Connect with us

Seattle, WA

Realio’s Ratings: Seattle Sounders vs. 2024, #20-#17

Published

on

Realio’s Ratings: Seattle Sounders vs. 2024, #20-#17


#20 Danny Leyva – 2024 Overall Rating: 5.33 in 21 appearances

MLS Regular Season: 5.25 in 12 appearances

MLS Playoffs: 6.50 in 2 appearances

US Open Cup: 5.50 in 2 appearances

Leagues Cup: 5.00 in 5 appearances

Advertisement

MOTM = 1 High = 7 Low = 4

Entering 2024, Danny Leyva had been a bit forgotten, overshadowed by others in the Sounders’ development pipeline who were more highly touted. Still only 21 years old, Danny had an interesting year. He was asked to play a number of positions across the midfield, and he found some success as a creative player to replace some of the attacking skill desperately needed by the Sounders. Leyva built confidence in the middle of the season which led to some opportunities late to show his impact in vitally important appearances. 

Highlights: Leyva announced himself early in 2024, and in late March he earned a ratings MOTM for great work in a losing effort against San Jose. In this match, we started to get an idea of the excitement Danny could create:

After growing into the match speed, Danny looked excellent, helping control the center of the field and displaying outstanding vision to stretch the opponent’s defense. His vertical passing and willingness to move the ball quickly were tremendous, earning him five key passes, a shot, and 85 percent passing on 70 quality touches in the center of the pitch.”

“Danny did his best Nico Lodeiro impression, creating from a variety of areas and adding something we haven’t seen in the midfield yet this season. His ability to turn and quickly release switching balls, including an absolute dime to Jordan Morris in the 57th minute, was dynamic and inspired. Leyva’s set pieces were by far the best we have seen in a while, giving chance after chance to Seattle through consistent, dangerous service.”

Advertisement

Danny showed that when given the opportunity, he could be a fulcrum to quickly move the ball around to create scoring chances, and his set pieces were beautiful. Months later in the playoffs against Houston, it was again Leyva who added to the attack centrally: “After Herrera was shipped for stupidly spitting at the referee, 75 was the number coach Schmetzer called. Leyva responded with a fantastic shift, completely switching the Seattle offense from defunct to defiant. He immediately drew a yellow card with his dribbling in the 63rd minute and did it again in the 79th. Houston suddenly had to deal with a dynamic central attacker who moved all over the field, combined with the wings, and passed vertically to create chances. Leyva finished with two shots and a key pass, a secondary assist on the game-winner, four touches in the Houston box, and cleanly finished one of Seattle’s penalty tries during the shootout.” These performances paved a potential route to long term Sounders success. 

Lowlights: Asked to be a defensive midfielder for much of the year, Leyva consistently struggled with perhaps the most important part of the role: defense. Often out of place and prone to overly physical play because of poor positioning and lack of pace, Danny wasn’t the reliable defensive stopper that Seattle requires of the deep midfielder role. He was especially unsuccessful when his midfield partner mirrored his skillset. Not pairing well with Obed Vargas, especially, meant limited opportunity for Leyva to find minutes at defensive midfield. This put Leyva in a tough spot, because the late substitute minutes available were often given over to better defensive options. These decisions were likely based on moments like these: “A clumsy tackle outside the box gave Colorado a set piece and then they managed to put the dead ball through his spot on the wall to eventually score. Bad look all around for Leyva.” This was in March when the Sounders conceded with just moments to go and were forced to split points with Colorado, as Leyva’s defensive struggles were exploited. 

Outlook: After his appearance in the playoffs I noted: “Having a 10 on the field made a huge difference for Seattle’s offense, and Leyva showed he can be a legitimate 10. His vision, movement, and connection brought the Sounders to more success in his time on the field than almost any minute prior, showing a maturity and evolution of his skills that reminds us he’s only 21,” and this is the exciting part of the future outlook for Danny Leyva. It’s a struggle for any young player in the Sounders organization to displace the high priced DPs that have usually occupied the attacking midfield position, but Danny showed in 2024 that he is an adequate replacement who adds something different from other players. His ability to bring forward push is unique among his peers, and Leyva has a big opportunity in 2025 to build on this potential. 

A special Realio’s Ratings: Goodbye, Raúl

Just a stone-cold killer with a heart of gold.

Advertisement

Realio’s Ratings: Seattle Sounders vs. 2024, #26-#22

Round two of our ratings recap features a lot of potential, both untapped and unrealized.

Realio’s Ratings: Seattle Sounders vs. 2024, #31-#27

It’s time for 2024’s ratings recap. Our first installment features youngsters who saw a variety of opportunities.

#19 Nathan – 2024 Overall Rating: 5.50 in 6 appearances

MLS Regular Season: 5.25 in 4 appearances

MLS Playoffs: 6.00 in 2 appearances

High = 6 Low = 5

Advertisement

Thought to be a big signing in the offseason, injuries stunted Nathan’s brief Sounders career, limiting him to a start and 64-minute appearance on opening day, followed by a 20-match absence, a few random moments before disappearing again, and then a surprising re-emergence late. To his credit, Nathan worked all season through his injuries and was ready when Seattle needed him, showing up in the playoffs and delivering quality performances. Having Nathan on the team allowed Seattle to move on from Xavier Arreaga, providing some valuable roster flexibility. 

Highlights: Nathan did not play badly as a Sounder, earning average ratings each time out. That came in handy in the playoffs, when Seattle’s deep bench was tested. Subbed on in the 66th minute for an injured Yeimar against LAFC in the Western Conference Semifinal, Nathan came in cold to an intense game with a difficult matchup: “Nathan, who hadn’t really played all year, stepped in and was fantastic. He was clearly comfortable with the tactics, had six vital clearances, completed 91 percent of his passes, and was about as good of a Yeimar replacement as you can ask for. To come in, ice cold from the bench, to succeed against Bouanga on the road in the playoffs: that is the kind of thing this coach, staff, and administration rarely get credit for, and something they (and Nathan) should be absolutely thrilled with.” Replacing perhaps the best defender in the league and stifling one of the best attackers in the league was incredible work by Nathan in difficult conditions. When tasked with a second straight appearance in the conference final in LA, again Nathan was ready: “He had another tremendous effort, barely putting a foot wrong the entire match, meshing well between Ragen and Alex Roldan, and looking like he belonged in the back.” Nathan truly was “next man up,” showing MLS-level talent every time he stepped on the field for Seattle. 

Lowlights: There weren’t many lowlights for Nathan, because he only earned time in six games. For his salary, he should have been much more involved in matches. Nathan made one more appearance than a guy who was traded in April, and less than half as many as the backup keeper. Being stuck behind the best central defense in the league didn’t help, but Nathan also seemed to have constant injury issues. Unable to get in the discussion for minutes was concerning, as Seattle played in multiple cup competitions. There were opportunities to rotate lineups and find time for nearly every rostered player in some fashion, yet Nathan was notably absent. He wasn’t healthy when he needed to be, so was relegated to being an expensive bench player. He had far too little impact for TAM investment, and needed to be consistently excellent to remain a Sounder after 2024. 

Outlook: The injuries that limited his time in 2024, paired with his high cost, likely led to Nathan being deprioritized by the Sounders. There are other strong and efficiently priced pieces, making his spot on the roster a luxury that is better spent on increased offense. To his credit, Nathan showed in the playoffs that he is a good MLS defender, and that performance likely earned him a nice contract somewhere else. He is only 29, and hopefully his earlier ACL tear is behind him, but the constant injuries in Seattle may have dampened some enthusiasm to sign a highly priced player when there are legitimate questions about his durability. 

#18 Alex Roldan – 2024 Overall Rating: 5.55 in 42 appearances

MLS Regular Season: 5.34 in 29 appearances

Advertisement

MLS Playoffs: 6.50 in 4 appearances

US Open Cup: 5.25 in 4 appearances

Leagues Cup: 6.20 in 5 appearances

High = 8 Low = 3

As recently as 2023, Seattle relied on Alex to be a large part of the offense, using his wingback abilities to push high and offset the left-leaning offense of Nico Lodeiro. With new teammates and the addition of more direct players in front of him, Alex’s role drastically changed in 2024. Rather than bombing up the wing and crossing into dangerous areas, Roldan became more of a stay home defender who drifted inside at times to help control possession centrally. He struggled with this in the early season before adapting to a new role, leading to a wide range of ratings scores. Sometimes Alex looked completely washed, unable to add value on either side of the field, and other times his control in tight spaces was absolutely essential for Seattle’s success in overloading the midfield and building offense from the inside out. 

Advertisement

Highlights: In a Leagues Cup shellacking of eventual MLS Cup champs LA Galaxy, Alex was excellent:

The resurgent Alex Roldan has been improving over the past few months and was a killer in this one, connecting with his brother up the wing, showing strong defense, and when presented with an opportunity, delivering a dagger goal deep in first half stoppage time.”

“Roldan started early in the 25th looking direct to Vargas for a nice chance, earned a 30th minute corner and 35th minute shot before ERUPTING with an audacious curling shot before half off a layoff from his big bro. He had an excellent all-around performance.”

This inch-perfect finish was the kind of direct impact Alex can have when in an advanced position, and it was no coincidence that Seattle’s offense was humming when the Broldans dominated the creative right wing. For at least one match, the Sounders offense looked potent, again fueled by Roldanery up the right, and Alex made essential runs and connections that both tormented LA’s defense and forced their wings to stay home, supporting a positive defensive shape as Seattle completely flummoxed the Galaxy for a majority of the match. This was one example of how Alex jumpstarted the offense, and he also developed some unique possession play throughout the season which supported control in the center of the pitch. Drifting toward the middle, Roldan’s excellent possession and passing allowed an inside-out style that reinforced the spine and created some of the best Seattle interplay all season. 

Lowlights: Alex Roldan took a step back in offensive output and impact in 2024. Credited with a single goal and secondary assist, Alex wasn’t involved in creating offense for the Sounders, who desperately needed it. His progressive passing-received rate and shot creating actions were way down, as Roldan didn’t get into advanced positions with any regularity. By the fourth match of the year I commented:

Advertisement

It’s hard to tell what’s going on with Alex this season, but there’s been a marked decrease in his output. Whether that is entirely due to Roldan playing badly, to the new pieces around him being less effective, or to the tactical setup is hard to answer, but there is definite room, and expectation, for Alex to play better.”

In April, with cracks showing all over the Sounders team, rival Vancouver entered and rode TWO Sounder red cards to a win in Seattle. Alex had one of the worst moments of the entire season when he earned the second red:

This was a rough outing for Alex, who had zero offensive impact to go with his two tackles and one clearance defensively. He apparently was as dissatisfied with his performance as the crowd, as Roldan showed himself the door in the 75th minute, getting an early start on washing the muck of the game off … Losing his mind and lashing out to cleat a player, resulting in a red card and likely extra suspension, was an embarrassing foul, capping off a shameful performance.”

This was a plethora of awful; Alex’s emotional outburst was in direct conflict with the team culture, resulted in immediate expulsion, and was one of the lowlights of the entire 2024 season. 

Outlook: Alex continues to reinvent himself as a multifunctional player who is reasonably priced, a solid contributor, and a consistent if unspectacular depth piece for Seattle. Some of the moves rumored to come this offseason could impact his starting status. It will be interesting to see whether there is valid competition for his right back spot and what that might do to Alex’s performance. A lot of his success is the solid connection with his brother on the wing, an innate understanding of movement that helps both of them excel. If Cristian has found a permanent spot in the middle of the pitch, it will be crucial for Alex to create a similar understanding with whoever plays in front of him in 2025. Still possessing excellent service from the right as well as a great connection with the mighty Yeimar next to him, Alex will be hard to easily dislodge from this position. 

Advertisement

#17 Pedro de la Vega – 2024 Overall Rating: 5.57 in 23 appearances

MLS Regular Season: 5.63 in 16 appearances

MLS Playoffs: 5.50 in 4 appearances

US Open Cup: 5.00 in 1 appearance

Leagues Cup: 5.50 in 2 appearances

High = 7 Low = 4

Advertisement

The Sounders paid a huge fee to bring in a young player, expecting big things. Instead, they got Pedro de la Vega, the 17th highest rated player in 2024. He was a disappointment, as the team needed much more from him, but there were flashes of brilliance that kept us hoping he’d develop into the player Seattle needs. What we needed was dynamic goal creation through creative interplay and direct shooting, but our DP seemed at times to be playing in single-player mode. Tantalizing control and dazzling dribbling showed a high ceiling for PDLV, but these skills were almost always combined with a tactical page from some other team’s playbook. Time and again he did interesting things, then immediately turned the ball over, or just missed a run from a teammate. Getting on the same page with fellow Sounders was something Pedro struggled with all year, and this was compounded by consistent injuries that kept him on minutes restrictions. Early on, he seemed to force things, coming back too deep to find the ball. Later in the season he improved his movement, but still couldn’t consistently find teammates. This meant that while he was clearly more comfortable and did some fun things on the field, it rarely connected with others, and he just couldn’t unlock his clear potential within the Sounders’ system. 

Highlights: Pedro’s season started off well. He subbed in against LAFC in the first match of the year and immediately showed talent at dribbling and control. He dropped deep for touches, moved central, and was able to get into attacking areas on the dribble or with dynamic off-ball movement. His energy and drive were incredibly exciting and his desire to get on the ball was reminiscent of Nico Lodeiro. When given the pressure of taking a spot kick, he finished the penalty, giving Seattle 15 minutes to try to find an equalizer. Even in the first match of the year, it was clear that Pedro had talent and attacking influence as expected. We continued to see these high-ceiling moments throughout the year, small seconds of intensity as he easily controlled a difficult ball or dribbled through multiple defenders with the kind of elite skills that DPs must have in this league. Although there was plenty of adversity for Pedro and the Sounders in 2024, he had at least one big “wow” moment every time out, showing a skillset that the rest of the team was lacking. 

Lowlights: Expecting big things immediately, Sounders fans instead got a steady diet of injuries, starting as soon as PDLV arrived in Seattle. This led to strict minutes restrictions and much less output than expected. After playing in the first two MLS matches of the year, Pedro missed 19 of the next 20. He then sporadically featured, missing half of the next 10 available games. He wasn’t consistently available for the team until August 24th, seven months into the season. When he did play, it was not a full 90, due to fitness and injury caution, leading to stunted appearances and low performance metrics. A DP should never rate a 4, yet Pedro did this twice, once in mid-July and once in the playoffs.

“Pedro generally looked incapable of connecting with teammates. His passing remains dismal, 56 percent completion in this match which may have been an improvement over previous outings. Either way, he is not connecting with Sounders when kicking the ball, and his dribbling, while fun to watch, isn’t producing for himself or others.”

It was startling how much this criticism midseason mirrored the complaint five months later at the end of playoffs:

Advertisement

This was a disappointing outing from PDLV, who struggled in most aspects of the match. Although he contributed a key pass and a shot, a majority of the time he was not in the same book, let alone the same page as the rest of the Sounders. This showed up in his abysmal 67 percent passing and five turnovers. The movement he makes can be so good, but it must be supported by quality combination with those around him, and that disconnect often meant that the right wing was where attacks went to sputter and die.”

All the individual skill paled in comparison to those wingers higher up in these ratings, and that’s not because they are more talented than Pedro, but they’re better at fitting into the team. It was frustrating to see someone as technically skilled as de la Vega not understand the tactical needs of the Sounders system. One goal, one assist in the 2024 season was a huge disappointment. 

Outlook: From July: “Sure, he’s an eight million dollar man. Sure, he’s exciting. Sure, he’s the future of the franchise you build around. At some point, he needs to be all those things AND combine with teammates while being goal dangerous. He hasn’t been. And I don’t want to wait for next year.” And here we are, preparing for next year. While 2025 isn’t a make-or-break year for a 23-year-old, Seattle needs more from de la Vega than what he brought in 2024. He’s clearly talented, but there is plenty to improve upon. Seattle has been spoiled with Oba, Raúl, Nico, JP, etc. coming in and being immediately impactful as DPs. That isn’t always the case in MLS; it often takes a while to feel comfortable in such a physical grind. We hope a season full of injury adversity and learning the team culture has prepared Pedro for the long schedule and travel expectations of his new league. If he can combine with teammates, it’s clear he has elite talent that can dominate in MLS, but putting it all together isn’t guaranteed. After struggling in 2024, PDLV must consistently produce in 2025 to be a success.



Source link

Advertisement

Seattle, WA

Residents and activists clash over plan to curb SEPA appeals at Seattle hearing

Published

on

Residents and activists clash over plan to curb SEPA appeals at Seattle hearing


Sharp divisions emerged Wednesday as Seattle residents, housing advocates and environmental activists sparred over a proposal that would dramatically reshape the city’s land-use appeals process.

At issue is legislation proposed by Seattle City Councilmember Eddie Lin. The bill would eliminate State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) appeals to the city’s Hearing Examiner for major legislative actions, including Comprehensive Plan amendments and development regulations.

It prompted impassioned testimony at a public hearing before the Seattle City Council’s Land Use Committee, which Lin chairs.

Lin said his bill would prevent costly delays that have slowed housing production and climate-focused planning. Opponents countered that it would strip residents of one of their few affordable avenues for holding city government accountable on environmental issues before projects move forward.

Advertisement

Lin said that concentrating new housing in dense, walkable neighborhoods near transit reduces suburban sprawl, preserves forests and farmland, lowers greenhouse gas emissions and limits pollution harmful to salmon and orcas.

Lin said Seattle can achieve both affordable housing and a healthy urban tree canopy through thoughtful planning. However, having projects repeatedly delayed by appeals that ultimately have little legal standing is something the city cannot afford, Lin said.

Over the past several years, Washington lawmakers have expanded exemptions within SEPA specifically to reduce red tape for housing production. But Seattle’s municipal code still allows administrative appeals on many actions that state law has already exempted.

Although those appeals are frequently dismissed because of state law, city officials said the process itself can significantly delay legislation.

Under Lin’s proposal, residents could no longer file administrative SEPA appeals before the Hearing Examiner for major legislative actions. Instead, challenges would have to be brought before the Washington Growth Management Hearings Board or King County Superior Court.

Advertisement

During the public hearing, opponents said such a change would effectively place environmental appeals beyond the reach of many residents because pursuing litigation requires attorneys and substantially higher costs.

Several speakers warned that raising the financial barrier to appeals would disproportionately silence neighborhoods and community groups with limited resources.

Environmental advocates also argued the legislation removes an important layer of independent oversight before major decisions become law. They said appeals have historically uncovered flaws in Environmental Impact Statements, revealed previously undisclosed information and prompted improvements before projects advance.

The debate is expected to intensify as Seattle prepares for the next phase of updating its Comprehensive Plan under Mayor Katie Wilson’s administration. The forthcoming environmental review of the plan, which includes proposals for taller and denser development across the city, is likely to make the question of who can challenge environmental reviews a central issue in the coming year.

No vote was taken following Wednesday’s public hearing. The legislation will return to the City Council for further consideration.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Seattle’s solution for the middle-class housing squeeze: government housing | CNN Business

Published

on

Seattle’s solution for the middle-class housing squeeze: government housing | CNN Business



New York — 

The eight-story, 150-unit Elara at the Market looks like just another sleek apartment building in Seattle’s trendy Belltown neighborhood.

Blocks from Pike Place Market, the Elara opened six years ago with a lush private courtyard, a gym and wine storage lockers. The building is full of Amazon workers who pay more than $2,000 a month for a one-bedroom to live near the company’s headquarters.

But this upscale building with a rooftop deck overlooking the Puget Sound recently transformed into something more likely to conjure images of high-rise public housing in the US or Soviet-style concrete housing blocks: government-owned housing for low-and middle-income renters.

Advertisement

Seattle believes the affordable housing model has left a void for middle-class households that earn too much to qualify for housing lotteries, but too little to pay for a market-rate apartment. The city’s solution is to create a social-housing model inspired by Vienna, where roughly half of residents across a wide range of incomes live in government-subsidized homes.

It’s not the traditional public housing the federal government built for low-income households during the 20th century. It’s also not affordable housing, privately-owned developments built with government subsidies and tax credits in exchange for below-market rents.

The Seattle Social Housing Developer (SSHD), the city’s newly established public development authority, purchased the Elara for $61 million this month from a private owner.

While many cities and states are trying to climb out of the housing crisis by cutting regulations and relaxing zoning laws to entice private developers, a growing movement on the left wants the public sector to build social housing. The acquisition is the first step in Seattle’s effort to buy more than 1,000 apartments and build 600 new units of social housing for mixed-income households over the next five years.

Roughly 15 of the Elara’s units are vacant. The social developer held a lottery to fill them for people making up to 50% of area median income — $65,000 for a two-person household. It also froze rents on existing market-rate tenants for two years. Nobody’s being evicted, but as apartments turn over, they will be filled with lower and middle-income renters.

Advertisement

Bilal Durrani, who works as a manager at Amazon and has lived in a 600-square-foot, one-bedroom apartment at the Elara for a year, was surprised when he received a letter in the mail from his new landlord.

He wondered if public ownership would affect his rent or change who lives in the building.

He’s glad the building’s new owner froze his rent and eliminated storage fees. He’s happy to be a guinea pig in Seattle’s experiment — at least for now — and hopeful that social housing may help people struggling to afford the city.

“People always get freaked out when the government steps in, but I’m glad the city is doing something,” he said.

‘Wasted three years and $60 million’

Social housing has won strong political support on the left in Seattle in response to soaring housing costs. The average home value doubled from 2012 to 2022 to $945,000, while rents grew 75% to roughly $1,800 a month.

Advertisement

Voters in 2023 approved a ballot measure establishing a public developer to construct social housing for people earning up to 120% of area median income — roughly $138,000 for a single person.

Last year, voters approved a dedicated “social housing tax” to finance the effort, levied on businesses like Amazon and Microsoft who pay employees more than $1 million in salary annually. Revenue from the tax will fund the social developer’s acquisitions and development, and rents for higher-income tenants will subsidize lower-income neighbors.

But many development experts and business advocates in Seattle have criticized the social developer’s strategy. They say it’s ineffective, led by activists without experience developing housing, and siphons off resources that could go to building housing for people with lower incomes.

The tax generated $115 million this year, and critics believe that funding should go to building new homes or preserving existing affordable apartments for lower-income renters. Dozens of nonprofit and for-profit affordable housing providers in Seattle are reporting losses and have sold off their properties, risking that they become market-rate apartments.

“I think the Seattle Social Housing Developer should develop social housing,” said Jamie Madden, an affordable housing development consultant in Seattle and the author of “Bittersweet Lane: Creating Home(s) in the American Affordable Housing Crisis.” “They have wasted three years and $60 million and delivered rent control for residents who are not low income and 15 new apartments.”

Advertisement

Seattle’s model represents a sharp break from how the federal government has funded affordable housing in America since the 1980s: the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), which awards tax credits to private companies that construct housing for lower-income residents.

Social housing advocates believe this model is broken. LIHTC funding is limited every year, and projects financed with the credits have strict income eligibility limits. Tenants with incomes above 80% of area median income typically don’t qualify. Credits also typically expire after 15 or 30 years, at which point the building’s owner can start charging market rents.

Montgomery County, Maryland, an affluent suburb of Washington DC, pioneered the social housing model Seattle and other US cities are trying to replicate.

Montgomery County has used a $100 million fund to finance construction of new mixed-income, mixed-use developments. These projects do not require LIHTC credits or other affordable housing subsidies. The first building, the Laureate, opened in 2023 with a courtyard pool, theater and a gym.

“We were very inspired by them,” said Tiffani McCoy, the interim director of the Seattle Social Housing Developer.

Advertisement

But Seattle’s social housing push has had growing pains since it was formed in 2023. The social developer’s board has turned over and it fired its first CEO in January, installing McCoy.

The social developer wanted to acquire a high-end building in a hot neighborhood to dispel the idea that people who make less money “should only have access too lower-quality housing,” McCoy said. It was also less risky than buying a struggling property behind on millions of dollars of repairs.

But ultimately, McCoy said it’s about thinking about housing as a public good like libraries and roads.

“We don’t want to rely on the private market, which is ultimately there to create a profit off renters,” said McCoy. “We need a model in this country, like other countries across the world, that creates housing as public infrastructure.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Will Katie Wilson’s endorsements help or hurt Seattle’s position in Olympia?

Published

on

Will Katie Wilson’s endorsements help or hurt Seattle’s position in Olympia?


Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson is wading into a series of high-profile Democratic primaries, backing progressive challengers against longtime state lawmakers in a move that could test both her political reach and Seattle’s relationship with Olympia.

Wilson has endorsed several local candidates, including Ron Davis in the 46th Legislative District and Hannah Sabio Howell in the 43rd District. Both are running from the left against veteran Democratic legislators, including Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen.

The endorsements come as Democrats in Washington state face a series of intraparty challenges, with younger and more progressive candidates arguing that longtime lawmakers have not moved quickly enough on affordability, housing, taxation and social services.

An image of Mayor Wilson and Gov. Bob Ferguson giving an update on how the World Cup matches have played out so far in Seattle. (KOMO)

Advertisement

Political analyst Sandeep Kaushik called Wilson’s decision “a high-risk roll of the dice,” saying she is not only challenging veteran Seattle Democrats but also potentially putting at risk the city’s relationship with state leaders in Olympia.

“It’s definitely going to be” a test of her political influence, Kaushik said, noting that Pedersen can point to a long list of progressive credentials, including work on LGBTQ rights and the state’s new millionaires’ tax.

Wilson’s endorsements follow a national trend in which progressive candidates have tried to build momentum by challenging establishment Democrats in deeply blue areas. Kaushik said the timing did not appear coincidental, coming shortly after New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani endorsed several candidates who went on to win their races. But he also noted a key difference: Wilson won Seattle’s mayoral race by a much narrower margin and has faced a bumpier start in office.

Davis, who is running against Rep. Gerry Pollet in the 46th District, said he entered the race after working on statewide housing legislation and deciding Olympia was a place where he could make a larger impact.

“Urgency” has been missing in Olympia, Davis said, arguing that too many lawmakers treat the job as a side role while families struggle with the cost of living. He said he wants the state to move faster on housing, transit, Sound Transit accountability, and progressive taxation.

Advertisement

Davis said Wilson’s endorsement matters because of her role in Seattle’s JumpStart payroll tax and broader progressive organizing.

“Katie Wilson is one of the people who has done more to bring taxation on the rich in Washington state than anyone else,” Davis said, calling JumpStart a measure that “broke the legal dam” for other forms of progressive taxation.

Davis also defended a challenge from the left after Democrats delivered the millionaires’ tax, saying internal competition is healthy and necessary.

“I think it’s needed,” Davis said. “There needs to be disagreement, and there needs to not be a cling to the status quo.”

According to a Washington Public Disclosure Commission candidate finance chart, Democrat William Dreher has raised about $258,000 in the race and spent $21,000. Davis has raised about $140,000 and spent $26,000.

Advertisement

Pollet has raised about $96,000 and spent $14,000.

Kaushik noted that Dreher, a prosecutor who worked on cases connected to the Jan. 6 attack on the US. Capitol, makes that race a three-way contest.

In the 43rd District, Sabio-Howell is challenging Pedersen, one of the most powerful Democrats in the Legislature. Sabio-Howell said she is running because the affordability crisis has worsened under current leadership.

“I believe in Washington’s potential to be the best place in the country to build good lives if we can afford it,” Sabio Howell said. “Status quo leaders, career politicians who have been in office as the crisis of affordability has only gotten worse, are not the people who are going to make an affordable future possible.”

Sabio Howell acknowledged the millionaires tax as a “historic win,” but argued it came only after a severe budget deficit forced lawmakers to act. She said progressive leadership from the 43rd District should have pushed for the policy earlier.

Advertisement

She also rejected arguments from large employers that Washington has reached a tipping point on taxes, comparing the current debate to warnings made during the fight for a $15 minimum wage. Sabio-Howell said voters have repeatedly shown support for funding social services through measures such as the capital gains tax, the Climate Commitment Act and the Long Term Care Act.

Sabio-Howell said Wilson’s endorsement aligns with her campaign’s focus on affordability, housing, schools, public transit and shifting political power away from corporate interests.

The fundraising gap in the 43rd District remains significant. The PDC chart shows Pedersen has raised about $348,000 and spent $77,000. Sabio-Howell has raised about $82,000 and spent $23,000. A third candidate, Heather-Marie P. Wilson, reported no contributions or expenditures on the chart.

Wilson did not return a request for comment.

The Washington State Labor Council also issued a statement, “Jamie Pedersen is the most progressive Senate Majority Leader we have ever had, delivering on major progressive priorities like progressive tax reform and rent stabilization when previous majority leaders couldn’t. If he is not re-elected, the next majority leader will most likely be less progressive and less willing to tackle the toughest problems. Campaigning is an extended job interview and Pedersen has demonstrated he can do the job effectively and in-line with his district’s values. Our unions and community allies should be united in fighting back against a right-wing authoritarian government, not divided against legislators like Jamie Pedersen and Gerry Pollet, who have strong progressive voting records. We have a common foe: the conservative forces in Washington seeking to take over our State Supreme Court, attack our trans community, and repeal the Millionaire Tax and force deep cuts to education and healthcare.”

Advertisement

His campaign also cited a statement from Katy Ozog, the Executive Director of the Washington Senate Democratic Campaign, “Jamie Pedersen is the most progressive Senate Majority Leader in state history, and the author of landmark legislation like the Millionaires Tax, a champion for affordability measures like rent stabilization, and a leader in the fight for LGBTQ+ equality. He is proud to be the only candidate in the race to have sole endorsements from labor unions and Planned Parenthood.”

Kaushik said the broader picture is a Democratic Party “at war with itself” in Washington, with younger, outsider candidates challenging incumbents they view as part of a failed establishment.

“The mayor doesn’t see herself as just another typical Democratic politician,” Kaushik said. “She very much sees herself as part of and a leader of a movement, a progressive political movement that really aims to take over and change the Democratic Party.”

Whether Wilson’s endorsement can help deliver victories for those challengers remains uncertain. Her allies see the move as part of a broader push for progressive leadership at every level of government. Her critics may view it as an unnecessary risk at a time when Seattle still depends on Olympia for housing, transportation, public safety, and budget support.

For now, the races offer a clear test of whether Wilson’s narrow mayoral victory has grown into broader political power or whether longtime Democratic incumbents can withstand a challenge from their own left flank.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending