Connect with us

West

Progressive journalist says Newsom must take 'accountability' for how he 'destroyed' California

Published

on

Progressive journalist says Newsom must take 'accountability' for how he 'destroyed' California

Ana Kasparian of “The Young Turks” declared she will never take Gov. Gavin Newsom seriously as a potential Democratic presidential candidate until he takes responsibility for California’s decline. 

On “Her Take,” a new Valuetainment Studios podcast, co-hosts spoke about the current crop of Democratic leaders who may be vying to lead the party in the 2028 election. In the wake of President Donald Trump’s historic victory in 2024, the Democratic Party has been deeply divided over not just who should take the reins, but whether they need a fundamental shift in policy. 

Co-host Jillian Michaels, a former Californian, brought up how Newsom is a potential frontrunner for the upcoming election, drawing an immediate wave of dismay from her co-hosts.

“This guy has tried,” Michaels said, noting that the governor is changing his tactics. “He’s taken notes, he’s tried to be somewhat critical of his own party, he’s tried to reach out to the other side. He’s tried to be antithetical to, you know, ‘everything exists in our silo, and we don’t reach across the aisle.’ He’s tried to show himself.”

Kasparian, a left-wing commentator who frequently shreds California’s far-left policies, replied, “I will never take that piece of crap seriously, and yes, I’m calling Gavin Newsom, my governor unfortunately, a piece of crap until he does some accountability for how he destroyed the state of California.”

Advertisement

Ana Kasparian scorched Gov. Newsom for his leadership of California, particularly for trying to scapegoat Donald Trump. (“Her Take/Valuetainment Studios)

‘WOKE IS THEIR GOD’: EX-DEM FUNDRAISER SAYS PARTY ‘IN SHAMBLES’ AFTER 2024 ELECTION LOSSES

Rather than take a broad look at the Democratic Party, Kasparian recommended that Newsom “look inward and take a good hard look at the policies that you championed in our state that have completely destroyed the state.”

“He’s trying to blame Donald Trump for the loss of jobs in California,” she added. “Are you kidding me? The loss of jobs started well before Trump won the election, and it was the result of his policies, cumbersome regulations, that have now led to oil companies, for instance, deciding, ‘We’re not doing this anymore, we’re going to leave.’” 

Kasparian also argued that crime has exploded under his watch.

Advertisement

“You have rampant crime that Democrats want to deny exists, but it obviously does when businesses close up shop and move to other states because the cost of doing business is so expensive,” she said. “Insuring businesses in California is astronomical because of the issues with crime.”

Her Take podcast panel speaks

Multiple members of the panel had grievances to share about Gov. Newsom’s leadership of California. (“Her Take”/Valuetainment Studios)

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

Kasparian went on to condemn the governor, claiming, “in an effort to save California money, he preemptively shut down four state prisons. There is no room to put any of these inmates in.”

This has caused an issue for the state, she said, where now county jails that were already overflowing now have to release inmates “regardless of how much time they’ve served.”

“Even if they’ve been sentenced to decades behind bars, they’re being released after serving two, three years because there’s no room for them,” Kasparian said.

Advertisement
Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom speaks after being elected governor of the state during an election night party in Los Angeles, California, on November 6, 2018.  (REUTERS/Mike Blake)

Michaels shared a story about a man who was released early from jail after he invaded her house with a video camera and duct tape.

 “Gavin Newsom is a wrecking ball to California. He is, as [Adam] Corolla says, a ‘policy disaster,’” she lamented.

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

US Seattle Airport Plunged Into Chaos After Alaska Airlines Passenger Issues Direct Threat Leading To Runway Closures And Flight Cancellations – Travel And Tour World

Published

on

US Seattle Airport Plunged Into Chaos After Alaska Airlines Passenger Issues Direct Threat Leading To Runway Closures And Flight Cancellations – Travel And Tour World


Sunday, June 15, 2025

Alaska Airlines
US

US Seattle Airport was thrown into a full-blown security crisis when a passenger aboard an Alaska Airlines flight issued a chilling mid-taxi threat that forced an immediate emergency ground stop, complete runway shutdowns, and massive police mobilization. The terrifying incident brought airport operations to a standstill, triggered flight cancellations and diversions, and unleashed widespread chaos as emergency teams raced to neutralize the threat and secure the aircraft while passengers were evacuated and subjected to heightened security screening.

Seattle Airport Thrown Into Chaos as Passenger Threat Forces Emergency Ground Stop and Massive Security Response

Seattle-Tacoma International Airport was plunged into sudden turmoil on Saturday afternoon when a serious security scare unfolded aboard an Alaska Airlines-operated Horizon Air flight. The situation triggered the immediate closure of two runways, caused significant disruptions to flight operations, and drew a fast, coordinated response from various security forces and law enforcement agencies.

The alarming chain of events began just as the Horizon Air flight was preparing for departure to Walla Walla. According to officials, while the aircraft was still taxiing and had not yet taken off, a passenger allegedly made what authorities described as a “direct threat to the safety of the aircraft” during a conversation with a flight attendant. The gravity of the passenger’s words immediately raised red flags for the crew, who promptly notified ground control and airline security.

Advertisement

Without delay, air traffic controllers ordered the aircraft to halt its taxiing and redirected it away from the terminal to a secure location on the tarmac. Emergency response teams, including Port of Seattle Police, fire units, and specialized security personnel, quickly surrounded the aircraft to contain the situation and ensure the safety of everyone on board.

The Port of Seattle confirmed that as the situation unfolded, two of the airport’s major runways were shut down as a precaution, while inbound flights were temporarily halted or diverted. The incident sent shockwaves through the airport’s operations, causing widespread delays, flight cancellations, and ripple effects across Sea-Tac’s busy flight schedule. According to airport officials, at least six scheduled flights were canceled entirely, and two incoming flights were forced to divert mid-air to alternate airports.

Alaska Airlines disclosed in an official statement that as the aircraft was taxiing for takeoff, a passenger verbally made a serious threat to the safety of the flight while speaking with a member of the cabin crew. Following protocol, the aircraft was immediately redirected, and authorities were contacted.”

Although authorities have not disclosed the exact details of the threat, law enforcement officials emphasized that the seriousness of the passenger’s remarks required a full-scale security response to mitigate any potential danger. The suspect, whose identity remains undisclosed pending investigation, was taken into custody without any further incident. No injuries were reported among passengers or crew members.

After the arrest, Port of Seattle Police and federal security teams boarded the aircraft to conduct a thorough inspection. Meanwhile, passengers were carefully escorted off the plane and underwent secondary security screening procedures as an added layer of precaution. Each passenger was re-screened by Transportation Security Administration (TSA) personnel before being allowed to continue their journeys or rebook alternate flights.

Advertisement

TSA officials, in coordination with the Port of Seattle authorities, conducted a meticulous search of the aircraft to ensure no other security risks were present. The affected airplane will remain grounded until it successfully passes a full security clearance process conducted under enhanced safety protocols.

The sudden security alert not only disrupted normal airport operations but also triggered heightened concerns among travelers and airport staff. Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, a major gateway on the West Coast, was running close to full capacity at the time of the incident, intensifying the scale and complexity of the emergency operation.

Airline passengers throughout the airport reported long lines, extensive delays, and gate changes as airport officials worked tirelessly to minimize the broader operational fallout. While some travelers expressed frustration over missed connections and canceled flights, most acknowledged the necessity of the precautionary measures taken by the authorities to ensure safety remained the top priority.

A spokesperson for the Port of Seattle later addressed the media, stating: “Safety is our utmost concern. In this case, swift action by the flight crew, airport personnel, and law enforcement helped bring the situation under control quickly and without injury.”

While such incidents are rare, they highlight the importance of constant vigilance and the critical role that airline crew and airport security play in safeguarding passengers. Officials commended the Alaska Airlines crew for their professionalism and immediate response, which allowed for a controlled and coordinated intervention.

Advertisement

As of now, the investigation remains ongoing, and additional details regarding the passenger’s identity, motives, and the exact nature of the threat have not yet been publicly released. Authorities have confirmed that federal agencies, including the FBI, are involved in the ongoing inquiry.

US Seattle Airport descended into chaos after an Alaska Airlines passenger issued a terrifying mid-taxi threat, forcing an emergency ground stop, full runway closures, mass flight disruptions, and a rapid police lockdown.

The incident serves as a stark reminder of the complex security challenges facing modern air travel and underscores the need for robust safety protocols that can quickly respond to unpredictable situations. For passengers at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on Saturday, it was a sobering demonstration of how swiftly travel plans can be upended when safety concerns arise mid-operation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

As Trump celebrates birthday with military parade, Arizona protesters ‘build the resistance’

Published

on

As Trump celebrates birthday with military parade, Arizona protesters ‘build the resistance’


play

  • Thousands of Arizonans protested President Trump in Phoenix on June 14, criticizing his behavior and policies.
  • Protesters expressed concerns about Trump’s actions, including his handling of immigration and threats to social programs.
  • Organizers aimed to build community and encourage local activism.

While military tanks prepared to roll down Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C., as part of President Donald Trump’s parade to celebrate the Army’s 250th Anniversary, a different army was building at the Arizona Capitol.

Thousands of Arizonans flooded the Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza and braved triple-degree heat on June 14. They gathered to protest Trump and draw attention to what they called his authoritarian and king-like behavior.

Advertisement

“He wants to be a pretend king, but he’s following all the rules of a dictator! And he’s slowing picking out people he wants us to villainize,” Randy Hamilton, 78, said.

Parents pushing their children in strollers and seniors with walkers chanted against the president and watched drag queens perform as music blasted in the background. They held signs that said things like, “Unpaid protester but I hate Trump for free,” and “No Crown for the Clown.”

At the same time, musicians and live entertainment took the stage in D.C. for the inaugural military parade.

The “No Kings Day of Defiance” in Phoenix was one of more than 2,000 planned events across the United States. The event was meant to poke fun at Trump as he kicked off an expensive parade on his 79th birthday.

Advertisement

Erica Connell, a liaison for the 50501 movement that helped organize the event, said it was meant to build community before the summer heat would make it too difficult.

“We’ll have more policy-driven events in the future, but right now, it’s just so broad that it’s about building the resistance. It’s about making sure that we have the numbers,” Connell said.

Elected officials like Phoenix Councilwoman Anna Hernandez spoke to the crowd from onstage, telling attendees “revolution” was the “acceptable response to fascism.”

“It is not for us to take a more moderate approach to policy. It is not to take a moderate approach to politics,” Hernandez yelled to an uproar of applause. “It is revolution, and it is to invest in our communities!”

Advertisement

‘I don’t want to lose our democracy’

Attendees almost uniformly gave the same response when asked what brought them out: opposition to Trump. He’s acting like he’s king, protesters told The Arizona Republic. Congress isn’t standing up against him. The courts aren’t doing enough to rein him in.

Swanson, 88 and from Ahwatukee, attended against the wishes of her adult children, who feared for her safety. Swanson said she felt like she had to go.

“I don’t want to lose our democracy. Something dramatic has to be done,” she said. Swanson’s neighbor, 66-year old Stephanie Drobatschewsky, felt the same. Drobatschewsky said both her parents were Holocaust survivors, and that Trump’s immigration round-ups reminded her of World War II Germany.

Robert Lang, 64, said he hoped the number of protests taking place across the country showed elected leaders that change was wanted.

Advertisement

Attendees repeatedly echoed each other in the changes they wanted to see: for Donald Trump to resign or be impeached; to stop threatening Social Security and Medicare; for more humane treatment of immigrants; to reject attacks against the U.S. Department of Education, PBS and National Public Radio.

Connell, a main planner of the Phoenix protest, said the overarching demand was to “uphold the constitution.”

Up next: resistance at the neighborhood level

Connell said organizers conceived of a carnival-themed event partially to “have fun making fun of (Trump) on his birthday” and also partially to attract families.

“We’ve had very specific goals in mind and growing the movement in our state by hitting those various demographics in what we’re doing,” Connell said.

Organizers planned educational events and wanted attendees to identify causes they cared about, then connect with groups working on those issues. They focused on “inspiring and teaching people how to become activists on their own corner,” Connell said, “because that’s how we’re trying to grow the movement.

Advertisement

Hernandez, the Phoenix councilwoman known for fiery rhetoric, was added to the speaker list to give more of a rally feel. Her speech amplified the crowd as she spoke about Trump “hunting” the public.

“Let me be clear: He is hunting us,” Hernandez said. “From Palestinian protesters to students to immigrant communities, we are under attack. His ICE minions are in our neighborhoods, our stores, our workplaces and our homes.”

Parents: Protest can be positive and powerful at any age

South of the stage, kids played in bounce houses while grown men dressed in chicken costumes. They held signs saying “TACO,” a nod to the joke about tariffs that, “Trump always chickens out.”

Jules and Audra Nelson stayed near the stage with their three children, who were 10, 8 and 3. The Nelsons brought their two sons and daughter to show them that protest could be a positive and powerful force for change.

Advertisement

The kids had seen the protests in L.A. and Audra said she wanted them to understand “when people come together, it’s really positive.”

She said she wanted her kids to know they weren’t “bound by their age,” and that young people had been “key catalysts of the civil rights movement.”

“Resistance is little pieces at a time. It doesn’t have to be big. It can just be you saying, ‘I’m not OK with this,’” Audra said. “Sometimes we think we’re so small, but we are so big.”

Taylor Seely is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at The Arizona Republic / azcentral.com. Do you have a story about the government infringing on your First Amendment rights? Reach her at tseely@arizonarepublic.com or by phone at 480-476-6116.

Seely’s role is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California’s High-Speed Rail Deserves to Be Canceled | Mint

Published

on

California’s High-Speed Rail Deserves to Be Canceled | Mint


(Bloomberg Opinion) — If President Donald Trump follows through on his recent threats to cut off federal funding for California’s long-troubled high-speed rail project, it would be better for all concerned: For all intents and purposes, this thing went off the rails (sorry) a long time ago.

Escalating costs have made it clear that no money was or ever would be available to realize the vision of a modern bullet train between Los Angeles and San Francisco. What’s under construction is a segment through California’s Central Valley, where costs are cheap compared to other parts of the system but which offers almost no economic value. The whole thing has become a zombie project that nobody with clout in state politics can either rescue or kill. A hated outsider officially ending it would let the state’s Democrats complain while also allowing them to acknowledge the reality that it’s not going to happen.

The tragedy is that the basic concept of high-speed rail for California makes a lot of sense.

Los Angeles and San Francisco are two large metropolitan areas that are about as far apart as Rome and Milan (about 380 miles). Trains between those two Italian cities have a 68% market share relative to airplanes, and the competition puts downward pressure on airfares. At this kind of distance, many passengers prefer the comfort of a train to the speed of a plane, and the convenience of train stations to airports. A train could also provide frequent service to intermediary locations such as Bakersfield, Modesto and Fresno — cities that in the aggregate have a large population, but by themselves aren’t large enough to support a lot of flights to LAX or SFO. And finally, once the core HSR line was built, spurs to San Jose and Sacramento, and an extension to San Diego, would be relatively straightforward.

Advertisement

These are all real benefits. But they depend on connecting Los Angeles and San Francisco with a train that is both fast and cost-effective to build.

The failure to achieve this has become a legendary case study in progressive excess, but the original sin was committed by a Republican — Michael Antonovich, then a member of the LA County Board of Supervisors — in 1999. Planners wanted the train to head north from Los Angeles along the route of Interstate 5, but Antonovich successfully pushed to detour the train through his district. That made the project more expensive and increased travel time.

Unfortunately, this set the template for almost every subsequent decision around the project. To build a fast train between Los Angeles and San Francisco in a cost-effective way, it is important to prioritize making the train go quickly between Los Angeles and San Francisco. There may be tradeoffs between expense and speed. But it should never cost more to make the train slower. Yet it happened again with another major decision to get from the Central Valley to San Francisco via the Pacheco Pass rather than the more northerly Altamont Pass.

There are many more details, complexities and decisions that went into this fiasco, but the basic story is pretty simple: They couldn’t build a cost-effective fast train between Los Angeles and San Franciso because they kept making choices that deprioritized that goal. It is of course understandable that elected officials who represent places other than LA or San Francisco would have other priorities. But regularly deferring to the wishes of those who weren’t aligned with the core goal of the project undermined it.

The way to do these things is to avoid precommitments. California should have invested a modest amount of money for a cost-effective proposal, and then asked the legislature to support it. If it said yes, great. If it said no, fine. Either way, you wouldn’t end up with a bottomless money pit — and no train.

Advertisement

A new high-speed rail proposal for the East Coast, from the Transit Costs Project at New York University, shows what sound planning looks like. Rather than copying Amtrak’s official proposal — which starts by asking every stakeholder what they want, then rolls it into an impossible $117 billion plan — the NYU study looks for the cheapest way to send trains from Washington to Boston in just under four hours. Its plan involves modest amounts of new construction and significant changes to commuter rail operations. But the whole thing comes in at about $17 billion, which is a very modest cost for a program with large benefits given New York’s constrained airspace, and leaves most train commuters better off.

Yes, some existing riders would lose out, as would some Amtrak customers in less populated cities. The politics of making this plan a reality aren’t simple. But the upside — especially to “in between” cities such as Baltimore, Providence and Philadelphia — would be huge. It’s an idea creative politicians should take up.

More important, politicians throughout the country should pay attention to the enormous price gap between the “do it as cheaply as possible” plan and the “accommodate as many as possible” plan, because the basic point is applicable to all kinds of infrastructure projects in all kinds of places: If something is worth doing, it needs to be made a priority. If it’s not important enough to be prioritized over other considerations, better to give up and do something else instead. Otherwise, like California’s politicians, they may be left with not much more than a lot of wasted time and money.

Elsewhere in Bloomberg Opinion:

For more, subscribe to our newsletter.

Advertisement

This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Matthew Yglesias is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. A co-founder of and former columnist for Vox, he writes the Slow Boring blog and newsletter. He is author of “One Billion Americans.”

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending