Connect with us

West

San Francisco sued over reparations fund, accused of unlawful use of taxpayer money

Published

on

San Francisco sued over reparations fund, accused of unlawful use of taxpayer money

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

San Francisco is being sued over its reparations fund on grounds that its taxpayer money is being “unlawfully” used for a policy that allegedly violates the equal protection clause.

According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, several San Francisco residents and Californians for Equal Rights Foundation sued San Francisco Thursday, challenging an ordinance that establishes a fund for Black residents. 

The lawsuit alleges that the ordinance is discriminating on the basis of race because it allows taxpayer money to be funneled into the fund. The plaintiffs said a win would protect taxpayers from supporting a government-based racially motivated program and establish boundaries for other cities implementing similar policies.

The San Francisco skyline April 26, 2023.  (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)

Advertisement

NO CLEAR CHAMPION OF CASH PAYMENT REPARATIONS AMONG DEMOCRATS IN CALIFORNIA GUBERNATORIAL RACE

“Acknowledging past injustice does not give the government license to spend public resources on programs that sort people by race and ancestry today,” said Andrew Quinio, an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation. 

“The Constitution requires the city to address proven harm directly, not through sweeping racial and ancestral classifications. This lawsuit is about ensuring that all Americans are treated as individuals under the law and not forced to subsidize government policies that collectively bind them to history that they did not experience or inflict.”

San Francisco officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.

The mayor of San Francisco signed an ordinance that creates a reparations fund that could one day grant each of the city’s eligible Black residents up to $5 million in reparations for alleged historic discrimination and displacement.

Advertisement

CHICAGO MAYOR BRANDON JOHNSON TAKES JAB AT CLARENCE THOMAS WHILE DEFENDING CITY’S REPARATIONS TASK FORCE

The mayor of San Francisco signed an ordinance that creates a reparations fund that could one day grant each of the city’s eligible Black residents up to $5 million in reparations for alleged historic discrimination and displacement. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

The ordinance, passed by the Board of Supervisors in December, was signed by Democratic Mayor Daniel Lurie two days before Christmas. It establishes the legal framework for the fund but does not allocate funds or guarantee payments. The fund can be financed with private donations, foundations and other non-city sources. Any taxpayer-funded reparations payouts would require separate legislation, an identified funding source and mayoral approval. 

However, Lurie told Fox News Digital that no taxpayer money would be paid into the potential pot, citing the city’s $1 billion budget deficit. 

“I was elected to drive San Francisco’s recovery, and that’s what I’m focused on every day,” Lurie said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “We are not allocating money to this fund. With a historic $1 billion budget deficit, we are going to spend our money on making the city safer and cleaner.”

Advertisement

MARYLAND CHURCH TO ISSUE REPARATIONS GRANTS TO ‘BUILD UP BLACK COMMUNITIES’ DUE TO ‘SYSTEMIC RACISM’

“The Reparations Plan outlines a variety of methods to provide restitution, compensation and rehabilitation to individuals who are Black and/or descendants of a chattel enslaved person and have experienced a proven harm in San Francisco,” the ordinance says.

The plaintiffs allege a “misuse of government power” as the city’s Human Rights Commission administers the program.

According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, several San Francisco residents and Californians for Equal Rights Foundation sued San Francisco on Thursday, challenging an ordinance that establishes a fund for Black residents.  (Carolyn Cole/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

Advertisement

According to the complaint, “By directing an agency funded almost entirely by taxpayer dollars to administer funding solely dedicated to implement race-exclusive benefits, the city is using public money, public employees, and public authority to carry out an unconstitutional racial spoils system that allocates benefits and opportunities based on race and ancestry.”

“Taxpayer funds cannot be used to manage the assets of an unlawful program,” Quinio said in a statement to Courthouse News.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP



Read the full article from Here

Advertisement

West

Trump admin squashes controversial Biden rule forcing foster homes to affirm children’s LGBTQ+ status

Published

on

Trump admin squashes controversial Biden rule forcing foster homes to affirm children’s LGBTQ+ status

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A rule implemented during the Biden administration, requiring prospective foster homes to prove they will support a child’s gender transition, or lesbian, gay or bisexual status, in order to retain federal funding, has been formally rescinded by the Trump administration Friday.

A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) was published in the federal register Friday morning to formally rescind the 2022 rule titled, “Designated Placement Requirements Under Titles IV-E and IV-B for LGBTQI+ Children,” which a court in Texas already vacated in June. 

The move follows a warning letter sent to all 50 states, telling them that as long as they receive federal child welfare funding, they are obligated to ensure the removal of any kid from their home must be grounded in “objective evidence of harm or imminent risk,” citing reports of states removing children from their parent’s homes because the parents disagreed with their children’s gender transition. 

Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families Alex Adams told Fox News Digital that there has been a record year-over-year decrease in the number of foster families nationally. He said that the Biden-era rule is a main issue for religious-oriented families, boxing them out of the foster care system. 

Advertisement

NEW YORK AG ORDERS MANHATTAN HOSPITAL TO RESUME GENDER-TRANSITION TREATMENT FOR TRANSGENDER YOUTH

President Donald Trump’s administration took a pair of actions this week to ensure parents and kids are not being impacted by LGBTQ activism by the foster care industry. (Getty Images)

“There’s 57 homes for every 100 kids that come into the system. We can do better, and we must do better, and we must do more to send a welcoming message that the red carpet will be rolled out to every family willing to step forward and welcome a child into their home and open their heart and open their home to these kids,” Adams said. “Your most likely families to raise their hand and volunteer as a foster family are those who have sincerely held religious convictions. So the message that you send is so important. The message we’re trying to send is we’re going to roll out the red carpet for everybody. We need more foster homes.”

By rescinding the move in the federal register, that “officially” takes it off the books, “so that nobody tries to breathe life into it,” according to Adams. 

The final move to squash the 2022 rule, follows pressure the Trump administration had already been placing on states. At the end of last year, ACF sent a letter to 13 states, expressing concern about families being turned away from fostering because they refuse to give up their sincerely held religious beliefs. At least one of those states, Massachusetts, amended their policy amid the scrutiny.

Advertisement

It also follows a November 2025 executive order telling the Health and Human Services Department to “modernize” the foster care system within 180 days, maximize partnerships with Americans of faith, and a litany of other measures. Trump also issued early executive orders during his presidency challenging left-wing gender ideology and pushing a return to “biological truth.” 

President Trump took on transgender activism early in his second term, including through Executive Order 14187, which prohibits sex-change surgeries for anyone under the age of 19. (Getty Images)

SUPREME COURT RULING ON SECRETIVE CALIFORNIA GENDER POLICY COULD RESHAPE PARENT RIGHTS FIGHTS NATIONWIDE

Public reports, including one as recently as this year, illustrate examples of kids being taken from their homes in states like California and Ohio, because their parents have been accused of abuse, or of denying appropriate medical care to their kids. These claims have also been brought up in divorce and family custody hearings as well, sometimes resulting in the parents losing custody. 

Meanwhile, Trump highlighted the issue during his State of the Union address last month, when he told the story of the parents to Sage Blair, who a judge ripped from their custody over alleged abuse after the family did not immediately recognize their daughter as a boy.

Advertisement

Sage Blair and her mother, Michelle Blair, stand in the gallery during President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address after he highlighted her case involving alleged school gender transition policies. (Pool)

Earlier in the week, Adams and ACF told states that while they have a duty to protect children from abuse and neglect, they are cracking down on any states conflating that with a parent’s choice about how they parent their child who expresses a desire to transition genders, or a desire to be romantically involved with the same sex. While related to Fridays NPR, it is a separate action.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 

“We’re basically putting states on notice that if they violate our interpretation of abuse or neglect, we would take appropriate action, which could include pulling back CAPTA funds,” Adams told Fox News Digital.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

SF mayor assures there’s ‘no imminent threat’ after FBI report warns Iran aspires to attack CA

Published

on

SF mayor assures there’s ‘no imminent threat’ after FBI report warns Iran aspires to attack CA


SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — The FBI has warned police departments in California that Iran aspires to retaliate for American attacks by launching offensive drones against the West Coast, according to an alert reviewed by ABC News. Over the years, ABC7 Eyewitness News has reported on other alerts from the FBI that said the Bay Area could be a target for terrorists. This new alert is the first we’ve seen to mention the potential use of drones.

The FBI alert sent to the California police departments reads, “We recently acquired information that as of early February 2026, Iran allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United States Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran.”

FBI warns Iran aspired to attack California with drones in retaliation for war: Alert

With the U.S. bombing campaign of Iran now in its twelfth day, Iran has used drones to attack American facilities and allies in the region, but the FBI alert says they “have no additional information on the timing, method, target or perpetrators of this alleged attack” on California.

Advertisement

California Governor Gavin Newsom activated a state emergency operations center when the war started to monitor risks to California. During a webinar on another issue on Wednesday, the governor spoke about the FBI drone alert.

“We are aware of that information, and we transfer that information, in real time, to our local partners,” Newsom said. “Drone issues have always been top of mind. And we’ve assembled some work groups specifically around those concerns.”

When pressed about whether he is concerned about the possibility of a domestic terror attack in the U.S. that is backed by Iran, President Donald Trump said he is “not.”

“This is extremely alarming,” said Elizabeth Neumann, ABC News National Security Contributor. “We know that Iran’s approach to combating the United States and Israel is through asymmetric warfare. They cannot take us on militarily.”

Neumann worked for the Department of Homeland Security in counterterrorism during the first Trump administration, and she explains why an alert about drones potentially coming from the ocean would go to local police departments.

Advertisement

IRAN LIVE UPDATES: Trump says there’s ‘practically nothing left to target’ in Iran

“State and local law enforcement are our eyes and ears on the ground, so alerting them for suspicious behavior or anything that looks out of the ordinary is an important tool to be able to help the rest of the federal government’s protective measures,” said Neumann.

East Bay Congressman Mark DeSaulnier is highly critical of the U.S. bombing of Iran, and we spoke about the idea of a drone attack in California.

“Living in such, odd and stressful times, you have to take all of this seriously, but you also have to take it with a grain of salt,” DeSaulnier said. “Should we be concerned? Absolutely. But we’ve got to go about our business and our day, take care of our families and our jobs and our communities, while we’re concerned about the international situation.”

Late Wednesday, San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie commented on the FBI drone alert.

Advertisement

“We have been in constant communication with our state and federal partners who have assured us there are no imminent threats to us here in San Francisco,” said Lurie.

ABC7 checked with police and sheriff’s departments around the Bay Area, who say they are in constant contact with their state and federal partners. They also told us there is no specific intelligence indicating any threat to the Bay Area.

Oakland Police Department

We have spoken with our federal partners, who informed us that there may be a heightened risk due to the conflict in the Middle East. To ensure the safety of our community, we are maintaining close contact with local, state, and federal law enforcement. OPD will keep monitoring the situation and determine if there is a need to increase police presence.

San Francisco Police Department

The SFPD is always ready to respond to any emergency that may occur in San Francisco, and we are closely monitoring events in the Middle East and around the world. We’re in communication and working closely with our local, state and federal partners.

San Jose Police Department

SJPD works closely with our federal partners to stay informed about potential threats and intelligence that may impact our region. As a matter of practice, we do not comment on specific intelligence or alerts. At this time, there is no known threat to our community.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

DPS foes Denver East, Northfield one win away from facing off for 6A Colorado girls basketball title

Published

on

DPS foes Denver East, Northfield one win away from facing off for 6A Colorado girls basketball title


A simmering Denver Public Schools rivalry is two big wins away from a historic main event.

Denver East and Northfield are playing in opposite sides of the bracket of the Class 6A Final Four on Thursday. If both win, it will set up the first all-DPS championship game in the half-century since girls basketball became a sanctioned CHSAA sport.

There is no love lost between the programs, who have played a handful of physical, tense games over the last two seasons. That includes three showdowns this year and last year, over which the re-established old guard Denver East owns a 5-1 record against upstart, relatively new Northfield.

“It’s been a really competitive rivalry between the top teams in the DPS,” said Denver East head coach Carl Mattei, “and this has been brewing for the last couple of years for bragging rights in the city.”

Advertisement

The Angels have seen a resurgence under Mattei, who is in his fourth season on City Park Esplanade. Denver East is the last DPS girls team to win a hoops title, accomplishing the feat in 2010, and is one of only two DPS programs to do so, along with Montbello in 1997.

Mattei, who built Regis Jesuit into a powerhouse, went to eight title games and won three of them in his 18-year tenure with the Raiders. He was initially talked into applying for the Denver East job by a couple key DPS stakeholders, including Angels boys coach Rudy Carey and ex-longtime district athletic director John Andrew.

‘They don’t need to go play in the suburbs’

Mattei said he took the job because “when I looked at what Denver East could be, I thought it could be the Cherry Creek of DPS (girls basketball).” The Angels were successful under the prior coach, Dwight Berry, who led them to the 2010 title. But Denver East struggled to consistently make deep tournament runs.

“I had to get the kids to believe that they could compete with the Grandviews, the Cherry Creeks, the Regis Jesuits, the Highlands Ranches,” Mattei said. “Players in (the Denver East neighborhood) can actually stay in the city and represent our city, and be part of being the jewel of the city that is the Denver East Angels. They don’t need to go play in (the suburbs).

“That’s what Rudy and (Denver East principal) Terita Walker wanted for this program, and I think that’s where we’re at right now.”

Advertisement

The Angels are headlined by senior forward Mairead Hearty, a San Diego State commit who is averaging 16.9 points a game. Junior guard Grace Hall, a Division I recruit, is averaging 12.3 points. And senior sharpshooter Liana Valdez, a Western Nebraska commit who is a four-year starter like Hearty, can make teams pay from beyond the arc.

East’s Grace Hall (2) controls the ball against Valor Christian’s defense during 6A great 8 basketball game at Denver Coliseum in Denver on Friday, March 6, 2026. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

Hearty, who lives a couple blocks from Denver East, is jazzed with the ascension of the program at the school she walks to. The Angels went from a first-round playoff exit in Mattei’s first season, to the Sweet 16 the next, to the Great 8 last year and now the Final Four.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending