Connect with us

Utah

Voices: The Utah Fits All scholarship helps my homeschooled children — and other Utah students — get the education they need

Published

on

Voices: The Utah Fits All scholarship helps my homeschooled children — and other Utah students — get the education they need


My mornings buzz with activity, but it isn’t the rush of getting children out the door to school, because my children’s education takes place at home. I have chosen to be the primary educator of my children, who range from kindergarten to seventh grade, and my liberal arts bachelor’s degree prepared me well. Giving my children individualized attention fills the morning, as I bounce between explaining math concepts to one child and providing feedback on a writing assignment with another. Other days start with scientific experiments, forest school group, world history, language study, music and art, while afternoons are spent reading and pursuing extracurricular activities. Every day I join Utah teachers in the important quest of educating children, and I do so without monetary compensation.

Last year, Utah implemented an education voucher program called the Utah Fits All scholarship (UFA). The UFA scholarship allows eligible students to receive state funding to further their education. These funds may go towards private school tuition, hybrid programs or home-schooling. Students are reimbursed for approved educational expenses and a state selected program administrator, who is charged with implementing the program, closely reviews all expenditures. To remain eligible for funding, students are required to either complete standardized testing or submit a portfolio outlining how scholarship funds have furthered their education.

Though Utahns may disagree about the details of educational methods and policies, I believe we are united in wanting educated citizens who are intellectually engaged, emotionally and socially mature and prepared to contribute to society in positive ways. With the broad range of learning styles, family resources and health limitations or disabilities, it follows that there is not an effective, one-size fits all model of educating children. In order for every student to thrive, they need an educational method that fits and the funding flexible enough to foster it.

Quality education requires time and resources. In some cases, we provide these for our children through actual expenditures, while in others, we offer them by forgoing opportunities, resulting in “opportunity costs.” I forgo the equivalent of a teacher’s salary in order to teach my children at home. This cost is worthwhile to me, as it provides my students an educational environment they thrive in, but it is still a cost to my family.

Advertisement

While we tend to view education as what happens in a school building during the day, other experiences and activities significantly contribute to children’s intellectual, social and physical education. UFA scholarship funds make it so that we don’t also need to spend our single household income on education materials and experiences.

A public school uses government funds to pay for the facility, teachers, administrators, bus systems, janitor services, sports fields and property insurance. Those public school families can then use their own money to cover other aspects of their student’s educational costs including uniforms, extracurricular activities and school supplies. A homeschool family uses their own resources to cover facility costs, teacher salary, transportation and janitor services, while scholarship funds help to cover other educational expenses, including books, computers, curriculum and additional expenses that go directly to enhancing student education. My students do not benefit from the teachers, counselors, buses, educational programs and the new football field at the local high school. Likewise, a public school student won’t have access to my student’s bike or violin. This isn’t unfair or disproportionate, as some have complained. In each instance, public money is being tailored to the student’s needs and priorities.

Finally, even if someone opposes the existence of the UFA scholarship, they need to recognize that it saves taxpayer money. According to the Office of State Auditor, Utah public school students receive an average of $11,500 per student. For home educated students, a portion of these funds have been available via charter schools for years. If a full-time homeschool student participates in a charter school to access government funding, they only receive $1,800 of the public funding allotted to their student, according to Harmony Educational Services.

On average, students who utilize the UFA scholarship rather than the public or charter systems are using 30% less of the government’s money — $8,000 rather than the $11,500 average statewide spending per student. Thus, not only do UFA funds allow tailored education for each student’s needs, it also is cheaper for taxpayers than either public charter or traditional public schools.

Public school teachers and administrators should not oppose the UFA scholarship because public schools also benefit. The scholarship will improve classrooms by allowing advanced and struggling students to find a better educational fit. This will benefit public school teachers in some of the challenges they face, including in their classroom management with insufficient time and resources, as all students find their best learning environment. The education of our children is a collective endeavor, and we all win when our money is making the biggest impact by meeting every student’s educational needs.

Advertisement

As this next legislative session kicks off, thank your legislators for doing a great job of prioritizing all Utah children, saving tax dollars and putting your hard-earned dollars to work in educating the next generation.

(Naomi Burton) Naomi Burton is a home educator and mother of seven children.

Naomi Burton is a home educator, mother of seven amazing children and a passionate advocate of those who don’t always speak up for themselves. She is a perpetual learner whose current interests include restoring her historic home, reading “Don Quixote” and learning Chopin’s “Fantaisie-Impromptu.”

The Salt Lake Tribune is committed to creating a space where Utahns can share ideas, perspectives and solutions that move our state forward. We rely on your insight to do this. Find out how to share your opinion here, and email us at voices@sltrib.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah Mammoth sign forward Nick Schmaltz to an 8-year, $64 million contract extension

Published

on

Utah Mammoth sign forward Nick Schmaltz to an 8-year,  million contract extension


SALT LAKE CITY — Forward Nick Schmaltz re-signed with the Utah Mammoth on Wednesday, agreeing to an eight-year contract extension worth $64 million rather than going to free agency this summer.

Schmaltz will count $8 million against the salary cap annually through the 2033-34 NHL season.

“There was never a doubt that Utah is where I want to play the rest of my career, and I’m thrilled to sign an eight-year extension,” Schmaltz said. “We have a great core of players, and I know we can do some special things together here in Utah. We have a very bright future, and I am thankful to (owners) Ryan and Ashley Smith for wanting me to be a part of the group that will one day bring a Stanley Cup to Utah.”

Schmaltz, 30, is second on the team in scoring with 59 points in 64 games. His hot start of 16 points in 10 games helped put Utah on track to make the playoffs in the franchise’s second season since moving to Salt Lake City and its first as the Mammoth.

Advertisement

“Nick is a tremendous player and person, who is very deserving of this contract,” general manager Bill Armstrong said. “We expect him to continue producing on the ice and leading our young, skilled forwards for years to come.”

Last fall, the Mammoth signed Logan Cooley for $80 million over the next eight years. Schmaltz’s current contract, which paid him an average of just under $6 million a season, expired June 30.

“There’s a lot of momentum building around our team, and extending Nick Schmaltz is an important part of continuing that,” Ryan Smith said. “Utah is becoming a true destination in the NHL, and Nick’s long-term commitment reflects the excitement around what we’re building here.”

The Mammoth hold the first wild card spot in the Western Conference, six points ahead of second wild card Seattle through Tuesday’s games. The organization, formerly known as the Arizona Coyotes, has not made the playoffs since 2020 — when the field was expanded because of the pandemic — and last qualified for the traditional 16-team tournament in 2012.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

‘It’s really cool’: Utah selected to lead federal pilot program testing electric aircraft

Published

on

‘It’s really cool’: Utah selected to lead federal pilot program testing electric aircraft


SALT LAKE CITY — The 2002 Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City were, in a way, Utah’s entrance onto the world stage.

While the Beehive State is no longer a secret, the return of the Winter Olympics in 2034 will give the state a chance to showcase what could very well be the future of flight after the Utah Department of Transportation and state partners on Monday were selected to lead a federal pilot program to test advanced electric aircraft and other emerging aviation technologies.

More specifically, the Federal Aviation Administration selected Utah as one of eight projects nationwide for the Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing Integration Pilot Program, a three-year initiative designed to help safely integrate advanced aircraft into the national airspace.

“What this means for Utah and for advanced air mobility is that this enables us to work very closely with the FAA in testing the technology that makes up advanced air mobility,” said Matt Maass, director of UDOT’s Aeronautics Division. “So the vertical takeoff and landing aircraft will be used for moving passengers, these aircraft will be used for moving cargo, medical transport, and it’s all going to be done electrically.”

Advertisement

Specifically, through an initiative called “uFly,” Utah will lead a collaboration between Oregon, Idaho, Arizona and Oklahoma — along with industry partners and research institutions — to test new aviation technology and gather data that will inform the future of electric flight.

Partners in the initiative include BETA Technologies, Ampaire, Joby Aviation, Lockheed Martin, Future Flight Global, Alpine Air, Jump Aero and Utah aerospace and defense company 47G.

BETA Technologies might sound familiar to a lot of Utahns, for good reason.

In May 2024, the company launched Project ALTA in conjunction with 47G. Technically known as the Air Logistics Transportation Alliance, the project’s goal is to establish an “advanced air mobility system” for the state.

Advertisement

According to 47G, advanced air mobility is a novel mode of transportation that uses electric aircraft to move people and packages throughout the state. BETA Technologies in March 2025 returned to the state to conduct six days of demonstration flights, showcasing its electric ALIA aircraft.

The federal project, although it doesn’t have any funding attached, brings together over 30 public and private partners to conduct real-world flight operations.

UDOT leadership and others gather for a photo behind a drone during a press conference to discuss UDOT’s selection to lead a federal pilot program testing advanced electric aircraft in Salt Lake City on Tuesday. (Photo: Tess Crowley, Deseret News)

“It will focus on parcels and packages, but then eventually people,” said Aaron Starks, president and CEO of 47G. “This designation now allows us to, through a phased approach, begin implementing all of this right away.”

Utah’s diverse landscapes are another reason the FAA chose the state to lead one of eight projects, Maass explained, saying the electric aircraft can be tested at high-altitude, snowy settings, desert environments and more.

Starks added he’s excited by the prospect of Utah leading the way when it comes to building a functional air mobility system.

Advertisement

“I grew up in northern Utah and rural Utah, and I remember as a kid, coming down to Salt Lake was like a big deal. That was the big city, right? You can be in an air taxi in Provo and into Moab in 36 minutes,” Starks said. “(If) I’m a Utah Jazz fan, or I want to go catch an MLB game, I can get in an air taxi and my family and I can be in Salt Lake, and we can be part of what’s happening here in the state, and live further away from the metropolitan areas that exist on the Wasatch Front. It’s awesome. It’s really cool.”

Starks added that in addition to moving people and packages, the project is also looking into how electric aircraft can be used for avalanche detection and mitigation, organ transplant delivery, wildfire monitoring and other exciting applications.

“This is going to happen in a phased approach, and our goal is to democratize this form of transportation so all families can take advantage,” Starks said.

Senate President Stuart Adams speaks during a press conference to discuss UDOT’s selection to lead a federal pilot program testing advanced electric aircraft in Salt Lake City on Tuesday. (Photo: Tess Crowley, Deseret News)

The pilot program, like the inaugural ventures into electric flight from players like 47G, UDOT and BETA Technologies, has strong legislative backing.

Advertisement

Utah Senate President Stuart Adams said that nearly a decade ago, he told the Legislature that someday, electric air taxis would be flying in Utah and that he wanted the state to lead that effort.

“That one day, that one day is here today. We are now leading the effort with other states to bring air mobility to Utah and I couldn’t be more excited,” Adams said. “Our goal, our vision, is, we hope to have this functioning to be able to show off air taxis delivering to our Olympic venues.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

‘They’re trying to change the rules’: Republicans ramp up fight to stop new maps in Utah

Published

on

‘They’re trying to change the rules’: Republicans ramp up fight to stop new maps in Utah


Utah’s Republican-controlled legislature is escalating its fight against the state’s anti-gerrymandering law after a series of court rulings threatened the congressional map that has long favored the GOP.

In the latest move, lawmakers passed a new rule over the weekend that blocks many voters from withdrawing their signatures from a petition that sought to repeal Proposition 4 ahead of a Monday deadline, undermining efforts by grassroots groups to preserve the reform. That could affect the result of the petition after some voters said they were misled by Republicans who asked them to sign.

The move comes as redistricting battles intensify across the US ahead of the midterm elections. Courts in several states are weighing lawsuits over congressional maps, while Donald Trump has urged Republican governors to redraw districts in ways that could strengthen GOP control of House seats.

On 25 August 2025, third district judge Dianna Gibson ruled that Utah lawmakers had unconstitutionally overridden Proposition 4, the 2018 voter-approved initiative that created an independent redistricting commission, set neutral mapping criteria and required greater transparency in the process.

Advertisement

Gibson sided with the League of Women Voters of Utah and Mormon Women for Ethical Government, striking down the state’s 2021 congressional maps and reinstating Proposition 4 as a binding law, which allows independent bodies to redraw the districts. The ruling aligned with public opinion as well, according to the conservative Sutherland Policy Institute, which found that 85% of registered Utah voters support involving an independent commission in redistricting.

Gerrymandering’s impact has been most severe in Salt Lake county, Utah’s youngest and most populous county, which heavily leans Democratic. The 2021 Republican-drawn maps split the county across all four districts, diluting urban Democratic votes and entrenching GOP dominance.

“Salt Lake county was chopped into pieces,” said Katharine Biele, president of the League of Women Voters of Utah. “This new map reunifies the county, so people there have a fair chance to be heard.” By consolidating the county into a single district, the revised map restored genuine electoral competition; it could also give Democrats a fair chance to win one of Utah’s four congressional seats in the midterm elections.

But the sense of optimism many in Salt Lake City felt in August has steadily faded as Republicans have passed layers of legislation aimed at weakening or repealing Proposition 4. After the district court ruling last year, Utah’s Republican leadership quickly rejected the decision. Some lawmakers even threatened to impeach Judge Gibson.

As it became clear that Proposition 4 could deliver an additional seat to Democrats, the fight drew national attention. Trump and JD Vance both weighed in, framing the dispute as part of a broader struggle over election rules, with Trump immediately taking to social media, calling the proposition “unconstitutional” and the judges part of the “Radical Left”.

Advertisement

“What’s really frustrating is seeing that instead of listening to the people, and to the courts who are trying to keep them in line, they’re just trying to change the rules,” said Elizabeth Rasmussen, executive director of Better Boundaries, an advocacy group that had been running an awareness effort urging petition signers to withdraw their signatures before the Republican’s latest legislation.

In late January, Utah Republicans passed legislation adding two seats to the state’s supreme court. The state’s governor, Spencer Cox, quickly signed the bill into law, expanding the court from five to seven justices. Critics argue the move amounts to court expansion aimed at blunting the impact of rulings related to Proposition 4.

“Disagreement with judicial decisions is normal,” Rasmussen said, referencing criticism from the Trump administration and frustration expressed by the governor. “But impeaching a judge because you lost is not. Trying to rewrite the rules after the fact is not. Court-packing is not how this system works.”

(The Guardian reached out to the Utah governor’s office for comment multiple times but had not received a response at the time of publication.)

In early February, with the deadline to file for re-election just over a month away, two Utah Republican members of Congress, representatives Celeste Maloy and Burgess Owens, filed a federal lawsuit challenging the state court’s order to reinstate the district court-approved map. They argued that the ruling violated the US constitution and asked the US district court for Utah to restore the map passed by the Republican-controlled legislature in 2021.

Advertisement

Later that month, a three-judge federal panel rejected the GOP-led effort to block the new House map. The judges denied Republicans’ request for a preliminary injunction, allowing the revised map to be used in this year’s election and giving Democratic candidates a potential opportunity to win a US House seat. (The Guardian reached out to the Utah GOP for comment in December but had not received a response as of publication.)

Biele, of the League of Women Voters of Utah, sharply criticized Republican lawmakers, calling the move an abuse of power. “Every time they lose, or get a ruling they don’t agree with, they change the rules so it works for them,” she said.

But in a final push to overturn Proposition 4, Utah Republicans announced last Monday that they had submitted enough verified signatures to qualify a repeal measure for the November ballot, with a deadline to verify on 9 March. Once verified, county clerks were expected to publish the names of signers, triggering a 45-day window during which voters could withdraw their signatures – a process later threatened by the weekend legislation to make it harder to do so.

Rasmussen, executive director of Better Boundaries, said the bill was pushed through with little public scrutiny. “This bill was obviously planned to pass as the clock ran out with very little public input,” she said. “It was introduced at 11pm on a Friday, the last night of the legislative session, and was signed into law only 12 hours later.” She added that the move reflects a broader problem.

“This type of legislative behavior is what happens when there aren’t any checks on power.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending