and fairly as possible.
Weed & Pest Districts, like schools, hospitals and other tax-supported services, may have to make that case more clearly than ever before. The video below is the story of Wyoming’s Weed and Pest Districts.
Wyoming Weed & Pest’s Most Notorious Species
Gallery Credit: Kolby Fedore, Townsquare Media
Notorious Idaho Murderer’s Home Is Back On The Market
Convicted murderer, Chad Daybell’s home is back on the market. Could you live here?
Gallery Credit: Chris Cardenas
Wyoming
Wyoming battles tougher flu in 2025–26 season, health experts report
CASPER, Wyo. — While the fall and winter are often highlighted by snowfall and holiday gatherings, the season is also marked by the coughing, running noses and chills that come with the flu. This year, health experts warn of an especially virulent flu in Wyoming and beyond.
Data from the Wyoming Department of Health show that Wyoming saw 426 new influenza cases reported in just the final week of 2025, with well over 1,000 cases in total through flu season thus far in Wyoming. The report also states that, through Dec. 27, there had been 19 deaths in Wyoming caused by the flu this season. Nationally, the CDC reports more than 7.5 million cases of the flu and more than 3,100 deaths.
The uptick in flu cases is seen locally, too, the Natrona County Health Department told Oil City News on Thursday.
“While we don’t have exact numbers locally and only have the statewide data that’s reported, I can definitely say anecdotally that locally we’re seeing the same trends that we’re seeing statewide and nationally,” health department PIO Hailey Bloom said. “There is a surge in the rate across our community, the state and the country.”
Bloom said the surge in cases can partially be attributed to this year’s particular strain. The current flu is a mutated strain known as subclade K, originating from the common flu-causing virus influenza A and its variant H3N2. The strain is one of the more aggressive influenza variants, Bloom said.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, subclade K is also more adept at resisting immune systems that have already built up protections against other strains of the virus. Bloom also said this season’s vaccine may not be ideally suited for combating the current strain.
“We use the flu season in the southern hemisphere as a predictor [when crafting the vaccine], and we did see that there were some strains not as effectively combated by this year’s flu shot,” she said. “Some years we get a really, really good match on the flu shot and all of the circulating strains are perfect matches to that shot, and some years it’s not as perfect.”
However, Bloom also said some of the increased cases can be attributed to a lower number of people getting vaccinated, which remains the best way to avoid the virus.
Bloom said 989 Natrona County residents have gotten a flu shot through the health department so far this season. That’s down from the 1,227 distributed in the 2024–25 flu season and the 1,478 the year before that.
The decline in vaccinations similarly mirrors a nationwide trend. In mid-December, the CDC reported that roughly 32.5 million flu shots had been given thus far, which is down about 1.9 million from the same point the prior flu season.
People still in need of a vaccine can get one at the Natrona County Health Department by calling ahead and setting up an appointment or by walking in, Bloom said. Vaccinations can also be administered at other locations like various local pharmacies.
Other than getting vaccinated, tips for avoiding the flu include regularly washing hands, avoiding people you know to be sick, exercising caution if feeling under the weather and dressing appropriately for the weather, Bloom said.
“This year’s flu is more aggressive, more intense and not as well covered by the vaccine, so it’s definitely nasty,” Bloom said. “All that said, the flu shot is still going to give significantly more protection than not getting one.”
Related
Wyoming
Former director of Colorado Parks and Wildlife lands a job in Wyoming
This story is part of our Quick Hits series. This series will bring you breaking news and short updates from throughout the state.
The former director of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) agency is joining Wyoming’s Game and Fish Department.
9-News reported that Jeff Davis was hired as the department’s deputy director in late December. That’s after Doug Brimeyer retired.
He starts the job in February.
Davis resigned from CPW last year instead of being fired as part of a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement Davis signed did not directly cite a reason for his termination.
Davis joined CPW as the state reintroduced wolves. His resignation came shortly after Washington state said it would not provide wolves to Colorado’s reintroduction program.
Before joining CPW in 2023, Davis had a long career in the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. While there, he focused on coordinating conservation initiatives involving interdisciplinary teams and salmon recovery.
-
Detroit, MI6 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology3 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX5 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Iowa3 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska3 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Nebraska3 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Missouri3 days agoDamon Wilson II, Missouri DE in legal dispute with Georgia, to re-enter transfer portal: Source