Connect with us

Wyoming

Elk Fire Now At 74,000 Acres And Still Out Of Control, But Some Signs…

Published

on

Elk Fire Now At 74,000 Acres And Still Out Of Control, But Some Signs…


People in the potential path of an out-of-control wildfire that’s scorching its way across northwest Sheridan County may not be able to get to church services Sunday, but are doing plenty of praying.

It’s the same prayers they’ve been offering up for a week since the Elk Fire that began with a lightning strike southeast of Dayton blew up overnight last Sunday — and has continued to blow up since. After starting Saturday at more than 62,000 acres, the fire was last estimated Saturday afternoon at 76,000 acres and adjusted to 72,998 Sunday morning.

For those who’ve evacuated or been told to be ready to leave their homes, there’s a feeling of helplessness and fear at having to watch the flames and smoke advance without being able to do anything.

Chad Flanagan, a lifelong Dayton resident, told Cowboy State Daily on Saturday that it’s simply “heartbreaking” to see the face of the Bighorn Mountains that used to stand over the town like a protector instead glow orange with wildfire.

Advertisement

Others haven’t been so lucky.

The Sheridan County Sheriff’s Office reports it’s confirmed at least two primary residences in the Horseshoe subdivision have burned, while the list of areas that have been evacuated has grown almost as fast as the fire.

There are some inspiring stories of hope emerging from the area as well.

A stunning photograph shared by the Wyoming Department of Transportation from a worker at Burgess Junction on the southwest side of the fire shows the successful efforts of firefighters to save a home. It stands unscathed as an island surrounded by a sea of black.

In the wake of the fire’s spread, some people have returned expecting to find their homes destroyed only to find miracles instead.

Advertisement

Laura Eaton, who lives on a ranch in Wolf south of Dayton, posted about her family’s miracle to Facebook.

“The fire moved an incredible distance last night and blew through the mountains and foothills around the ranch in about three or four hours,” she wrote.

Blown by “insanely high” winds that gusted more than 60 mph, she said the fire was about 2 miles north of the ranch at about 10 p.m. Friday, then by 7 a.m. was “already about 4-5 miles south of us, (and) the ranch is about 6 miles long … along the mountains.”

She expected the worst when returning Saturday.

“Driving into the ranch, it looks really bad,” she wrote. “The majority of the lower elevations seem unaffected, but the face of the mountains, South and North Red Canyons and the hill along Gentry Field by the race track have been hit hard.

Advertisement

“Driving up the ranch road and seeing all black around the hollow where the main part of the ranch is located, I was preparing for the worst. I was pretty sure it had all been wiped out.”

A WYDOT worker at Burgess Junction made a morning run Saturday to check the road conditions of what can be access and took this photo of a ranch house saved from wildfire from Sand Turn. (WYDOT District 4)

The Miracle

Instead, like that WYDOT worker, she found her home had been spared.

“Amazingly, all of the buildings have been spared,” she wrote, adding how grateful the family is to the firefighters working to protect people and property. “Of course, we have so many individuals who have put in the hours on the ground to be thankful for.”

But there’s another reason for the miracle of the Elk Fire not burning the ranch to the ground, Eaton wrote.

“Even with all the effort put into prevention and actively fighting the fire, with the conditions last night, I feel like the only reason we were spared is because of all the positive energy that has been sent our way,” she posted. “So thank you, all of you, for your love and prayers.”

Advertisement

Also devastated at how the fire is impacting where he calls home is country music star Ian Munsick, who grew up in the area.

“That’s my childhood right there,” Munsick told Cowboy State Daily on Saturday. “And when I write music, those are the mountains that inspired me the most.”

Munsick has been heartsick seeing the homes and towns he loves threatened by fire. That prompted him to start a GoFundMe campaign, The Elk Fire Relief Fund, to help all the rural fire departments involved in fighting the fire.

He even kicked it off with a little donation of his own — $15,000 from himself and $15,000 from his wife, Caroline.

“We have to do our part in helping them, because we physically couldn’t be there helping,” Munsick said. “It’s been pretty crazy to see the small community just rally behind this. And we have raised quite a bit of money in the last 12 hours, which is pretty cool to see.”

Advertisement

The fund has already exceeded the initial goal of $50,000 and had topped $76,000 by Sunday morning. Munsick was pleased, but not surprised to see the fund grow so quickly.

That’s just the Wyoming that he knows and loves, where there’s always a cowboy ready to lend a hand.

In this photo shared to her Facebook post about returning to her ranch after the Elk Fire moved through, Laura Eaton describes and shows how the fire didn't get their buildings.
In this photo shared to her Facebook post about returning to her ranch after the Elk Fire moved through, Laura Eaton describes and shows how the fire didn’t get their buildings. (Laura Eaton photo via Facebook)

Still Growing

Now at nearly 73,000 acres, the fire remains “extremely active,” the Rocky Mountain Incident Management Team in charge of battling the Elk Fire reports Sunday morning.

The weather also isn’t helping, with a cold front bringing dry winds and low humidity, which is blowing the fire in multiple directions. And there isn’t much relief on the way from the weather.

“Sunday is the beginning of a warming and drying trend as high pressure builds over the region,” the update says, although it’s expected to be less windy.

There are nearly 600 people working to build breaks and lines around the fire, as well as clear out or burn any fuels within where safe to do so.

Advertisement

No new evacuations were ordered overnight Saturday, and none were lifted. Those area ordered to leave are:

• The area within Eaton’s Ranch Road to the intersection of Beckton Road, then south to Big Goose Road and west to Rapid Creek.

• Little Horn Canyon

• Eaton’s Ranch.

• Tongue River Canyon.

Advertisement

• Pass Creek and Twin Creek roads west of Parkman.

• All homes from X-X Ranch north to the Montana state line.

• Tongue River Canyon west of Dayton where the road turns to dirt.

• The Horseshoe subdivision.

• Homes west of Beckton Road from Dayton south to the intersection of Beckton and Eaton • Ranch roads.

Advertisement

• Eagle Ridge subdivision and homes directly east of U.S. Highway 14 up the mountain.

Along with Dayton now on “set” status, so are:

• South of Twin Creek Road from Parkman north of Amsden Road; also west of Highway 343, including along Smith Creek and Columbus Creek roads.

• Homes east of Tongue Canyon and Amsden roads.

The best and most current information about the Elk Fire is being posted to the U.S. Forest Service-Bighorn National Forest and Sheridan County Government Facebook pages.

Advertisement

Greg Johnson can be reached at greg@cowboystatedaily.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wyoming

Called on to defend the rule of law, Wyoming’s delegation says judges, not Trump, are the problem – WyoFile

Published

on

Called on to defend the rule of law, Wyoming’s delegation says judges, not Trump, are the problem – WyoFile


The judiciary holds too much power and Congress should curb its authority, Wyoming’s federal delegation argued in response to Equality State lawyers and retired judges who called on them to defend “American Rule of Law” from attacks by President Donald Trump and his billionaire ally Elon Musk.

In an April 11 letter, Rep. Harriet Hageman and Sens. John Barrasso and Cynthia Lummis said the federal judiciary has drawn scrutiny on itself. “Unelected judges imposing their policy biases on our nation without democratic legitimacy are the root cause of today’s controversy,” they wrote. 

The politicians largely sidestepped the central tenet of an open letter signed by more than 100 Wyoming lawyers and retired judges and published late last month. That letter had called on Hageman, Barrasso and Lummis to condemn an increase in personal attacks and calls for impeachment led by the president and his allies on federal judges who issue court decisions they dislike.

The Wyoming jurists who signed that missive focused on Trump’s calls to impeach specific judges who ruled against his policies, and social media posts by Musk calling a judge’s ruling an “attempted coup,” among other criticisms. 

Advertisement

The letter also cited threats of violence against judges, a phenomenon U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has said is on the rise. It also noted Trump’s efforts to target law firms he doesn’t like. “These attacks are part of a growing effort to discredit, not just judges, but seemingly the American Rule of Law,” the letter stated. 

The delegation’s response does not mention the president, Musk or threats of violence against judges. 

Instead, Barrasso, Lummis and Hageman wrote that “the country is witnessing a healthy debate right now about the appropriate role of judges,” according to a copy of the letter obtained by WyoFile. The federal lawmakers also cited legislation they were cosponsoring to eliminate judges’ authority to issue nationwide injunctions on actions by the federal government. 

“I think the delegation sort of missed the point,” former Wyoming governor and longtime attorney Mike Sullivan told WyoFile on Monday. “This was not a partisan effort. This is a legitimate, serious and what I think is a constitutional concern about the judiciary and the rule of law.”

Last week, House Republicans including Hageman passed the No Rogue Rulings Act, which would curb judges’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions. Republican lawmakers did so in response to a series of court rulings against aspects of Trump’s agenda — particularly elements of his mass deportation effort that judges found could violate peoples’ civil rights, and parts of the Musk-driven effort to cut budgets and staffing levels across the federal government. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has introduced a similar measure in the Senate.

Advertisement
U.S. Rep. Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., leans forward to listen to a member of the crowd attending her town hall event on March 19, 2025, in Laramie. (Megan Johnson/WyoFile)

“Both the legislative and the executive branches are rightfully using their constitutional checks and balances to address judicial overreach,” Hageman, Barrasso and Lummis wrote in their letter.

In their letter, the Wyoming jurists told Lummis, Barrasso and Hageman the U.S. Constitution called on them to defend the judiciary from attacks, even if those attacks come from other branches of government. 

“As our elected federal representatives—and as required by your own oaths—we thus urge you to publicly condemn these threats, affirm judicial independence, and remind Americans that appeals—not violence, intimidation, or invitations to lawlessness—are the constitutional remedy for undesired court decisions,” the letter read. 

Though the delegation in its letter described a bipartisan drive for judicial reform, the No Rogue Rulings Act did not draw any support from Democrats in the House and will likely die in the Senate, where it won’t be able to garner 60 votes, according to a report in Politico.

Lummis, Barrasso and Hageman expressed pique at the letter authors’ choice of an open letter. Among the letter’s more noted signees were former Gov. Mike Sullivan; retired Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justices Marilyn Kite, Michael Golden, Michael Davis and E. James Burke; retired U.S. District Court Chief Judge William Downes and former Wyoming Attorneys General Gay Woodhouse and Patrick Crank. 

Advertisement

(WyoFile board member Susan Stubson also signed on. She was not involved in the production of this report, and neither she nor any member of the WyoFile board have authority to direct news coverage or news content.)

Many of those attorneys are retired from public office and working in private practice, if not retired entirely. The jurists appear to have sought a public discussion, concluding their letter with: “We welcome your earliest public response to these very serious concerns.”

But the federal delegates said the more than 100 signees should have reached out as individuals.

“We are disappointed you failed to express your concerns with us directly before rushing to publish your letter,” they wrote. “A robust discussion about addressing the challenges and concerns facing our nation would be more beneficial than attempting to score political points through the press.” 

WyoFile reached out to signees of the original letter but did not receive a comment on the delegation’s response by early Monday afternoon. This story will be updated if that changes. 

Advertisement

Sullivan noted that the Wyoming attorneys published their letter in the wake of a highly unusual statement by Chief Justice Roberts, who protested Trump’s call for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg. Trump called for Boasberg’s impeachment after the judge issued a ruling momentarily halting one of Trump’s most controversial deportation policies. Judges are not politicians, Sullivan said, “and when they come down in a way that doesn’t agree with your position they shouldn’t be demeaned or defamed or threatened with impeachment.”

Those signing the letter have an obligation to maintain judicial independence, as does the delegation, the former governor said.

“This is a group that believes this ought to be a public discussion,” Sullivan said. “We have our own constitutional obligations as members of the bar, practicing before the judiciary, and we shouldn’t just sit back and let this happen. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming shed antler hunters support regulations, survey says

Published

on

Wyoming shed antler hunters support regulations, survey says





Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

New laws complicate Wyoming’s abortion situation as bans set to be argued in state Supreme Court | CNN

Published

on

New laws complicate Wyoming’s abortion situation as bans set to be argued in state Supreme Court | CNN



Casper, Wyoming
AP
 — 

When a Wyoming woman phoned the state’s only abortion clinic recently to make an appointment to end her pregnancy, she received news that complicated her life even more.

Wellspring Health Access had stopped providing abortions that same day, responding to a slew of new requirements for the Casper clinic to become a licensed surgical center.

“It was kind of really bad timing on my part,” said the woman, who declined to be named because of abortion’s stigma in her community.

Advertisement

Though abortion remains legal in Wyoming, it has become increasingly difficult because of new requirements for abortion clinics and women seeking abortions. In this case, the woman had to go to Colorado, which partially borders southern Wyoming.

On Wednesday, the Wyoming Supreme Court is set to hear arguments over state abortion bans that a lower court judge has suspended and struck down as unconstitutional. But even if the state high court agrees with those rulings, access to abortion in Wyoming stands to remain uncertain.

One new law targets Wellspring Health Access as Wyoming’s only abortion clinic, requiring licensure as an outpatient surgical center at a cost of up to $500,000 in renovations, according to the clinic.

The law also requires the clinic’s physicians to get admitting privileges at a hospital within 10 miles. A hospital three blocks from the clinic is under no obligation to admit its doctors, however.

“This is an abortion ban without banning abortion,” said Julie Burkhart, founder and president of Wellspring Health Access.

Advertisement

A second new law requires women to get ultrasounds at least 48 hours before a medication abortion, costing them $250 or more plus gas money and travel time in a state where ultrasounds are unavailable in many rural areas.

The Wyoming Legislature is well within its rights to regulate abortion to protect women from even the small chance of an abortion mishap, argued an attorney for the state, John Woykovsky, at a recent court hearing on the new laws.

In most cases, a transvaginal ultrasound is required to obtain a fetal image in the earliest stages of pregnancy, when most abortions are done. That invasiveness, especially for victims of rape and abuse, caused Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, to veto the ultrasound bill a few days after he signed the surgical center requirement into law Feb. 27.

The Republican-dominated Legislature overrode his veto, leading Wellspring Health Access, the Wyoming abortion access advocate Chelsea’s Fund and others to sue over it and the licensing law.

Meanwhile, the legal uncertainty caused Wellspring Health Access, which opened in 2023 after an arson attack delayed the original date by almost a year, to halt both medication and surgical abortions.

Advertisement

Several dozen abortion opponents attended a Tuesday hearing in Casper on whether to suspend the laws while the lawsuit moves ahead. If that happens, clinic abortions will resume, to the dismay of opponents, said Ross Schriftman, president of the local Wyoming Right to Life chapter.

“No inspections, no confirmation of whether the people committing the abortions are licensed doctors for Wyoming and no continuity of care to the hospital,” Schriftman said by email.

A former Wyoming resident who, in 2017, got an abortion in neighboring Colorado, her closest option at the time, sympathized with rural Wyoming women seeking abortions now.

“God forbid it’s the winter,” said Ciel Newman, who now lives in New Mexico. “Wyoming’s a huge, rural state without much interstate coverage.”

The amount of business at Wellspring Health Access shows that the lawmakers who passed the abortion laws are out of step with their constituents, Burkhart said.

Advertisement

“We have had people coming in our doors each and every week that we’ve been open,” Burkhart said. “If people who come from Republican states, or more traditional-leaning states, didn’t approve of abortion, we would go out of business because people just wouldn’t show up.”

In the case about to be argued before the state Supreme Court, the same groups and women are suing over laws banning abortion that Wyoming has passed since 2022. They include the first explicit ban on medication abortions in the US.

In November, a judge in Jackson ruled the bans violated a 2012 constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right of competent adults to make their own health care decisions.

Even if the justices agree, Wellspring Health Access stands to suffer. Before the new laws, the clinic saw as many as 22 patients a day, 70% of whom were there for abortions: half surgical, half by pills.

Now, Wellspring Health Access doesn’t offer abortions and sees about five patients a day, all of whom are transgender people receiving hormone replacement therapy, according to the clinic.

Advertisement

Twenty-three other states, including 14 that have not totally banned abortion, have passed requirements similar to Wyoming’s that opponents call “targeted regulation of abortion providers,” or TRAP, laws. Surgical center licensing and hospital admitting privileges are typical requirements, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that advocates for abortion access.

Few states have passed TRAP laws since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, but abortion remains an unsettled issue in several. A licensing law in Missouri stood to curtail abortions until it was blocked by a judge, pointed out Kimya Forouzan, state policy advisor for the Guttmacher Institute.

“They still have a major impact on the ability to provide care,” Forouzan said in an email.

The Wyoming woman recently seeking a surgical abortion at Wellspring Health Access had to drive more than twice as far from her hometown, more than four hours each way, to have the procedure at the Planned Parenthood in Fort Collins, Colorado.

“Even though I support abortion fully, it’s not something that I thought I personally would ever do,” the woman said, adding that Wellspring Health Access helped cover her costs.

Advertisement

“It was a humbling experience,” she said. “It just gave me a lot more compassion for people who have experienced abortions as well as people who aren’t able to take that route.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending