Washington
The Pants Predicts: Iowa vs Washington
The Hawkeyes are back at home with their tail between their legs after getting pummeled by Ohio State last week. Now they try to get back on track with a matchup with the Washington Huskies.
Our friends over at DraftKings Sportsbook expect them to have some success as they have Iowa favored by 3 in this one. The over/under is set at 42.5 total points, which puts the implied final score at 22.75-19.75 (call it 23-20).
Here at The Pants, we’re a bit torn. Of our participating staff, just over half is on the Hawks to get a win. Our average score prediction is Iowa 20.6, Washington 20.2. That puts us back on the under (finally!!) and taking the Huskies with the points.
Feels good to be pessimistic again, doesn’t it Hawkeye fans?
Anyway, here’s a look at our individual predictions for Saturday’s matchup.
SirNicholas33
I’m worried about this game. Really worried.
Washington owns one of the losses in the stat going around regarding travel in league play. You’ve probably seen it – Big Ten teams are 1-8 when having to travel two or more time zones, either east or west. The lone win is Indiana at UCLA.
Here’s the thing though – Washington completely dominated the game they lost, at Rutgers, only to be undone by missing not one, not two, but THREE field goals in a game they lost by 3 (misses from 42, 37, and 55 yards; the 55-yarder was at the buzzer). They outgained Rutgers 521-299. They had zero turnovers. And they lost. This is a good team that has two tough losses (the second loss was the Apple Cup in which they were stuffed on 4th and goal from the 1 in the final seconds of the game).
Now, perhaps their body clocks will be off with the early kickoff. We see west coast-based NFL teams struggle with early kickoffs when they get to the central or eastern time zones all the time, and they’re professionals. We’ve seen it in college – the Stanford team that smashed Iowa in the Rose Bowl started the season at Northwestern (early kickoff, so 9:00 a.m. on their body clocks) and lost by 10.
But if that is the card we have to play in hopes of winning this game…that’s not good, you guys. Not good at all. I do think their run defense is a little suspect and that’s an advantage for Iowa given they have Kaleb Johnson, but this is going to be nip and tuck the whole way. I think Iowa will hang on and win, but I will not be surprised at all if Iowa loses this, they’re 3-3, and any goals for the season are officially gone. Iowa wins, we exhale, then we kick on to the next make-or-break game.
Prediction: Iowa 24, Washington 21
JPinIC
I have to admit, the Huskies have performed better than I expected when they turned over their coaching staff and the vast majority of their roster this offseason. I thought this was a 6-win team and they’ve looked better than that, especially knocking off Michigan a week ago.
I will also say the Hawkeyes have underperformed my expectations on both sides of the ball so far this season. Not by a lot, but the secondary is not as sure as I thought it would be and Cade McNamara’s complete inability to stretch a defense with vertical throws has disappointed.
But at the end of the day, the Huskies are coming off an incredibly emotional win over a top-10 team that defeated them in the national title a year ago. That’s a prime set up for a letdown. Add in that they get to travel across two time zones, where Big Ten teams are 1-8 on the year (the lone win being Indiana at UCLA and Washington being among those to already lose such a game at Rutgers) and this has all the markings of a complete no-show from Washington.
Oh, it’s also at 11am CT/9am PT? Yeah, I think the Huskies really fall off from a week ago. This sets up like a Kaleb Johnson game to me. I expect him to get 20+ touches and turn that into 150+ yards and multiple scores. I still don’t have any confidence in the passing game, but I think we see some things work underneath based off the run and the defense creates multiple turnovers.
Prediction: Iowa 24, Washington 16
Bartt Pierce
This season is not going like I thought it would. The crazy thing is that I never expected us to lose to Iowa State. This season already has a pretty big downer vibe for me; I’m sure it’s because the Hawks don’t typically blow a lead at home like they did against ISU. Ohio State is one of the best three teams in the country. It’s time for the Hawks to stack some wins. Our offense is improved. Phil Parker and LeVar Woods are incredible coordinators. I just don’t feel like this is our year. Please prove me wrong, Hawks. I love you no matter what. It still has a must-win feel to me. A loss at home against Washington and folks are gonna start looking ahead to basketball and wrestling. I’m picking against our boys. It worked for me in 2020. Go Hawks!
Prediction: Washington 20, Iowa 13
MattReisener
This game feel like a must-win for Iowa if they want to avoid watching this one-promising season go sideways fast. Unfortunately, Washington is far from a pushover. One year after having one of the worst pass defenses in football, the Huskies have a legitimate claim to being the best pass in football at this same metric, leading the FBS in opponent completion percentage (46.7%), yards per pass attempt (4.5), and passer rating (85.31). Even after losing several key players from their national-runner up team, the Washington offense is still formidable thanks to quarterback Will Rogers, running back Jonah Coleman, and a dangerous duo of wide receivers. Given Iowa’s struggles defending the pass this season, the balanced Washington attack could create opportunities for the Huskies to attack Iowa downfield.
Still, the Hawkeyes may have a slight advantage in this game. Kaleb Johnson should be able to move the ball on the ground, Washington’s tendency to commit penalties should play right into the hands of Iowa’s bend-but-don’t-break defense, the Husky kicking game has been shaky this season, and the home crowd should be rocking in this high-profile matchup. Washington may also be susceptible to a let-down after avenging their national championship loss to Michigan last week, which could be compounded by what will feel like a 9:00 AM kickoff for a west coast team. If Iowa can avoid turning the ball over and surrendering big plays, the Hawkeyes should be able to eek out a win.
Prediction: Iowa 21, Washington 20
GingerHawk
Before the season I had this game down as a loss and I’m still debating whether or not to change my mind. The Huskies lost a lot from last year’s national championship runner up team but that doesn’t mean they’re a shell of their ‘23 self. Michael Penix Jr. is off to the NFL but in his place, Will Rogers has already thrown for over 1600 yards, 12 touchdowns, and only one interception. He’s connected with receiver Denzel Boston for 8 of those scores. They’re actually ranked #8 in total defense on the year as well, allowing 256 yards and 13.17 points per game.
Iowa’s offense is much improved but this will still be a battle. Cade needs to take better care of the ball than what we saw last week and be smart with his throws. Lean on Kaleb Johnson and the running game where the Husky defense isn’t as strong. Defensively, this is a prove it game for Iowa’s secondary after giving up more big plays than we’re used to seeing. Throw out last week’s game, nobody else Iowa will face has Ohio State’s receivers. But the Rogers-Boston connection can be dangerous, so this will be an opportunity for Iowa’s pass defense to put those doubts to rest.
I want to believe Washington emptied the tank last week to get revenge against Michigan, and that coupled with the famous 2+ timezone jump and early kickoff will work against the Huskies this weekend. Because I’m a man of my word I’ll stick to my preseason prediction, but I am this close to going the other way.
Prediction: Washington 24, Iowa 21
So that’s how we see things playing out on Saturday. How about you, Hawkeyes fans? Let us know in the comments below.
Washington
Black bear injures teen hiker in Washington state mountain area
A black bear injured a teenage boy hiking in a mountainous recreation area outside Seattle on Tuesday, officials said, prompting a closure of the trail where it happened.
The boy was scratched when the bear charged and “swiped” at him in the early afternoon about 2.7 miles up Mount Si Trail, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife said.
He was one of three people hiking together along the trail in the the Mount Si Natural Resources Conservation Area, the department said in a statement.
“His injuries were very minor, but he was of course terrified,” King County Sheriff’s Office deputy Peter Linde told NBC affiliate KING of Seattle. “The bear tossed him around a little bit, but nothing serious. He’s on his way to the hospital right now to be checked out, get the wounds clean, and maybe get some antibiotics.”
King County Search and Rescue crews responded alongside the department’s own officers and transported the teen to a hospital for treatment, the fish and wildlife department said.
A separate group of hikers had another black bear encounter Tuesday when the animal followed them closely for “several miles,” the department said.
No other injuries were reported.
Fish and wildlife officials ultimately closed the Mount Si Trail so officers could search for the bear, it said.
The Washington State Department of Natural Resources said other nearby trails, including the Little Si and Mount Teneriffe trails and trailheads, have been closed “until further notice due to bear activity.”
“Please stay out of the area,” it said.
The state has recorded one death from a black bear encounter, in 1974. Twenty encounters have resulted in injury since 1970, the latest before Tuesday’s incident taking place in 2022, the Department of Fish and Wildlife said.
Mount Si Natural Resources Conservation Area, a scenic state landmark composed of four mountain peaks, is about 35 miles east-southeast of Seattle.
Washington
Suspect in deadly shooting of National Guard troops pleads not guilty to new charges
A man accused of shooting two National Guard troops near the White House, killing one of them, pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to charges in a new indictment that make him eligible for a possible death sentence if he is convicted.
Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan national, was arraigned on 17 counts, including first-degree murder, in the new indictment handed up by a federal grand jury in Washington. Lakanwal originally pleaded not guilty in January to nine charges in the November 2025 shooting that killed Spc. Sarah Beckstrom and critically wounded Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe.
Before the Justice Department announces whether it will seek the death penalty against Lakanwal, his defense attorneys can meet with prosecutors and present any evidence that they believe weighs against a death sentence.
Beckstrom, 20, and Wolfe, 24, were deployed with the West Virginia National Guard for the federal law-enforcement surge that began in August in Washington, D.C., at the direction of President Donald Trump.
Lakanwal is accused of driving to the nation’s capital from Bellingham, Washington, while in possession of a stolen firearm and ambushing the two Guard members outside a subway station three blocks from the White House.
Another National Guard member heard gunshots and saw Beckstrom and Wolfe fall to the ground as Lakanwal fired a gun and screamed, “Allahu Akbar!” according to a police report.
Lakanwal, who was shot during the confrontation, was seated in a wheelchair during his arraignment on Tuesday. He didn’t speak during the hearing; one of his attorneys entered a not guilty plea on his behalf.
Lakanwal entered the U.S. in 2021 through a Biden administration program that evacuated and resettled tens of thousands of Afghans after the U.S. withdrawal from the country. Lakanwal worked with the American government, including the CIA, “as a member of a partner force” in Kandahar, Afghanistan, CIA Director John Ratcliffe has said.
Lakanwal is due back in court Sept. 16. A trial date for his case hasn’t been scheduled yet.
Washington
Washington mayoral candidates outline how they would stand up to Trump
There’s a transplant from Mar-a-Lago at the center of DCs mayoral primary race on Tuesday, but his name is nowhere on the ballot.
For the first time in more than a decade, Washington DC will have a new mayor this year as the city faces concerns about how to address public safety, housing affordability, and increased federal immigration enforcement in the district. How the next mayor handles Donald Trump is also key question on residents’ minds, with many closely watching to see if any of the president’s supporters are pouring money into the race, as well as the primaries for the city’s congressional delegate.
Two frontrunners, DC councilmember Janeese Lewis George and former councilmember Kenyan McDuffie, both Democrats, are vying to succeed Mayor Muriel Bowser, who led the city during both of Trump’s terms in office. In a Democratic stronghold, whoever wins the primary is likely to win the election in November.
Lewis George, a democratic socialist and two-term city councilmember, has been campaigning on what she calls a “people-first platform”, promising to lower childcare costs and utility bills, stabilize rent for tenants, and prioritize downpayment assistance for homebuyers.
McDuffie, a former at-large city councilmember and former prosecutor, has garnered support from much of Washington’s business community, including restaurants and realtors, while promising to expand affordable housing, improve public safety, and diversify the local economy.
Trump weighed in a week before the election – threatening DC home rule, which allows district residents to elect their own mayor and council, if Lewis George wins the mayoral primary. “I wouldn’t like it. Maybe we take back Washington and run it on the federal basis. We won’t put up with it,” he said.
Meanwhile, Bowser, who has had her own trying journey with the administration, expressed her support for McDuffie, but stopped short of a full endorsement. “I have always supported Kenyan McDuffie … [but] I’m not endorsing or making any endorsements for mayor because I’m stepping off the political stage,” said Bowser during an Axios event on 10 June.
During interviews with the Guardian, both leading candidates outlined how they would stand up to the current administration.
Lewis George said she plans to build relationships with members of Congress while also looking for areas of compromise with the Trump administration.
“My approach to Donald Trump is one where I set a line that there is going to have to be [that] DC autonomy and DC statehood are non-negotiables, our immigrant community and neighbors, our Black youth are non-negotiables,” said Lewis George. “But if there are things you want to work with together, I’m happy to do that … I look at Union Station as an opportunity to build and create a regional transit hub and create jobs for our city.”
If elected, McDuffie said he would be a “fighter” for Washingtonians, working with the attorney general to preserve DC home rule.
“Washington DC residents deserve leaders who will never back down from Congress or the White House when they attempt to undermine our autonomy, and I have consistently opposed federal interference in DC’s local affairs and fought to protect our rights to govern ourselves,” he said. “We know as local officials what’s best for local Washington DC, and we are really working hard to make sure that we can protect our home rule.”
In response to increased federal immigration activity in the city, Lewis George said she would rescind former chief of police Pamela Smith’s executive order, which directs Metropolitan Police Department officers to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement for individuals not in police custody.
“Our officers need to be focused on getting guns off our streets and solving crimes. It is not their jobs to be alongside or babysitting or transporting federal immigration officers across the city to wreak havoc on our communities in our neighborhoods,” she said.
McDuffie offered a different approach.
“On day one, I’m going to appoint a police chief and a chancellor of our school system, and to make sure that we have an interagency coordinated effort to tackle the biggest challenge facing Washington DC residents right now, which is affordability,” said McDuffie.
Throughout this election, Democratic candidates have pushed to distance themselves from Trump while attempting to connect him and Republicans to their opponents, and ramped up attacks on each others campaigns.
In a recent televised debate on NBC4 Washington, Lewis George accused McDuffie of accepting “tens of thousands of dollars from Trump’s supporters”, though it was actually a relatively small number of donors who have given to both Trump and McDuffie.
“My principal opponent has been running a disinformation campaign that rivals Trump in spreading rumors and innuendo about donors to my campaign,” McDuffie said. “The reality is I have largely 99.9% of my donations have come from Democrats and independents who agree that I am best qualified to lead Washington DC and make our city safer and more affordable.”
Days before the election, the DC Office of Campaign Finance fined Lewis George $16,000 after it investigated her campaign for improperly coordinating with unions that also manage an independent political action committee.
The campaign said it will appeal the order, calling it a “reckless order … riddled with factual errors”. Lewis George’s team also raised concerns about the process. “Filing an order without legal merit just before an election follows a disturbing pattern of OCF’s conduct,” said the campaign in a written statement.
“I want [voters] to see through the political attacks and this political strategy to try to muddy the waters. It is clear that there is a candidate in this race who is accepting Trump donor dollars, big Trump donor dollars, and that is my opponent, Mr McDuffie, who has accepted those dollars and refused to return them,” said Lewis George before the OCF decision.
Conservative dollars have also appeared in the race to replace Eleanor Holmes Norton, the city’s non-voting House delegate for Congress. Five Democratic candidates are running to succeed Norton, and one of the more well-known candidates, Brooke Pinto, also a city councilmember, has reportedly received nearly $170,000 from donors who have also contributed to Trump and other Republican candidates in the past.
In a social media video response, Pinto said five of her donors out of nearly 2,000 have previously donated to Trump, adding that her opponent, Robert White, also has donors who have given to the president.
“The difference, though, is that I understand what it means to build a broad tent coalition. I have support from Democratic socialists, and Democrats, and independents, and yes, even Republicans,” said Pinto in the video. “It’s time that we have someone in this seat who can work with a broad set of stakeholders to make sure that those values are carried out.”
Currently, Lewis George has an 11-point lead over McDuffie, according to a new poll released by the Washington Post and George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government. After the top frontrunners, these candidates are also on the ballot for DC mayor: Rini Sampath, Vincent Orange, Gary Goodweather, Ernest Johnson and Hope Solomon.
The 16 June primary also marks the first election using ranked choice voting in Washington DC.
This story was done in collaboration with URL Media
-
Rhode Island53 seconds ago
RI Lottery Mega Millions, Numbers Midday winning numbers for June 16, 2026
-
South-Carolina8 minutes agoU.S. strike on an alleged drug boat kills 1, leaves 2 survivors
-
South Dakota11 minutes ago
SD Lottery Mega Millions, Millionaire for Life winning numbers for June 16, 2026
-
Tennessee16 minutes agoJohn Rose visits Blountville amid quest for Tennessee governorship
-
Texas23 minutes agoBystanders rush to rescue passengers after small plane crashes on Texas highway | CNN
-
Utah26 minutes agoData center dominates candidate forum in Utah Senate president’s reelection bid
-
Vermont31 minutes ago
VT Lottery Mega Millions, Gimme 5 results for June 16, 2026
-
Virginia38 minutes agoNearly 660 housing units, 8 redesigned holes proposed for VB National Golf Course