Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Pitching crisis looms as Padres face crucial point of 2025 season

Published

on

Pitching crisis looms as Padres face crucial point of 2025 season


PHOENIX — The Dodgers seemed to marvel a little bit at how Mike Shildt managed Wednesday’s game.

“Bringing in a guy to get a big out with Shohei,” Dodgers left fielder Michael Conforto said. “Yeah, it can feel a little bit more like playoffs.”

He referred to Shildt replacing starting pitcher Randy Vásquez with left-hander Adrián Morejón to face Dodgers lead-off hitter Shohei Ohtani in the fifth inning.

“The way you saw Mike manage, with some urgency and the moves,” Dodgers manager Dave Roberts said, “I wouldn’t say playoff game, but it was intense.”

Advertisement

Yes, Vásquez had thrown just 70 pitches and allowed one run. And it is not even the middle of June.

Yet Shildt had a relatively rested back end of his bullpen and an off day coming up. Ohtani, one of the two best hitters on earth, was coming up a third time in a tie game. Vásquez has allowed a .217 average and .677 OPS the first two times through the batting order and a .361 average and .961 OPS the third time through.

So Shildt decided to do what he has done fairly often and usually so adeptly this season. He chased a victory by attempting to make the pieces of a pitching puzzle fit.

It didn’t work out. And it was the latest sign that something needs to change for the Padres.

Relievers are not computer programs. They are human.

Advertisement

Morejón made every pitch he needed to but muffed a grounder. Jeremiah Estrada allowed his first home run in a month.

So Wednesday’s failure probably does not entirely correlate to both Morejón and Estrada pitching for the fourth time in six days, twice in a tie game and twice protecting a one-run lead. It can’t be entirely blamed on Estrada having pitched in the second-most games in the majors this season or that Morejón is one of the Padres’ MLB-leading six relief pitchers to have made at least 29 appearances this season.

But Monday was the 12th time in the past 24 games the Padres’ bullpen has lost a lead or let an opponent untie a game. That is after the team’s relievers began the season protecting the first 22 leads with which they were entrusted.

When considering what has happened — and worrying about what might happen — a remarkable convergence of events cannot be dismissed.

While playing 22 of the 23 days leading up to Thursday’s off-day, the bullpen posted a 2.69 ERA (eighth best in MLB) while working 83⅔ innings (seventh).

Advertisement

That workload alone is not the story.

Padres relievers made 82 appearances in that span. An astonishing  71 times, a reliever entered a game with the game tied or the Padres leading or trailing by no more than two runs.

Friday is the start of a run of 13 games in a row and 29 games in the next 31 days.

The Padres have played 37 games that have been decided by no more than two runs, fourth most in MLB. Of those, 16 have come in the past 20 games. Before beating the Dodgers 11-1 on Tuesday and losing 5-2 on Wednesday, the Padres had played nine games in a row at the start of June decided by one or two runs.

The bullpen cannot continue being pushed like this.

Advertisement

It was just in 2021 that something similar unfolded, and a bullpen that had to pick up for a starting rotation decimated by injuries eventually sputtered. The Padres imploded in multiple areas that season, falling from 17 games over .500 in early August to a 79-83 finish. But the chief reason was the attrition in the rotation and ensuing workload that led to the bullpen with MLB’s best ERA (2.84) on July 6 to have its seventh-worst ERA (4.50) the rest of the way.

Several people in the organization have privately acknowledged the emerging crisis with the pitching staff, though no one will say it for publication.

However, Shildt did say something this week that was significant, in that he almost never says anything like it.

The manager rarely comes close to calling out his players. He frequently denies commenting even on obvious events if doing so could be construed as a disparaging comment. But after Nick Pivetta threw 93 pitches in four innings Monday, Shildt said it like it was.

“A lot of guys are carrying the mail,” he said of the bullpen. “We’re pushing, piecing it together and competing at the same time. But, you know, we’re going to need some depth out of some starters.”

Advertisement

This was not a swipe at Pivetta. In fact, Pivetta has been the Padres’ most effective and most durable starter.

The rotation as a whole, however, has gone through stretches in which it is burdening the bullpen far too much.

In the season’s first 13 games, the Padres got six or more innings from a starting pitcher just three times and fewer than five innings five times.

And in the past 15 games, starters have gone six innings just three times and fewer than five innings six times.

That is not the only thing threatening to crush the bullpen. The Padres’ offense — with or without the additional bat it desperately needs — can help out a little more.

Advertisement

The Padres have scored more than three runs in just nine of their past 25 games.

The reality is the Padres need the offense to more consistently do its share of the work. They probably also need to add a starter and/or a higher-leverage reliever.

Or Shildt is going to have to start letting Vásquez pitch on in situations like Wednesday. He will have to push young starters Ryan Bergert and Stephen Kolek. He will have to test the limits of what some of his relievers can do.

And those sorts of compromises usually do not end well.

The Padres have done some remarkable maneuvering to win as many games as they have.

Advertisement

One of their three top starting pitchers — Yu Darvish — has yet to make his season debut while he works back from an elbow injury. Another, Michael King, has been out the past three weeks with a shoulder malady. The other, Dylan Cease, has made every start, but the majority of them have not been altogether good.

Their best starter this season, Pivetta, is better than he has ever been — which is either great or concerning. The three young pitchers they are now running out every five days have been better than could have been expected, which is either great or concerning.

The Padres are nine games over .500 and in playoff position.

But with 95 games remaining, their season hinges on a disconcerting number of maybes.

Maybe Cease has found that rhythm he needs and is going to maintain it most of his remaining 18 or 19 starts.

Advertisement

Maybe Pivetta can keep turning in quality starts more often than not.

Maybe Kolek and Bergert will continue to keep even the low-scoring Padres in games as they navigate their first seasons as major league starting pitchers.

Maybe Vásquez can keep stranding the legion of runners that reach base against him in many of his starts.

Maybe the Padres bullpen can withstand the stress of working multiple higher-leverage innings and Shildt and pitching coach Ruben Niebla can continue to pull almost every correct lever almost every game for the next 3½ months.

Maybe Darvish will return before the All-Star break and King shortly after, and maybe both will remain healthy and pitch brilliantly.

Advertisement

Maybe Matt Waldron comes up and trusts his knuckleball. Maybe reliever Bryan Hoeing comes off his rehab assignment and picks up where he left off before his shoulder injury.

Maybe 34-year-old catcher Elias Diaz and 38-year-old catcher Martin Maldonado will remain healthy and able to catch upwards of three games a week and continue to serve as the pitching staff’s sherpas all through the summer and into the fall.

Maybe all or most of those things will happen.

Because if not, the Padres are almost certainly in trouble.

That the team’s left fielders are batting .201 with a .541 OPS, third worst among any of the 30 teams’ left field groups, is a problem. The Padres have been shopping for help there for more than a month.

Advertisement

That the Padres’ lead-off batter is hitting .188 since May 3 and the No. 2 batter is hitting .216 since May 23 and the No.4 batter is hitting .210 since May 13 is a collective albatross for the offense.

But the gray clouds darkening the skies ahead have accumulated not because of what the Padres are doing or not doing on offense.

It is on this mountain of maybes that the Padres could wash out.

“We’ve done the best we can to put the guys in the right spots,” Shildt said. “And for the most part, we’ve been rewarded for that. … We’re getting contributions from everybody who is giving us what they have. That’s all you can ask.”

Actually, they’re going to have to get more.

Advertisement



Source link

San Diego, CA

SD Unified moves forward with layoffs of classified employees

Published

on

SD Unified moves forward with layoffs of classified employees


SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Less than 3 weeks after the San Diego Unified School District finalized a new contract with teachers, the school board voted unanimously on Tuesday to move forward with layoff notices for other district employees.

The layoffs affect classified employees — workers who are employed by the district but are not teachers and are not certified. That includes bus drivers, custodians, special education and teacher aides, and cafeteria workers.

The district says it is eliminating 221 positions — 133 that are currently filled and 88 that are vacant — to save $19 million and help address a projected $47 million deficit for the next fiscal year.

Preliminary layoff notices will go out on March 15, with final notices by May 15.

Advertisement

The district estimates about 200 classified employees will receive preliminary notices, but of them, about 70 are expected to lose their jobs based on union-negotiated bumping rules.

Bumping allows employees with more seniority to move into another position in the same classification, thereby “bumping” a less senior employee out of that role.

Lupe Murray, an early childhood special education parafacilitator with the district, said the news came as a shock after the teacher strike was called off.

“When the strike was called off, I’m like, ‘Yes!’ So then when I got the email from the Superintendent, I’m like, ‘Wait, what?’ So, I think everyone was shocked,” Murray said.

The district says it sends out annual layoff notices, as all districts in the state do.

Advertisement

Before Tuesday’s board meeting, classified employees rallied outside, made up of CSEA (California School Employees Association) Chapters OTBS 788, Paraeducators 759, and OSS 724. They were joined by parents, students, and the San Diego & Imperial Counties Labor Council, AFL-CIO.

Miguel Arellano, a paraeducator independence facilitator with San Diego Unified and a representative of San Diego Paraeducators Cahpter 759.

“What do we want? No layoffs! When do we want it? Now!” the crowd chanted.

Arellano said he felt compelled to act when he learned about the potential layoffs.

“The first thing that went through my mind was that I need to speak up. I need to protect these people,” Arellano said.

Advertisement

Inside the meeting, the board heard emotional, at times tearful testimony from classified employees before voting unanimously to move forward with the layoff schedule.

Superintendent Fabi Bagula said the district has tried to protect classrooms from the cuts.

“We have tried our best to only, I mean, to not touch the school. Or the classroom. But now it’s at the point where it’s getting a little bit harder,” Bagula said. “What I’m still hoping, or what I’m still working toward, because we’re still in negotiations, is that we’re able to actually come to a win-win, where there’s positions and availability and maybe even promotions for folks that are impacted.”

Arellano warned the layoffs could have a direct impact on students.

“We are already spread thin, so, with more of a case load, it’s going to be impossible to be able to service all the students that we need to have,” Arellano said.

Advertisement

Follow ABC 10News Anchor Max Goldwasser on InstagramFacebook, and Twitter.

This story was reported on-air by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.





Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Scripps Oceanography granted $15M for deep sea, glacier science

Published

on

Scripps Oceanography granted M for deep sea, glacier science


The Fund for Science and Technology, a new private foundation, granted Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego $15 million for ocean science Tuesday.

FFST, funded by the estate of the late Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, was started in 2025 with a commitment to invest at least $500 million over four years to “propel transformative science and technology for people and the planet.”

“Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego is pushing boundaries for exploration and discovery across the global ocean,” Chancellor Pradeep Khosla said. “This visionary support from the Fund for Science and Technology will enable Scripps researchers to advance our understanding of our planet, which has meaningful implications for communities around the world.”

The grant, the largest of its kind since Scripps joined UCSD in 1960, will go toward research in three areas: monitoring of environmental DNA and other biomolecules in marine ecosystems, adding to the Argo network of ocean observing robots, and enhancing the study of ocean conditions beneath Antarctica’s Thwaites Glacier, often referred to as the “Doomsday Glacier.”

Advertisement

Scripps Institution of Oceanography has used Argo floats for more than two decades to track climate impacts in our oceans. NBC 7 meteorologist Greg Bledsoe reports.

“The Fund for Science and Technology was created to support transformational science in the search of answers to some of the planet’s most complex questions,” said Dr. Lynda Stuart, president and CEO at the fund. “Scripps has a long tradition of leadership at the frontiers of ocean and climate science, and this work builds on that legacy — strengthening the tools and insights needed to understand our environment at a truly global and unprecedented scale.”

Scripps Director Emeritus Margaret Leinen will use a portion of the grant in her analysis of eDNA — free-floating fragments of DNA shed by organisms into the environment — in understudied parts of the ocean to collect crucial baseline data on marine organisms, according to a statement from Scripps.

“In many regions, we know very little about the microbial communities that form the base of the ocean food web or that make deep sea ecosystems so unique,” Leinen said. “Without data, we can’t predict how these communities are going to respond to climate change or what the consequences might be. That’s a vulnerability — and this funding will help us begin to address it.”

Using autonomous samplers that can collect ocean water for eDNA analysis, as well as conventional sampling, scientists will use tools to “reveal the biology of the open ocean and polar regions.”

Advertisement

According to Scripps, the international Argo program has more than 4,000 floats that drift with currents and periodically dive to measure temperature, salinity and pressure. Standard floats can record data up to depths of 2,000 meters (6,560 feet), while newer Deep Argo floats can dive to 6,000 meters (19,685 feet).

The grant funding announced Tuesday will allow for Scripps to deploy around 50 Deep Argo floats along with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory.

Sarah Purkey, physical oceanographer at Scripps and Argo lead, said this leap forward in deep ocean monitoring comes at a crucial time because the deep sea has warmed faster than expected over the last two decades.

Thwaites Glacier is Antarctica’s largest collapsing glacier and contains enough ice to raise global sea level by roughly two feet if it were to collapse entirely. According to Scripps, prior expeditions led by scientist Jamin Greenbaum discovered anomalously warm water beneath the glacier’s ice shelf — contributing to melting from below. Greenbaum now seeks to collect water samples and other measurements from beneath Thwaites’ ice tongue to disentangle the drivers of its rapid melting.

This season’s Antarctic fieldwork will “test hypotheses about the drivers of Thwaites’ rapid melt with implications for sea-level rise projections,” the statement from Scripps said.

Advertisement

“The ocean holds answers to some of the most pressing questions about our planet’s future, but only if we can observe it,” said Meenakshi Wadhwa, director of Scripps Institution of Oceanography and vice chancellor for marine sciences at UCSD. “This historic grant will help ocean scientists bring new tools and approaches to parts of the ocean we’ve barely begun to explore.”



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Southern California’s Jewish community reacts to war in the Middle East

Published

on

Southern California’s Jewish community reacts to war in the Middle East


The Jewish community in Southern California is sharing their fears and hopes following the weekend’s strikes on Iran and retaliatory attacks on Israel, U.S. military bases and other targets in the Middle East.

The exchange of missiles in the Middle East is having a devasting effect on Iran’s defense capability, but retaliatory strikes in the region are taking a toll. 

“Weapons of enormous capacity that are targeting civilian areas,” said Elan Carr, CEO of Los Angeles-based Israeli American Council.

Carr says toppling the Iranian regime, taking out its nuclear capabilities and freeing the Iranian people from this oppressive rule should have been done decades ago.

Advertisement

“This is about seeing the most evil regime, the world chief state sponsored terrorism to no longer have the ability to do what it’s been doing,” Carr said.

Sara Brown, regional director of the American Jewish Committee, said the U.S. and Israel are concentrating strikes on Iran’s missile sites and military industrial complex. Iran’s retaliatory strikes are focused on many civilian targets.

“We are hearing from our partners from around the region, who are terrified,” Brown said. “Across the Middle East right now, I think there is a tremendous amount of fear, but also hope and also resolve.”

AJC is the advocacy arm for Jewish people globally. Many members and partner groups are in harm’s way. Brown says the risk is great, but the potential reward is world changing.

“That Iranian people will get to choose leadership for themselves, that we will finally see a pathway forward for peace across the Middle East,” Brown said.

Advertisement

If wars of the past hadn’t produced lasting peace, then why now? Carr says Iran’s nuclear capabilities are destroyed and Iran’s military and proxies are weakened after Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 Hamas ambush.

“No more terrorist network throughout the Middle East. Think of what that could mean. Think of the normalization we could see,” Carr said.

President Donald Trump expects fighting to last several weeks. Some critics are concerned about a drawn-out conflict that could spread.

Carr is not convinced.

“Who is going to enter a war against the U.S. and Israel? Russia is plenty busy. China has no interest in jeopardizing itself this way,” Carr said.

Advertisement

Besides the six Americans killed as of Monday night, government officials say 11 people were killed in retaliatory strikes in Israel.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending