Connect with us

Utah

Utah sued in the Supreme Court for control of public land. It’s spent more on a media campaign than lawyers.

Published

on

Utah sued in the Supreme Court for control of public land. It’s spent more on a media campaign than lawyers.


Utah has paid over $500,000 to the law firm championing its Supreme Court attack on federal control over public lands — while budgeting twice as much on a blitz to influence the court of public opinion this summer and fall.

Clement & Murphy filed Utah’s lawsuit in August, challenging the Bureau of Land Management’s ownership of 18.5 million acres of land “unappropriated” to parks, monuments or other national sites in the state.

Between June and November, the state expects to spend $1.35 million — on a website, podcasts, billboards and other advertisements in Utah and Washington, D.C. — under its contract with Utah-based public relations firm Penna Powers, according to records obtained by The Salt Lake Tribune. Utah expects to pay the firm a total of $2.642 million over five years, the contract said.

Other documents released in response to The Tribune’s open records request detail the state’s strategy for increasing “awareness” that the BLM’s oversight and policies for public land in the West “are harming Utahns by restricting access to public lands, hindering active management, and reducing economic and recreation opportunities.”

Advertisement

That strategy includes messaging on a podcast hosted by journalist Bari Weiss ($12,750) and advertisements placed in The Washington Post ($105,885), The Wall Street Journal ($62,500) and National Review ($54,560). The Tribune received $25,000 for ads placed on its website and newsletters.

The burst of taxpayer spending is aimed at shaping public opinion, the documents show — though Supreme Court justices are the ones who will decide whether or not to hear Utah’s arguments. The justices could reject Utah’s filing and tell the state to pursue its case with a lower court first, rather than taking jurisdiction over it themselves.

In a September interview with the Deseret News, Utah House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, said lawyers representing the state urged the public relations campaign. Schultz said he was not immediately available to comment to The Tribune.

“We want the Supreme Court to hear this argument. And so they recommended that we do a little bit of public outreach to talk about that,” Schultz told the Deseret News.

“So they did feel like that was important to make sure that, one, we could be successful with educating, I think, some of the clerks at the Supreme Court,” he continued, “and to maybe help our chance that they’ll take this lawsuit up.”

Advertisement

The campaign planned to pay for geofencing to target the display of its messages to “government buildings,” the documents obtained by The Tribune showed.

Spending on the lawsuit

The state has paid lead attorney Paul Clement $2,300 per hour for his work, according to the Center for Western Priorities, an environmental nonprofit that cited records it obtained under its own records request. Junior Attorney Joseph DeMott’s rate was $1,100 per hour, the center said.

Utah has paid Clement & Murphy, PLLC, based in Virginia, a total of $518,490 since 2023 to litigate the case, according to the state auditor’s Transparent Utah website.

A spokesperson for the Utah Attorney General’s Office confirmed Friday that the state is paying the firm only for work on the public lands lawsuit. When the state’s brief was filed in August, the office said the lawsuit was the product of “decades of legal analysis.”

Gov. Spencer Cox signed HB3002 into law in June; it named the state’s “Federal Overreach Restricted Account,” which “allows for account funds to be used for educating the public on federalism issues.” Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes said in August that the Legislature has set aside about $20 million for its public lands lawsuit.

Advertisement

One common legal strategy for encouraging action by a court is filing “amicus” or “friend of the court” briefs, which groups use to support or expand on a litigant’s arguments. Eleven briefs have been filed by states, counties and other groups that support Utah’s stance.

Ad campaign spending in D.C.

A third of the $1.35 million the state planned to spend this year was targeted to audiences in Washington D.C., including “policy/legal advisors” and “decision-makers” in September and October, according to a July media plan.

The federal government’s response to Utah’s request to proceed in front of the Supreme Court was originally due on Oct. 22. But on Oct. 7, the court granted the government’s request for an extension to Nov. 21.

Here’s the shopping list drafted by Utah’s Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office and Penna Powers for September and October in D.C.:

  • The $105,885 to The Washington Post, which included $35,295 for its custom “Capitol Hill” wraps and inserts, which the Post promises will “engage the most influential policy makers in Washington.” The rest was for website ads.

  • $65,125 to The Dispatch, a conservative online magazine, for podcasts and newsletter sponsorships.

  • The $62,500 to The Wall Street Journal for its “Policy Impact Bundle,” which includes messaging in its Politics & Policy newsletter and Potomac Watch podcast.

  • $12,750 to appear on “Honestly with Bari Weiss,” hosted by the co-founder of The Free Press.

  • The $54,560 to National Review, a conservative magazine, which included $7,060 for the back cover of the November issue.

  • $50,000 for social media advertising, including “Meta (FG/IG)” and “X.”

  • Nearly $100,000 for advertising, including $30,000 for ads with geofencing to deliver them to government buildings; $60K for ads targeted to unspecified audiences; and $9,180 for “paid search” ads tied to keywords.

Ad campaign spending in Utah

The Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office had initially entered into a five-year, $500,000 contract with Penna Powers in February to provide “media relations, marketing, and communications.” The contract was awarded “without competition,” according to records.

Advertisement

The state amended that contract — increasing the budget from $500,000 to $2.642 million — in July, records show.

Here’s the shopping list for this summer and fall in Utah:

  • $250,000 to “local broadcast TV stations” between August and October.

  • $150,000 to “interstate billboards” between August and the week of Nov. 4.

  • $80,000 to “connected TV/YouTube” between August and October.

  • $80,000 to “local radio stations” between August and October.

  • $50,000 to “podcasts + audio streaming” between August and October.

  • $75,000 to “Meta (FB/IG), Reddit, Twitter” between August and October.

  • $65,000 to “local publishers + sponsored articles” between August and October.

  • $60,000 to Facebook and Instagram, between July and early September.

  • $25,000 to The Tribune for “sitewide display/newsletters” and a “native article” between July and August.

  • $25,000 to ads tied to “paid search” between July and early September.

  • $20,000 to KSL for “sitewide display” and a “native article” between July and August.

  • $20,000 to the Deseret News for “sitewide display/newsletters” and a “native article” between July and August.

Aaron Weiss, deputy director for the Center of Western Priorities, is critical of the state’s spending on advertising.

“This is a PR campaign disguised as a lawsuit,” Weiss said. “Two-point-six million is a lobbying campaign, and there’s no reason to spend that money if you’re convinced your legal arguments have merit.”

Environmental groups argue Utah and other Western states agreed to relinquish public lands as a condition of statehood.

Advertisement

In its filings, Utah argues the Supreme Court should take the case because “the time has come to bring an end to this patently unconstitutional state of affairs,” referring to the BLM’s continuing control over “unappropriated” public land inside Utah’s boundaries.

“Nothing in the Constitution authorizes the United States to hold vast unreserved swathes of Utah’s territory in perpetuity, over Utah’s express objection,” the state contends, “without even so much as a pretense of using those lands in the service of any enumerated power.”

At the August press conference when the state announced its lawsuit, Cox said that the federal government has “failed” to manage the Beehive State’s public land. “Utah deserves priority when it comes to managing this land,” he said. “Utah is in the best position to understand and respond to the unique needs of our environment and communities.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Beaver County residents set up thousands of sandbags ahead of flashfloods

Published

on

Beaver County residents set up thousands of sandbags ahead of flashfloods


BEAVER COUNTY, Utah — A massive community effort is underway as volunteers and Beaver County crews distribute thousands of sandbags to protect homes from the potential path of floodwaters.

After the Cottonwood Fires, residents have been waiting for weeks for relief to come in the form of rain, though officials now warn it may come all at once with an increased risk of flooding and debris flow.

Emergency Service Director Les Whitney believes that the fire has left plenty of debris to bring trouble for residents.

“We got a lot of water. We’re bringing debris with it, so tree branches, tree limbs, logs, lots of different size firewood, and that’s all in the creeks. We’re worried about that plugging up our bridges and stuff, so we have heavy equipment and excavators located in strategic places so that we can keep those bridges open,” said Whitney.

Advertisement

An estimated 140 homes and condominiums were spared from the flames, but remain in the paths of floodwaters.

Residents can also pick up sandbags at the Beaver County Sheriff’s Office or at the Beaver County Rodeo Fairgrounds.





Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah man arrested again for allegedly abusing dog twice in three months

Published

on

Utah man arrested again for allegedly abusing dog twice in three months


EAGLE MOUNTAIN — An Eagle Mountain man currently on pretrial release in 4th District Court who is accused of abusing his dog has been arrested again for allegedly punching the same animal.

Keith Reaves Davis, 43, was booked into the Utah County Jail on Wednesday for investigation of aggravated cruelty to an animal.

Utah County sheriff’s deputies were called Wednesday afternoon to a grocery store on a report that a man was beating his dog after it had gotten off its leash and was stopped by a bystander, according to a police booking affidavit.

“I reviewed security camera footage from the grocery store, and an individual matching the description of the suspect was seen holding the dog in the air by one paw and repeatedly striking the dog on the right hind leg area. I observed the male strike the dog several times before dropping the dog from approximately 1-2 feet. The strikes appeared to be as hard as the male could hit,” the arresting deputy wrote in the affidavit. “The dog did not cry out or whimper as if the dog was accustomed to the abuse.”

Advertisement

When questioned, Davis “admitted to striking the dog because it was not behaving,” the affidavit states.

An animal control officer who responded to the scene to take custody of the dog noted it was the same dog he had taken from Davis exactly three months earlier during another animal abuse investigation.

In that case, Davis was charged in 4th District Court with aggravated cruelty to an animal, a class A misdemeanor; and public intoxication, a class C misdemeanor, after deputies received a tip from a neighbor that a dog was being abused at Davis’ home, according to charging documents. When questioned, Davis “acknowledged hitting his dog as punishment,” the charges state.

Deputies also reviewed videos that the neighbor had filmed. The neighbor told investigators “there was blood from the dog on the ground of the garage and (the neighbor) can hear the dog screaming as if it’s being hurt. Deputies got the videos from the (neighbor) and you can hear very loudly the dog screaming and crying with a lot of loud banging noises. In one of the videos, you can hear the dog sounding like it is being choked by a collar and is grasping for air,” a police booking affidavit states.

Davis’ next court hearing in the April case is scheduled for July 28.

Advertisement

In their latest booking report, sheriff’s deputies note that they “believe further harm will be inflicted on this dog if it is released back to the male a second time,” and have recommended the dog not be returned to Davis.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Muslim man stabbed at Utah mall over his religion, authorities say

Published

on

Muslim man stabbed at Utah mall over his religion, authorities say


play

A man was arrested in Utah after allegedly stabbing a Muslim employee at a mall multiple times and telling investigators he targeted the victim because of his religion, according to court records. 

Peter Michael Larsen, 48, was booked into the Salt Lake County Jail on suspicion of attempted murder and prohibited dangerous weapon conduct following the attack on July 13 at the Valley Fair Mall in West Valley City, Utah, court and online jail records show. West Valley City is a suburb of Salt Lake City.

Advertisement

The West Valley City Police Department said the incident occurred shortly before 3 p.m. local time, when Larsen approached a man working at a kiosk at the mall.

“After a brief interaction, the suspect pulled out a knife and began stabbing him multiple times,” police said in a statement on X. “A few bystanders interfered, and were able to separate the suspect from the victim and subdue the suspect until police arrived.”

The victim, who was not identified by authorities, sustained multiple stab wounds and was taken to a hospital in critical condition, according to police and court records.

Larsen told investigators that he had “targeted the victim with intent to kill him because of his religion (Muslim),” police said in an affidavit obtained by USA TODAY. The affidavit also states Larsen said he believes he is “a catalyst” and “intends to kill Muslims.”

Advertisement

The incident remains under investigation, and police said they were looking into any possible relationship between the suspect and victim. USA TODAY reached out to the West Valley City Police Department for comment.

Police: Suspect poses a ‘substantial danger to the public’

The suspect approached the Muslim man, asked for his name, asked about his religion, and indicated he wanted a bottle of water, The Salt Lake Tribune reported, citing comments from Imam Shuaib Din, who leads the Utah Islamic Center and had been in contact with the victim’s family.

As the victim turned to get the water, the attacker began stabbing him, Din told the newspaper. Police said in the affidavit that they received multiple 911 calls at around 2:30 p.m. local time reporting two men “involved in a physical altercation where one male was stabbing the other.”

When officers arrived at the scene, they observed bystanders pinning the suspect to the ground and “had already removed the knife from his hand,” according to the affidavit. Police said the victim was “bleeding profusely” and was then transported to the hospital.

Advertisement

The victim was identified by friends as Syed Sohail Uddin, local television station FOX 13 and The New York Times reported. A GoFundMe fundraiser organized on his behalf said he was stabbed 15 times and required multiple surgeries. 

Larsen was also transported to the hospital “due to being punched in the head from bystanders trying to get the knife out of his hand,” according to the affidavit. He was later medically cleared and taken to the police station for an interview.

Police said in the affidavit that Larsen posed “a substantial danger to the public if released based on his violent actions today, ideologies and pre-planned mass casualty events.”

Advocates condemn stabbing attack at Utah mall

Muslim advocacy groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), condemned the attack.

Advertisement

“This horrific attack is yet another reminder that anti-Muslim rhetoric has real-world consequences. When Muslims are routinely demonized, portrayed as threats, or treated as less deserving of equal rights and dignity, some twisted individuals inevitably act on that hatred,” CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad said in a statement on July 14.

Civil rights advocates have noted a rise in Islamophobia in the United States over the last two-plus decades following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, ⁠and ​more recently because of immigration policies and the fallout of the Israel-Hamas war, according to Reuters.

CAIR, which is the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, reported last year that it received a record number of complaints of discrimination and Islamophobic attacks amid the war.

The organization received more than 8,650 complaints in 2024, the highest number since CAIR began publishing its annual civil rights report in 1996, according to the report released in March 2025. Complaints rose more than 7%, breaking the previous record set in 2023.

Advertisement

The Utah attack follows several high-profile incidents targeting Muslims in recent years, including the fatal stabbing of a 6-year-old Palestinian American boy in Illinois in 2023 and a deadly shooting at a San Diego mosque earlier this year.

Contributing: N’dea Yancey-Bragg, USA TODAY; Reuters



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending