Connect with us

Utah

Labor leaders make final push to get repeal of anti-union bill on Utahns’ ballots

Published

on

Labor leaders make final push to get repeal of anti-union bill on Utahns’ ballots


With days remaining, union officials are scrambling to get signatures in a number of critical senate districts.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Union workers host a signature gathering event to put a referendum on the 2026 ballot to rescind HB267, a law that affects the ability of public workers to organize, at University of Utah in Salt Lake City on Friday, March 21, 2025.

With less than a week left before they have to turn in signatures, labor leaders are scrambling to collect enough signatures to put a referendum on the ballot to repeal a law cracking down on unions passed during the last legislative session.

Advertisement

April 15 is the final day Utahns can sign petitions for the “Protect Utah Workers” referendum, and organizers are planning to submit their signature packets the following day to county clerks to be verified.

“This is the big push this last week,” said Renee Pinkney, president of the Utah Education Association. “We’re in the home stretch, and we need people to get out to the various events, and we still need people to sign petitions right up until April 15.”

UEA, AFL-CIO, Utah Public Employees Association, Utah Professional Firefighters, AFSCME and others have banded together in an attempt to repeal HB267, which bans collective bargaining with government employers — meaning those public employee unions cannot represent members in contract negotiations.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Union workers host a signature gathering event to put a referendum on the 2026 ballot to rescind HB267, a law that affects the ability of public workers to organize, at University of Utah in Salt Lake City on Friday, March 21, 2025.

“We’re coming down to the wire and its always one of those ‘hold your breath, here you go guys’ [things],” said Jeff Worthing, president of the Utah AFL-CIO. “You just pray that everyone has done the right process in getting the signatures and that they all verify out, because if they don’t … then it was all for naught, so it can be a little nerve-wracking.”

Advertisement

During the final week, Pinkney said organizers are trying to ensure volunteers who have taken packets out remember to return them, whether the packets are full of signatures or not.

Utah has the most onerous referendum law in the country. To get a repeal measure on the ballot, supporters have 30 days to gather signatures from 8% of the registered voters statewide — equating to 140,748 people — as well as meet that same 8% threshold in 15 of the state’s 29 Senate districts. Those targets range from about 3,000 to 5,700, depending on the district.

Currently, organizers believe they have enough signatures in six Senate districts, but still need to meet their targets in nine more.

Pinkney said efforts are focused intensively in this final week on gathering signatures in critical areas of Davis and Utah counties.

The referendum movement has been bankrolled in large part by money from the National Education Association and teacher unions around the state and country. The Protect Utah Worker Political Issues Committee has reported receiving nearly $2.6 million, which includes a $1 million contribution from NEA and another roughly $750,000 in in-kind donations — things like payments to professional signature gatherers, Spanish translation of materials and supplies.

Advertisement

In addition, after the signatures are submitted, opponents of the referendum have 45 days to contact voters who signed the packets and try to convince them to rescind their support.

While labor groups had collected more than 130,000 signatures as of March 28 and say they now have more than the required number of signatures in hand, but they are finding more than expected are invalid for various reasons, prompting them to raise their signature goal before the deadline.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Union workers host a signature gathering event to put a referendum on the 2026 ballot to rescind HB267, a law that affects the ability of public workers to organize, at University of Utah in Salt Lake City on Friday, March 21, 2025.

Groups supporting the collective bargaining ban are mounting their own offensive. The Utah chapter of the Koch brothers-backed Americans For Prosperity is running ads urging voters to “Decline to Sign.” Utah Parents United is pushing back, as well, accusing teachers of putting their own paydays ahead of students’ well-being.

The bill the Legislature passed is good policy, said Kevin Greene, state director of Americans for Prosperity.

Advertisement

“I think it protects taxpayers,” he said. Unlike when private companies negotiate with unions, Greene said, with public employee unions, “the taxpayer is the ultimate person who is being negotiated against and we actually don’t have any say as taxpayers when collective bargaining is happening.”

That said, based on the 130,000-signature figure previously released, Greene said he thinks “they’re well on their way to more than enough signatures.”

If the unions do get enough, Greene said AFP will see if there are specific districts where it can get involved to knock off enough to make a difference.

Worthington said he has seen huge momentum for the effort to repeal the anti-union law and doesn’t think the opposition efforts will make a dent.

“People are tired of the bulls—,” Worthington said. “They’re tired of the attacks on working-class people. They’re tired of the attacks from our own legislators and government.”

Advertisement



Source link

Utah

Utah’s bottom-up approach to clean energy

Published

on

Utah’s bottom-up approach to clean energy


Like many utilities in the Trump era, Rocky Mountain Power is pulling back on its renewable energy plans. But more than a dozen Utah communities are taking matters into their own hands.

About 300,000 homes and businesses will soon be part of a novel, bottom-up program to bring new clean power to the state’s fossil-fuel-heavy grid. The Utah Renewable Communities initiative allows city and county governments to offset their electricity use with 100 percent renewable power, backed by a $4 monthly bill surcharge.

“There’s no other program available to our residents that is this affordable or this impactful to Midvale’s environmental and economic future,” said Dustin Gettel, mayor of the Salt Lake City suburb of Midvale.

Advertisement

Midvale is set to vote Tuesday on whether to join 15 other communities that have signed up ahead of an enrollment deadline next week. Three other eligible communities have opted out, although one may reconsider.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

15-acre wildfire threatens structures north of Birdseye in Utah County

Published

on

15-acre wildfire threatens structures north of Birdseye in Utah County


A wildfire burning north of Birdseye in Utah County is threatening structures, according to Utah Fire Info.

The fire was estimated at 15 acres Thursday afternoon. The Anderson Point Fire has since grown to 40 acres, according to Utah Fire Info.

A helicopter and multiple fire engine crews responded.

Information about the cause of the fire was not immediately available.

Advertisement
Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

The world’s largest data center was supposed to run on 100% natural gas. Utah’s Republican governor says ‘never.’

Published

on

The world’s largest data center was supposed to run on 100% natural gas. Utah’s Republican governor says ‘never.’


This coverage is made possible through a partnership between Grist and The Salt Lake Tribune, a nonprofit newsroom in Utah.

A sprawling, 40,000-acre data center planned for northern Utah has stirred up controversy across the state over the past month, partly because of the pollution it’s expected to contribute to a region that already struggles with smog.

Officials with the quasi-governmental Military Installation Development Authority, or MIDA, which approved the project and created tax incentives to spur its development, have become de facto cheerleaders for the data center campus, called the Stratos Project. They say Kevin O’Leary, the Canadian TV personality and the main backer of Stratos, specifically selected a remote valley north of the Great Salt Lake because a gas pipeline runs through it.

The plant that will generate electricity for the data complex would be powered “100 percent off the Ruby Pipeline,” a MIDA official said in April. 

But after weeks of protests, reams of comments against the project, and disgruntled Utahns digging into state leaders’ finances and family businesses, the state’s Republican governor has now asserted the project will “never” be solely powered by natural gas.

Advertisement

“That’s never going to happen,” Governor Spencer Cox told The Salt Lake Tribune last week. “The very first phase will be natural gas, but the other phases should not be. They should be nuclear, and they should be geothermal, and solar and other technology.”

The proposed Stratos Project is light on details so far. O’Leary has said that at full build, it will be one of the biggest data centers in the world, as large as Washington, D.C. Scientists, environmental advocates and some residents have raised alarms about the impact that the project — and the possibility of a massive natural gas plant to power it — could have on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and water supplies near the shrinking Great Salt Lake.

According to some estimates, a 9-gigawatt power plant entirely powered by natural gas could raise Utah’s carbon emissions by 64 percent. Although it’s still unclear how much water the facility would need, the project’s developers have said they’re working to secure 13,000 acre-feet in Hansel Valley and the surrounding area, which is mostly agricultural. That’s enough water to meet the needs of more than 20,000 households in Utah.

The north end of the Great Salt Lake and Hansel Valley, the planned site for the Stratos Project.
Trent Nelson / The Salt Lake Tribune

Opposition to the proposal has been intense. A water right filed to support the data center and power plant received nearly 4,000 letters of protest this month. Opponents held a rally at Utah’s Capitol last week and delivered a letter to Cox with more than 6,000 signatures urging him to take “binding action” to preserve the Great Salt Lake instead of issuing platitudes over social media.

During a news conference on Wednesday announcing a geothermal partnership with the neighboring states of Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico, Cox acknowledged problems with the rollout of the Stratos Project in Box Elder County, saying future decisions like it should involve his office and elected representatives.

Advertisement

“There’s no question, the process was not good,” Cox told reporters. “It’s something I’ve worried about for a long time with that entity that made that decision.” 

Cox appeared to be referring to MIDA, a development authority ostensibly meant to fund projects to support the military. Its biggest developments in recent years, however, include a hotel at the Deer Valley luxury ski resort and a swanky ski village. MIDA officials and other Stratos supporters have called the project a matter of national security.

“That was not a decision that was made by me or the Legislature,” Cox said. “In the future, those are decisions that should be made by us, so that we can do these types of things ahead of time to make sure people understand what’s actually happening out there. That did not happen, and it should happen.”

When he made his comments, Cox was hosting the final workshop in his “Energy Superabundance” initiative as chair of the Western Governors Association, part of a broader push that complements his “Operation Gigawatt” goal to more than double Utah’s energy production over the next decade.

Electricity use across the country has held relatively steady for decades, but a surge in demand for artificial intelligence computing and data centers is putting a strain on the electric grid. That’s left Western states scrambling to build new energy supplies.

Advertisement

At the same time, public skepticism toward large data center developments appears to be growing, particularly over concerns involving water use, noise, energy costs, and pollution.

“It feels like the future is here,” Cox said during his opening remarks at the workshop. “It’s coming quicker than people asked for, and there are so many amazing things that can come from that future, and some pretty awful ones as well.”

Read Next
A protestor holds a sign at a meeting
Utah’s fragile desert could feel like the Sahara if America’s biggest data center gets built

Cox has also pushed for faster permitting timelines for large energy and infrastructure projects, arguing that environmental review processes often take too long. “This whole idea of being rushed — I’m so tired of our country taking years to get stuff done,” he said in April. “It’s the dumbest thing ever. We think that taking time makes things better or safer. It absolutely does not.”

Advertisement

Last week, Cox struck a more measured tone as criticism of the project continued to mount. “One of the things people are worried about, and rightfully so, is air quality,” he said in a brief interview as he left the workshop. “That’s a yearlong [permitting] process. … We’re not speeding those up. Those are really important, and we want to make sure that things are done the right way.”

Earlier this month, O’Leary, who was featured on the reality show “Shark Tank,” also seemed to suggest that renewables could help power the Stratos Project. He described other technological advances — such as turbines cooled with air rather than water — before turning to the natural gas power causing a stir.

“We can also put a percentage of the power generation through solar, wind, and batteries, because the battery technology is 10x more efficient than it was just five years ago,” O’Leary posted on X on May 5. “So that’s very helpful, because it makes the cost of energy lower.”

But he stopped short of fully endorsing renewables for his project.

Logan Mitchell, a climate scientist and analyst with Utah Clean Energy, calculated that a 9-gigawatt natural gas power plant will produce around 35 million metric tons of carbon emissions each year. By comparison, the entire state of Utah generates 55 million metric tons annually, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. So the Stratos Project could raise Utah’s emissions by about 64 percent.

Advertisement

“That’s massive,” Mitchell said. But it could be even more, because his estimate didn’t account for “any additional methane leakage” from piping and using the natural gas, he said.






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending