Calvin Barrett is a writer, editor, and prolific Mario Kart racer located in Provo, Utah. Currently writing for SB Nation and FanSided, he has covered the Utah Jazz and BYU athletics since 2024 and graduated (woohoo!) from Utah Valley University.
I had that dream again.
The one where Utah appears at the NBA Draft Lottery reveal with a favorable chance to grab the top selection, only to trip, slide, and tumble all the way down to the 5th overall selection.
In a cold sweat, I bolt and sit upright in my bed. Rigid. Perspiring. Anxious. After an 82-game slate that cast the Utah Jazz to the worst record not only in the NBA but also in franchise history, an all-too-real possibility haunts my subconscious mind, in which the sacrificial Jazz are cast to the depths of reality.
Obscured by a twisted mirror of horror and helplessness, my vision is skewed by a probability. A hypothetical. Good heavens, I’ve been cast into a dimension wherein suffering is not quenched — only met with a second helping. My tummy is full, Grandma. I couldn’t possibly stomach another helping of green bean casserole. My resistance is futile. As the jumbo spoon scoops another heap of greens with mysterious fluid, the NBA lottery odds are out of my control, and the result unmoving.
Advertisement
The tanking cycle calls to me, and I fear I may be incapable of more oblivion.
Heaven forbid, Utah falls in the draft order, and the draft pool shallows out far too quickly. How many more years of torment? How many painful defeats in the name of potential deliverance? Just how long can the Utah Jazz satiate their hungry fanbase on faith and broken dreams?
Maybe this is all a touch dramatic (Me? Dramatic?). Let’s reel in our emotions before “what ifs” catch our line and drag us off the pontoon. Yes, the Jazz could realistically drop to the 5th spot. Does that really suggest doomsday for this taffy-pulled rebuilding process?
With reason as my advocate, let us evaluate a pool of dark horse candidates for the Jazz’s draft selection. Assuming the most popular top four players are off the table (Flagg, Harper, Bailey, Edgecombe), who are some attractive replacements to step onto Utah’s young depth chart and electrify the reconstruction process?
Put simply: who are the sleeper candidates that could make Utah the winners of the draft, even if Cooper Flagg shakes Adam Silver’s hat with travel plans to San Antonio this June (heaven forbid)?
Advertisement
Sleeper Draft Picks Who Could Transform the Jazz
I’ve got to get myself back to bed, so let’s embrace sleep the same way I do every night: desperately rationalizing my imprudent NBA Draft biases. I might need a better hobby.
Advertisement
Tre Johnson attacks the paint in a game against Arkansas.Photo by Wesley Hitt/Getty Images
Candidate 1: Tre Johnson | G | Texas
Gasp! The player on the article’s cover is making an appearance in the text itself? Yes, I know, please simmer down as I attempt to make sense of my not-so-extreme claim.
Is Tre Johnson a popular name in the top-10 range of this draft class? Of course. So here’s my twist: Tre Johnson would be an incomprehensibly terrific outcome compared to his peers likely to be selected directly before him — Bailey and Harper.
Maybe I’m hiking in a wilderness all my own on this one, but the more I envision a projected career for each of these three players, one intrusive thought plants its claws in my mind’s eye and refuses to release until I yield to its insistence: Does the NBA overrate pure athleticism?
Advertisement
Given the raw, god-given ability delivered to each of these three off-ball hoopers, Johnson is well behind his classmates in this subject.
Please forgive me, oh jury of the internet, when I reply with the following.
Big whoop.
That’s right. Big whoop. I’m going against the grain. I’m swimming upstream. I’m searching the internet for more cliches to vomit onto the page. When I look at Johnson, I see a player with the offensive utility belt that could lift the Texan into rarified air in the NBA.
An aetherial scorer and gifted bucket-getter, Tre uses his offensive dousing rods to uncover invisible treasures that mere mortals are simply incapable of revealing. When I see Tre Johnson, I see a ceiling akin to the career path of Devin Booker.
Advertisement
Consistency grabs my attention when evaluating Johnson. A near 40% 3-point shooter and comfortable scorer from anywhere on the floor, he only dropped below double-digits twice on the season as he led the SEC in points per game. As an 18-year-old freshman, he averaged 19.9 per night against the stiffest competition in the nation.
Here’s my pitch: stop salivating over the quote-unquote “high ceilings” of the especially athletic, and start fixating on prospects with a specific and tantalizing talent. If Johnson is still on the board, the Jazz should grab him.
Advertisement
Fears attacks a dangerous tandem at the 3-point line.Photo by Matt Kelley/Getty Images
2. Jeremiah Fears | G | Oklahoma
Hold on, hold on. Everybody, quiet down for a second. Yes, I know he struggled shooting the ball at Oklahoma in his freshman year. Yes, I know he’s been known to dip his finger into a few too many hot apple turnovers. Yes, I know that the Jazz are already testing the waters with a fascinating point guard prospect in Isaiah Collier.
I know you know. I get the concept.
Advertisement
But Fears could stealthily become the best point guard in this entire draft class. Save for Dylan Harper — who, we must tragically remind our audience, is unavailable for this thought exercise — the list is very shallow above Fears at the one.
Do you want to know how I really feel about some of the other point guard options in this bunch?
Caution: Entering Ad Hominem Pun Zone. Hazmat suit mandatory past this door
Jakucionis? Jaku Ci U later.
Nolan Traore? More like… No, man. Try no way!
Advertisement
Egor Demin? …I could never speak ill of you.
Fears plays in spite of his namesake. He abandons all hesitancy at the door and flips all 26 locks, bolting the exit shut. Sure, the 3-ball didn’t fall with much consistency this season (hitting sub-30% as a freshman), but he could never be dissuaded from an attempt that could be successful.
It’s clear that his remote control has no pause button, and his car has no brake pedal… and likely no seatbelts to that point.
Athleticism with a punch of power and a drenching of creative finishing moves makes this Sooner a fascinating proposition in the NBA. If his pull-up jumper clicks into place and his decision-making receives a tune-up, we could see Fears become a viable option in leading an NBA offense.
Tight handle. Paint magnetism. A thirst for success unquenchable by even a highly refreshing Lime Cucumber Gatorade. Don’t be surprised if Fears becomes a popular riser in the rumor mill.
Advertisement
Noa Essengue, baby.Photo by Harry Langer/DeFodi Images via Getty Images
Advertisement
Noa Essengue | F | France
You may already be well aware of how I feel about this international play-dough prospect. In my very own words, “Love it or hate it, Essengue is an inevitable force soon to hit the National Basketball Association.”
Depending on who you ask, Essengue is a holographic projection who could appear anywhere between the top 10 of the upcoming draft or fall somewhere in the 20s.
Slippery. Fluid. Swift. Effortless. String cheese. These are all words I’ve used to describe how Noa moves across the court, and that to me is one of the most fascinating aspects of his profile. At his size and length (6’9” with a very plus wingspan), he appears comfortable on the basketball court, almost to the point where I question if he ever leaves it. In a Tom Haverford-esque maneuver, could he have replaced the insoles of his shoes with hardwood floorboards?
Whatever the case,
Advertisement
Already a defensive nightmare for his adversaries, his size helps him get into passing lanes, block shots, and pester any offensive action foolish enough to cross his path. On offense, Essengue boasts a surprisingly tight handle and ability to reach into the chest of the defense by reaching the paint. With proper weight training, Essengue could become something of a Giannis-lite with a stronger baseline and potential to stretch his shooting range well beyond that of the Greek Freak.
I’m higher than most on Essengue, and his shooting ability still leaves plenty of room for improvement. But after improving in each of his two professional seasons, Noa’s shooting touch seems to only be working in a positive direction, and could easily project to become a 35% to 37% 3-point man on top of the defensive versatility and hypnotic feel for the game.
If Utah is so inclined, they could reach deep into their bag for this player, even if it’s not the general consensus. Let me put it this way: it would be insane for Essengue to slip to Utah’s second pick in the draft. Trade up, draft early, or miss out.
The soaring desert vistas of Canyon Point, Utah, provide the backdrop to our June 2026 cover shoot, setting the stage for a Travel Issue titled ‘The Great Escape’ – a series of ‘horizon-expanding adventures and voyages of discovery’, as Wallpaper* editor-in-chief Bill Prince describes.
The luxurious base camp for the shoot was Amangiri, a unique 600-acre estate that is part of the Aman hotel group and appears out of the ochre-coloured desert like a modernist oasis. Completed in 2008 by architects Marwan Al-Sayed, Wendell Burnette, and Rick Joy, it has become a pilgrimage for design aficionados seeking the ultimate escape: indeed, the various low-lying structures are designed to fade away into their surroundings, so that visitors feel entirely consumed by the area’s majestic – but desolate – landscapes.
The story behind our June 2026 cover story
Dress, $1,800; boots, price on request, both by Calvin Klein Collection (calvinklein.co.uk)
Advertisement
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
‘It has always been a dream to shoot at Amangiri,’ says Wallpaper* fashion and creative director Jason Hughes, who collaborated with American photographer Geordie Wood on the story. Landing in Las Vegas, the team – including model Colin Jones, who was born in Spanish Fork, Utah – travelled through Nevada and Arizona on a five-hour car journey to Amangiri, where they set up in one of the new private villas on the estate. ‘It was amazing to witness the way the landscapes changed across the journey,’ says Hughes.
Despite the serene end result, shooting in such a remote location did hold some challenges: notably, the rapidly shifting March weather. ‘It was insane to witness out of nowhere a one-hour-long snow storm, turning the entire landscape white, before disappearing again within an hour after the sun came out,’ says Hughes. ‘Colin was an absolute trooper, braving the conditions and battling through to deliver the best pictures.’
Jones, who has previously walked the runway for houses like Maison Margiela, Ferragamo and Givenchy, wears a series of pieces from the S/S 2026 collections in the images, which were selected to echo the landscape. ‘We wanted the tones and textures to reflect the backdrops, which were incredibly inspirational,’ says Hughes. ‘It was a truly one-of-a-kind shoot.’
Discover the full shoot below.
Advertisement
Dress, £960, by Hodakova (hodakova.com)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Dress, £2,840, by Saint Laurent by Anthony Vaccarello (ysl.com)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Jacket, £4,610; trousers, £2,960, both by Versace (.versace.com). Boots, price on request, by Calvin Klein Collection (calvinklein.co.uk)
Advertisement
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Jacket, £4,300, by Phoebe Philo (phoebephilo.com)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Gilet, £850; trousers, £1,350, both by Coach (coach.com). Top, price on request, by Durazzi Milano (durazzimilano.com). Boots, price on request, by Calvin Klein Collection (calvinklein.co.uk)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Advertisement
Top, price on request, by Durazzi Milano (durazzimilano.com). Top (worn underneath), £300, by Acne Studios (acnestudios.com). Skirt, £300, by Meryll Rogge (meryllrogge.com)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Coat, price on request, by Bottega Veneta (bottegaveneta.com)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Advertisement
Shirt; trousers, both price on request, by Victoria Beckham (victoriabeckham.com). Boots, price on request, by Calvin Klein Collection (calvinklein.co.uk)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Dress, £1,975, by Ferragamo (ferragamo.com)
(Image credit: Photography by Geordie Wood, fashion by Jason Hughes)
Saint Laurent
Advertisement
Lavallière Dress in Nylon
Acne Studios
Thin Ribbed Tank Top
Versace
Straight-Leg Leather Trousers
Advertisement
Phoebe Philo
Harrington Jacket
Victoria Beckham
Embroidered Woven Shirt
Model: Colin Jones at Women Management. Casting: Bert Martirosyan. Hair: Michael Thomas Lollo at The Only Agency using Living Proof. Make-up: Akiko Owada at The Wall Group using Chanel. Digi tech: Dayvid LeMmon. Photography assistant: Karen Goss. Fashion assistant: Lucy Proctor. Production: Danielle Quigley. Production assistant: Sheriff Production Retouching: May. Special thanks to Amangiri, Utah.
Advertisement
Receive our daily digest of inspiration, escapism and design stories from around the world direct to your inbox.
Many Americans don’t like the AI data centers popping up in their communities, though Kevin O’Leary thinks that’s because they don’t fully understand them.
Advertisement
O’Leary, the venture capitalist and “Shark Tank” investor who recently starred as a villainous businessman in “Marty Supreme,” said Americans have misconceptions about data centers and their environmental impact.
“It’s understanding the concerns of people, but at the same time, think about the number of jobs,” O’Leary said in a post on X on Friday.
Addressing environmental worries, O’Leary noted that he graduated from the University of Waterloo with a degree in environmental studies.
“When a group comes to me and says, ‘Look, I have concerns about water, I have concerns about air, I have concerns about wildlife,’ I totally get it,” O’Leary said.
O’Leary has clashed with residents in Box Elder County, Utah, over a new AI data center he’s backing on a 40,000-acre campus.
Advertisement
County commissioners approved the project, which is also backed by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority, on Monday despite the community opposition. O’Leary said, without providing evidence, that the criticism mainly came from “professional protesters” who were “paid by somebody.”
One major concern for residents about the data center — dubbed the Stratos Project — is that it could strain the water supply. Data centers can use millions of gallons of water each day. Increased utility bills, noise, and a drop in quality of life are also points of contention.
O’Leary said the public misunderstands the impact of data centers because they were “poorly represented” in the past, and that the technology powering them has “advanced dramatically.” He said data centers don’t use as much water as they once did and can use a closed-loop system to avoid evaporation. Data centers can also rely on air-cooled turbines as an alternative to managing the temperature of the computer arrays, he said.
A fact sheet published by Box Elder County said the project won’t divert water from the nearby Great Salt Lake, agriculture, or homes. It also says that Stratos won’t increase electricity prices or taxes.
Many residents, however, are not so sure. The Salt Lake Tribune reported on Thursday that an application to divert water from the Salt Wells Spring stream, near the Great Salt Lake and long used by a local ranch for irrigation, was rescinded after nearly thousands of Utah residents lodged complaints.
Advertisement
“At some point, understanding the value of sustainability, water and air rights, indigenous rights, and making sure the constituencies understand what you’re doing is going to be more valuable than the equity you raise,” O’Leary said on X.
Anjney Midha, a Stanford University adjunct lecturer who appeared on the “Access” podcast this week, would agree with that sentiment. He said that listening to local communities and being transparent about the intentions and impacts of data centers are essential to making them work.
“My view is that if it’s not legible to the public that these data centers and the infrastructure required to unblock this kind of frontier technology progress are serving their benefit, then it’s not going to work out,” Midha said.
In a subsequent post on X on Friday, O’Leary said his project would be “totally transparent.”
“We want it to be the shining example of how you do this,” he said.