Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Bay Area teen survived a broken neck after swim accident. His family says the hospital care cost him his life

Published

on

Bay Area teen survived a broken neck after swim accident. His family says the hospital care cost him his life


Payman and Ofelia Noroozi, right, pose for a portrait as they hold an image of their son, Amin, at their home in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025. Amin was paralyzed while swimming in the ocean with his girlfriend at Stinson Beach and died days later.

Gabrielle Lurie/S.F. Chronicle

The helicopter carrying Amin Noroozi landed at John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek less than an hour after the 17-year-old broke his neck while swimming in the ocean.

Amin, a varsity football player, track and field athlete and wrestler at Acalanes High School, had lost feeling below his chest. But after an emergency surgery to stabilize his spine on April 13, his parents and younger sister said he moved a finger, and indicated he could sense a touch on his leg.

Although it was unclear whether Amin would walk again, doctors told his parents, Ofelia and Payman Noroozi, that he was young and strong, which would help with his physical rehabilitation and recovery.

Article continues below this ad

“We were very hopeful,” Ofelia Noroozi told the Chronicle. “Everything seemed pretty OK, like they knew what they were doing.”

Advertisement

Over the next 48 hours, Amin’s temperature soared to 109 degrees, his electrolyte counts spiraled, and his heart rate plummeted. His parents have alleged in a lawsuit filed Thursday in Contra Costa Superior County Court that John Muir doctors failed to manage his increasingly critical condition. Amin died on April 17, just four days after arriving at John Muir.

“Despite the successful surgery, the critical post-surgical care was deficient, disorganized, unsupervised and spun out of control, directly and unnecessarily causing Amin Noroozi’s suffering and death,” according to the lawsuit, which alleges that John Muir should have transferred Amin to UCSF-Benioff Children’s Hospital in Oakland, the nearest top-level pediatric trauma center.

The complaint names John Muir, the neurocritical care physician who treated Amin, Dr. Sandeep Walia, and John Muir’s affiliate partner, Stanford Medicine Children’s Health, which the lawsuit alleges has allowed the community hospital to fraudulently present itself to the public as being capable of treating highly complex medical conditions.

Article continues below this ad

Advertisement

John Muir declined to comment on specific allegations or details of Amin’s care, citing the pending litigation and patient privacy requirements.

“We extend our deepest sympathies to the family and loved ones of Mr. Noroozi,” the hospital said in a statement. “John Muir Health is a nationally recognized provider that treats complex, high-acuity cases using evidence-based protocols and multidisciplinary teams, and when appropriate we coordinate transfers through established regional networks.”

The hospital said its partnership with Stanford improves access to subspecialty expertise and maintains its high-quality care.

“We stand behind the professionalism and dedication of our physicians, nurses, and staff, and we remain focused on patient safety, quality, and continuous improvement,” John Muir said.

Stanford Medicine Children’s Health and Dr. Sandeep Walia, the neurocritical care physician who treated Amin, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

In 2015, John Muir partnered with Stanford Medicine Children’s Health to open a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, or PICU, for critically ill children. Leaders of both hospital systems said at the time that the alliance would allow John Muir to provide top-notch care to children in the East Bay.

Although Amin was not treated in John Muir’s PICU, Ofelia and Payman Noroozi are the latest parents to accuse the community hospital of trading on its partnership with Stanford to take on cases beyond its expertise, leading to potentially preventable deaths.

A 2022 Chronicle investigative series detailed the deaths of four children at John Muir’s PICU, which top medical experts said appeared to reflect the hospital’s low patient volumes and inexperience treating exceptionally sick children. Those children included 2-year-old Ailee Jong, who died in 2019 during a complex liver surgery at John Muir. The hospital approved the procedure — its first-ever pediatric liver resection — despite warnings from staff members that the unit wasn’t prepared.

Ailee’s parents, who have an ongoing lawsuit against the hospital, also allege that it was the Stanford association that reassured them John Muir was capable of treating their daughter. John Muir and the doctors involved in Ailee’s care have denied the allegations. A judge is expected to set a trial date for next year.

Advertisement

Following the Chronicle’s reporting, federal and state health inspectors found John Muir’s PICU had violated regulations, forcing corrections and prompting threats to pull funding and close the unit.

Article continues below this ad

Ofelia and Payman Noroozi, who live in Lafayette, said they knew nothing about this history as emergency medical specialists airlifted Amin to John Muir. Amin had been born there and as Ofelia and Payman researched the surgeon online and spoke to friends, they said the Stanford connection gave them confidence their son would receive excellent care.

“At that point, I was like, we know we have the best people working on him,” said Payman Noroozi. “At no point was there talk of him dying.”

The door to Amin Noroozi’s room at the family home in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.

The door to Amin Noroozi’s room at the family home in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.

Advertisement

Gabrielle Lurie/S.F. Chronicle

Amin was a rambunctious, outgoing and social child, who showed maturity and skill beyond his youth. He fell in love with scooters at an early age, so the family searched for skate parks in their hometown of Lafayette and across the East Bay. There, Amin would befriend the older kids and eventually built his own scooter from scratch.

Article continues below this ad

Although Amin got good grades, Ofelia recalled that he wasn’t particularly studious, often coming to her for help the night before a school project was due. Ofelia, who was born in Honduras, remembered laughing with Amin last school year as she tried to guide him through a Spanish class presentation, despite his limited Spanish.

“The whole thing was a disaster,” she recalled, “but the two of us had a blast.”

When the family moved to a new house close to Acalanes High in Lafayette, Ofelia and Payman said they became aware of an older neighbor with medical problems. Amin gravitated to him and soon, the neighbor would yell out Amin’s name, and the teen would walk over, helping him set up his television, internet and radio.

Advertisement

Another time, Amin sat next to a woman he found crying on the curb of a local grocery store parking lot and spoke to the stranger for more than an hour, his parents said. She attended Amin’s funeral.

“He never sugar coated anything, he was so authentic,” Ofelia said. “He literally told you the truth in a way that wasn’t hurtful.”

In middle school, he played flag football. By high school, he wore No. 51 and played offensive and defensive line.

“Amin fell in love with football,” Ofelia said. “Not just with football but his teammates and coaches.”

After football season, he joined the track and field team, throwing shotput and discus. And because his father wrestled in high school, he joined the Acalanes team and qualified for the North Coast Section Championship. His father called him a “gentle giant.”

Advertisement
Amin Noroozi, who played football for Acalanes High School, posed with his mother Ofelia. Amin, 17, died in April at John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek after being paralyzed in a swimming accident.

Amin Noroozi, who played football for Acalanes High School, posed with his mother Ofelia. Amin, 17, died in April at John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek after being paralyzed in a swimming accident.

Courtesy of Noroozi family

The morning of April 13, Amin gave his mother a kiss before leaving with his girlfriend to Stinson Beach, a popular Marin County shoreline Amin had visited many times. That Sunday was a stunning spring day, and a bunch of East Bay high school kids met to hang out and swim.

A half hour after setting up, Amin and his girlfriend Audrey Martin, also an Acalanes High junior at the time, ran into the cold Pacific Ocean for a quick dip, she recalled. As they waded into the salty, grey knee-deep water, a small wave rose. Audrey dove through before it broke.

When she surfaced, Amin was floating face down in the water, she said. Audrey thought he was joking, but when she flipped Amin over he told her he couldn’t feel his legs. Authorities would later say that they believed his head struck a sand bar. Audrey said she screamed for help and teens from Acalanes and nearby Campolindo high schools rushed to pull Amin from the water.

Amin Noroozi with his girlfriend Audrey Martin.

Amin Noroozi with his girlfriend Audrey Martin.

Advertisement

Courtesy of Noroozi family

“I was really scared and really nervous,” said Audrey, now 17. “He was an athletic guy and he loved to do stuff. It’s just really scary when someone says they can’t move their limbs.”

A medical helicopter arrived for Amin. Paramedics determined the closest Marin County hospital, a Level 3 trauma center, was inadequate for his severe injuries, the lawsuit alleges. Instead, he was airlifted to John Muir, a Level 2 adult trauma center, bypassing UCSF-Benioff Children’s hospital in Oakland, a Level 1 pediatric trauma center, the highest caliber.

“A community hospital like John Muir does not have the resources to treat complex cases such as Amin’s,” said attorney Dan Horowitz, co-counsel for the Noroozi family. “They should have transferred him 15 miles down the road to UCSF Benioff and he would have survived.”

Amin’s mother was working in the family’s food truck when she got the call.

It was Amin’s number, but his girlfriend was on the other end. Amin was hurt, Ofelia recalled the girl saying. He hurt his neck and couldn’t feel his legs. They raced home.

Advertisement

The phone rang again. This time it was Amin as Audrey held a phone to his ear, his mother recalled.

“Hi Baba,” Ofelia said.

“Hi Mom, I got hurt,” he said. He explained he wasn’t in pain, but he had lost feeling below his chest. Amin’s girlfriend took the cell and told the family to meet them at John Muir.

Payman began calling friends and family. Was John Muir the right place to be?

They all agreed, he recalled, the Walnut Creek facility had topnotch credentials. Online, Payman read how it provided Stanford level care as part of its partnership.

Advertisement

However, the lawsuit claims that John Muir should have transferred Amin upon learning the severity of his injury. They allege John Muir was out of its depth as it did not treat such severe cases on a regular basis like surrounding tertiary hospitals, such as children’s hospitals in Oakland and Palo Alto.

“Calling yourself Stanford does not make you Stanford,” the suit said, referring to John Muir Health as JMH. “Yet JMH has constructed an elaborate, systematic branding scheme designed to create the false impression that patients receiving care at JMH are receiving Stanford-level medical care.”

The X-ray contained bad news, the doctor explained shortly after Amin’s arrival. He had shattered his C-5 vertebrae and damaged his spine. While he could partially move his arms and shoulders, he could not move his hands or anything in his lower body. The doctor said he was paralyzed.

“Excuse me?!” Amin told the doctor, according to his mother. “Tell me again, I don’t think I heard you right.”

“I’m sorry buddy, you are paralyzed from the chest down,” the doctor said.

Advertisement

Amin turned toward Ofelia.

“Mom, I want to cry but I can’t,” Amin told her. “The tears are not coming.”

“Mi amor, I will take you anywhere in the world. I will find a way to get you better,” she said.

Hours after his arrival, nurses wheeled Amin into surgery, where a surgeon removed a portion of his vertebrae and fused three together to stabilize his spine.

“People around us were saying they are the best. They have surgeons from Stanford,” Payman recalled. “Even the nurse was saying this is something that we see all the time. It is nothing that is new to us, so that made me feel better.”

Advertisement

The surgery appeared to be a success.

Still sedated and with tubes preventing him from speaking, Amin wagged his finger after his sister Sahar joked with him that if he didn’t get better soon she’d start driving his BMW. Not long after, a doctor poked Amin’s lower body asking if he could feel her touch his leg. At one spot, Amin nodded yes.

His parents started researching a rehabilitation center in Colorado.

Mementos of Amin Noroozi at the family home in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.

Mementos of Amin Noroozi at the family home in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.

Gabrielle Lurie/S.F. Chronicle

A catastrophic neck injury can disrupt the communication between the brain and the body’s autonomic nervous system, which controls involuntary functions like body temperature regulation and blood pressure. Constant monitoring is required. The lawsuit claims John Muir staff fell short in Amin’s post-surgery care.

Advertisement

When Amin suffered cardiovascular instability, the hospital “inappropriately treated” him with the wrong drugs for his condition, the family alleges. It caused his heart to slow, the suit said.

Amin also developed severe hypokalemia, critically low potassium levels that can lead to cardiac arrest. The hospital did little to bring it up, the lawsuit alleges, and when they finally responded, they overcorrected, sending his potassium levels soaring dangerously in the other direction — levels approaching those used by veterinarians for euthanasia, the lawsuit claims.

In addition, the lawsuit claims the hospital failed to diagnose and treat an infection and signs of sepsis. When testing was performed, a protein released into the bloodstream to fight bacterial infections was at such an elevated level it indicated sepsis had been raging for days unchecked, the suit said.

Amin’s fever rose to 109 degrees and remained elevated for more than 12 hours, according to the suit. The hospital only administered an over-the-counter fever reducer, the family alleges.

“Amin was allowed to overheat so that his entire metabolic system was off the charts,” Horowitz said. “No parent would let their child run a 109 fever without massive intervention, why did John Muir basically sit back and watch?”

Advertisement

The hospital indicated it used cooling blankets at one point, according to the suit, but the hospital failed to use one of its more powerful Arctic Sun cooling devices designed to control hyperthermia in critically ill patients until moments before his heart stopped.

Payman Noroozi discussing his son Amin at their home in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.

Payman Noroozi discussing his son Amin at their home in Lafayette, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.

Gabrielle Lurie/S.F. Chronicle

After returning from the cafeteria on the afternoon of April 17, Payman found Amin’s room in chaos. Multiple doctors and nurses took turns with chest compressions on his son.

Daryoosh Khashayar, a family friend who is also representing Ofelia and Payman as an attorney, walked in expecting to greet Amin. Instead, he heard Payman screaming and people yelling “Code Blue!”

Ofelia and Sahar arrived soon after, holding Amin’s hands for more than 20 minutes as nurses performed CPR.

Advertisement

Doctors declared Amin dead at 3:41 p.m.

Payman said he asked a doctor what happened and he repeatedly said: “I don’t know.” Ofelia, Payman and Sahar stayed in the room with Amin for hours, as word spread in the lobby where more than 100 friends, as well as Amin’s coaches, had gathered.

The community raised almost $200,000 for the family with friends, family and rival teams donating money and sending condolences. Now, days after what would have been Amin’s final Homecoming dance, the family said it wants accountability.

“We just don’t want it to happen again,” Ofelia said. “We cannot bring my son back, we cannot take away the pain. We lost someone extremely valuable to this world, he had his whole life ahead of him and it got cut short because of mistakes that could have been prevented.”



Source link

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock

Published

on

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock


Few things are more valuable in the Bay Area than real estate. In San Francisco, the median house price is now over $2 million. Last month, at least seven houses in the city sold for $1 million over the asking price, and buyers regularly offer to pay in cash or waive contingencies to stay competitive. Yet there is one thing that remains even more valuable than a house, and possibly more valuable than money itself: stock in Anthropic or OpenAI.

Last week, 160 Noe Street, an Edwardian home in San Francisco’s desirable Duboce Triangle neighborhood, was listed for sale at $2.9 million—or the equivalent amount in Anthropic or OpenAI shares, as based on those companies’ current valuations. Rachel Swann, the listing agent, says she was inspired to set these unusual terms after meeting several Anthropic employees at an open house for a different property. “These people have a lot of paper wealth, but they don’t always have the liquidity to do things they want,” Swann says. Some of these employees were expecting to come into as much as $50 million from their Anthropic shares, and wondered if they could use that as leverage to buy a house, according to Swann. “This kept coming up over and over again.”

Swann’s listing is unconventional, but not singular. In April, an investment banker named Storm Duncan offered to exchange his Mill Valley home and an adjacent parcel of land for Anthropic shares. And in May, Vijay Chattha, who owns an agency that does PR for tech companies, listed his Healdsburg home for $2.5 million, or $2 million in Anthropic stock. “I want to sell my house, and I want to invest in Anthropic,” Chattha says. “Why not combine the two?

Chattha’s house—a three bed, three bath with a pool and a bocce court in a part of Sonoma County that abuts some of the region’s most famous wineries—also comes with coveted short-term rental status, allowing the owner to list it on platforms like Airbnb. Only a handful of properties in Healdsburg come with that status, and only about a dozen come up for sale in a given year.

Advertisement

Chattha is offering a $500,000 discount to Anthropic employees because he believes the value of Anthropic shares will grow faster than any other investment, and his vacation home in wine country is the best bargaining chip he has to try to access them. “If you look at Anthropic’s growth last year, it’s insane,” he says, noting the $380 billion valuation the company claimed in February. “Now they’re raising at $965 billion. That’s three X in like three months.” He added that he was open to exchanging the house for shares in Anthropic, but not OpenAI, because he prefers using Anthropic’s products.

The real estate listings come at a time when investors are salivating at the record-high valuations of Anthropic and OpenAI, and even those considered wealthy by Bay Area standards are feeling FOMO about the affluence that could come from these companies’ debuts on the stock market. (On Monday, Anthropic submitted paperwork for its initial public offering; OpenAI is also reportedly preparing to file in the coming months.) Despite the unprecedented valuations of these companies, many people believe their stock prices will only go up, and that anyone who gets a piece now could win the jackpot.

People are clamoring to buy equity in OpenAI and Anthropic on the secondary market, leading to a frenzy of transactions that may or may not be legitimate. As a result, Anthropic updated its policy around “unauthorized Anthropic stock sales” this spring, which notes that “if someone purports to sell Anthropic shares without proper board approval, that transaction is invalid.” A spokesperson for Anthropic pointed back to this policy when asked about the possibility of exchanging company shares for real estate.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026

Published

on

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026


Welcome to our running tally of Election Night results. Or, as this is California, well beyond tonight, as results continue to trickle in.

The first batch of results should arrive at 8:45 p.m., with three more to follow tonight. The Department of Elections has the breakdown.

San Francisco is voting in three special elections, for District 2 and District 4 supervisors and for a Board of Education member. Both supervisor races are referendums on housing, especially District 2, while the main backdrop of the D4 race is all the hot feelings around the fate of the Sunset Dunes Park (nee Great Highway).

The winners of all three special races will have to compete again in November for their seats.

Advertisement

Keeping it local, SF is also voting on four ballot measures. Prop A is for a bond to pay for an emergency water-system. B is for term limits. C and D are dueling measures related to the “overpaid CEO” tax. (Links go to our reporting on each race or issue; or click here for our Election 2026 page.)

Vote local, think national: Which two candidates will advance to the November election to replace Nancy Pelosi?

Statewide races include the primaries for governor, education superintendent, lieutenant governor, and much more.

Polls close soon. If you haven’t voted yet, find your polling station here.

Tuesday, June 2, 5:40 p.m.

Two and a half hours until our polls close. Before we go down the local rabbit hole, a reminder that other states have primary action today: New Jersey, Iowa, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Montana.

Advertisement

Why does it take so long to get results in California? CalMatters has you covered on that story. We shouldn’t expect a call tonight on the governor’s race.

The last big election was November 5, 2024. (Remember?) Ten days later, there were still races to call in San Francisco.


Advertisement

So if you’re waiting for the pundits (and maybe even us) to tell you What It All Means, you might have to wait a while.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco voters to decide on dueling measures on Top Executive Pay Tax changes

Published

on

San Francisco voters to decide on dueling measures on Top Executive Pay Tax changes


San Francisco voters weighed in Tuesday on two competing measures that seek to change the Top Executive Pay Tax, with one of the measures also including a change to the Gross Receipts Tax.

Should both measures pass, the one with the most votes will take effect, according to the propositions’ legal text.

Currently, the measures state that most businesses with San Francisco gross receipts up to $5 million are exempt from the Gross Receipts Tax. And businesses that use more than half of their city payroll for in-house administrative and management services pay an Administrative Office Tax instead of a Gross Receipts Tax.

The Top Executive Pay Tax is a tax some large businesses pay if their highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median pay of their San Francisco employees. Businesses that have city gross receipts up to $5 million and are not subject to the Administrative Office Tax are exempt.

Advertisement

Proposition C

Proposition C states it would increase the number of businesses that could be exempt from the Gross Receipts Tax and would stop any further increases to the “Top Executive Pay Tax” after a final rate bump.

The proposed measure says it would raise the Gross Receipts Tax exemption ceiling to $7.5 million. The $7.5 million ceiling would also apply to the Top Executive Pay Tax exemption.

As for changes to the Top Executive Pay Tax, Proposition C states it would implement the 2028 tax rate increase in 2027, but then stop any future increases.

Supporting Proposition C are Rodney Fong, CEO of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, and Chris Wright, senior vice president of Advance SF, an organization of companies, which includes Bank of America, OpenAI, Waymo, the SF Giants CEO and others.

Fong and Wright, in their argument for the measure, say giving businesses more tax breaks would help keep more employees on payroll and would give companies the ability to “contribute to city services in a predictable and balanced way.”

Advertisement

Critics of Proposition C, such as the San Francisco Tenants Union, slam the measure as “billionaire-backed” and argue it would kill the Top Executive Pay Tax and would hand out more tax breaks to businesses at a time when the city is in a budget deficit and faces cuts to essential services.

Proposition D

Proposition D also seeks to change the Top Executive Pay Tax, which is collected from some large businesses where the highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation paid to other employees.

If approved, the measure would change the calculation of the tax using the compensation of all employees, not just employees based in San Francisco. Top Executive Pay Tax rates would also be increased for San Francisco gross receipts and payroll.

Supporters have billed the measure as a way to counteract federal cuts to Medicaid. A report by the City Controller’s Office said the measure could result in $250 million to $300 million in additional revenue.

“Proposition D is the solution to our budget deficit. It asks large corporations — not small businesses, not working families — to contribute a little more,” supporters said in the city’s official voter guide.

Advertisement

The measure has the backing of most of the Board of Supervisors, along with labor unions and Rep. Nancy Pelosi.

Opponents, including Mayor Daniel Lurie and state Sen. Scott Wiener, have argued Proposition D would negatively impact the city’s recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“San Francisco is already one of the most expensive cities in the country to live and do business. Adding extreme and unpredictable tax increases risks driving employers away just as we are trying to bring jobs, workers, and foot traffic back downtown,” said Supervisor Matt Dorsey in the city’s voter guide.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending