Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco wins Supreme Court case against EPA over wastewater discharge into bay, Pacific Ocean

Published

on

San Francisco wins Supreme Court case against EPA over wastewater discharge into bay, Pacific Ocean


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — The city of San Francisco won a Supreme Court case on Tuesday against the Environmental Protection Agency or EPA over the wastewater that is being discharged into the bay and the rules it follows.

It was a fight taken to the highest court of the law. The focus: water waste into the bay. And the Supreme Court sided with San Francisco.

“The EPA had a practice of what is known as End Results Requirements, or in other words, they would measure the overall pollution in the ocean or the bay, which could have been caused by numerous sources, not us, and try to hold us accountable for that. Rather than hold us accountable fairly for what our city puts into the water,” said San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu.

He said the city has been following strict guidelines under the Water Pollution Control Act of 1972.

Advertisement

“Our city has spent billions of dollars to ensure that our waters are clean, that we are not polluting into the bay or into the ocean,” said Chiu. “The federal government was insisting on potential infrastructure,” he added.

According to City Attorney Chiu, this lawsuit saved San Franciscans money.

“EPA could have forced San Francisco to make over $10 billions of dollars of capital expenditures which would have caused our water bills and our sewer bills to increase ten-fold from $850,000 a year to nearly $9,000 a year for repair without much improvement in the quality of the water,” said Chiu.

According to San Francisco’s Public Utilities Commission during intense storms 94% of the water discharge is storm water which means about 6% is sewage.

We checked the city’s water quality map monitored by the city’s Public Utilities Commission and the latest water samples are up to standard.

Advertisement

One site was reported as “orange” with elevated concentrations of bacteria. The court’s decision created a wave of concern among environmental advocates.

“This will have an impact throughout California and throughout the country. The city has provided a blueprint to other municipalities to industrial entities that discharge pollutants into water bodies as to how to avoid accountability or restrictions on their conduct,” said Eric Buescher, Managing Attorney for SF Baykeeper.

In a statement the EPA said: “It’s reviewing the decision.”

During Tuesdays Board of Supervisor’s meeting, Supervisor Myrna Melgar spoke about the overall environmental implications she believes this decision will have and highlighted.

“Despite today’s ruling, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commissions still has the responsibility to uphold the highest standards for water quality and environmental stewardship,” said Supervisor Melgar.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Francisco, CA

Fielder may resign from Board of Supervisors, possibly over illegal leak

Published

on

Fielder may resign from Board of Supervisors, possibly over illegal leak


The San Francisco Standard reported on Friday evening that Sup. Jackie Fielder checked herself into the hospital following what it called “major turmoil in her office“ and a city attorney investigation into “a reported leak.” The VOSF reported on the leak and suspicion about Fielder yesterday in its Thursday newsletter. The leak was a confidential […]



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Trump floats sending federal agents to San Francisco to tackle crime

Published

on

Trump floats sending federal agents to San Francisco to tackle crime


President Donald Trump was once again floating the idea of sending federal agents to San Francisco to tackle crime.

It happened during a cabinet meeting on Thursday. The president praised Mayor Daniel Lurie’s efforts to lower crime but said he can do it more effectively.

“San Francisco, I know, they have a mayor who’s trying very hard. He’s a Democrat, but he’s trying very hard, but we can do it much more effectively, because he can’t do what we do. He can’t take people out from the city and bring them to back to the country, from where they came, where they were in prisons,” Trump said.

“He’s trying. He’s doing okay, but we could do much better. We could make it a lot safer than it is. San Francisco, a great city, was a great city, could quickly become a great city again. But, you know, they’re going very slowly,” he continued.

Advertisement

The president implied that the mayor needs federal help to battle crime, saying immigrants are responsible for the lawlessness. However, according to a 2025 study by researches at UCLA and Northwestern, arresting and deporting undocumented immigrants was not associated with reduced crime rates.

Gabriel Medina, executive director of La Raza Community Resource Center In San Francisco agrees.

“I think we need to make sure that our city does not also try to play this game of making up ideas about always associating crime with immigrants, when immigrants commit less crime, so that’s really bad,” Medina said.

In response to the president comments, the mayor released a statement that reads: “In San Francisco, crime is down 30%, encampments are at record lows, and our city is on the rise. Public safety is my number one priority, and we are going to stay laser focused on keeping our streets safe and clean.”

This isn’t the first time President Trump has mused with the idea of sending federal agents to the Bay Area; last October, agents were staged at a military base in Alameda, but Trump called off the plan after talking with Lurie and Bay Area tech leaders.

Advertisement

“We cannot normalize what this president is saying from San Francisco, that crime is associated with immigration. We need to stop conflating that,” Medina said.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Man convicted in the deadly 2021 assault of a Thai grandfather in San Francisco avoids prison

Published

on

Man convicted in the deadly 2021 assault of a Thai grandfather in San Francisco avoids prison


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The man convicted in the fatal 2021 attack of an older Thai man in San Francisco, which galvanized a movement against anti-Asian hate, will be able to avoid prison time, a judge ruled Thursday.

Antoine Watson, 25, was sentenced to eight years for manslaughter in the death of Vicha Ratanapakdee, 84. But, having already spent five years in jail awaiting trial, Watson received credit for time served, and San Francisco Superior Court Judge Linda Colfax said he could have the remaining three years suspended if he follows the rules of his probation.

Ratanapakdee’s daughter, Monthanus, expressed her family’s disappointment in a statement shared by Justice For Vicha, the foundation named for her father.

“We respect the court process. However, this is not about revenge — it is about accountability,” she said. “When consequences do not reflect the seriousness of the harm, it raises concerns about how we protect our seniors and public safety.”

Advertisement

Vicha Ratanapakdee was out for his usual morning walk in the quiet neighborhood he lived in with his wife, daughter and her family when Watson charged at him and knocked him to the ground. Ratanapakdee never regained consciousness and died two days later.

Watson testified on the stand that he was in a haze of confusion and anger at the time of the unprovoked attack, according to KRON-TV. He said he lashed out and didn’t know that Ratanapakdee was Asian or older.

San Francisco Public Defender Mano Raju, whose office defended Watson, also said at his trial that the defendant is “fully remorseful for his mistake.”

The Office of the San Francisco Public Defender did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment on Watson’s sentencing.

Footage of the attack was captured on a neighbor’s security camera and spread across social media, prompting a surge in activism over a rise in anti-Asian crimes driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. Hundreds of people across several U.S. cities commemorated the anniversary of Ratanapakdee’s death in 2022, seeking justice for Asian Americans who have been harassed, assaulted and even killed in alarming numbers.

Advertisement

Asians in America have long been subject to prejudice and discrimination, but the attacks escalated sharply after COVID-19 first appeared in late 2019 in Wuhan, China. More than 10,000 hate incidents against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders were reported to the Stop AAPI Hate coalition from March 2020 through September 2021.

While the Ratanapakdee family asserts he was attacked because of his race, hate crime charges were not filed and the argument was not raised in trial. Prosecutors have said hate crimes are difficult to prove absent statements by the suspect.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending