Connect with us

Washington

How Monumental’s Virginia deal affects the Commanders’ stadium search

Published

on

How Monumental’s Virginia deal affects the Commanders’ stadium search


If approved, the deal to move the Washington Capitals and Wizards from downtown D.C. to Northern Virginia is likely to increase political pressure on the District to win the jurisdictional battle for the Commanders’ new stadium.

D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) would feel more urgency to land the NFL team she long has championed to return to the RFK Stadium site because of the public perception that she “lost” the Wizards and Capitals, according to Derek Hyra, a public administration and policy professor at American University.

Marc Ganis, the founder of Sportscorp Ltd. and a consultant to multiple leagues and teams, and one other person with direct knowledge of the Commanders’ stadium search, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the discussions, agreed with the broader characterization that the political pressure on Bowser to bring back the Commanders would increase if the Monumental deal goes through.

Ganis said Bowser’s $500 million offer to Monumental immediately set a new floor in financial negotiations for the Commanders — which is notable because Bowser had not previously discussed any direct public funds for the team.

Advertisement

But Beverly Perry, a senior adviser to the mayor who is spearheading D.C.’s efforts to bring back the Commanders, disagreed that the deal to move the Capitals and Wizards would affect the city’s pursuit of the football team.

“They’re independent of each other,” she said. “There is no way you can tie the two together.”

Buckner: Ted Leonsis makes wonderful promises. Ask D.C. what they’re worth.

The immediate ripple effects for D.C.’s competitors, Maryland and Virginia, are less clear. Experts have particularly conflicting views on whether the deal increases or decreases Virginia’s chances at the NFL team. But the deal to move the teams owned by Monumental Sports & Entertainment to Potomac Yard, which could involve the largest arena subsidy ever, sets the stage for a bidding war over the Commanders’ next stadium that could continue shaking the regional sports landscape.

For its part, the Commanders’ ownership group has been careful not to indicate a preference between jurisdictions.

Advertisement

“It’s all developing,” the person with direct knowledge of the Commanders’ stadium search said. “Obviously, D.C. needs a sports team. They need more than one sports team.”

D.C.’s pursuit of the Commanders is stuck in Congress. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) introduced a bill in July that would give D.C. greater control over the RFK site and make it a realistic option for the team. In late September — despite significant debate over whether the District should be allowed to use public funds to redevelop it into a stadiumthe bill advanced from the committee.

But the legislation has stalled. In October, the House spent weeks without a speaker, and more recently, House committees with jurisdiction over the bill have discussed changes, such as which federal agency would own the land or take on administrative functions, according to two people with knowledge of the legislative effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive deliberations. The House broke for the year Thursday without advancing the bill further.

Comer introduced the RFK bill as an extension and amendment of the city’s lease of the site with the National Park Service, which is slated to end in 2038 and restricts land usage to sports, recreation and entertainment. The bill may ultimately be rewritten as a land transfer, Perry said.

City officials expect the bill to pass “early next year,” a spokesperson for the mayor’s office said.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee, which has jurisdiction over the bill, did not respond to a request for comment.

After the splashy Monumental announcement Wednesday morning, Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) was asked if Virginia would still pursue the Commanders.

“We’re talking about basketball and hockey, a tremendous organization,” he said of Monumental. “The Commanders are going to have to decide what they’re going to do. Of course, we would engage in that discussion, but this is where our focus has been, and I’m so excited that it was able to come together in an announcement that truly reflects something that will be one-of-a-kind for the world.”

The cost of landing the Capitals and Wizards — $1.35 billion in state and local funds — could make Virginia less inclined to pursue an NFL team and help fund a multibillion-dollar stadium. The arena might also “diminish the market viability” of an NFL stadium because the commonwealth wouldn’t want to build a competing stadium-anchored, mixed-use development, said Terry Clower, director of the Center for Regional Analysis at George Mason University.

But Ganis argued Monumental’s potential move could actually make it easier for Virginia to land the Commanders.

Advertisement

“Virginia has put together a structure to help support the development of new sports facilities,” Ganis said. “It has crossed that line where they’ve made the decision, this is important to the community, to the state. They’ve come up with funding sources and broad parameters of a deal. When you’ve done it once, it’s a lot easier to do it a second time. We can use the example of Maryland for that.”

In 1986, two years after Jim Irsay moved the Baltimore Colts to Indianapolis, the Maryland General Assembly formed the Maryland Stadium Authority to try to land an expansion NFL team. The authority, which issued tax-exempt bonds to finance its operations, negotiated a long-term lease to retain the Orioles and open Oriole Park at Camden Yards in 1992. Three years later, the NFL approved the relocation of the Cleveland Browns to Baltimore as a new franchise, the Ravens.

This year, the Ravens renewed their lease at M&T Bank Stadium for 15 years, keeping them there through at least the 2037 season. An increase in bond authorization from the state allowed the MSA to provide $600 million to both the Ravens and the Orioles for stadium improvements. The Ravens announced last week they plan to use $430 million of their allocated funds for a multiyear renovation project.

Now, even though Virginia legislators are more open to working with the Commanders following the departure of former owner Daniel Snyder, they might be wary of asking constituents to support the funding of another sports stadium.

Two Virginia legislators, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive deliberations, said they didn’t believe it would be possible for the state to land the Commanders as well. But both said the Youngkin administration didn’t frame Monumental and the Commanders as an either-or proposition.

Advertisement

If Virginia’s interest or negotiating power is diminished, that would help the other two jurisdictions.

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D) has already begun to make his case for keeping the Commanders in Prince George’s County, and he also has said he’s willing to provide public funds for a new stadium. Moore could have the most to lose if FedEx Field isn’t replaced with a gleaming, multibillion-dollar stadium and a mixed-use development to attract year-round activity in the state. Moore has called his early efforts to persuade the team to stay in Landover “very aggressive.”

“Nothing about what we saw this week with the Wizards and the Capitals changes how we will continue to aggressively pursue a continued relationship with the Commanders,” Moore said in a radio appearance on 106.7 the Fan on Friday. In a statement Saturday, Carter Elliott IV, a spokesman for Moore, said the governor was “committed to continuing” the “long-standing partnership” with the Commanders.

Bowser’s negotiations draw scrutiny as D.C. could lose Capitals, Wizards

A more limited competition for the stadium would also help D.C. because, as Ganis and Hyra pointed out, the city has a ceiling on what it can offer to the Commanders.

Advertisement

“Bowser may not have much more to give them,” Ganis said. “Interestingly, I think Congress [which can reject or modify D.C.’s budget] might be more inclined to help with a football stadium than the arena. People still remember what the old Redskins meant to the city and to the politicians and to the people who would use the stadium to bring guests and things like that. There’s still memory of that when it was the only game in town.”

Others with knowledge of the Commanders’ plans have warned that funding and ancillary developments are parts of the equation but certainly are not the sole determinants of the location of their future stadium. In short: It’s about more than money.

Barry Svrluga, Laura Vozzella, Gregory S. Schneider and Michael Brice-Saddler contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Washington vs. Weber State Game Thread

Published

on

Washington vs. Weber State Game Thread


In roughly 30 minutes, a new era of Husky football kicks off on the Big Ten Network. As noted in the open thread posted earlier, this is your spot to comment on the game and follow along during all of the action with your fellow Husky fans.

We will be extremely loose with the definition of trolling and any offenders will be banned. Also, any comments directed at other posters will be deleted and the offenders may be placed on pre-moderate mode.

*****

Make sure you didn’t miss our week of scouting the Wildcats.

Advertisement

Weber State Offensive Preview

*****

Weber State defensive Preview

*****

Q&A with Wildcats beat reporter Brett Hein of the Standard-Examiner

Advertisement

*****

The Prediction

*****

How to Watch

*****

Advertisement

Go Dawgs!



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Tim Walz has 'gilded his record for political gain,' Washington Post columnist says

Published

on

Tim Walz has 'gilded his record for political gain,' Washington Post columnist says


Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker criticized Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for exaggerating elements of his career for “political gain” in an op-ed published on Friday. 

Advertisement

“I’m not saying that Walz lies, precisely,” Parker wrote in an op-ed headlined, “Tim Walz isn’t exactly what he seems.” “But he tends to gild his résumé for political gain.” 

Walz has been forced to defend a number of controversies that have emerged following Vice President Harris’ announcement that he would be her running mate. In particular, Walz has had to explain his record in the National Guard and his 2006 congressional campaign’s statements on his 1995 drunk driving incident. 

‘MASTERFUL SHAPESHIFTER’ WALZ GETS POINTED MESSAGE FROM MINNESOTA VOTERS AT STATE FAIR BOOTH

Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker criticized Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for exaggerating elements of his career for “political gain” in an op-ed published on Friday. (Scott Eisen)

Parker called out Walz’s statements about his 1995 arrest for drunk driving.

Advertisement

“Walz, then a 31-year-old high school teacher, was clocked at 96 mph in a 55-mph zone in Nebraska,” Parker wrote. “He was pulled over by a state trooper, who, upon smelling alcohol, asked Walz to take a field sobriety test, which he failed. Walz then submitted to a hospital for a blood test, which revealed his blood alcohol level to be 0.128, well above the state’s legal limit.” 

While that info is verifiable by police records, Walz’s 2006 congressional campaign staff told the press that the candidate was not drinking and actually failed to understand the police officer’s directions because of hearing loss, blaming an injury relating to his time in the National Guard. 

Parker also responded to Walz’s interview alongside Harris with CNN. 

WALZ ON ABORTION, RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IS ‘ON PAR WITH CHINA AND NORTH KOREA,’ SAYS PARENTAL RIGHTS ADVOCATE

Tim Walz speakimg

Veterans who served alongside Walz in the same battalion when he was in the National Guard have spoken out against his honesty about his service record.  (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“Morning show softballs may give comfort to the ill-prepared, but they deny viewers the content they need to be better-informed voters,” Parker wrote. “Nothing about the pair’s first (taped) interview Thursday night, with CNN’s Dana Bash, satisfied that imperative. Although Harris handled the interview relatively well, Walz seemed to be a mixed-up mess.”

Advertisement

“He answered none of the four questions he was asked, including whether he had misspoken when he said he had carried a gun ‘in war’ when he never was deployed to a combat zone,” Parker wrote. “A simple ‘yes’ might have sufficed, but instead he sputtered evasive nonsense and, to be rhetorically accurate, gobbledygook.”

Veterans who served alongside Walz in the same battalion when he was in the National Guard have spoken out against his honesty about his service record. 

The Harris-Walz campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Top prospects for Washington Capitals | NHL.com

Published

on

Top prospects for Washington Capitals | NHL.com


How acquired: Selected with No. 20 pick in 2022 NHL Draft
2023-24 season: Washington (NHL): 21 GP, 2-4-6; Hershey (AHL): 47 GP, 9-16-25

Miroshnichenko adapted well in his first season in North America, getting experience in the NHL and American Hockey League. After playing one game in the Stanley Cup Playoffs with Washington, the 20-year-old native of Ussuriysk, Russia, helped Hershey win its second consecutive Calder Cup championship with 12 points (seven goals, five assists) in 20 AHL playoff games.

Miroshnichenko (6-1, 185) will compete for an NHL roster spot in training camp but could return to Hershey to begin the season.

“We would like to see ‘Miro’ become a quality, well-rounded player,” Capitals coach Spencer Carbery said, “but also someone that can produce in the NHL and can be a potential 25-, 30-goal scorer. So you want to make sure we’re taking the necessary steps to enable that inside of him, and not putting him in a scenario where he’s playing 10 minutes and playing on the fourth line.”

Advertisement

Projected NHL arrival: This season



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending