Connect with us

Washington

Debate over the name of Washington’s NFL team is starting all over again

Published

on

Debate over the name of Washington’s NFL team is starting all over again


A day after assuming control of the Washington Commanders, Josh Harris beamed about taking over the NFL team he and co-owner Mitch Rales rooted for as kids.

“I grew up with Sonny Jurgensen, Billy Kilmer, Joe Theismann, Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Joe Gibbs, the Hogs, Darrell Green, John Riggins and the rest of these legends and three Super Bowl championships,” Harris said. “The then-Redskins were the team that everyone wanted to be a part of.”

Commanders Old Name Debate Football
josh Harris, the leader of a group buying the Washington Commanders, speaks at an introductory NFL football news conference at FedEx Field in Landover, Md., on July 21, 2023. It was noticeable when Harris and fellow new Commanders owner Magic Johnson referred to the old Redskins name in their opening news conference.

Advertisement

Alex Brandon / AP


Rales talked about moving to the area and giving up the Pittsburgh Steelers for the “then-Redskins.” The team hasn’t been called that since 2020 when Dan Snyder, under pressure from sponsors during the national reckoning on racism following the death of George Floyd, dropped the name he insisted over two decades as owner he’d never abandon.

With the group led by Harris that also includes Magic Johnson now referencing the former name, the debate is raging again over what the storied franchise is called today and should be called moving forward.

Controversy is back

While it’s almost certain Washington won’t be the Redskins again, advocates on both sides and experts watching carefully are split on the path forward less than two years since the Commanders re-brand.

“The Washington Redskins used to be probably a top-10 NFL brand,” said Michael Lewis, an Emory University marketing professor who specializes in sports marketing and analytics. “When I look at the data these days, they are probably the worst on just about every marketing metric. And so (the new owners) may have the intuition that we’ve got to steer it back to that heritage.”

Advertisement

That was certainly coach Ron Rivera’s message. When NBA star Kevin Durant made an appearance at training camp, Rivera said he knew “how much of a Washington Redskins/Commanders fan” he is. That came a week after Harris, Rales and Johnson publicly said the old name, which had been shunned over the past three years.

“Mr. Harris and that ownership group talked extensively about bringing back the glory,” Rivera said. “What Coach Gibbs did, the traditions, that alumni group of guys that are around, it’s hard to escape it. It really is. And that’s just the truth of the matter. And just so everybody knows, we do that with the utmost respect for the native tribes, for the American Indian. Any time that’s brought up, it is brought up with the utmost of respect.”

Native American advocacy groups that fought to get rid of the name and others around sports don’t see it that way. Crystal Echo Hawk, founder and executive director of the Native American-led nonprofit IllumiNative, said she was shocked, disgusted and stunned to hear the old name spoken again openly by team officials.

“It just felt like we slid back,” she said. “After everything that happened and the hard-fought victory to finally retire the dictionary-defined racial slur and everything that came post-George Floyd, it is just mind-blowing to me.”

Webster’s New World College Dictionary’s entry for “redskin” says it is “now considered by many to be an offensive term.”

Advertisement

One group pushing for the old name to return argues the opposite. Billy Dieckman, of the Native American Guardians Association, which has started a petition to bring back the old name, contends the term refers to a Native bloodroot ceremony for warriors, not a reference to skin color.

A “fresh start”?  

“It’s a status symbol. It’s not about ethnicity,” said Dieckman, whose name as a member of the Kiowa Tribe in Oklahoma is Tsay Goon Pi Tahlee. “The fact that (the new owners are) actually using the terminology again means a lot because it’s like they have an opportunity for a fresh start, and if they want to get that fresh start, this is the perfect opportunity.”

A fresh start – eventually another re-brand – is possible, but a return to the old name doesn’t appear in the cards. Team president Jason Wright, who was hired by Snyder in the summer of 2020 to run the business side of the organization and has remained in that job under new ownership, said on Washington radio last week it was “not being considered – period.”

That statement garnered criticism from the Native American Guardians Association – and praise from IllumiNative and the National Congress of American Indians, which said it wrote to the team in response to the renewed use of the old name to reiterate its opposition to Native mascots and imagery.

“The use of unsanctioned Native ‘themed’ sports mascots perpetuates harm and dehumanizes our citizens, impacting both Native and non-Native individuals, and particularly our children,” NCAI executive director Larry Wright Jr. said in a statement.

Advertisement

“NCAI remains committed to fostering a proactive partnership with Washington ‘Commanders’ leadership, ensuring that harmful pasts are not repeated with future generations.”

Possible paths  

While Lewis, the marketing professor, questions the upside of using the old name, he acknowledged the human nature of some longtime fans not feeling welcome since it was dropped.

That, he believes, could be solved by emphasizing the city – which was part of the transition period in 2020 and ’21 when “Washington Football Team” was the official name.

Charles Grantham, director of the Center for Sports Management at Seton Hall University, thinks talk about the name is secondary to changing the culture within the organization in the aftermath of the Snyder scandals that prompted the ownership change.

“The interest is there,” Grantham said. “The demand for the team is there. There’s no question about that. But what’s required and what’s needed is a cultural change, which Josh and Magic and the other 20-odd owners are pushing for.”

Advertisement

Evidence of that demand is clear: Camp drew thousands of fans, and the Commanders announced the Sept. 10 season opener at FedEx Field against Arizona was sold out.

Harris, when asked about the Commanders name at his introductory news conference, said it wasn’t about how he felt but “about how the city feels about all this stuff.”

A Washington Post poll conducted in February 2022 just after the name change found that, among 904 District of Columbia residents, 49% either disliked or hated the new moniker.

“It’s generic,” Lewis said. “The branding concept of the Commanders, they may have paid a lot of money for it, but it’s something that students would come up with in half an hour.”

Echo Hawk agrees about the shortfall of the Commanders name – just not with bringing back the past.

Advertisement

“So many people think that the Commanders name is a horrible name, so I’m not surprised that they might want to change that,” she said. “But why you would slide back into a legacy of racism is beyond me.”

For the new owners, specifically Harris and Rales, Redskins was the name of the team when they were growing up in Maryland and going to RFK Stadium as fans.

“We never missed a game,” Rales said.

That also was when Washington was winning. Under Gibbs, the team won the Super Bowl three times in the 1980s and early ’90s.

Under three different names, Washington has made the playoffs just six times in 30 years.

Advertisement

“The Redskins have three Super Bowls. The Commanders have zero,” Lewis said. “It’s that simple at some level.”



Source link

Washington

Families of victims to drunk driving gather in Washington DC, calling for action from congress

Published

on

Families of victims to drunk driving gather in Washington DC, calling for action from congress


A rally was held Tuesday night outside the US Capitol lawn in Washington D.C. Members of congress along with the families of those who lost someone at the hands of a drunk driver, gathered with Mothers Against Drunk Driving, calling for congress to act to pass laws that stop a driver who is drunk from ever starting a car. 

Advertisement

Rana Abbas’s life forever changed almost 6 years ago. Five members of her family were driving home to Dearborn when they were struck and killed by a drunk driver on I-75 in Lexington, Kentucky.

“My family was killed on Jan 6, 2019, not even a week after the new year,” she said. “It’s been six years and it doesn’t get any easier.”

Congresswoman Debbie Dingell says at the Abbas funeral it became clear what she needed to do.

Advertisement

“There were five, five of them that were active in the community,” she said. “Rema was in access, her husband was a doctor. We knew everybody. And overnight, I mean everyone had a good holiday and a drunk driver wiped out this family and devastated this community. Children that went to school with the kids looked at me and said technology exists to keep this from happening. Why haven’t you stopped it?”

Both Congresswomen Dingell and Rashida Talib worked with Abbas to get a law passed in congress. It was called ‘Halt,’ which requires all new cars to come equipped with tech that detects and stops impaired drivers from starting the vehicle. It was supposed to come into effect in 2026, giving time for regulations to be put in place. The candlelight rally in DC on Tuesday was designed to speed the process up.

Advertisement

“Every 78 secs someone is injured or killed by a drunk driver,” Abbas said. “When we hear that we needed three years, and we might need another three more, what we hear is we need 30,000 more people to be killed, and we might need another 30,000 more people to be killed before were ready to put this technology that’s available in vehicles and that is not okay.”

The National Transportation Safety Board has called on automakers and the US Department of Transportation to make this a priority.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Denzel Washington Lost Best Actor to Kevin Spacey and Stopped Voting for Oscars: ‘They Don’t Care About Me? I Don’t Care. I Gave Up. I Got Bitter.’

Published

on

Denzel Washington Lost Best Actor to Kevin Spacey and Stopped Voting for Oscars: ‘They Don’t Care About Me? I Don’t Care. I Gave Up. I Got Bitter.’


Denzel Washington revealed to Esquire magazine as part of a new cover story that he got bitter after losing the best actor Oscar to Kevin Spacey in 2000. Washington was already a three-time Oscar nominee and one-time winner when his performance as Rubin Carter in “The Hurriance” landed him in the Oscar for best actor opposite Spacey (“American Beauty”), Russell Crowe (“The Insider”), Richard Farnsworth (“The Straight Story”) and Sean Penn (“Sweet and Lowdown”). Washington won a Golden Globe for his performance, but the Oscar went to Spacey.

“At the Oscars, they called Kevin Spacey’s name for ‘American Beauty,’” Washington said. “I have a memory of turning around and looking at him, and nobody was standing but the people around him. And everyone else was looking at me. Not that it was this way. Maybe that’s the way I perceived it. Maybe I felt like everybody was looking at me. Because why would everybody be looking at me? Thinking about it now, I don’t think they were.”

“I’m sure I went home and drank that night. I had to,” Washington said about his reaction to losing. “I don’t want to sound like, ‘Oh, he won my Oscar,’ or anything like that. It wasn’t like that. And you know, there was talk in the town about what was going on over there on that side of the street, and that’s between him and God. I ain’t got nothing to do with that. I pray for him. That’s between him and his maker.”

“The Hurricane” marked the second time Washington had found himself in the best actor race. He was previously nominated in the category for playing the title role in Spike Lee’s “Malcom X,” but the Oscar went to Al Pacino for “Scent of a Woman” instead. After losing best actor for a second time, Washington grew bitter and had his wife, Paulette, start voting in his place for the Academy Awards.

Advertisement

“I went through a time then when [my wife] Pauletta would watch all the Oscar movies—I told her, I don’t care about that. Hey: They don’t care about me? I don’t care,” Washington said. “You vote. You watch them. I ain’t watching that. I gave up. I got bitter. My pity party.”

Two years after losing best actor, Washington would finally win his first Academy Award for best actor thanks to “Training Day.” His victory made him only the was the second African-American performer to win the category, following Sidney Poitier for 1963’s “Lilies of the Field.” Washington has since gone on to earn four more Oscar nominations, most recently in 2022 for “The Tragedy of Macbeth.” He’s now back in the Oscar race in the supporting category field for “Gladiator 2.”

Head over to Esquire’s website to read Washington’s cover story in its entirety.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Nationals Linked to Superstar Free Agent Third Baseman

Published

on

Washington Nationals Linked to Superstar Free Agent Third Baseman


The Washington Nationals might not be as far away from contention as it seems, even as they are coming off back-to-back 71-win seasons and four last-place finishes since they won the World Series in 2019.

Despite the struggles the five years since that championship triumph, the Nationals boast one of the best farm systems in baseball and have several players ready to become full-time big leaguers and start making a serious impact.

With that the case, some believe it’s time for Washington to take a big swing in free agency and spend some money in order to bring in veteran leadership for a young ball club.

Few fit the bill more than Houston Astros superstar third baseman Alex Bregman.

Advertisement

The two-time All-Star, represented by the game’s top agent, Scott Boras, is expected to receive a lucrative long-term deal. But as a player who was a key cog in an absolutely dominant run of success in Houston, he would also bring a championship mentality to the Nationals.

There may be positional fit concerns at third base due to prospects already in the organization. But, Mark Feinsand of MLB.com writes that Bregman’s willingness to switch positions could lead him to become a fit in Washington.

The Nats’ production at the position right now is a big reason to make a play for Bregman. But it’s the future that Washington must consider, too, according to Feinsand.

“Washington’s .589 OPS at third base ranked 29th in the Majors last season, ahead of only the White Sox (.533). Four different players started at least 30 games at the hot corner for the Nationals last season, though none were able to produce at the plate. Brady House, ranked by MLB Pipeline as the Nats’ No. 3 prospect, plays third base, but Bregman’s willingness to change positions could keep him in play for Washington.”

Whether House is Major League-ready remains a question. But Bregman could hold it down until House is ready. that point and then migrate to a different position. Notably, the Astros had him work at first base last season due to an injury, and the Nationals need power at that corner, too.

Advertisement

The Nationals have the pieces to become a force in the National League, but they were also one of the youngest teams in baseball in 2024 and this team will take some time to come into their own.

That’s where a player like Bregman comes in. He’s a steady veteran who has produced at a high level on the biggest stages the sport has to offer for nearly a decade.

He wouldn’t come cheap, but Bregman is absolutely a player Washington should at.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending