Connect with us

Utah

Gordon Monson: The Utah Jazz’s plan for tanking is in a pained state of limbo

Published

on

Gordon Monson: The Utah Jazz’s plan for tanking is in a pained state of limbo


Lauri Markkanen spent last summer in the Finnish military.

He spent this Jazz season in a tank.

You know the difference between America’s M1A2 Abrams and the Jazz?

The Abrams shoots straight. So does the Leopard 2A6, Finland’s main battle tank.

Advertisement

While we’re at it: Knock, knock. Who’s there? Tank. Tank Who? You’re welcome.

I’ve got a few more tank jokes, but they might go off track.

Apologies. Sincere apologies.

Not only are jokes about tanks and tanking not funny, living through them, or in the Jazz’s case living in them, is a thousand times worse.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Utah Jazz guard Collin Sexton (2) takes a moment to get back up during their loss to the Cleveland Cavaliers 113-129 at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.

Advertisement

And yet, here they are, having lost a gazillion games down the stretch — in a fashion that’s alternated between comical and just plain sad. And you can almost hear a player like Markkanen singing the lead vocals down on the bench, along with Jazz fans crooning in the chorus up in the stands, the old classic from Stealers Wheel:

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right,

here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

Can we say it all clear here?

Losing stinks. It’s worse than that, but I can’t use the more accurate verb in a family newspaper. Tanking stinks. But the Jazz and their fans have been shoehorned into getting used to it by management. And the fans never stopped going to games. They’ve given a team stripped down to its rawest stubs more support than many folks could have imagined.

Advertisement

If the losing and the tanking are to continue, what will the seats at the Delta Center look like then, even if they go cheap?

Failing a couple of dramatic moves — the use by the Jazz of some of their prime future draft prospects in trade for accomplished seasoned players now — this offseason, a proud franchise, a franchise that historically has known so much regular-season winning, but never achieved the ultimate postseason goal — will find out.

The fact that the Delta Center is empty as it’s fallen dark in April just might spill over when the lights flip back on in October. The Jazz and their fans will not only discover the bitterness of being pretty much beaten before the ball is tipped at the start of games, they’ll also know what it’s like to be looked upon as a joke. That’s something most Jazz fans have never experienced, not since the early years when the team first arrived from New Orleans.

That won’t be fun. It won’t be funny. Not for anyone, not the people who root for the home team around here.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Utah Jazz coach Will Hardy argues with referee CJ Washington (12) during the game against the Cleveland Cavaliers at the Delta Center in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, April 2, 2024.

Advertisement

But it was what Danny Ainge had in mind from the moment he decided to offload Rudy Gobert and Donovan Mitchell and Mike Conley and the rest of the guts of a team that just a few years back won more games in the regular season than any other team. The coach of that group, Quin Snyder, was not made to feel welcome as he should have been by the powers that be with the Jazz. He didn’t leave on his own because he was concerned or afraid of a rebuild. It was, in part, because he was not made to feel comfortable with management’s decision-making process.

And, as it turned out, that decision-making process hasn’t been very good.

And it’s taking its toll on the ultra-competitive and exceptionally capable Will Hardy.

The front office wanted flexibility so it could have a chance at outsmarting the league, but to this date, they’ve outsmarted themselves. We get it. The NBA pushes mediocre teams to get worse in order to get better through the draft, especially small-to-mid-market teams, outfits that aren’t “destination” cities for free agents, outfits that can’t make up for their boneheaded mistakes by swiping away quality players as they exit other teams.

However, if the Jazz were going to tank, something they’ve not often done in the past, nor as we see now are any good at, they wasted time doing so, fiddle-faddling around, prolonging the team’s pain by being part-good, part-bad.

Advertisement

At present, they’re real bad, holding their few quality players out, as the Hindenburg burns to the ground. Oh, the humanity.

As they traded away their experienced big Frenchman — Gobert — for future draft picks, they blew their shot at the young big Frenchman — Wemby — by going only partway with their plan last season. They currently are paying big time for that bygone indiscretion, whatever their odds, long or short, might have been at landing Wembanyama. And while this coming draft is supposedly talent-sparse, they won, at first, too much, planned deferments or not, and now they are collapsing all around. The 2025 draft looks much more promising.

And everywhere you go, people ask, “What’s the Jazz’s plan? How is this going to work?”

The answers: Uuuuuggh and duuuuhhh.

Nobody knows because the Jazz themselves don’t know. They can’t know because they’re neither in the minds of potential acquisitions, nor the teams for which they play. The Jazz want to make the aforementioned offseason moves, but they aren’t clear on what or who they can get when and at what price.

Advertisement

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Utah Jazz forward John Collins (20) gets the ball knocked away by Dallas Mavericks forward P.J. Washington (25) during an NBA basketball game Monday, March 25, 2024, in Salt Lake City.

General manager Justin Zanik avoids the tank word and instead focuses on phrases such as “development of young players.” That digs up another question: Are guys like Keyonte George, Taylor Hendricks and Brice Sensabaugh, even if they bump ahead as the Jazz lose, difference-makers?

The flow of free agents, something the Jazz have rarely tapped into with any significance, has slowed, he says, because of the NBA’s emphasis on helping teams extend their own players.

“The main driver of how you’re building teams is developing your players and adding by trade,” Zanik says. “We’re in a more unique position than some other teams. … Not only just the flexibility we have, but just the multiple assets we have to deal.”

He adds: “You always want to get as many No. 1 guys as you can. In the absence of that, you want to get players that help the team function, and hopefully in a longer timeline than just a one- or two-year basis because of age.”

Advertisement

But that’s like sitting at the roulette table, hoping the ball lands fortuitously, as is guessing about positioning in future drafts, who might be available at what spot and what it would take to get to that spot.

Zanik tells The Tribune’s Andy Larsen that the Jazz want to build around Markkanen and Walker Kessler, but are those players, while good, great enough to lead the Jazz to the higher trajectory they sought from the beginning?

As for the t-word, Zanik says, “I think it’s really hard to bottom out with what we already have, which I would rather have than not have.”

Then why are the Jazz holding players out now as they lose and lose badly? They already are tanking, whether they admit it or not.

It makes you wonder whether it might have been better for the Jazz to hang onto what they previously had, as sick as it had become for stupid reasons, healing up competitively with their few All-Stars on the roster, and then scrap and claw for whatever cheap abridgments they might have been able to acquire as complementary pieces.

Advertisement

Or, what if the Jazz had held onto Gobert and Conley, and traded Mitchell, but added Markkanen and some draft picks? Just wondering here, just wondering.

Conversely, if you buy into the tank mode, and it’s understandable why you would for the reasons already discussed, then buy it hard and fast, go all in, and get ‘er done. But, again, it’s a crapshoot. You could be like Oklahoma City, if somehow you’d be fortunate enough to land Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, among others. Even at that, are the Thunder much better than the Jazz were just a few years ago? Or, you could be like the Clippers of the ‘80s, losing and drafting, losing and drafting, losing and drafting, straight into waves of laughter around the league.

Tanks, but no tanks.

Yeah, what do we know, then? We know this: Tanking is good, when it works. Trusting the process is good, when it’s worth trusting. When it doesn’t, when it isn’t, ticket prices don’t go down, wins don’t go up, and it …

Stinks. No, it (fill in the forbidden verb).

Advertisement

Uh-huh, that.



Source link

Utah

Utah victims lose hundreds of thousands to jury duty phone scams cost

Published

on

Utah victims lose hundreds of thousands to jury duty phone scams cost


A threatening voicemail caught KUTV 2News photojournalist Jeremy Dubas completely off guard near the end of his shift.

The call came from a man claiming to be Sgt. Tyson Young with the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office in Nebraska. The caller told Dubas he had missed jury duty for a major case and that meant jail time.

Dubas, who grew up in Nebraska, has lived in Utah for more than two years. But the caller seemed prepared, saying the subpoena went to an old address and was signed for by someone else on his behalf.

“It’s such a different scam from what I’m used to watching out for,” said Dubas. “I’m still on the phone with him and he said, ‘Okay, so we need to get a payment so we can freeze the warrant for your arrest so you don’t get arrested.’”

Advertisement

About 40 minutes into the call, Dubas sent roughly $200 through PayPal. Within an hour, he realized it was a scam.

MORE | Scam Calls

“I’m very on high alert when I get an email, when I get a phone call, when I get a text message,” he explained. “This one just caught me off guard.”

Investigators with the Davis County Sheriff’s Office here in Utah said Jeremy Dubas is far from alone.

Megan Reid, a detective with Davis County, said the Sheriff’s Office gets at least 30 reports of jury duty scams a day. And Utah is losing a significant amount of money to them.

“Hundreds of thousands,” Reid said. “Just last week, we had a victim lose $12,000. That was their entire savings in that account.”

Advertisement

And it’s not limited to just older adults. Scammers target victims across all age groups, using real detective names and spoofing actual law enforcement phone numbers. They pull personal details from online sources, adding legitimacy to their predatory calls.

The feeling of shame after falling victim often keeps people from reporting what happened.

“This just happened last week,” said Reid. “He drove several cities away to a cryptocurrency ATM that the scammers knew didn’t have warning signs. He lost everything in his savings and hadn’t told his family yet. The money was gone within two minutes.”

In Dubas’ case, PayPal was able to refund his money. Now, he hopes his experience helps warn others.

“I felt dumb for not seeing the signs right away,” said Dubas, later adding, “If it seems like it’s serious and needs to be handled immediately, that’s when you’re supposed to pause and think about what’s really going on.”

Advertisement

The scam is being investigated at the federal level because of how much money is being lost. In some cases, it is possible to recover funds, but investigators said time is critical.

_____



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

As judge decides whether to close the redistricting case, could lawmakers just make a new map?

Published

on

As judge decides whether to close the redistricting case, could lawmakers just make a new map?


SALT LAKE CITY — The judge overseeing the lawsuit over Utah’s redistricting process is expected to issue a ruling before Christmas on whether to grant the legislature’s request to close the case, sending it to the Utah Supreme Court.

Lawyers for the Utah State Legislature have urged 3rd District Court Judge Dianna Gibson to issue a final ruling, clearing their path for an appeal. They argued that the case effectively wrapped up once the judge issued a series of rulings on the legality of Proposition 4 and chose a new map for Utah’s congressional districts.

The League of Women Voters of Utah and Mormon Women for Ethical Government basically got what they wanted, argued Frank Chang, an attorney for the Utah State Legislature.

“What if I told you I disagree?” Judge Gibson said to him in the midst of arguments, asking for case law that even allows a case to be closed so abruptly.

Advertisement

During a hastily called hearing on Monday, lawyers for the League and MWEG urged the judge to reject the request. They argued that the case is far from over with claims yet to be addressed and the legislature failed to seek the proper interlocutory appeals when the time was appropriate. The injunctions she entered on Prop. 4 and the new map are preliminary, they argued, and the legislature passed new bills rewriting some of the rules of redistricting, which keeps the case alive.

When Judge Gibson asked if the legislature was essentially right that the case is basically over with the 2026 election? The plaintiffs suggested lawmakers might still bypass the courts and pass a new map in the upcoming legislative session.

“That is sort of a question mark I have in light of some statements, the public statements that have been made by certain legislators,” said Mark Gaber, an attorney for the plaintiffs. “Sen. Weiler, on his podcast, suggested the legislature could pass a new map for the 2026 election if a permanent injunction had been entered. That’s a question I have: if it’s intended by the legislature. If that’s the case? Remedial proceedings could certainly not be done as there would need to be a proceeding as to that new map.”

When Judge Gibson asked Chang about it, he said it was what “one member said in a podcast.”

“If this court is seeking to find out what the intent of the legislature is, it’s the act of the legislature. The most recent one here was what the legislature did in the special session,” he said.

Advertisement

In that special session, lawmakers voted to move the deadline for congressional candidate filings to March and pass a resolution condemning Judge Gibson’s ruling.

As the court hearing as going on, FOX 13 News texted Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Woods Cross, about his remarks. Sen. Weiler (who is an attorney in his day job), replied that he was explaining to listeners the difference between interlocutory and final appeals and just stating “hypotheticals” in response to any stay issued by the Utah Supreme Court.

“But I’m not aware of any plans to do that,” he wrote.

In 2018, voters approved Prop. 4, which created an independent redistricting commission to draw lines for boundaries in congress, legislature and state school board. When the legislature overrode the citizen ballot initiative and passed its own maps, the League and MWEG sued arguing that the people have a right to alter and reform their government. In particular, they alleged the congressional map that the Utah State Legislature approved was gerrymandered to favor Republicans.

The court sided with them, ruling that Prop. 4 is law and throwing out the congressional map. She ordered lawmakers to redraw a new one. They did, under protest, but she rejected their map for not meeting Prop. 4’s neutral redistricting criteria. Instead, she chose a map submitted by the plaintiffs that she declared met the tenets of Prop. 4. It has resulted in a Salt Lake County-centric district that Democratic candidates have rushed to enter, viewing it as more competitive for them.

Advertisement

The Utah State Legislature has argued that it has the sole constitutional right to draw boundaries in redistricting, setting up a legal showdown that will go to the Utah Supreme Court and potentially the U.S. Supreme Court.

Judge Gibson said she planned to issue a ruling before Christmas on whether to finalize the case.





Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Keller wins it in OT, Mammoth recover from Jets’ late rally | NHL.com

Published

on

Keller wins it in OT, Mammoth recover from Jets’ late rally | NHL.com


The goal was Connor’s 300th in the NHL. He is the third player in Jets/Atlanta Thrashers history to hit the mark, behind Scheifele (353) and Ilya Kovalchuk (328).

“Just a pretty cool milestone,” Connor said. “Once you look back on your career, that’s kind of the stuff you’ll remember. But right now it’s focusing on winning, trying to be the best player I can, and helping out.”

Connor scored his second goal at 15:23 of the third period, beating Vejmelka blocker side with a one-timer to cut the lead to 3-2.

“I think we just knew that we needed to be better,” Connor said of the comeback. “I think we were on our toes more, jumping and making plays and hemming them in.”

Advertisement

Barron scored just 25 seconds later, beating Vejmelka glove side with a snap shot tie it 3-3.

“That first period was ugly. It was really ugly,” Winnipeg coach Scott Arniel said. “We got better in the second, certainly dominated in the third, but at the end of the day, you can’t play two periods in this league and look to have success.”

Crouse gave the Mammoth a 1-0 lead at 5:20 of the first period. Guenther skated in from the blue line and shot through the legs of Jets defenseman Logan Stanley to put the puck on Hellebuyck. The rebound of his shot then found Crouse in front, where he scored blocker side with a slap shot.

“We made it interesting on ourselves,” Crouse said. “Definitely not the way we wanted the third period to go, but credit to our group, that’s not easy. They scored two right away and then we went right into OT pretty much, so credit to the group for having the right mindset and being able to get the win.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending