Connect with us

Washington

This American president’s rejection of monarchs and dictators resonates today | Opinion

Published

on

This American president’s rejection of monarchs and dictators resonates today | Opinion



Little did our founders know the immense and lasting impact that George Washington’s approach to power would have, not only on America but on the future of democracy across the globe

play

  • George Washington, despite initial doubts about his abilities, successfully led the American army to victory against the British.
  • Washington’s strategic avoidance of direct confrontation with the British and his perseverance were key to the American triumph.
  • After the war, Washington made the extraordinary decision to relinquish his military command, setting a precedent for civilian rule.
  • Washington’s resignation solidified his reputation as a selfless leader and influenced the development of democracy in America and beyond.

Two hundred and fifty years ago, the Second Continental Congress appointed George Washington to be commander in chief of the newly formed American army. Never before had a war been fought for the principles of liberty and self-government. But here they were, a diverse band of soldiers with many accents and many backgrounds, from cities, towns, and villages up and down the East Coast, fighting for the ideal of independence and the glorious goal of government by consent of the governed.

Perhaps anticipating the appointment, Washington arrived at the first session of Congress in military uniform. Thanks to the British, he had more military experience than most Americans; he had scouted the west, urged the French to leave the country, and fought valiantly on behalf of the British during the French and Indian War.   

By any reasonable account, winning the American fight for independence was virtually impossible. The Americans had no standing army, military academy, or formal military training. Its soldiers consisted of volunteers, formed into local militias of varying size, capability, and commitment. It’s no wonder that Washington expressed his fear of failure in accepting the command, telling the Congress, “I feel great distress from a consciousness that my abilities and military experience may not be equal to the extensive and important trust.”

Washington overcame odds to defeat British Army

And yet, over the next eight and a half years, Washington made the impossible possible. With nearly superhuman patience, he took command of a ragtag band of soldiers and turned them into a disciplined army. At the outset, there were few willing soldiers and even less food, guns, and equipment. The horrible winter of Valley Forge was only one episode of many in which American soldiers and their commander endured grueling and dangerous circumstances with little promise of remuneration.

Advertisement

Washington wisely adopted a strategy of avoiding the British head-on, moving his troops quickly and then striking by surprise. Faced with the vast expanses of the American continent, the expense of an overseas endeavor, and the relentless determination of General Washington and the American people, the British could not keep up. And their enemy abroad — the French — were only too pleased to intervene on behalf of the colonists to tighten the screws.

Legend has it that in Yorktown, as the British surrendered, their musicians played “The World Turned Upside Down.” For many, the world did seem upside down. American forces — led by General George Washington — had faced down the greatest army on earth. The “lobsterbacks” relinquished their arms, returned home, and left Washington and the victorious colonies with the momentous challenge of starting a new and independent nation.

It was to be many months before a peace treaty was signed. British troops still threatened New York City, and the Continental Army remained on duty, waiting for pay. The soldiers sought a lump cash payment to be distributed when they left the Army. But with no response from Congress, the troops grew restive and threatened to march on Congress.

Washington’s most extraordinary move was to relinquish power

In a now-famous and emotional appeal, Washington met with the soldiers in Newburgh, New York, and asked for their understanding. Reaching for his glasses, he said, “Gentlemen, you will permit me to put on my spectacles, for I have not only grown gray, but almost blind in the service of my country.” The march on Congress was not to be.

Advertisement

Having accomplished the impossible, Washington then did the extraordinary. He gave up his military command.

As he returned to his beloved Mount Vernon in Virginia, Washington stopped in Annapolis, Maryland, to meet again with the Continental Congress. Standing before the assembled body, he resigned his commission.

“Having now finished the work assigned me,” Washington said, “I retire from the great theatre of action, and bidding an affectionate farewell to this august body under whose orders I have so long acted, I here offer my commission and take my leave of all the employments of public life.” This one act was so remarkable that King George III in England is reported to have exclaimed, “If he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world.” 

Advertisement

Little did our founders know the immense and lasting impact that George Washington’s approach to power would have, not only on America but on the future of democracy across the globe. First, the indispensable commander of a revolution. Then, America’s Cincinnatus — the Roman statesman who famously gave up power and returned to his farm after saving the republic.

Washington’s unprecedented return of power set the new country on a unique path, one that rejected monarchs and dictators in favor of civilian rule and government by the people. Two hundred and fifty years later, all Americans — and untold millions around the world — remain the beneficiaries.

Anne Neal Petri, of Fond du Lac, is the regent of the Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association. The association has owned and managed George Washington’s Mount Vernon since 1858 and takes no government support.



Source link

Advertisement

Washington

Trump’s proposed 250ft Washington arch clears key planning hurdle

Published

on

Trump’s proposed 250ft Washington arch clears key planning hurdle


Donald Trump’s plans to build a skyline-altering arch in the nation’s capital won initial approval Thursday from a key federal commission, but its members put off a decision on whether a federal law that limits building heights should be applied to this project.

Despite overwhelming public opposition, the National Capital Planning Commission voted to approve preliminary site and building plans for the 250ft (76m) arch the Republican president wants to build on a traffic circle at the Virginia end of the Memorial Bridge from Washington.

The project, one of several being pursued by Trump in his quest to reshape parts of the nation’s capital to his liking, moved a step closer to reality with the vote.

Staff had recommended in its report on the project that the commission grant such approval and request a series of changes so the arch would comply with the Height of Buildings Act. The suggested changes included redistributing the heights among the main structure of the arch, the habitable roof, where an observation deck is planned, and the statues that would top it.

Advertisement

But commissioners, led by chair Will Scharf, voted to continue deliberations on whether the law indeed applies.

The staff report said the commission has long applied the law in its approval process. Scharf said the applicant, which is the interior department, had, as requested, provided a legal analysis that he said makes a “compelling argument” that the law “is not binding on the federal government”.

The interior department oversees the federal land where the arch would be built.

Eight of the 12 commissioners, including Scharf and two others appointed by Trump, voted for preliminary approval. One was against, and the remaining three commissioners voted present.

“This is a complex project,” Scharf said before the vote. He said a vote on final approval could come at the agency’s next meeting, in September.

Advertisement

All 12 commissioners listened to a summary of the staff report and its recommendations, and heard from several dozen people who had signed up to testify about the project.

As the commissioners met, construction continued at the White House on a $400m ballroom Trump is building there and crews draped tarps over the stone columns at the north entrance to the mansion, where work is being done to scrape off layers of paint.

Some of those who testified against Trump’s project opposed building a celebratory arch so close to Arlington national cemetery. Others suggested it would be more appropriate for a neighborhood near the Capitol and sporting venues.

Opponents say the arch is too big and would disrupt the carefully designed view between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington national cemetery that was meant to symbolize the reunification of the north and the south after the civil war.

The arch would be more than twice as tall as the Lincoln Memorial, which is 99ft (30m) tall, and close to half the height of the Washington Monument, at about 555ft (169m) tall.

Advertisement

Concerns about vehicular traffic and pedestrian safety also were expressed on Thursday. Others insisted that Congress must approve the arch – a position Trump disagrees with.

The US Commission of Fine Arts, a separate federal agency, approved the design for the arch in May. The National Capital Planning Commission oversees construction on federal land in the city and began reviewing the arch plan in June.

Trump had said last year that the arch could be paid for with unused funds from the hundreds of millions of dollars he said he has raised from corporations, donors and other wealthy people to pay to build a new $400m ballroom at the White House.

But, as it turns out, some public money will be used for the ballroom project, as well as the arch. The White House has not released a cost estimate for the arch.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Commanders are retiring Hall of Famer John Riggins’ No. 44

Published

on

Washington Commanders are retiring Hall of Famer John Riggins’ No. 44


The Washington Commanders are retiring John Riggins’ No. 44 during the upcoming NFL season, the team announced Thursday.

The Hall of Fame running back will be honored in a ceremony at halftime of the team’s game against the Los Angeles Rams on Nov. 8.

“There are certain players whose impact goes far beyond statistics, championships and accolades: They become woven into the identity of a franchise,” controlling owner Josh Harris said in a statement. “John Riggins is one of those players. …Our fans not only admired him, they identified with him. He is authentic, unapologetically himself and deeply connected to the people around him. John has meant so much to this franchise, our fans and the game of football.”

Riggins is the organization’s all-time leading rusher with 7,472 yards and 79 touchdowns on 1,988 carries and helped the team win the Super Bowl in the 1982 season.

Advertisement

The fan favorite nicknamed “Riggo” was the MVP of that Super Bowl for his performance best known for his memorable 43-yard TD run in the fourth quarter that put Washington ahead of the Miami Dolphins. He was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1992.

Riggins is the seventh player to have his number retired by the team, joining Sammy Baugh, Bobby Mitchell, Sean Taylor, Sonny Jurgensen, Darrell Green and Art Monk. Green, Monk and Riggins have all happened since Harris’ group took over from longtime owner Dan Snyder.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Future uncertain for site of former Mount Washington church destroyed in massive fire

Published

on

Future uncertain for site of former Mount Washington church destroyed in massive fire






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending